Trains.com

Classic Railroad Quiz (at least 50 years old).

741839 views
7952 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, July 5, 2013 7:23 AM

You are correct that it is in the west.  The center pair of tracks were 1200 volt, the other two pair 600 volt before the first service reduction, when one of the side pair moved onto the center pair (with reduced voltage) and contined the former 1200 volt line's service for almost another two decades.   The other side pair had service dscontinued several years later.  There was a lag of around a decade between the end of in-street trackage and the building of the current rail transit station.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:51 AM

Portland and Denver had narrow gauge streetcar systems and standard gauge interurbans.   Denver also had narrow gauge interurbans.  All Portland's interurbans were standard gauge.   I think Oregon Electric south to Eugene used higher than normal voltage.  So there would have been good reason for six tracks leading to the Portland RR Sta.  It is possible that the SP subsidiary in Portland did not use the street but rather shared SP right-of-way, but that still leaves two other interurban operations, and six tracks in the street seems a possibility.  Possibly OER modified their equipment to run on 600 volts as well, and in any case abandoned before the other interurbans, reducing the requirement to one pair of standard and one pair of narrow gauge tracks, then the local system was abandoned before the last interurban, leaving only one pair.

But Denver remains a possibilitiy, with its local Denver Traamways 3-1/2ft gauge system, the same gauge interurbans to Leyden and Golden, and the standard gauge interurban to Golden, but there is no physical reason why the narrow-gauge interurbans could not have always used the local streetcar tracks, so Portland, OR .seems a better bet.

AND HAPPY 4TH!!!     OBSERVE IT IN MY OWN SPECIAL WAY

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:24 AM

Except for the final two blocks, the street in front of the Portland, OR, station runs at an angle to the downtown Portland grid.  Possbily the local street railway system and the interurban to Oregon City and Gresham had separate tracks at 600V and the SP subsidiary suburban operation and/or Oregon Electric running south to Eugene had 1200 volts or 1500 volts?  This is a truly tough one.   I looked at Cincinnati Union Station, Cleveland Public Terminal, Ogden.    Wait, I did not check Denver. 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, July 3, 2013 9:50 AM

This major transit street  which still runs at an odd angle to other streets in the area had at one time as many as six electrified tracks in it on two different voltages.  After changes in service it later had four, then two, then none.  At one end of the street there is still a rail station.  City, Systems and Street name.  Bonus for connecting services.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, July 3, 2013 6:54 AM

All have now been tallied.   Yes, the NYW&B did handle freight in the Bronx, because its freight interchange was at the south end, not in New Rochelle or Portchester, and its single juice jack picked up and delivered at the NYNH&H Oak Point Yard.  Again, the South Brooklyn does not count because it operated over the tracks of three of the four Coney Island Lines, all exept the Brighton Line, in my experience.  What very limited tracks were exclusively South Brooklyn, were not used by post-electrification passenger service, and the SB was formed after electrification.  There may still be some tracks that are exclusively SB between 9th Avenue station and the Brooklyn Waterfront, including some tracks in the 39th St. yard, although I suspect these are not considered SB tracks and are used by MofW trains.   But yes, the Broadway elevated and the first part of its extension to Jamacia were opened with steam,  The stretch between Crescent and ENY is the oldest existing structure used in rail transportation in New York City.  That on Broadway, w of ENY to the Bridge was rebuilt duing the Dual-Contracts era.   Although Brighton, Culver (Prospect Park and Coney Island Railway), West End (West End & Bath Beach), and Sea Beach also have rebuilt structure of one type of another, there are traces of the original still in use.  In the case of the Brighton, this is mostly in the Prospect Park - Parkside area, for Culver, the lead into Coney Island Yard, and for Sea Beach and West End, the tracks just north of the Stillwell Avenue-Coney Island station.  Similarly, the on-level portion of the Canarsie Line is original, and it is also a former steam railroad line.

OK rc, let's see your question!

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Tuesday, July 2, 2013 10:11 PM
I may need to correct myself. I should have said the Jamaica line. Also opened in June 1888.
Thx IGN
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Tuesday, July 2, 2013 9:59 PM
The others I will tack on: The Broadway Elevated. Opened with steam 1880?
The stub of the Myrtle Av El.
Also the Dyre Av ex New York Westchester & Boston. Not sure if the freight was run into the Bronx or not so may not count.
What I thought of interest was all the Coney Island lines were opened as seasonal excursion routes.

Thx IGN
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:46 PM

With no claim to completeness here are eight:

South Brooklyn Ry (electrics in interchange - read the question!)

BMT Canarsie

BMT Sea Beach

BMT Culver

BMT West End (Brookly Bath and Coney Island)

BMT Brighton

IND Rockaway (the recently reopened ex-LIRR line)

SIRT

 Thanks to Nariq01 for the pointer.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:24 PM

rc, of course you are correct.   But you were not supposed to give an answer until you came up with 5!!!

So now you are OBLIGED to do the research and come up with four more, which should be eashy given the thread so far.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Tuesday, July 2, 2013 12:19 AM
I really don't want to take the baton right now as my laptop is giving me problems.

