Trains.com

British Railway Operations

122500 views
1906 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Monday, January 16, 2006 3:33 PM
Having read my post, and those leading to it, two thoughts strike me. (Ouch!)

Merry -Go-Round. This was a concept developed in the 1960's under hero/villain Dr Richard Beeching (previously mentioned on this thread) whereby a loco and a string of HAA coal hoppers simply work backwards and forwards between pit and power plant.

On arrival at the pit the loco is put into notch (run) 1 and trundles it's train at low speed under the loader. At the power plant you slow speed your bottom-discharge hoppers over the dump then head back to the pit for another load.

The crew - driver only - could swap out at either end after their 8 hour shift and the only real interruption would be when the loco needed fuel and an exam, or if a hopper got damaged.

I believe that Knottingley men would do three Selby Drift - Eggborough turns in an 8 hour shift. I'm not sure how long the 56's would go without a refuel.

Thought 2 - Attercliffe is'nt just a scrapyard, it's the home of Sharp's, where I buy all of my American HO stuff. If any of the UK contingent on here are into modelling and fancy a trip to Huddersfield this weekend I'll be behind Boldon Junction on it's second last show - after 18 years - before retirement.

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Monday, January 16, 2006 3:06 PM
The commodity that immediately springs to mind is coal.

Here in (cold, rainy) Yorkshire we had until recently the huge Selby pit. Nearly all of it's output was fed underground to a place called Gascoigne Wood (pronounced Gas-coin) then taken by rail to power plants locally - Ferrybridge, Drax and Eggborough. Ferrybridge, without looking it up, would be around 5 miles by rail from Gascoigne Wood, Eggborough perhaps 8.

Another flow was scrap metal from Attercliffe in Sheffield to Aldwarke in Rotherham - 5 miles maximum.

It's all in the "Freightmaster" book that Bealieau sent you. When you get my latest gift it'll get even clearer.

Tonight's "unwind after a bad day with a bottle of Merlot" album is Do It Yourself, by the Seahorses - John Squire at his blistering best!
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, January 16, 2006 12:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cogload
You can have hauls of less than 10 miles which make cash if the tonnage supports it and the flow is structured properly.


I've been trying to think of what you could haul (legally[;)]) less than 10 miles and make cash?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 15, 2006 6:17 AM
There seems to be plenty of incentive at the minute for companies to obtain nationwide freight licences. I can think of EWS; Freightliner; GBRF; DRS; Jarvis; FM Rail. Plus you have Road Hauliers who just borrow a haulier which W.Malcolm does with DRS out of Grangemouth.

Railfreight did make cash; however it has traditionally been in the heavy industry area where it has made the cash. Coal and the like. The high volume low weight sector has been traditionally the difficult section to make cash. This is not helped by a bias toward the hauliers in terms of weight (though they have had their proposals for 60 and 84 tonne trucks chucked out); and the use of space on a very low marginal cost basis.

You can have hauls of less than 10 miles which make cash if the tonnage supports it and the flow is structured properly.

Album of the Day: A Slight Case of Overbombing by the Sisters of Mercy.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:32 PM
owlsroost: Thanks for the info. I guess I didn't quite get the concept right in my head. I was thinking of a railroad's ability to expand by way of purchase/mergers of other railroads. Given the open access raiway system, competition from trucks, and something of a history of low profits(?), what is the incentive for a company to get into railroading in Britain? What did Ed Burkhard see in it? Thanks


(worth noting that it does take a certain type of talent to arrange barking dog sounds into a song, and make them seem to belong there[:)])

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Cambridge, UK
  • 419 posts
Posted by owlsroost on Saturday, January 14, 2006 7:27 AM
There aren't any 'regional' railfreight operators in the UK - they all have nationwide operating licences/safety cases as far as I know (but the smaller ones don't actually operate everywhere, just where they have business).

