daveklepper I don't believe that I am being political by stating that most of us agree neither Netenyahuh here in Israel nor Trump in the USA handled this problem 100% right from the start regardless of one's opinion of current actions. Be glad you are in the USA or Canada and not in France. The hospital train scheme is a reat necessity there. I received a message that originated at Gatestone, seems truthfull, wish to share it but not post it and traced to the URL: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15880/coronavirus-france-disaster Your comments are welcome.
I don't believe that I am being political by stating that most of us agree neither Netenyahuh here in Israel nor Trump in the USA handled this problem 100% right from the start regardless of one's opinion of current actions. Be glad you are in the USA or Canada and not in France. The hospital train scheme is a reat necessity there. I received a message that originated at Gatestone, seems truthfull, wish to share it but not post it and traced to the URL:
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15880/coronavirus-france-disaster
Your comments are welcome.
Any article that refers to this pandemic as the "Chinese Communist Party virus" is an example of ignorance and/or political propaganda at its worst.
You should stop posting such stuff.
Additionally, many more than 2-3 members have asked you to stop already with the logorrhea. If you don't know how to summarize, just post the link as long as it is not to a paywalled or advertisement-loaded article. If you want a personal blog, start one. There are many apps to do so. Google it.
EuclidWhat would handling the problem 100% correctly consist of?
Setting up the complex of 'standing' pandemic-response teams and organizations that should have been in place decades ago.
Now, with rapid sequencing, near-pervasive electronic communication, and vast cloud-based computational and storage resources, much of what used to require months and months of carefully-coordinated work can now be done effectively in... well, in the three days it took the Chinese to sequence the virus, and the subsequent 9 to 10 days it took the CDC to design and DFM the initial viral-particle test modality.
Unfortunately, all the science and technological capability in the world can't make up for shortsightedness, political and other expediency, and to a lesser extent overspecialization coupled with the wrong sort of appeals to authority. We're now seeing chapter 17 or so of the fribbling with the current discussion of masks and what they are 'supposed' to do, which even a cursory understanding of mechanical filtration will substantially expose.
Fortunately, this can be like the lifeboat 'controversy' concerning Titanic, which worked out by far for the best ... when your Britannic goes down much harder and faster later. Bill Gates and others are correct, I think, in expecting far greater catastrophe perhaps sooner than later, and it is ridiculous to think even that the economy can be crashed over a wretched lack of foresight ... let alone the suffering and death that is being 'tolerated' because a wide range of the experts in effective control of the situation are dropping their respective balls. The folks in basic and applied science appear to have been doing many, if not all, the 'necessary' jobs quite competently.
Listening to the advice of the best experts who have demonstrated competence and doing the best possible to follow their recommendations.
And thank you for asking the question.
daveklepper I don't believe that I am being political by stating that most of us agree neither Netenyahuh here in Israel nor Trump in the USA handled this problem 100% right from the start regardless of one's opinion of current actions.
I don't believe that I am being political by stating that most of us agree neither Netenyahuh here in Israel nor Trump in the USA handled this problem 100% right from the start regardless of one's opinion of current actions.
What would handling the problem 100% correctly consist of?
The previous abreviated article is timely because of the following, also edited for brevity:
The coronavirus survival rate on ventilators is disturbingly low, perhaps as low as 20%, according to Dr. Mehmet Oz.
"Ventilators have become a big concern," Dr. Oz told Sunday's "The Cats Roundtable" on 970 AM-N.Y., saying it is not about a shortage as much as a medical debate they might be endangering COVID-19 patients who need them. "When we use them — as we've used them for pneumonia — it might not be the best service for patients. "One of the things the COVID-19 does is that it hurts our ability to carry oxygen in our blood," he added to host John Catsimatidis. "That same process damages the lining of our lungs. What we really want is oxygen, not pressure, blasting through the lungs, which sometimes can hurt the lungs. That is perhaps one of the reasons why the survival rate in intubated patients, people with breathing tubes and ventilators, has been so poor."
