vsmith wrote: Cederstrand wrote:Ah..the Crampton design, originated in France where they were fast express engines often exceeding 60 mph. Ugly as sin, but they were apparently very successfull engines for their
Cederstrand wrote:
Ah..the Crampton design, originated in France where they were fast express engines often exceeding 60 mph. Ugly as sin, but they were apparently very successfull engines for their
Thomas Russell Crampton was born in England... his first enigines were built for the Dundee & Perth Railway in 1846 by Tulk and Ley Co.....the design didnt take hold in England but gained popularity in France and Germany upto about 1870...biggest drawback was lack of adhesion when starting
fafnir242 wrote: Does anyone else find this monstrosity completely hideous?www.steamlocomotive.com/bomuseum/co490.jpg
Does anyone else find this monstrosity completely hideous?
www.steamlocomotive.com/bomuseum/co490.jpg
negitive.....classic lines/streamlining.....shear power waiting to blast off
I think that C&O 4-6-4 would look a lot better without the shroud, but then I'm not a fan of most streamlining.
I'm surprised to hear anyone objecting to C-Liners or Shark... both had classic styling.
As for foriegn steam, well, there are so many choices.
There's the Swiss high-pressure Eb3/5.
And the Belgian triple-boilered 2-4-2.
The stuff of nightmares.
Nelson
Ex-Southern 385 Being Hoisted
SteamFreak wrote: I think that C&O 4-6-4 would look a lot better without the shroud, but then I'm not a fan of most streamlining.I'm surprised to hear anyone objecting to C-Liners or Shark... both had classic styling.As for foriegn steam, well, there are so many choices. There's the Swiss high-pressure Eb3/5.http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/swissHP/swissHP.htm And the Belgian triple-boilered 2-4-2.http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/tripleboiler/tripleboiler.htm The stuff of nightmares.
So many scales, so many trains, so little time.....
Railroader_Sailor_SSN-760 wrote:Without a doubt, the ugliest loco is one with CSX painted on it.
J. Edgar wrote: fafnir242 wrote: Does anyone else find this monstrosity completely hideous?www.steamlocomotive.com/bomuseum/co490.jpg negitive.....classic lines/streamlining.....shear power waiting to blast off
Hmm...you're right, it does look kind of impressive now that I think about it.
SteamFreak wrote: How about the fugly Alco DH643.
How about the fugly Alco DH643.
I'd kinda say more like PUG'ly
Looks like a dang'd PUG-Dog....
Byron
http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=86118
It needs an overhaul.....
http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=86774
Another ugly color from UP...
Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.
Lord Atmo wrote:man are you insane? the UP olympic units are 2 of UP's coolest locomotives ever. The blue looks great on them! If you want an ugly UP locomotive, try an SD60M or almost anything that doesnt have a flag...er i guess those are moreso boring than ugly
If you think thats look good?????????
Although this locomotive looks cool, I think it still falls under the ugly catagory.
Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com
Tjsingle wrote:jeez it sucks i really hate driving by Baltimore and seeing all this NS and CSX colors ugh wish conrail was still around
I agree with you thread.. I miss CONRAIL COLORS....
Tjsingle wrote: pssssssh oh no you didnt!
Oh, yes I did!
fafnir242 wrote:It's a BQ23-7. I'm pretty sure only about 17 were made, I could be wrong. It's basically a variation of the B23-7.
I miss Conrail too, but the original scheme, not the Conrail Quality stuff.
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locoPicture.aspx?id=59613
At least the new guy chopped the short hood and not the long one. He'd have a lot more explaining to do.
IMO this is one http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=45654 Like someone took two perfectly good paint schemes, chewed them UP, washed it down with tequila, ate the worm and puked it all UP. It would have been better if they'd had a contest with railfans to dream a paint scheme instead of hireing some non RR design firm.
This is sad looking too http://www.geocities.com/drgwlpd/JPEGs/UP4056.jpg
trainfan1221 wrote: fafnir242 wrote:It's a BQ23-7. I'm pretty sure only about 17 were made, I could be wrong. It's basically a variation of the B23-7.And yet Bachmann produced an HO version of this engine. But not a normal one. I miss Conrail too, but the original scheme, not the Conrail Quality stuff.
I like both the conrail quality, and normal scheme.
Why dont you like the quality scheme?
Tjsingle
hf1001 wrote: Although this locomotive looks cool, I think it still falls under the ugly catagory.
Can anyone find a cab photo of a B23-7 ?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.