Don't forget these aren't railroads in the US sense - they don't own any track, they just own/lease locomotives/freight cars and operate trains, so they are much closer to a trucking company in the way they operate than a traditional railroad (and are all competing directly with each other for business).

Tony

(and yes, I do listen to Chris Rea/The Eagles/Beach Boys etc as well - I chose Pink Floyd because it was the opposite end of the spectrum [:)] - did you see their reunion set at the recent Live 8 concert on TV - superb)
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, January 13, 2006 8:47 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by owlsroost

QUOTE: If CN didn't spin off EWS when they bought WC, they must have thought it had some potential to either make money, or sell off at a later date, at a profit?


From memory, CN were interested in offloading their share of EWS at the time of the WC takeover but there weren't any takers at a sensible price - so they decided to turn it around first.

QUOTE: Funny, that there wouldn't be a big uproar over foreign ownership of a British railroad, but maybe that just an Americanized perception.


Basically, UK railfreight had been a barely-profitable or money-loosing business for years, so I think most people here reckoned that the consortium led by Ed Burkhardt was the best chance to turn it around (given Ed's track record and enthusiasm).

Tony (reaching for a Pink Floyd album as an antidote to Johnny Cash...)


Is there any advantage for someone with deep pockets(CN) to purchase a few other companies to build a more end-to-end railroad system? Kind of like trying to make short hauls into longer hauls? Or, is that thought completely opposite of how the system was envisioned to work?
Pink Floyd? That would be something of the opposite end of t he spectrum from Johnny Cash. Middle ground might somebody I like to listen to- Chris Rea?
(" I hear the train a comin'. It's a rollin' 'round the bend......")

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Friday, January 13, 2006 5:17 PM
I can't see any real future for short-haul freight in some areas - where I live (near the South-Western main line) most former freight facilities are now car parks, because of the expanding London commuterland. What is the opinion of others far more knowledgeable than I ?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Cambridge, UK
  • 419 posts
Posted by owlsroost on Friday, January 13, 2006 1:32 PM
QUOTE: If CN didn't spin off EWS when they bought WC, they must have thought it had some potential to either make money, or sell off at a later date, at a profit?


From memory, CN were interested in offloading their share of EWS at the time of the WC takeover but there weren't any takers at a sensible price - so they decided to turn it around first.

QUOTE: Funny, that there wouldn't be a big uproar over foreign ownership of a British railroad, but maybe that just an Americanized perception.


Basically, UK railfreight had been a barely-profitable or money-loosing business for years, so I think most people here reckoned that the consortium led by Ed Burkhardt was the best chance to turn it around (given Ed's track record and enthusiasm).

Tony (reaching for a Pink Floyd album as an antidote to Johnny Cash...)
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, January 13, 2006 12:50 PM
If CN didn't spinn off EWS when they bought WC, they must have thought it had some potential to either make money, or sell off at alater date, at a profit? I do now see what beaulieu says about the SOO line colors. Funny, that there wouldn't be a big uproar over foreign ownership of a British railroad, but maybe that just an Americanized perception.
For what it's worth, I'm a Johnny Cash fan from way back. I failed the bonus question, though-I would have said Rodney Crowell-ex husband of Roseanne Cash, who I'm also a fan of. Now there's a family with a lot of talent.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Friday, January 13, 2006 12:39 PM
I'd hinted a while ago that I'd heard rumours about EWS, which basically ran along the lines of flotation, so they could be a more attractive proposition for sale because CN are'nt really interested. What I found a little difficult to concile at the time was that a potentially interested party was said to be a consortium led by Royal Mail. I've since seen this suggestion in print in a reputable broadsheet - The Independent.

Nothing at all wrong with Johnny Cash, my man, although I prefer his one-time son-in-law whom I still consider to be one of the underrated giants of British popular music. His 1984 album "Cowboy Outfit" is one of our most played, especially when Lynne is out and I can dance about to it.

