Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!
K1a - all the way
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly Who is more a "model railroader" - the guy that builds only Bowser type locomotive kits and uses RTR track, shake the box rolling stock and structures, or the guy who uses RTR locomotives and rolling stock but handlays every inch of track, scratchbuilds every building and concentrates on realistic operations? Along the same lines - it seems that another popular pasttime is to call anything less expensive than what one runs "junk" and anything more expensive than what one runs as "things for those that have more money than brains." As far as I am concerned, and this is just my opinion of course, if a person is running something that looks like a train and is smaller than 1:1 scale, and is having fun doing it - that person is a model railroader.
Scott - Dispatcher, Norfolk Southern
Have fun with your trains
QUOTE: Originally posted by vsmith I have to say this is one encounter you would never have in large scale... I can only say that in my scale G, I only wish we HAD more kits of locomotives! 95% of everything motive related is RTR which leaves alot up to our kitbashing skills. what kits there are, are pricey and often poor running. Selection is still very limited. I've had better luck scratchbuilding and bashing to get what I want than waiting for kits that might not ever get produced. So as it is RTR is just a given for most modelers. As for RTR in HO, I personally feel you should do what ever helps YOU to enjoy the hobby, these guys were being just plain rude!
The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing. Kinda twists your brain around, doesn't it? I think I learned this in abstract algebra, or perhaps it was in Partial Differential Equations.
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by 4884bigboy I'm getting really sick of people putting down RTR equiptment. Just the other day I was looking at getting an Athearn RTR SD60 and the 3 guys I was talking with gave me a dirty look and said "Don't go wasting your time on that Athearn or Kato or Atlas***, buy a kit and build it yourself". This made me lose it. I replied "Well, I don't really have the time to build kits, not to mention locomotive kits are usually somewhat challenging, and the RTR is way better looking than I could ever make it look". They were infuriated by this and yelled "How are you ever going to know if you don't do it yourself!?" After that they made a quick leave. What's the big deal with RTR locomotives and rolling stock? They offer a quick way to get your trains running and look great. I would consider Kato locomotives RTR, too, even if you do have to apply the detail parts. Most people including myself just don't have the time, the skills or the patience to build kits. And mind you I'm just talking locomotives (kit rolling stock is fun, but RTR is nice once in a while). So lay off, pro-kit builders. Anyone else feel the same way as me?[V][?] I'm a smart, gifted and talented individual, and can build, assemble or repair just about anything you put in front of me - or at least I'll try. However, I don't put other people down because they can't. It took many years of trial and error for me to learn what I know and develop my skills. We're not all put together exactly alike. I also buy RTR any time I can. Tracklayer I bet when asked you also help those that can't build, assemble or repair things. I"m sure they learn a bunch too. [:)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by 4884bigboy I'm getting really sick of people putting down RTR equiptment. Just the other day I was looking at getting an Athearn RTR SD60 and the 3 guys I was talking with gave me a dirty look and said "Don't go wasting your time on that Athearn or Kato or Atlas***, buy a kit and build it yourself". This made me lose it. I replied "Well, I don't really have the time to build kits, not to mention locomotive kits are usually somewhat challenging, and the RTR is way better looking than I could ever make it look". They were infuriated by this and yelled "How are you ever going to know if you don't do it yourself!?" After that they made a quick leave. What's the big deal with RTR locomotives and rolling stock? They offer a quick way to get your trains running and look great. I would consider Kato locomotives RTR, too, even if you do have to apply the detail parts. Most people including myself just don't have the time, the skills or the patience to build kits. And mind you I'm just talking locomotives (kit rolling stock is fun, but RTR is nice once in a while). So lay off, pro-kit builders. Anyone else feel the same way as me?[V][?] I'm a smart, gifted and talented individual, and can build, assemble or repair just about anything you put in front of me - or at least I'll try. However, I don't put other people down because they can't. It took many years of trial and error for me to learn what I know and develop my skills. We're not all put together exactly alike. I also buy RTR any time I can. Tracklayer
QUOTE: Originally posted by 4884bigboy I'm getting really sick of people putting down RTR equiptment. Just the other day I was looking at getting an Athearn RTR SD60 and the 3 guys I was talking with gave me a dirty look and said "Don't go wasting your time on that Athearn or Kato or Atlas***, buy a kit and build it yourself". This made me lose it. I replied "Well, I don't really have the time to build kits, not to mention locomotive kits are usually somewhat challenging, and the RTR is way better looking than I could ever make it look". They were infuriated by this and yelled "How are you ever going to know if you don't do it yourself!?" After that they made a quick leave. What's the big deal with RTR locomotives and rolling stock? They offer a quick way to get your trains running and look great. I would consider Kato locomotives RTR, too, even if you do have to apply the detail parts. Most people including myself just don't have the time, the skills or the patience to build kits. And mind you I'm just talking locomotives (kit rolling stock is fun, but RTR is nice once in a while). So lay off, pro-kit builders. Anyone else feel the same way as me?[V][?]
QUOTE: Originally posted by KenLarsen QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing. As a software writer, one thing I know for sure is that ANY quotient logic that attempts to perform a division by zero, will cause the application to crash![:D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing.
QUOTE: Originally posted by BRAKIE
QUOTE: What gets me annoyed are people putting down Athearn. I've said it once, I'm gonna say it again " You can't go wrong with Athearn!'
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out. Sorry lets try again! I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing. Kinda twists your brain around, doesn't it? I think I learned this in abstract algebra, or perhaps it was in Partial Differential Equations.
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out. Sorry lets try again! I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!)
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out.
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out.
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero)
QUOTE: Originally posted by timthechef I'm a kit builder too. I"m worried that kits are dissapearing from the market. I have to go to e-bay to find a simple steam engine kit. I've been trying to get chimneys for my railroad station project and can't find any at my local hobby stores. I understand that kits and scratch building is not for everybody, I'm just worried that the products in the hobby that I love are dissapearing.
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out. Sorry lets try again! I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing. Kinda twists your brain around, doesn't it? I think I learned this in abstract algebra, or perhaps it was in Partial Differential Equations. Don't go to school for thirty years and they go and change EVERYTHING. I remember specifically being told that 0/0 was NOT 1 but that was a long time ago. I thought (i) was going to come up in this, I never did get that square root of -1 stuff. That's probably why I became a mechanic.