QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa Fe A veranda Gas Turbine?
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by uspscsx I am not produced in HO scale any more. I was used by CSX and Maine Central. Lionel HO was the only manufacturer to produce me. I am an old GE. You could say I'm the runt of my family. What am I? Will be interesting to see some of the guesses[swg] uspscsx General Electric U-18B, produced for both the Maine Central and the Atlantic Coast Line (later part of CSX). Iain Rice did an article in MR on a an Athearn kitbash within the last few years (just prior to the series on the Roque Bluff layout) if I remember correctly. Andre
QUOTE: Originally posted by uspscsx I am not produced in HO scale any more. I was used by CSX and Maine Central. Lionel HO was the only manufacturer to produce me. I am an old GE. You could say I'm the runt of my family. What am I? Will be interesting to see some of the guesses[swg] uspscsx
_________________________________________________________________
QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa Fe I guess that means it's andrechapolin's turn. When did Lionel make their U18B? (1 more post...1 more post... 1 more post...)
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa Fe I guess that means it's andrechapolin's turn. When did Lionel make their U18B? (1 more post...1 more post... 1 more post...) I think it first came out in 1975. Here's an easy one for you. I was probably the most popular brass locomotive ever built. I was built by United and imported by PFM starting in the late 50's. What's my wheel arrangement, class and which railroad did I represent. Andre
"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"
EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION
http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588
Colorado Front Range Railroad: http://www.coloradofrontrangerr.com/
Renegade1c wrote:what am I?I am articulated.came be either coal or oil burningEarly versions had weight distribution problems.mostly found in South African and Australiado not need to be turned. (can run backwards just as easily as forwards
I guess some kind of garret.
andrechapelon wrote:QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa FeI guess that means it's andrechapolin's turn. When did Lionel make their U18B?(1 more post...1 more post... 1 more post...)I think it first came out in 1975.Here's an easy one for you. I was probably the most popular brass locomotive ever built. I was built by United and imported by PFM starting in the late 50's.What's my wheel arrangement, class and which railroad did I represent.Andre
QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa FeI guess that means it's andrechapolin's turn. When did Lionel make their U18B?(1 more post...1 more post... 1 more post...)
Andre--
Well, it's only taken me two years to read your post, but it's the Santa Fe 1850 2-8-0 Consol. Cute little devil, too. Have one of the originals, and it's still wobbling around giving me a lot of fun.
Tom
Tom View my layout photos! http://s299.photobucket.com/albums/mm310/TWhite-014/Rio%20Grande%20Yuba%20River%20Sub One can NEVER have too many Articulateds!
twhite wrote: andrechapelon wrote:QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa FeI guess that means it's andrechapolin's turn. When did Lionel make their U18B?(1 more post...1 more post... 1 more post...)I think it first came out in 1975.Here's an easy one for you. I was probably the most popular brass locomotive ever built. I was built by United and imported by PFM starting in the late 50's.What's my wheel arrangement, class and which railroad did I represent.AndreAndre--Well, it's only taken me two years to read your post, but it's the Santa Fe 1850 2-8-0 Consol. Cute little devil, too. Have one of the originals, and it's still wobbling around giving me a lot of fun. Tom
I'm having a freind put DCC and sound in mine, I think it's an excellent little engine! someone really loved it before me though, the wheels and frame show signs of ALOT of happy miles! (REAL miles, not Scale!!)
I am the lightest of my type built for an American railroad.
Only me and my 5 sisters exist of our kind.
We were all coal burners.
What am I?
Possibly a Russian Decapod?
Brad
EMD - Every Model Different
ALCO - Always Leaking Coolant and Oil
CSX - Coal Spilling eXperts
twcenterprises wrote: Possibly a Russian Decapod?Brad
Nope. I'm sure there were more than 6 Russian Decs built.
Many Russians were built, but you said "exist" leading me to think more were built, but only 6 were left. Perhaps you should have said "built" instead of "exist". Of course, all 6 may still exist.
So, allow me to ponder on it some more....
twcenterprises wrote: Many Russians were built, but you said "exist" leading me to think more were built, but only 6 were left. Perhaps you should have said "built" instead of "exist". Of course, all 6 may still exist.So, allow me to ponder on it some more....Brad
Perhaps I should say 'ever existed'.
Another clue-- I belonged to a short line in the midwest.
Texas Zepher wrote:Great Western 0-6-0T side tanks?
Texas Zepher wrote:Ok then, the 6 War Baby Challengers of the D&RGW. Umm L-97 class. Finally used on the Clinchfield, does that qualify that a midwestern shortline? Probably not huh?
nope. and nope. here are all the clues.
Only me and my 5 sisters ever existed of our kind.
We belong to a shortline in the midwest.
Lightest of our wheel arrangement, but still a large chunk of steamer.
Our drivers measure only 69"
http://mprailway.blogspot.com
"The first transition era - wood to steel!"
MidlandPacific wrote:P&WV 2-6-6-4?
not an articulated
Alex
Railfan Alex wrote:The Toledo, Peoria & Western's six 4-8-4 Class H-10 Northerns?
Yes!
AggroJones wrote: Railfan Alex wrote:The Toledo, Peoria & Western's six 4-8-4 Class H-10 Northerns?Yes!
What am I?On my maiden run before being put in regular survice I impressed the railroads officials by producing a drawbar horsepower of more than twice the 4-6-4 class, and more than even the 4-8-4 locomotives I was replacing. Later, on the same run because the engineer wasn't familiar with how I loaded down, I stalled on the routes only 3.5% grade with 1182 tons of train behind me. Everyone thought they were going to have to call for a helper unit, but I impressed them again by digging in (producing 108,000 lbs of drawbar pull) and getting the train moving to 16mph by the top of the hill.
Texas Zepher wrote: AggroJones wrote: Railfan Alex wrote:The Toledo, Peoria & Western's six 4-8-4 Class H-10 Northerns?Yes!Since Railfan Alex hasn't gone, and the other similar thread seems to be degenerating into who' idea got stollen..... I'm posting the same locomotive question here. What am I?On my maiden run before being put in regular survice I impressed the railroads officials by producing a drawbar horsepower of more than twice the 4-6-4 class, and more than even the 4-8-4 locomotives I was replacing. Later, on the same run because the engineer wasn't familiar with how I loaded down, I stalled on the routes only 3.5% grade with 1182 tons of train behind me. Everyone thought they were going to have to call for a helper unit, but I impressed them again by digging in (producing 108,000 lbs of drawbar pull) and getting the train moving to 16mph by the top of the hill.
One of Canadian Pacific's T series 2-10-4s?
AggroJones wrote: Texas Zepher wrote: AggroJones wrote: Railfan Alex wrote:The Toledo, Peoria & Western's six 4-8-4 Class H-10 Northerns?Yes!Since Railfan Alex hasn't gone, and the other similar thread seems to be degenerating into who' idea got stollen..... I'm posting the same locomotive question here. What am I?On my maiden run before being put in regular survice I impressed the railroads officials by producing a drawbar horsepower of more than twice the 4-6-4 class, and more than even the 4-8-4 locomotives I was replacing. Later, on the same run because the engineer wasn't familiar with how I loaded down, I stalled on the routes only 3.5% grade with 1182 tons of train behind me. Everyone thought they were going to have to call for a helper unit, but I impressed them again by digging in (producing 108,000 lbs of drawbar pull) and getting the train moving to 16mph by the top of the hill. One of Canadian Pacific's T series 2-10-4s?
Can't be. The T-1's were only good for about 75,000 lbs of TE.
Sounds to me more like Santa Fe's 2-10-4 #5000 (aka "Madame Queen"). Although only rated at 93,000 lbs of TE, that rating was nominal.
Andre
AggroJones wrote: Texas Zepher wrote:On my maiden run before being put in regular survice I impressed the railroads officials by producing a drawbar horsepower of more than twice the 4-6-4 class, and more than even the 4-8-4 locomotives I was replacing.One of Canadian Pacific's T series 2-10-4s?
Texas Zepher wrote:On my maiden run before being put in regular survice I impressed the railroads officials by producing a drawbar horsepower of more than twice the 4-6-4 class, and more than even the 4-8-4 locomotives I was replacing.