This is'nt a thread for music guessing games! The answer is Nick Lowe.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:40 PM
Cogload speaks.....

Tuylar 15 - I am not doubting your affinity or affection for things Irish; nor am I doubting the fact that the Irish are very nice. Indeed; Rugby trips over to Dublin have proven that they are very nice indeed...(hic) However a large majority may raise an eyebrow re: yr comments on sterling (especially as the republic had its own currency for many yrs) and how close they feel to "Britain". Thats all.....:-)

Murphy - EWS was formed by WC and 2 merchant banks (one Boston MA based, the other Geneva Switzerland based); when CN bought WC they ended up with EWS. Although there are hints of a stockmarket flotation for the firm as it is now making some wonga.

As for Franchises - HMG decides on the shape and scope of them. It seems that Merseytravel (thats Liverpool and area) may get its hands back on the rails in that area as an experiment. When they come up for renewal they maybe merged or split with other franchises (i.e. Central and Wessex/Thames and Great Western).

Incidentally if we had the amount of derailments whoich seem to afflict parts of the US network the entire railway would have been shut down by now. AND| finally; off topic but I am listening to Johnny Cash at the min - American IV. Fantastic Stuff - Hurt; Hung My Head and a great cover of the Ewan Macoll (father of the late much missed Kirsty) song "The first Time I Saw your face".
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by beaulieu

QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding

Interesting-I didn't know that CN owned EWS. I'm surprised it hasn't been *assimilated* with buckets of red paint.[;)]


Murphy, you didn't recognize the old Soo Line paint scheme, with the school colors of the University of Minnesota on the EWS diesels? What other railroads use that scheme, humm? Think Wisconsin Central Ltd. That is how CN came to own a controlling interest in EWS. Ed Burkhardt chose the paint scheme. So every railroad that Ed has been involved in uses that scheme. Montreal, Maine & Atlantic RR
Estee Raudtee (in Estonia) Rail Polska (in Poland). What color scheme does Tranz Rail (New Zealand) use? Ever think you would see that scheme on Russian built diesels?


I knew Ed Burkhardt of WC fame was in on EWS. I guess I just figured he had found some (perhaps British) investors to bankroll the project, and let him run the railroad. Maybe there's a guy who could be tapped to run CN some day?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Cambridge, UK
  • 419 posts
Posted by owlsroost on Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:46 AM
QUOTE: Also, up until the 1990's Irish Rail bought its carriages from British makers - examples of BR Mk2 and 3's are still in use though I'm not sure if any of the steam heated Cravens carriages are left.


I travelled in some of the "steam heated Cravens carriages" in October 2005 so they're probably still around, although I suspect only until DMU's replace them on the remaining branch-line duties.

Tony

(Just back from Canada - nice to see Toronto Union Station still has a tower controlling a huge array of dwarf colour light signals [:)] )
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:04 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Simon Reed
[

Tulyar 15. I'm still a member of the ITG and you may have had to put up with my stewarding on various tours in the late 80's and early 90's - when we still need your financial support can you think of a good reason for not still being a member?? E-mail me if there are any issues because I'm still quite involved.


I'm not sure why I lapsed my ITG membership. I certainly enjoyed going on their tours, especially the Sunday outings to industrial and preserved. My late Irish friend used to go on their tours to - that's how I met him. I still get details of their tours as I'm on Pathfinder Tours Mailing list. Perhaps I will re-join.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 11:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding

Interesting-I didn't know that CN owned EWS. I'm surprised it hasn't been *assimilated* with buckets of red paint.[;)]


