Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Why Still Nickel Silver Rail? Locked

24679 views
178 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Monday, September 18, 2017 7:48 PM

I wonder if Rod Stewart used Ed's code 83 Platinum rail on his magnificent layout.

If he did I guarantee you he didn't get the materials from catalytic converters.   Indifferent

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Monday, September 18, 2017 8:03 PM

Track fiddler

Huh.   Can some one please explain to me why Platinum is needed and what its purpose is for in a catalytic converter.

 

Platinum is used in a chemical reaction to convert the nastier bits of a car's exhaust into less nastier stuff.  You ever notice car exhaust doesn't smell as bad as it used to and makes you less dizzy?  That's because the platinum is converting the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide.  Still stuff you don't want to breathe, but you won't die as fast?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, September 18, 2017 8:31 PM

They start marketing platinum track to those who can afford it, burglars all over the country will be casing model railroads -- and ripping up the track whether or not it's platinum.

Good grief, Charlie BrownSigh

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Monday, September 18, 2017 8:33 PM

Huh.   Thanks for clarifying that one for me NittanyLion.

I suppose driving on the highways and breathing that air everyday is a little worse than all the fuss about secondhand smoke.  Things that make you go hmmm.

I think I better re-rail this thread back to subject before we all get in trouble.

I think more importantly than changing the alloy that track rails are made of.  The greatest thing the model railroad track manufacturers could do is give us 8 foot length rails we could thread the 30 to 36 inch plastic ties so we have less joints on our curves.

That would be a good thing.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Monday, September 18, 2017 8:52 PM

Track fiddler

The greatest thing the model railroad track manufacturers could do is give us 8 foot length rails we could thread the 30 to 36 inch plastic ties so we have less joints on our curves.

That would be a good thing.

 

 
Well, this raises a couple of new questions.  With potential answers that again would cost those willing to spend extra bucks.
 
First, are there any American rail suppliers that produce the stuff themselves or at least have it made here in the U.S.?  If so, I wonder if they're ever approached for special orders of rail in special longer lengths, say 5 or 6 feet?   8 feet might be a bit much, unless you agreed to pick it up at the factory.  Granted that it would also cost for special packaging and shipping, but we're mostly dreaming here are we not?  Of couse that would be an option for those that lay their own track as the makers might not be nearly so inclined to retool to add the ties.
 
Why not dream?
  • Member since
    April 2012
  • From: Huron, SD
  • 1,016 posts
Posted by Bayfield Transfer Railway on Monday, September 18, 2017 8:56 PM

MicroEngineering will sell you 6' lengths of rail.

 

 

Disclaimer:  This post may contain humor, sarcasm, and/or flatulence.

Michael Mornard

Bringing the North Woods to South Dakota!

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Monday, September 18, 2017 9:37 PM

And there you go!

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 2:22 AM

I soldered code 83 rail into 12' and 15' lengths for using it with Central Valley tie strips.  To accommodated the rail joiners, I used a cut-off disc in a motor tool to alter the base at each end of each 3' section of rail, making the base both thinner and narrower, then used code 55 rail joiners.  Obviously, the rail joints are still there, but they're not all that obvious, even when you're looking for them.  The rail was affixed to the tie strips using contact cement.

Wayne

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 5:11 AM

Have to say, I enjoy the clickety clack of steel wheels going over rail joints.  Of course my layout is set in the '50s, when welded rail was minimal.

Good information to be had on this thread ! 

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 7:00 AM

Bayfield Transfer Railway

MicroEngineering will sell you 6' lengths of rail.

 

 

 

M E sure likes  thier 6's.  I laid my cork for 5 and 7 turnouts.  Although I have heard of people mixing Atlas with M E.   I'm not sure how that will look.

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 7:18 AM

mlehman

They start marketing platinum track to those who can afford it, burglars all over the country will be casing model railroads -- and ripping up the track whether or not it's platinum.

Good grief, Charlie BrownSigh

 

They start making Platinum track I'm going to go get a job there.

I'll be like Johnny Cash with my big lunch box.

And I'll build it one piece at a time and it won't cost me a dime you'll  know it's me when my train comes through the town.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 7:30 AM

Good news is, unless you're trying to get a full size loco from GE, you won't even need a buddy with a mobile home.

                              --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 7:55 AM

rrinker

Good news is, unless you're trying to get a full size loco from GE, you won't even need a buddy with a mobile home.

                              --Randy

 

 

Lol.      Right.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:04 AM

How would any of the materials mentioned in this thread be better than nickel silver?

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:45 AM

People have declared that nickel silver rail corrodes.

Platinum does not corrode.

 

Ed

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:02 AM

7j43k

People have declared that nickel silver rail corrodes.

Platinum does not corrode.

Ed

Ed,

As mentioned before - and in just about any application - it depends primarily on how well you take care of it.  (FYI: Even stainless steel can corrode under the right circumstances and conditions.)  Polish/burnish and minimize the amount of abrasion to the surface of NS rail and it should serve you well for years.  Exotic metals is a waste of money...

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:26 AM

 I have brass track that is older than me, often stored in an uncontrolled space. It's badly tarnished, but not corroded. A good cleaning and it would probably be usable (some of it is actually fiber tie flex, amazing it isn;t curled up, but still probably out of gauge).

 The oldest nickel silver track I have is probably 20 years old. Also not corroded.

It's not so much a corrosion issue (unless you are building an outdoor layout at a beachfront house by the ocean) as it is an oxidation issues. Most metals react with oxygen. The oxides formed by many are non-conductive - the only way to stop this is to seal up your layout room and fill it with pure nitrogen, but that may make operations difficult. Other metal oxides remain conductive, if at a lower level than the base metal. Such is the case with nickel silver.

                                     --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:38 AM

Randy,

Corrosion is the result of an oxidation process, in which metals react with oxygen, ending in the turning of metals into various oxides, which we commonly call rust.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:13 AM

I have several sections of unused Nickel Silver flex track that I bought in the early 70s that doesn’t have any corrosion or oxidation, at least by eye I can’t see any.  A lot of my track has gone through three moves and three layouts, three totally different climate changes from the west Texas desert to the northern mountains ending up in central California.  No corrosion on my NS track.
 
If there is or has been oxidation on my track my CMX and scrubber cars must have taken care of the problem.  I’ve never had any problems with my NS track since the 70s when I dumped my brass track because the NS track looked better. 
 
In the very early 50s I used steel rails (or whatever it was) and living in the desert with no humidity I didn’t have a problem with it either.  I’ve been modeling HO for 66 years and the only problem I’ve had my track is dirty rails, an occasional bit of cleaning has always taken care of that.
 
 
EDIT:
 
When I was piddling with G gauge in my garden railroad I did have a problem with the G gauge brass rails.  When ants got crushed on the rails if left on the rails their remains would eat the brass.  I had to run a heavy scrubber car in every train.  I tried some Green stuff to prevent the ants from using the rails as freeways but watering would do that in.  I ran a Centerline car with the roller soaked with the Green stuff and that helped but ants were still a big problem for the brass rails.  
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:56 AM

Order rail in 1/4 mile long strips or make it that long like prototype railroads do.

In my area, the Pan Am railway has had 1/4 mile, 136 lb, ribbon rail put down for a new Amtrak routing.

They used new ties with Pandrol clips and the upgrade was quite fast. no more spikes.

New turnouts were assembled nearby before the rail was put down.

Quite something to see a long string of flatcars with layers of 1/4 mile ribbon rail.

A lot less clacking. I ride a bicycle on the road near the mainline and sometimes carry bike accros the rails until the new tunnel is finished in Octtober. Rail trail on both sides of the main.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:25 PM

mobilman44
Have to say, I enjoy the clickety clack of steel wheels going over rail joints.  Of course my layout is set in the '50s, when welded rail was minimal....

You could use a razor saw to make shallow cuts in the railhead every 39'.  This would give a real prototypical clickety-clack. Smile, Wink & Grin

Track fiddler
...They start making Platinum track I'm going to go get a job there....

A big lunchbox is one thing, but one that's three feet long might raise a few eyebrows - unless, I suppose, you take subs for lunch everyday.

I remember my Dad talking about a guy with whom he worked, supposedly rather "light fingered".  Somebody had bet him that he couldn't swipe an especially large bench vise.
Apparently, he came to work one day wearing a long overcoat (luckily, it was in the winter).  When he left work that afternoon, the vise was between his legs, suspended on a very sturdy rope that he had wrapped around his neck and shoulders.   As soon as the guy was out of sight of the guard, the vise was ditched.

There were incidents at the steel plant where I worked where contractors would leave the plant with either company or other contractors' equipment.  This included office trailers, and heavy equipment, like front-end loaders and backhoes.  Why bother building it from pieces when you can get it r-t-r? Stick out tongue

RR_Mel
....When I was piddling with G gauge in my garden railroad I did have a problem with the G gauge brass rails.  When ants got crushed on the rails if left on the rails their remains would eat the brass.  I had to run a heavy scrubber car in every train.  I tried some Green stuff to prevent the ants from using the rails as freeways but watering would do that in.  I ran a Centerline car with the roller soaked with the Green stuff and that helped but ants were still a big problem for the brass rails.

The problem was caused by the formic acid in the ants' bodies.

Wayne

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Staten Island NY
  • 1,734 posts
Posted by joe323 on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:39 PM

Platinum eh why not titanium if its good enough to hold my spine together its good enough for rail.

Joe Staten Island West 

  • Member since
    May 2014
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by trolleyboy on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 1:00 PM

hi all here is my 2 cents ( not that it's worth much as I like selector am the farthest from an electrical engineer or metalurgist as well )

 

How about we do away with the whole issue by not using the rails to conduct energy. This way you could us any metal to create the rails as the dirt would become less an issue.

 

What i am saying and I'm sure this will happen eventually.With micro circuts and battery tech getting smaller and better. I can for see even n scale radio control engines controlled by wifi for command control and direction speed etc. With a small abttery pack powering the locomotives themselves. Certainly this will be expensive when it first arrives on the seen but with time and sales the cost per unit would go down. I know that garden rail folks are already douing this,so in time we indoor types may reap their rewards.

 

TB

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 3:10 PM

 Still need some sort of 'area' detection for signalling. The prototype uses the track. Our models have always used the track. So even if the propulsion power doesn't coem through the rails, some power needs to flow there for block detection. Few if any of the schemes that use IR sensors can duplicate the 'car somewhere in a block' detection you get with track current sense methods of detection. 

                                 --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 3:30 PM

rrinker
Few if any of the schemes that use IR sensors can duplicate the 'car somewhere in a block' detection you get with track current sense methods of detection. 

None do unless you use the bounce detectors (ones that point up at the bottom of the car) every (insert shortest car length) across the whole railroad.  

rrinker
So even if the propulsion power doesn't come through the rails, some power needs to flow there for block detection.

 

This makes battery power redunant in my mind, because all the problems it solves, are still problems (=>solves nothing).  Kind of like keep alives.  I have always said that they are neat, but just a band aid solution to the actual problem (be it broken pick ups, insuficient feeders, dirty track or dirty wheels).  

Taking the control circuit off the track is a logical step blutooth, or radio now can fit in a locomotive.  

 

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 3:34 PM

rrinker

Most metals react with oxygen.

 

Platinum does not react with oxygen.  Or much of anything else.

 

The oxides formed by many are non-conductive - the only way to stop this is to seal up your layout room and fill it with pure nitrogen, but that may make operations difficult. Other metal oxides remain conductive, if at a lower level than the base metal. Such is the case with nickel silver.

                                     --Randy

 

Randy,

I should very much like to hear about "metal oxides [that] remain conductive".

Apparently rhenium oxide is as conductive as metallic silver.  Who knew?  What others have you found?

But here, we're talking about oxides of copper, nickel, and zinc.  When I do an online search for oxides of these metals, I find nothing about them being conductors.  Nickel oxide, for example, is plainly stated to be non-conductive.  Copper and zinc oxides can apparently be semi-conductors at times, but I still found nothing hinting there were conductors.  

 

Ed

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 5:09 PM

doctorwayne

Track fiddler

...They start making Platinum track I'm going to go get a job there....

Wayne

 
Are we getting somewhat analytical dissecting my humor Wayne?   Ha ha!
 
You did over look in your analogy I would need an 8ft lunch box as I am after long rail.
 
Sure hope I'm hungry.
 
But on a more serious note I'm the type of guy if a cashier overpays me in my change and I realize it after I left the store.  I have gone back in the store to give her the money back.
  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 51 posts
Posted by SETH CRAWFORD on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 5:48 PM

A better question is why the heck are people still making steel (not stainless, regular steel) tracks, the very thing nickel silver was to replace as a much less expensive alternative to brass. Unlike nickel silver, steel rusts and can rust very fast if not maintained properly. 

 

Just clean the track more often, look up more efficient or long lasting ways of doing so, it'll save you a lot of trouble. 

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 6:24 PM

SETH CRAWFORD

Unlike nickel silver, steel rusts and can rust very fast if not maintained properly. 

The easiest way to confirm the regular use of prototype rail is the presence of unrusted steel on the crown.  Conversely, though, if one wanted to model rarely used and therefore rusted trackage, is there some sort of STAIN for nickel silver rail that does not impede the transfer of current to wheels and other contacts?  Seems as though there are some metals that can be discolored other than with a coat of paint.  I wonder if nickel silver is one of them.

John

 

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,173 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Tuesday, September 19, 2017 6:58 PM

I'd like to make a point.   

Nickel silver was the last Improvement done in the 70's as Kevin stated,  OP of this thread.  

It was a great Improvement. It oxidizes or corrodes (whatever you want to call it) very slow.  As Ulrich basically said rust is rust.  My classic car agrees with that one as well as I do.  

What I'm getting at I think nickel silver rail is just fine it's not like it's rotting out disintegrating into the plywood on our layouts.

The issue a lot of modelers on this forum have stated is the corrosion, oxidation whatever you want to call it causes lack of continuity in the track connectors joining the rails.

I guess this can make sense especially after you ballast and the water and glue seeps into the track joiners and Festers overtime.

So my point is.  Would stainless steel rail and stainless steel track joiners be a better solution.

Bear with me here.  It's a no-brainer and everyone knows two pieces of Steel close together where the moisture can not dissipate rusts faster than anywhere else.

That's why the seams that come together around the wheel wells on our cars always rusted out first.

Stainless does not rust. Stainless is more expensive but not extremely more expensive than steel. Especially in the size of our little tinsel tail rails I don't think it would be that expensive.

One more plus I would like to point out about stainless steel.  No matter what type of alloy you use for model railroad rail, black gunk will always beckon us.

Nothing likes to stick to stainless steel.  We had a stainless a steel counter in our fish cleaning house at my parents Resort.  Windows were on all four sides and the sun baked through them.

Some of our guests were pigs and they left their fish guts and slop all over the counters.  I would have to go and clean it up the next day after the sun-baked it on.

Guess what,  the stuff came off easily I never had a problem with that.  Maybe black gunk would too.

Edit    I have a lot of stock in stainless steel.           

Disclaimer:   Just kidding

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!