If someone to research this look at this :
http://www.nycsubway.org/wiki/Main_Page

My apologies for not linking this as I am using a tablet and can not do a lot of things on the mobile site.
It is quite a story these lines.

Thx IGN
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, July 1, 2013 8:39 AM

The South Brooklyn was not a steam railroad.   It was set up as  the freight railroad of Brooklyn United, then Brooklyiln Rapid Transit, and then after the Malbone St. tradgedy caused reorganization, the Brooklyn Manhattan Transit, and finally the New York City Transit Authority.  In fact, i do not believe the SB  ever owned a steam locomotive.  By the time it was set up, all lines were lectrified, and the only steam remaining was through service to a particular common destination by LIRR summer only trains using the same tracks as some of SB freight service.   It certainly did haul freight, and hauled it over three of the lines that were once steam railroads.  But there were four, and there is no record I know of of the SB hauling frieght on the one of the four that alway had and sstill has the heaviest passenger service of the four. I never saw a freight siding on that line.   (But it probably did haul freigiht in its steam days, inclding consructiion material for hotels.)  I never sas a freight siding on one of the lines the SB run over, but it was a good shortcut between important interchange points, and so I once did see an SB steeple cab with a bunch of boxcars, one of which was Illinois Terminal!.  So, look deeper and then you will have five to speak insteada of just two.   And one other is extremely obvious, was  not steam but did have one frieght locomotive for a small amount of freight business (mostly coal delivery, like the Philadelphia and Western's freight business), and has been discussed often in this Forum, with its reopening in part as a rapid transit line using the oldest equipment operating at the time.   The hints given should give nearly all of them away.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, July 1, 2013 8:37 AM

The LIRR item was the Rockaway Beach line, later taken over by MTA.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, July 1, 2013 8:32 AM

The South Brooklyn was not a steam railroad.   It was set up as  the freight railroad of Brooklyn United, then Brooklyiln Rapid Transit, and then after the Malbone St. tradgedy caused reorganization, the Brooklyn Manhattan Transit, and finally the New York City Transit Authority.  In fact, i do not believe the SB  ever owned a steam locomotive.  By the time it was set up, all lines were lectrified, and the only steam remaining was through service to a particular common destination by LIRR summer only trains using the same tracks as some of SB freight service.   It certainly did haul freight, and hauled it over three of the lines that were once steam railroads.  But there were four, and there is no record I know of of the SB hauling frieght on the one of the four that alway had and sstill has the heaviest passenger service of the four. I never saw a freight siding on that line.   I never sas a freight siding on one of the lines the SB run over, but it was a good shortcut between important interchange points, and so I once did see an SB steeple cab with a bunch of boxcars, one of which was Illinois Terminal!.  So, look deeper and then you will have five to speak insteada of just two.   And one other is extremely obvious and has been discussed often in this Forum, with its reopening in part as a rapid transit line using the oldest equipment operating at the time.   The hints given should give nearly all of them away.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, July 1, 2013 6:05 AM

I can only come up with two for sure - one ex-Long Island and one South Brooklyn RR.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, July 1, 2013 4:02 AM

I am surprised that nobody has come up with six out of eight of the answers.   I thought everyone knew about which steam railroads became rapid transit lines in one particular borough of NYC.  One was commonly named after its builder.   OK, if anyone has five answers, go ahead and be the winner.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, June 29, 2013 1:50 PM

and one was in the news recently and over the past year

and another opened its rapid transit service with some of the very oldest New York City equipment avilable, long since scrapped.

and a third currently operates on (or in?) the  oldest structure still in use in rapid transit service in New York City.

And four others had a common destination.

And one had a unique feature discussed in this forum but no longer existing.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, June 28, 2013 8:14 AM

Several have been discussed on recent posts here and on the TRAINS Transit post.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, June 28, 2013 1:19 AM

I possibly left one out, in that the Kenwood branch also used former steam RR RoW, but in this case I think  this was just bought directly and never involved trackage rights.  

I will ask a similar question:    The New Yok City Tranist Auhtority operates on RofWs that at one time or another had steam locomotives in regular freight and/or pasenger or electric locomotives in interchange frieght service operating.  Name as many as you can, minimum number six.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, June 27, 2013 1:54 PM

daveklepper is correct and has the right to the next question.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:16 PM

Actually the 2000s were built by Pullman...

The North Side line had a long and tangled history.  Built by  CM&St. P. interests as a separate company it was intended to provide lakefront service to Milwaukee in competition to the C&NW.  The furthest is got was Llewellyn Park in what is now Wilmette on the site of the present CTA Linden station.  The Chicago and Milwaukee Electric got trackage rights south to Church St.. in Evanston in 1904.  The Northwestern Elevated entered into a trackage rights agreement in 1908 where NWE had rights to Central Avenue Evanston and C&ME retained their rights to Church St (about a mile of overlap.)  NWE extended to Linden (Llewellyn Park) in 1911.  CM&St. P provided the tracks, NWE the overhead, C&ME paid something to both.  Freight and oversize C&ME cars got around NWE stations on gauntlet tracks.