80% of COVID-19 patients who go on ventilators do not survive, according to findingss quoted by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. "In my hospital, New York Presbyterian, we're getting about a 50% survival rate, which is significantly better than what Gov. [Cuomo] had quoted as a 20% survival rate," Dr. Oz said.
My email address is daveklepper@yahoo.com
Edited for conciseness from Jerusalem Post, website www.jpost.com
Israeli company Pluristem created a placenta-based cell-therapy that helps patients survive and improves respiratory parameters. After trials on animals, patients suffering from acute respiratory failure and inflammatory complications were treated at three different Israeli medical centers for one week under the country’s compassionate use program and all survived. Four of the patients had demonstrated failure of other organ systems, including cardiovascular and kidney failure. Four showed improvement in respiratory parameters with three in the advanced stages of weaning from ventilators, and two with preexisting medical conditions showing clinical recovery in addition to the respiratory improvement.
Pluristem CEO and president Yaky Yanay: “Pluristem is dedicated to using its competitive advantages in large-scale manufacturing to potentially deliver PLX cells to a large number of patients in significant need.”
The company will apply to multiple nations to begin clinical trials, including the FDA in the United States with whon Pluristem is already talking to “define our clinical strategy for COVID-19.”
The PLX cells are “allogeneic mesenchymal-like cells having immunomodulatory properties.” They harness our own immune system’s regulatory T cells and M2 macrophages to prevent overactivation of the immune system, helping to avoid the symptoms of pneumonia and pneumonitis from becoming fatal.
Euclid Dave, I read the first part of the article you posted. You had chosen to omit that first part when you quoted the article. I find that omitted content to be quite interesting and do not see a problem if you do choose to post it. The following are my thoughts about that first part of the link: The first part of the article proposes a suggestion for addressing and solving the virus problem by the use of universal testing and contact tracing, apparently on continuing basis of monitoring everyone in the country. This suggested solution has not been implemented or tried by those suggesting it, but they imply that the current Administration is negligent for not implementing it. Yet there is no indication that the Administration has ruled it out. That implication in the article is that the Administration is not doing the right thing and is doing the wrong thing by wanting to restart the economy. But the suggestion of widespread testing and contact tracing does not preclude the option of restarting the economy. They are not mutually exclusive as the article implies. Certainly we cannot move ahead and complete the system for national testing and contact tracing prior to restarting the economy. That would leave the economy shut down for years while massive work of developing the new system of testing and tracing is implemented. I would like to see the price tag for the suggested new system of testing/tracing. It may be that our economy is simply incapable of servicing the debt on the funding needed for such a revolutionary and comprehensive federal system. The link to the article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/10/contact-tracing-coronavirus-strategy/
Dave,
I read the first part of the article you posted. You had chosen to omit that first part when you quoted the article. I find that omitted content to be quite interesting and do not see a problem if you do choose to post it. The following are my thoughts about that first part of the link:
The first part of the article proposes a suggestion for addressing and solving the virus problem by the use of universal testing and contact tracing, apparently on continuing basis of monitoring everyone in the country.
This suggested solution has not been implemented or tried by those suggesting it, but they imply that the current Administration is negligent for not implementing it. Yet there is no indication that the Administration has ruled it out. That implication in the article is that the Administration is not doing the right thing and is doing the wrong thing by wanting to restart the economy.
But the suggestion of widespread testing and contact tracing does not preclude the option of restarting the economy. They are not mutually exclusive as the article implies. Certainly we cannot move ahead and complete the system for national testing and contact tracing prior to restarting the economy. That would leave the economy shut down for years while massive work of developing the new system of testing and tracing is implemented. I would like to see the price tag for the suggested new system of testing/tracing. It may be that our economy is simply incapable of servicing the debt on the funding needed for such a revolutionary and comprehensive federal system.
The link to the article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/10/contact-tracing-coronavirus-strategy/
I don't quite understand what you are saying about my review of the first part of the Washington Post article. Above is what I said after you had said you omitted the first part because you considered it to be political. When you red my review, how did your opinion about the article change?
daveklepper So my answer should simply be: So don't read my posts.
So my answer should simply be: So don't read my posts.
Yep. That all that is needed here.
An "expensive model collector"
I appreciated the review and critique of the first half of the Washington Post article, which made me review and modifiy my immediate approval of it.
My current practise is and will be to do the kind of editing that resulted in my posting the Satuday tally on the state of the illness in Israel. One reason I overcame my first thoughts not to post anymore is that Israel is giving statistics, that I believe reliable, on those recovered. Who else is?
And my reading of McFarlain's post was that I should not post on the website period. His condemnation did not appear to me to be restricted to this thread.
York1 Convicted One So you are copying stories from behind a paywall, and pasting them here? I think what he is saying is that he doesn't like reading someone's post with just a link to an article, and then trying to access the link, can't get the article. I think he wants to avoid that.
Convicted One So you are copying stories from behind a paywall, and pasting them here?
I think what he is saying is that he doesn't like reading someone's post with just a link to an article, and then trying to access the link, can't get the article. I think he wants to avoid that.
I don't think he means that. If I understood him correctly, his problem came when he was done reading the post and wanted to see the 'source reference'.
Surely there is a sensible medium between long, probably technically illegal pasting of copyrighted and paywalled content on the one hand, and pasting little more than cryptic links to inaccessible or potentially reader-hostile and ad-infested sites on the other. One very useful part of that is use of the URL tags to substitute highlighted plaintext with some sort of descriptive language in place of the plain hotlinked URL code -- I see this is working this morning. Another is to use the quote tool or tags 'correctly' to take FAIR USE REFERENCES from the article text(s) and paste them in correctly (perhaps with their own inline references still 'live') and then intersperse a few comments, even if they are only a few words each, on the importance of what the 'quote' contains.
One very, very significant (at least to me) thing this helps with is getting rid of the great mass of objectionable or manipulative politics in many of these newsworker or propagandized accounts, stuff that does not belong in any discussions here as it's a repeatedly-mentioned violation of TOS. Some of us are 'trained' to read critically in the presence of active 'disinformation' or trolling attempts to rile up emotions, which are often a considerable part of such articles. But very few of us do that for 'pleasure'...
York1I think he wants to avoid that.
If they are copied from another published source, I'd er on the side of caution and suspect it was protected material. Which you can get away with extracting small relevant chunks from under the "fair use" doctrine, and then providing a link to the full protected article. Which is all we are trying to get him to do.
Convicted OneSo you are copying stories from behind a paywall, and pasting them here?
I believe we can give a very learned and intelligent man a pass here on his posts. If someone doesn't want to read through them, they can just click past them.
York1 John
daveklepper I still want to hear from Flintlock on this question, since this is his thread. When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get: Page cannot be displayed You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line
I still want to hear from Flintlock on this question, since this is his thread.
When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get: Page cannot be displayed You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line
So you are copying stories from behind a paywall, and pasting them here?
Coincidently enough, we already have Flintlocks position on the reposting of copied, longwinded dissertations right here:
http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/740/t/281586.aspx?page=1
Scroll down to his reply to me on the very subject.
BaltACDcan just about assure you, nobody is wadeing through the length of the posts. If 'you' can't develop a sentance or two summary about the article, I have my doubts that you waded through it either.
I've wondered the same thing. In one of his marathon posts last week, the same subject was reported three times, just with slightly different wording, making me wonder if he had copied and pasted from three separate sources into one post. Without bothering to proof his own post.
On top of all that If I had 6+ different people here all asking me "don't do that anymore" I don't think I would feel justified blaming them for being the ones who were argumentative
daveklepper Part of what? McFarlane posted that I should cease immediately posting because nobody was reading anything I wrote anyway, and I redponded with the quote you used. I then realized he was pulling my leg, and that was proved by the immediate response of several viewers to a posting on another thread. I explained this already in a previous posting, but some posters keep quoting this response. Part of what? The posting for which I gave a URL? The first half.
Now I have to reply, was I posting in the other thread in which you refer to? Possibly not, but when I do post in a thread I'm specifically talking in that thread and that thread only. If I have to be specific and state I'm surprised you're still posting in the COVID-19 thread because I doubt anyone is reading your posts anymore I will, but I was not pulling your leg. This is my last post in this thread because I'm completely sick of COVID-19 news. I no longer care about it, it's just wasting my time...I've already been put on a rotating schedule because no one can/wants to travel. Sweden has it right, even with all the deaths the only reason their economy will falter is because oft he remainder of the world shutting down.
David K: I'm sure an MIT grad learned how to succinctly summarize an article. These days most accomplish this with bullet points or numbers for the main points, followed by a phrase. Of course that requires the poster to read the article using critical thinking.
Alternatively you could cut and past the introductory paragraph of the article, which, if well-written, would be a summary.
And answering Jim Wrinn's blog:
Jim:
Not Amtrak but Metro North and the State of New York --- One Boss. Cuomo
Vanderbilt Avenue reserved fir the purpose
Street Level High Platforms at GCT Riverdale also a boarding point
Commuter-car doors wide enough to ma Add Quote to your Post neuver stretchers
Hospitals available Tarrytown, Ossining, Peelskill, Beacon. Poughkeepsie, Hudson. Albany and on to Buffalo
Can you give Cuomo a call eight now?
In the earlier posting, I did think about deleting the Obama statement for both possibly being political and also not really necessary for the main message. Buit since I've been wrongly accused of being a right-wing conservative, I though I'd better leave it in or removing it might be thought of as proving the lie qs a truth.
243129daveklepper I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so.
Mr. Klepper:
What part of this am I not getting?
That isn't true. For one thing, I must look for material that violates the guidelines.
But I will try to do better to strike out anything not essential to the information that is important, as follows
daveklepperI still want to hear from Flintlock on this question, since this is his thread. When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get: Page cannot be displayed You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line Page timed out No such address If Flintlock asks me to conform to your wish I will do so. You probably have an excellent server and your own state-of-the-art computer. I do not. Do all other readers? And just how could I possibly summarize the preceding posting of mine without omitting information? Just state that Israel is testing verious treatments? Don't readers wish to know which treatments, from where, and how are they tested? I assture you that this tijme and for the future, I did erase political stuff and photos.
When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get:
Page cannot be displayed
You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line
Page timed out
No such address
If Flintlock asks me to conform to your wish I will do so.
You probably have an excellent server and your own state-of-the-art computer. I do not. Do all other readers? And just how could I possibly summarize the preceding posting of mine without omitting information? Just state that Israel is testing verious treatments? Don't readers wish to know which treatments, from where, and how are they tested?
I assture you that this tijme and for the future, I did erase political stuff and photos.
Without posting just a summary and a link - I can just about assure you, nobody is wadeing through the length of the posts. If 'you' can't develop a sentance or two summary about the article, I have my doubts that you waded through it either.
The link gives the readers the opportunity to pursue the info - If they want to.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Dave - I don't need to see entire articles posted in the TRAIN'S forum. A summary and a link will do.
After due deliberation, I decided that Flintlock and of course the Moderator due have the power to ask me not to post long but fact-filled posts instead of just URLS or URLS and a short paragraph. I think a najority of readers still would rather have the information on the thread and not have pull up other websites. We had the same argument on the L-Sandy-Recovery thread on the Tranit Forum.
daveklepper I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so.
Two posts later you are expounding on Israel.
daveklepperDefense Ministry uses Israeli start-up to streamline coronavirus fight 'We hope that by conducting due diligence on the credibility of suppliers, and speeding up the supply chain, hospitals will be better prepared to cope with the coronavirus' By JERUSALEM POST STAFF APRIL 10, 2020 09:40
Two posts after the one above you again expound ad nauseam re Israel.
daveklepperIsrael's Health Ministry signed an agreement with the Weizmann Institute of Science on Friday to use its advanced laboratories to perform coronavirus tests. According to the ministry, testing will start immediately and screen about 1,000 people per day.The news comes as the number of coronavirus patients in Israel surged past 10,000 on Friday morning leaving 93 people dead and the government lifted some of the restrictions on most of the country.
My question is who requested that info? I saw no request between "I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so." and"Israel's Health Ministry signed an agreement".
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.