Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What am I?

31641 views
746 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 5, 2004 7:32 PM
The 4-6-4 Baltic?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 5, 2004 8:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89

The 4-6-4 Baltic?

Nope

DOGGY
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 5, 2004 8:34 PM
Doggy, now your getting ahead of yourself! The Baltic was class F-7 as I just found out, the S2 was a 4-8-4 Northern.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, April 5, 2004 11:44 PM
I have the longest ridged wheel base in the US.

I'm one of the most famous steamers on my road.

I roamed the open spaces in the West.

My boiler jacket is relatively clear of piping.


What am I?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 12:12 AM
A UP 4-12-2 ? Joe G.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 12:18 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by joseph2

A UP 4-12-2 ? Joe G.


I knew that was way too easy.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 12:24 AM
I didn't win this round, but I am a popular wheel arrangement--for a time, I was known by a different name
than what I am most commonly known as--what's my arrangement, and what was my alternative name?
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:39 AM
There aren't many wheel arrangements with TWO names, usually one, or for 4-8-4, more than you could imagine.

4-6-4, Baltic or Hudson is my first guess!

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:41 AM
Hint--WWII.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:42 AM
Thank you General MacArthur!

2-8-2
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C

Thank you General MacArthur!

2-8-2
Bingo!! Nice job my friend!!! Tag you're it!!!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:55 AM
There were only two Railroads with this wheel arrangement for fast passenger trains, and they gave the class different names. The first road rebuilt theirs very quickly to much more common arrangement. The second user built them, two classes, after most people thought there would not be anything like it built, but kept them until the end of steam.

A correct answer would be either name or the wheel arrangement.

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 6:08 AM
A 4-4-4 Jubilee ? Joe G.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 5:17 PM
Atlantic 4-4-2?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 6:25 PM
Sorry about the delay! We have night and sleeping at different times.

Joseph2 is correct.

CP called it the Jubilee

Reading called it the... wait for it... "Reading type"

Reading rebuilt theirs as Atlantics because the trailing truck caused problems, but they had to fit a smaller (Wootten) firebox.

So AggroJones was very close and should get half a point!

Over to somebody else please!

Peter
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 6:40 PM
I do not have air pumps mounted on my face.
My giant articulated body is tremendously powerful.
I spent alot of time movin coal in lush, green surroundings.
The first one of our group of 30 was built in 1944.
I burn coal from my HUGE, unique shaped tender.

What am I?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 7:24 PM
I'll have to say a Pennsy 4-4-6-4 Q2, as that is (I think anyway,) a compound and had almost 8,000 horsepower.[:O][^]
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 9:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89

I'll have to say a Pennsy 4-4-6-4 Q2, as that is (I think anyway,) a compound and had almost 8,000 horsepower.[:O][^]


Nope. And the Q2 wasn't articulated. [;)]

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 5:47 AM
Another clue : there is a lot of locomotive information at www.steamlocomotive.com Congrats on 1,000 + postings . Joe G.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 6:30 AM
Baltimore and Ohio EM-1 2-8-8-4

(What's odd about the tender?)

Peter
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 3:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C

Baltimore and Ohio EM-1 2-8-8-4

(What's odd about the tender?)

Peter


Bingo.


The conture of the tender roof, I haven't seen many like that.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 6:14 PM
CB&Q had some Mikados with tenders like that.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 9:22 PM
ok my turn
I am a famous locomotive
my kind was used by the NP but my Railroad only bought 13 of me
i still exsist today
what am i
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 10:18 PM
hint
it wasnt built in the 1940's
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Thursday, April 8, 2004 12:11 AM
ATSF 3751?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 8, 2004 6:35 PM
darn to easy

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 8, 2004 6:44 PM
I was one of the few fully streamlined steamers.

My wheel arrangement is considered the best looking to the eye by many.

I kept my sheathing for only 6 years, and I am named after one of the Greek mythological characters.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, April 8, 2004 10:47 PM
cjm89

CB&Q 4-6-4 No 4000 "AEOLUS" (Keeper of the Winds)

I've posted some data on this on the Classic Trains Website some time ago.

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 9, 2004 10:43 AM
Arrrggg... too easy again!

you win M636C.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Friday, April 9, 2004 11:26 PM
I have a different number of front drivers than my rear drivers.

I'm pretty freaky looking, put I preformed well.

My small articulated body could take some sharp curves.

I look like a 1:1 scale kitbash.

My group was built by Baldwin 1910-1911.

What am I?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!