Murphy, you didn't recognize the old Soo Line paint scheme, with the school colors of the University of Minnesota on the EWS diesels? What other railroads use that scheme, humm? Think Wisconsin Central Ltd. That is how CN came to own a controlling interest in EWS. Ed Burkhardt chose the paint scheme. So every railroad that Ed has been involved in uses that scheme. Montreal, Maine & Atlantic RR
Estee Raudtee (in Estonia) Rail Polska (in Poland). What color scheme does Tranz Rail (New Zealand) use? Ever think you would see that scheme on Russian built diesels?
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:39 PM
Interesting-I didn't know that CN owned EWS. I'm surprised it hasn't been *assimilated* with buckets of red paint.[;)]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:03 PM
Murphy - re mergers - to add to Simon's comments, the rail system for passenger purposes is divided into Franchises for each area, so although a company might have (say) two contiguous franchises, they would be considered as separate entities. It is possible for a company to be stripped of a franchise for poor performance, as happened recently to Connex in the South-East corner of England.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:07 PM
Murphy...
1 - No mergers - the "system" won't allow this.

2 - Some paint schemes are more popular than others here. My personal view is that as long as the trains run effectively and deliver the service they're meant to they could be orange with purple spots as far as I'm concerned.

3 - Network Rail laid out a set of guidelines for photography about this time last year for
it's own staff, enthusiasts and the BTP (our railroad cops.) This seems to have been a well thought out document and has minimised any concerns about security. Britain runs at a far lower level of security alert than the US anyway.

4 - Derailments happen. As I've previously observed on this thread, though, the standards of Maintainence of Way in North America would'nt be considered fit for a served-once-a-month industrial spur in Europe so they're an irregular occurence.

EWS is owned by Canadian National. Cogload will elaborate in his inimitable fashion.

Tulyar 15. I'm still a member of the ITG and you may have had to put up with my stewarding on various tours in the late 80's and early 90's - when we still need your financial support can you think of a good reason for not still being a member?? E-mail me if there are any issues because I'm still quite involved.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:54 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cogload
. When I worked for Canadian National...er...sorry EWS


cogload: A while back, you posted this about CN / EWS, and I wondered what you meant by this. I'm sure it was meant in jest. Were you comparing the operations of the two? Just curious.

Thanks to all posters from accross the pond. You make for some interesting, and different reading on this forum. You must not have as many *issues* with mergers,paint schemes,picture takers,derailments etc....as we seem to have.[;)]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:32 AM
Originally posted by cogload

The Irish regards themselves as almost Britain.....really?

Huummm. Suggest you study history sir!
[/quote

I HAVE studied history (at 'O' Level I did Britain and Ireland 1865 - 1914!) and I have also visited Ireland on numerous occassions (both the North and the Republic). I have always found the people there extremely hospitable. I used to have a friend (alas he passed away last year!) who worked for Iarnrodd Eireann who used to arrange visits for me and a few friend to railway installations. As well as IE ones we visited quite a few obscure peat bog railways as my friend had a few contacts there too.

As for history, if any nation has a right to hate us Brits its the Irish. But I've not found that at all, so they could be the winners of the most forgiving nation on earth prize. Many people from the Republic served in the UK forces during WW2 and many still do - there are still regiments in the UK army that are recruited from all of Ireland.

To-day IE is a well run system - what attracted me to it were the old steam heat passenger cars and MetroVick diesels (albeit re built with EMD engines). I used to be a member of the Iri***raction Group, which has preserved some of these and I have several certificates for the £10's I donated to them. There's still a significant number of loco hauled trains in the Republic while Northern Irleland Railway still keep a couple of loco hauled sets in reserve for major sporting events, especially 6 nations Rugby matches.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:35 PM
The Irish regards themselves as almost Britain.....really?

Huummm. Suggest you study history sir!
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: U K
  • 146 posts
Posted by mhurley87f on Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:32 AM
Tulyar,

Point taken about BL cars, but the decision of which make of car to buy will always be a personal one taken by the buyer.

At the time in question, CIE was not a person, but a State Owned Transport Undertaking, and we all know how much arm twisting goes on to direct where and from whom they should buy.

From what I've seen of CIE, it would seem to be very well run, and the GM locomotoves and Japanese DART sets certainly deliver the goods (pardon the pun).

Martin

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:55 AM
I think BL and other British makes have traditionally sold well in Ireland. After all, the Irish still regards themselves as almost Britian. The last time I went there I met quiet a few people who wished the Irish Republic had carried on using Sterling. Dont forget tha

If Irish Rail had bought EE diesels they might have kept with them. The Northern Ireland Railways bought EE diesels in the 1960s and their Diesel Electric MU's are all powered by the same EE engine used in the BR Southern Region DEMU's! Also, up until the 1990's Irish Rail bought its carriages from British makers - examples of BR Mk2 and 3's are still in use though I'm not sure if any of the steam heated Cravens carriages are left. These were favourites for Iri***raction Group railtours in the 1990's but I've not been on any ITG tours lately. I do know hte Railway Preservation Soc of Ireland have bought a set of Mk2's for their steam tours, which they've painted in the Malachite Green colous used by Irish Rail in the 1950's. (they adopted this colour when Oliver Bulleid became their Chief Mechanical Engineer in 1949).

The fact that the Irish Republic used Sterling up till 1978 was a factor in people buying Briti***here.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Monday, January 9, 2006 4:52 PM
Thanks Martin - until your post the significance of trying to sell English Electric badged products to Ireland had escaped me. Food for thought.

What did the Irish do, then, about cars - auto's, we should say. How did British Leyland products fare in the Republic? I know that Fiat were more succesful initially in Ireland than the mainland. Goodness knows why, though. One of my friends had a Fiat X-19, which was a stunning car on a sunny day but let in rain through every joint and seal.

Germanium - absolutely correct, although let's accept that Beyer Peacock, and North British, and probably Hunslet (if we look at NIR's 101-103) were simply expected to be able to build diesel loco's with the same aplomb that they applied to their steam products. The thinking seemed to be that a loco is a loco and if you can build steam you can build diesel.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Monday, January 9, 2006 8:05 AM
I suspect that in the 1950's some British firms still had the attitude (inherited from the days of Empire) that "Made in Britain" would sell anything, regardless of whether or not it was suited to the customer's environment or operating conditions. This is probably why Beyer Peacock (the British Baldwin) went bust. It did not cross their minds that the world was changing, and that they had to move with it. Is this the lesson that General Motors and Ford are now learning, to their cost ??
Martin's point on the previous post is also very relevant.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: U K
  • 146 posts
Posted by mhurley87f on Monday, January 9, 2006 7:11 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Simon Reed

Murphy - I think the short answer is no.

There were British diesels of all sorts of different power ratings, abilities and intended purposes. There are plenty of publications dealing with this and when I think of some I'll let you know.

British builders tended to look to Europe for inspiration, on the rare occasions that they bothered to research anything, despite the fact that the Irish had so despaired of UK products that they turned to GM.

Have we not touched on this a few months ago?


Simon,

The Irish might not have had a lot of luck with the UK products that they purchased, but I suspect that buying Diesels which performed consistently well on the UK mainland, but bearing the name "ENGLISH ELECTRIC", would have been a non-starter.

Martin

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Monday, January 9, 2006 1:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Townsend

I've never read of the prototype Deltic going to the USA or Canada and thats something that the books would keep quiet. On the other hand it is suprising that English Electric built this very expensive loco that could capable of running in America or Canada on the off chance. Does any one know if any Arican railroad were actually interested in an engine like the Deltic.


Don't forget that in the 1950's English Electric had built up quite an export trade, not only to British Commonwealth countries but also one or two others including Latin America countries and even a few European countries such as Portugal and Poland.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Sunday, January 8, 2006 4:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Simon Reed
I'm hoping that your delightful president and congress don't murder Amtrak



With any luck, it might be the other way round !!
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, January 8, 2006 3:31 PM
Don't worry, Amtrak will be saved in one form or another.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy