Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What am I?

31643 views
746 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 28, 2004 11:13 PM
If you're only looking for wheel arrangement, then 4-6-0. I can go look up a D&RG (pre-W) 4-6-0 if that's what you are looking for.
-Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 28, 2004 11:48 PM
yep, your turn
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:01 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Fergmiester

Was it one of those NP 2-6-8-2 or something or others?

You mean a GN 2-6-8-0 M1 or M2 class. They have normal tenders.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 10:50 PM
Just because we need a little bit of it....

I am quite possibly the greatest locomotive failure in the history of railroading.
I even beat out the Union Pacifics in my category.
I was stored for 25 years before scrapping.

What am I?

Class and wheel arrangement, please.

-Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 11:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29
I am quite possibly the greatest locomotive failure in the history of railroading.
I even beat out the Union Pacifics in my category.
I was stored for 25 years before scrapping.


AT&SF 3000 class 2-10-10-2?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 11:53 PM
2-10-10-2![:O] wow that is a HUGE engine, i can see why it was a failure
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Thursday, December 2, 2004 5:43 PM
Virginian XA 2-8-8-8-4?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 2, 2004 11:34 PM
Sorry, you haven't guessed it.

Pay attention to what you thought was a typo--it's not.

If nobody gets it by tommorrow evening, I'll give another clue.

-Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 3, 2004 8:35 PM
Clue:
Somebody must have had a grudge against articulation [:)].
I'm not from the US or Canada.

-Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Northern Indiana
  • 1,000 posts
Posted by PennsyHoosier on Friday, December 3, 2004 10:14 PM
It should have been the Pennsy T1
Lawrence, The Pennsy Hoosier
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Saturday, December 4, 2004 4:07 PM
The Soviets built a massive loco,I believe it was a 2-14-2 which was a failure.Pennsy Hoosier,I wonder what the PRR should have bought in place of the T1 and Q2 types ? Maybe tried and proven steam designs or should they have started to Dieselize? Joe G.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Saturday, December 4, 2004 4:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by joseph2

The Soviets built a massive loco,I believe it was a 2-14-2 which was a failure.Pennsy Hoosier,I wonder what the PRR should have bought in place of the T1 and Q2 types ? Maybe tried and proven steam designs or should they have started to Dieselize? Joe G.


Actually, it was a 4-14-4 http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Stephen_Karlson/soviet.html.

http://home.att.net/~Berliner-Ultrasonics/bw-apoc4.html#russki14

It's probably the locomotive he was thinking about. It certainly qualifies by the stated criteria.

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, December 6, 2004 12:09 AM
I know of every steam locomotive ever built on every railroad on earth. And then some.

Who am I?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Monday, December 6, 2004 12:54 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

I know of every steam locomotive ever built on every railroad on earth. And then some.

Who am I?


You're AggroJones.

The one who is the subject of your question is andrechapelon.

BTW, I'm the one who trained Ken Jennings for Jeopardy.[(-D][(-D][(-D].

It ain't just locomotives. [:-^]

Cheers.

I've been a railfan as long as I can remember and I can remember (although just barely) when Harry Truman was President. 50+ years gives you a long time to accumulate information.

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 6, 2004 11:12 PM
Dear Andre Chapelon,
Russian 4-14-4 is right, class, though, please [:)].

-Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 12:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29

Dear Andre Chapelon,
Russian 4-14-4 is right, class, though, please [:)].

-Daniel Parks


AA20.


Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 10:11 PM
Your turn [:)]!
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Sunday, May 8, 2005 6:31 PM
Well Chapoleon, you're up again!

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 5:36 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

Well Chapoleon, you're up again!


OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I?

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 6:35 PM
This is a long shot but UP 4-12-2?
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:51 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by npr765

This is a long shot but UP 4-12-2?


Nope. Not even close. I was a much smaller engine used in passenger service.

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Thursday, May 12, 2005 7:21 PM
Probably some weird, obscure locomotive belonging to some unfamous road.

At least tell me this: eastern or western?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:10 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

Probably some weird, obscure locomotive belonging to some unfamous road.

At least tell me this: eastern or western?


Midwestern.

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Friday, May 13, 2005 5:16 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon

QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

Well Chapoleon, you're up again!


OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I?

Andre


Wabash Class P-1 4-6-4, one rebuilt from 3 cylinder 2-8-2 class K-5 but my source says 1943, but two more were rebuilt from 2 cylinder 2-8-2s.

A similar rebuild was Illinois Central 4-6-4 No 1 but it was rebuilt in 1937 from a 2-8-4

Edward Thomson's rebuild of a Gresley K3 2-6-0 into a K5 actually qualifies too!

But I'm sure I'll recognise the real answer!

This posting got delayed hours by a couple of magazine articles and deadlines!

Peter
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Friday, May 13, 2005 7:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C

QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon

QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

Well Chapoleon, you're up again!


OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I?

Andre


Wabash Class P-1 4-6-4, one rebuilt from 3 cylinder 2-8-2 class K-5 but my source says 1943, but two more were rebuilt from 2 cylinder 2-8-2s.

A similar rebuild was Illinois Central 4-6-4 No 1 but it was rebuilt in 1937 from a 2-8-4

Edward Thomson's rebuild of a Gresley K3 2-6-0 into a K5 actually qualifies too!

But I'm sure I'll recognise the real answer!

This posting got delayed hours by a couple of magazine articles and deadlines!

Peter


Nope. This was a one off engine. However, the engine in question probably showed up at St. Louis Union Station next to a Wabash loco.

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Friday, May 13, 2005 8:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon

QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C

QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon

QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

Well Chapoleon, you're up again!


OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I?

Andre


Mopac 4-6-2 6001 rebuilt with Franklin poppet valves from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000

At least I was geographically close

It was mentioned in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it!

Peter

Wabash Class P-1 4-6-4, one rebuilt from 3 cylinder 2-8-2 class K-5 but my source says 1943, but two more were rebuilt from 2 cylinder 2-8-2s.

A similar rebuild was Illinois Central 4-6-4 No 1 but it was rebuilt in 1937 from a 2-8-4

Edward Thomson's rebuild of a Gresley K3 2-6-0 into a K5 actually qualifies too!

But I'm sure I'll recognise the real answer!

This posting got delayed hours by a couple of magazine articles and deadlines!

Peter


Nope. This was a one off engine. However, the engine in question probably showed up at St. Louis Union Station next to a Wabash loco.

Andre


Mopac 4-6-2 6001, fitted with Franklin valves, rebuilt from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000

This was in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it!

(I posted this, but my answer was deleted - never happened before)

Peter
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:12 AM
QUOTE:


Mopac 4-6-2 6001, fitted with Franklin valves, rebuilt from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000

This was in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it!

(I posted this, but my answer was deleted - never happened before)

Peter


Yup, that's it.

Your turn.

Andre
It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Saturday, May 14, 2005 6:58 AM
OK,
An easy one! Yet another 3 cylinder Alco of 1925, these five units were a rare application of three cylinders and this wheel arrangement for passenger service. Built for an Eastern road, by 1931 they had already been converted to two cylinder operation.

Peter
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Morgantown, WV
  • 1,459 posts
Posted by cheese3 on Saturday, May 14, 2005 7:24 AM
SP 4-10-2

Adam Thompson Model Railroading is fun!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 14, 2005 9:40 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon

QUOTE:


Mopac 4-6-2 6001, fitted with Franklin valves, rebuilt from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000

This was in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it!

(I posted this, but my answer was deleted - never happened before)

Peter


Yup, that's it.

Your turn.

Andre
Andre stop look ing for the guy who did that ,he's propley dead.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!