This odd arrangement remained in place even after the North Shore started operating to the Loop, maintaining their own platform at Davis for Shore Line trains after their Evanston local service ended.  The NWE and successors CRT and CTA operated freight service to CMSt.P&P's account until 1973 along the north side right of way which had been elevated with the help of CM&St. P crews in the teens and twenties.  CTA gained ownership in the 1950s - I'm pretty sure after the end of Shore Line service.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, June 27, 2013 10:41 AM

rcdrye

2000s were originally Alpine Green and White (later repainted a bunch of different ways). The Budd 2200s were (of course) Stainless Steel!  6000 series were originally painted in the fabulous Mercury Green and Croydon Cream scheme, with Swamp Holly Orange striping.  Most of the 6000s ended up in the Green and White scheme by the early seventies, before bicentennial mania hit.

 By Pullman, I meant manufacturer, not the green color!   Thanks for the answer!

CSS - we're ready for your question!

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, June 27, 2013 10:39 AM

The CRT and CTA operated Gaarfield Park service west of Laramie on the CA&E out to Mannheim and stopped around 1951, with the CA&E continuing to provide service at longer headways and higher fares.   The Northside Elevated for a while had trackage rights on the Milwaukee's Evanston Branch untl the CRT bought the line while continuing to provide freight service for the Milwaukee, I think this was just before WWWI.  The Stockyards Branch operated on trackage rights on RoW owned by the Stockyards own railroad until the CTA abandoned the line around 1956(?)    The Dempter Street - Howard Street line had local stops and operated on trackage rights on the North Shore north (west) of Howard Street, and trackage rights continued to be used after the service was discontinued around 1950 to reach the CTA's shops which were located on the CNS&M and not on the CTA itself!   The CTA bought the line with the final CN&M abandonment in 1963 and later restored some nonstop service with the Skokie Swift.   This continues today.  The CNS&M continued to serve Demster Street, again higher  fares and longer headways, as long as it operated.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, June 27, 2013 10:23 AM

CRT/CTA operated some rapid transit service on trackage rights arrangements.  Name the operations involved, the railroads on which the rapid transit operated, and the year the operations were discontinued.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 7:55 PM

2000s were originally Alpine Green and White (later repainted a bunch of different ways). The Budd 2200s were (of course) Stainless Steel!  6000 series were originally painted in the fabulous Mercury Green and Croydon Cream scheme, with Swamp Holly Orange striping.  Most of the 6000s ended up in the Green and White scheme by the early seventies, before bicentennial mania hit.

 

CSS - we're ready for your question!

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 3:10 PM

The 2000's were the Pullman green and cream and the 2200's the Budds or visa versa?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:33 AM

Lake St used all sorts of wood cars, including control trailers.  Before and after the "lift" the line was almost completely equipped with 4000 series "Plushies" with poles.  The 5001-5004 articulated experimentals could not operate west of Laramie due to clearance problems, and only made a couple of test trips (not sure what the problem was but it didn't seem to be worth fixing).  6000 series and 1-50 series PCC cars were never assigned to Lake St.  The 2001-2180 series replaced all of the Plushies by mid-1966. 2200 series cars came in 1969 with the Lake-Dan Ryan through route.

Before the line change C&NW had suburban stations about every half mile along the stretch.  The Oak Park station was the only one that remained after the change. "L" stations  were reduced from 7 to 5, all at the same cross streets used by C&NW's former stations.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:50 AM

And the line on the ground used simple suspension trolley wire, with all cars motor cars assigned to Lake Street equipped with two trolley poles, and jumpers provided to power light and heat in the non-motored trailers.   I do not believe Lake Street at the time used any control trailers, and my memory says all trains were gate cars, but that might be in error.  I don't think any of the postwar cars, 6000's and after, were used on the line until after the "lift," except possibly test operation of the articulated experimental.  I recall riding only gate cars in 1952.

Next question please

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 6:19 AM

I knew that would have a quick turnaround.  The original line ran 10 miles west to the Des Plaines River in what's now River Forest.  It was soon extended west, double tracked and is now the very busy UP Galena Sub.  The lift of the Lake St. L was in November 1962, so it makes our 50 year mark by a few months.  It's interesting to note that the gates on the ground level "L" only had lanterns on the bars, had no crossing flashers and were hand operated to the end.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:05 AM

The railroad is the Chicago & North Western, the rapid transit line is CTA's Lake Street Line (relocated from ground level operation west of Laramie to the C&NW embankment) and the yard is Proviso.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:11 AM

This railroad's original main line segment west out of its namesake city was built as single track in 1847, double tracked fairly early, eventually growing to 5 tracks for the length of the original segment (double track west of there.)  In the 1930's one of the tracks was removed for a water line to the raiload's major freight yard.  In 1962 the line was further reduced to three tracks after a bunch of near-in suburban stations were closed, and a nearby rapid transit line was relocated.

Railroad (best known name is OK), RT line and major freight yard should do it.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter