Trains.com

Bad train pictures

77223 views
2468 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, December 24, 2003 4:56 PM
Hi Dan,
No, they dont have seatbelts.
But, on the wide cab, or North American cab, the cab interior is a lot better laid out than before.
The control surfaces are easier to reach, the seats on the EMDs are adjustable, including the back and arm rest, the conductor has a tabletop desk, with lights, his own radio mike, things like that.
Stay Frosty,
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, December 24, 2003 4:56 PM
Hi Dan,
No, they dont have seatbelts.
But, on the wide cab, or North American cab, the cab interior is a lot better laid out than before.
The control surfaces are easier to reach, the seats on the EMDs are adjustable, including the back and arm rest, the conductor has a tabletop desk, with lights, his own radio mike, things like that.
Stay Frosty,
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, December 24, 2003 4:46 PM
Okay, Here's another dumb one I thought about as I was driving 4 blocks to the grocery store...on Christmas Eve....to stand in line for 15 minutes...for a jar of molasses.....

Do locomotives have seatbelts? I have only been in a few cabs, all older stuff. They did not. But the cabooses did, and after reading this forum for awhile, I understand why. Do the newer cabs have seatbelts?

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, December 24, 2003 4:46 PM
Okay, Here's another dumb one I thought about as I was driving 4 blocks to the grocery store...on Christmas Eve....to stand in line for 15 minutes...for a jar of molasses.....

Do locomotives have seatbelts? I have only been in a few cabs, all older stuff. They did not. But the cabooses did, and after reading this forum for awhile, I understand why. Do the newer cabs have seatbelts?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 10:22 AM
trainheart:

Have seen Amtrak held out of a terminal because :(1) Terminal was unmanned after hours, (2) Medical emergency, (3) Coroner report investigation for earlier incident, (4) Terminal congestion at platforms, (4) Hoglaw problems, crew and train separated, (5) Water supply and potty sanitaion problems, (6) Rowdy passengers being handed off to the local constabulary....

Murphy was an optimist and he usually works overtime on passenger trains.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 10:22 AM
trainheart:

Have seen Amtrak held out of a terminal because :(1) Terminal was unmanned after hours, (2) Medical emergency, (3) Coroner report investigation for earlier incident, (4) Terminal congestion at platforms, (4) Hoglaw problems, crew and train separated, (5) Water supply and potty sanitaion problems, (6) Rowdy passengers being handed off to the local constabulary....

Murphy was an optimist and he usually works overtime on passenger trains.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by skeets

Yes, you got it. Freight cars are being lettered NYC; it's strange to see a brand new CSX color paint job with NYC on the flank. I understand that CSX is relettering their Conrail stuff NYC, while freight cars still in CR are considered NS. I don't think you'll see freight cars lettered PRR.


Actually, I think I have seen PRR on cars - we get a lot of coal at a local cogen plant and for a while we were getting a mix of CR cars -some NYC, some PRR. Don't see that now, though. They've pretty well sorted them out.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by skeets

Yes, you got it. Freight cars are being lettered NYC; it's strange to see a brand new CSX color paint job with NYC on the flank. I understand that CSX is relettering their Conrail stuff NYC, while freight cars still in CR are considered NS. I don't think you'll see freight cars lettered PRR.


Actually, I think I have seen PRR on cars - we get a lot of coal at a local cogen plant and for a while we were getting a mix of CR cars -some NYC, some PRR. Don't see that now, though. They've pretty well sorted them out.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainheartedguy

OK - Another stupid question - What would cause an AMTRAK train to be running 6 hours late, and then stop in a town for an hour that it isn't even supposed to stop in. The one AMTRAK that comes through brunswick has done that a few times (I have found the explination for 2 of those times, but there are many unefined days, one time the lead AMD-103 died and had to be taken off and placed in the yard here, leaving the second unit to run the 16 car train on is own, the other, it ran out of fuel)
Amtrak due here in the morning about 12 something am. Came thru at 3:44 - (yes I was awake and just ready to get up for the day) It does this pretty regularly. But this time it may have been due to the big rumble out in California yesterday. Otherwise, I just figure it is just somewhere in the Amtrak contract - always be off schedule in Lincoln!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainheartedguy

OK - Another stupid question - What would cause an AMTRAK train to be running 6 hours late, and then stop in a town for an hour that it isn't even supposed to stop in. The one AMTRAK that comes through brunswick has done that a few times (I have found the explination for 2 of those times, but there are many unefined days, one time the lead AMD-103 died and had to be taken off and placed in the yard here, leaving the second unit to run the 16 car train on is own, the other, it ran out of fuel)
Amtrak due here in the morning about 12 something am. Came thru at 3:44 - (yes I was awake and just ready to get up for the day) It does this pretty regularly. But this time it may have been due to the big rumble out in California yesterday. Otherwise, I just figure it is just somewhere in the Amtrak contract - always be off schedule in Lincoln!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, December 22, 2003 7:50 PM
....We have quite a bit of NS traffic through my area and I will begin looking for any PRR lettering on the cab sides...I'm just curious too.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, December 22, 2003 7:50 PM
....We have quite a bit of NS traffic through my area and I will begin looking for any PRR lettering on the cab sides...I'm just curious too.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,317 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Monday, December 22, 2003 7:45 PM
i have seen repainted conrail locos stenciled with prr underneath the cabs.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,317 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Monday, December 22, 2003 7:45 PM
i have seen repainted conrail locos stenciled with prr underneath the cabs.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 22, 2003 6:33 PM
Yes, you got it. Freight cars are being lettered NYC; it's strange to see a brand new CSX color paint job with NYC on the flank. I understand that CSX is relettering their Conrail stuff NYC, while freight cars still in CR are considered NS. I don't think you'll see freight cars lettered PRR.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 22, 2003 6:33 PM
Yes, you got it. Freight cars are being lettered NYC; it's strange to see a brand new CSX color paint job with NYC on the flank. I understand that CSX is relettering their Conrail stuff NYC, while freight cars still in CR are considered NS. I don't think you'll see freight cars lettered PRR.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:32 PM
Thank you gents.....'ppreciate it. That's what I thought I remembered too.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:32 PM
Thank you gents.....'ppreciate it. That's what I thought I remembered too.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....I believe it's CSX using New York Central, etc....


I'll second that. Believe I read it somewhere, too.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....I believe it's CSX using New York Central, etc....


I'll second that. Believe I read it somewhere, too.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:20 PM
....I believe it's CSX using New York Central, etc....

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:20 PM
....I believe it's CSX using New York Central, etc....

Quentin

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:14 PM
Someone please refresh my memory.........It's small and I keep pushing out stuff to make room for new stuff...

With regards to Conrail is it CSX using NYC and NS using PRR or the other way around?
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, December 22, 2003 2:14 PM
Someone please refresh my memory.........It's small and I keep pushing out stuff to make room for new stuff...

With regards to Conrail is it CSX using NYC and NS using PRR or the other way around?
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, December 22, 2003 5:27 AM
Yeah Big Z, once.
You can use the toilet in a SD50, but only if:
A: the locomotive is standing still.
B: You are desperate, very desperate.
C: The size of my 10 year old daughter.
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, December 22, 2003 5:27 AM
Yeah Big Z, once.
You can use the toilet in a SD50, but only if:
A: the locomotive is standing still.
B: You are desperate, very desperate.
C: The size of my 10 year old daughter.
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 21, 2003 10:02 PM
still on the toilet issue, What about steam locos. I thought I saw one under a seat in the cab of a C&O Allegheny one time. anybody know?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 21, 2003 10:02 PM
still on the toilet issue, What about steam locos. I thought I saw one under a seat in the cab of a C&O Allegheny one time. anybody know?
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:40 PM
Ed-
Did you ever have the experience of trying to use the tiolet in a SD50? The CNW7000 series has such small toilet area, I cannot imagine anyone old enough to work on the railroad being able to fit.

The SD50 gets my vote as the worst toilet facility.
GP7&9 (without boilers) get the vote as the best.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:40 PM
Ed-
Did you ever have the experience of trying to use the tiolet in a SD50? The CNW7000 series has such small toilet area, I cannot imagine anyone old enough to work on the railroad being able to fit.

The SD50 gets my vote as the worst toilet facility.
GP7&9 (without boilers) get the vote as the best.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy