Murphy Siding wrote: John: Thanks for your reply on the *typical * carload trip. That was interesting. It does raise a few questions. What are *avoiding tracks* and *freight rings*? You mention the train changing power at The Netherlands border. Is that due to changing to a different railroad, or to a differing electrical(?) system? When the customs officials look over a train, what do they do/what are they checking? -Thanks
John: Thanks for your reply on the *typical * carload trip. That was interesting. It does raise a few questions. What are *avoiding tracks* and *freight rings*? You mention the train changing power at The Netherlands border. Is that due to changing to a different railroad, or to a differing electrical(?) system? When the customs officials look over a train, what do they do/what are they checking? -Thanks
marcimmeker wrote: There is a faster way. Rather than going via Woerden and Gouda to Rotterdam, this train goes on to Utrecht, Arnhem, Emmerich and to its destination, Hagen, just south of the Ruhr. This train hauls a lot of steel products and I think Hagen is used to collect and redistribute cars and trains from various steel producers. I am not sure about the route south, probably via Siegen and Frankfurt to Mannheim and then along the Rhine. Might be a day faster. Especially since these trains run through with Russian build big diesels (formerly used in East Germany) and, at the most, change only a crew at Emmerich. Hagen will be the first point were classification can take place.
There is a faster way.
Rather than going via Woerden and Gouda to Rotterdam, this train goes on to Utrecht, Arnhem, Emmerich and to its destination, Hagen, just south of the Ruhr. This train hauls a lot of steel products and I think Hagen is used to collect and redistribute cars and trains from various steel producers.
I am not sure about the route south, probably via Siegen and Frankfurt to Mannheim and then along the Rhine. Might be a day faster. Especially since these trains run through with Russian build big diesels (formerly used in East Germany) and, at the most, change only a crew at Emmerich. Hagen will be the first point were classification can take place.
Marc, I looked at that possibility as I was aware of the solid trainloads into Germany. There is a website that lists the freight trains that operate in the Netherlands for all companies. The list is available here, it is an Acrobat file.
Dutch Freight List
To understand it you also need the abbreviations list here.
Abbreviation List
The list does not include what the Brits would call trip freights and what we in the US would call locals.
Marc, the only train south out of Hagen Vorhalle that might be the train you are looking for is CSQ 50031 bound for Mannheim Rbf. That train is a possibility. If so it would still be a solid trainload from Corus, but it might break up at Mannheim. CSQ means a complete trainload for one customer moving under a quality guarantee.
Come to think about it, an increasing number of container trains run with these diesels as well from Rotterdam to Emmerich. They then can pass their Canadian competitors from ACTS, ERS etc.greetings, Marc Immeker
Come to think about it, an increasing number of container trains run with these diesels as well from Rotterdam to Emmerich. They then can pass their Canadian competitors from ACTS, ERS etc.
Marc Immeker
Hugh Jampton wrote:Technically speaking they're not in cab signalling systems (the driver still gets the movement authority from lineside signals), they're train protection systems. These systems merely inform the driver that the signal ahead is either clear or restricting (by means of a bell or hooter or somesuch) and apply the brakes if the driver does not act appropriately. The cost of fitting these sytems to a train or loco is actualy minimal in terms of overall cost. The problem with retrofitting the equipment required (some sensor to pick up the information from the signalling system, a processing unit and some bits and pieces on the drivere's desk) is where the heck do you install it. The sensor needs to be mounted close to a bogie pivot point so that it remains above where the trackside equipment is at all times, even in curves. Some various syetems can use the same sensor, but not all of them. The processing units need to be located somewhere where they can be accessed for maintenance and not block any other equipment from the same, and the buttons and hooters / bells etc. need to be found a home in the cab. All in all it's just too much hassle
Hugh Jampton wrote: and the buttons and hooters / bells etc. need to be found a home in the cab. All in all it's just too much hassle
Sorry to be irreverent, but on this side of the Atlantic, "hooters" has a whole different connotation. What are hooters in a European locomotive?
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
Murphy Siding wrote: Hugh Jampton wrote: and the buttons and hooters / bells etc. need to be found a home in the cab. All in all it's just too much hassle Sorry to be irreverent, but on this side of the Atlantic, "hooters" has a whole different connotation. What are hooters in a European locomotive?
The Hooters were also a 1980's Folk/Pop band from Philadelphia. That's enough of that.
Martin - I'm surprised about your 5% figure. I'd have expected this to be higher. A BLS 485, for instance, would need 3 seperate systems - Italian, Swiss and German. That must be a complicated installation unless there is a degree of commonality.
That gets me wondering about a Basle based BLS driver. Would he or she have to learn three different signalling systems? I don't know how BLS crews work but even if there is a crew change at Basle and Brig drivers would need to be proficient on two systems.
Simon Reed wrote:The Hooters were also a 1980's Folk/Pop band from Philadelphia. That's enough of that. Martin - I'm surprised about your 5% figure. I'd have expected this to be higher. A BLS 485, for instance, would need 3 seperate systems - Italian, Swiss and German. That must be a complicated installation unless there is a degree of commonality. That gets me wondering about a Basle based BLS driver. Would he or she have to learn three different signalling systems? I don't know how BLS crews work but even if there is a crew change at Basle and Brig drivers would need to be proficient on two systems.
ERS, quotes the price of installing ETCS as 300,000 Euros per locomotive, not including extra costs for the protoype installation in the first of any model locomotive. The simpler systems are possibly cheaper.
The BLS drivers don't run north of Basle. South of the Simplon Tunnel to Domodossola and on the Luino line are Swiss, with the Italians doing the maintenance. And currently you need four systems for a freight locomotive to run from Germany to Italy, Indusi and Elke in Germany, Signum in Switzerland, and BACC? in Italy. Elke is in use between Offenburg and Weil am Rhein only. BLS has been pooling one Re 485 with Railion Br 185s on freight from Germany to Italy. This may have stopped while the Re 485s are being fitted with ETCS, they have 5 leasers right now including a Railion Br 185.
martin.knoepfel wrote:It is 5% per additional system. In Beaulieus example, you have one system plus three more, makes 15% more. If an electric engine costs 3 million Euros, so it is 450 000 Euros more. Swiss Federal Railways employs engineers working in Germany and Switzerland. They have to be certified for both countries and need two drivers' licences. I don't know of any engineers working in three countries except for the Thalys-trains which run from the UK (London) through France to Belgium (Brussels) without crew-changes.
Hugh Jampton wrote:Are you sure you're not confusing Thalys and Eurostar. They're 2 seperate companiesThalys (a maroon coloured train) is owned by SNCF, SNCB, NS & DB and runs Paris - Amsterdam and Clologne. Their web site is http://www.thalys.com and a route map can be found athttp://goeurope.about.com/od/traintravelineurope/ss/thalys_info.htm Eurostar on the other hand (a yellow and cream coloured train) are owed by London & Continental Railways and run London - Paris, Brussels, Avignon and Bourge-Saint-Maurice (as far s I know it's only Franch crews that operate to these last destinations). Their website is http://www.eurostar.com (and it's not that great IMO, no company info at all) and a map is at http://goeurope.about.com/library/bl_eurostar_intro.htm Both trains are TGV deriviatives and the cabs are almost the same. The difference is in the handling due to extra traction motors on the Eurostar which were required to operate in the Chunnel (A fully laden Eurostar with a dead power car must still be able to climb the steep gradients at the end of the tunnel).
For those who lost tracks with the steel train twisting and turning through the Netherlands on avoiding tracks and freight rings.
First map is the part Uitgeest to Rotterdam. But for a small piece of track near the southeastern part of Amsterdam you can make this same trip by train. Second is from Rotterdam to Venlo at the border with Germany.
And the direct route from Beverwijk (station next to the steelworks, south of Uitgeest) to the border at Zevenaar / Emmerich:
All maps were taken from the website of NS, from its travel planner.
Note: there is a direct line south of Beverwijk via the Velsertunnel. The grade into the tunnel starts at the south and of Beverwijk station. Heavy freight trains do not use that route because they have trouble getting out of the tunnel.
greetings,
Indeed that place is not ideal but all there is apparently. The alternative means backing up the train at the north lead in Beverwijk and make a run at / through the Velsertunnel.
On the other hand, not that many trains make use of this route so with creative scheduling it should be possible.
Remember, the steel works is located next to the sea. It's port for raw materials is ouside the canallocks. It's barge harbor is inside the locks. Most of it's production moves by sea or canal / river and truck.
As I related on another thread I went to the Deventer second hand book fair last sunday. I changed trains in Zwolle and saw the last 3 remaining cars of the Dutch / Swiss TEE trains, still in Ontario Northland / Northlander paint (yellow. light blue band and black Northlander on the nose).
In Deventer there was a steam train with 23.071 5 "blokkendozen" passenger cars (1920's former emu's) and diesel 2530, the last of 2400 class build by Alsthom and a one of a kind. It performed a shuttle service to Zutphen I think.
I had no photo equipment with me, darn!
Tonight the radio reported the arrival of the first GTW's from Stadler of Bussnang Switzerland for Arriva via Nieuweschans in the Netherlands. It will move to Leeuwarden and then to Groningen were it can be inspected. There is a photo contest till 15 september.
RudyRockvilleMD wrote:We are planning a trip to Europe in the fall. As a part of the trip we will take a cruise on the Danube River from Bucharest, Romania to Budapest, Hungary. Are there any restrictions on photographing trains or streetcars in Bucharest or Budapest from streets, parks, or railroad stations.?
beaulieu wrote:Right now the Europeans are enjoying very cheap air fares to many Eastern countries.
Hugh Jampton wrote: beaulieu wrote:Right now the Europeans are enjoying very cheap air fares to many Eastern countries.You ain't wrong there,, why, I can fly to somewhere unpronouncable for little more than a tenner, provided I want to fly on Tuesday morning at 06:00 in a sardine can...
I'am glad that I am not flying soon. Long distance flights may get boring if we can't even take the latest issue of trains with us into the cabin. Not to mention all those tax free goodies....
Murphy,
This is true for most of western Europe. Exceptions are dedicated freight lines (existing like some routes in the Ruhr area of Germany or future ones like the Betuweroute here in the Netherlands).
One of the main freight routes is from the North Sea coast over the Alps like: Rotterdam (Netherlands) - Rhine valley (Germany) - Switzerland - northern Italy. These days lots of containers to Italy as many container lines do not go into the Mediterranean (a detour for most lines). Or Belgium (Antwerp / Gent / Oostende) - Germany - Switzerland - Italy. Or Hamburg / Bremerhaven / Emden (Germany) to Italy.
Another route is northern France - southern France and then to Italy or Spain. Due to the frequent strikes on French railroads and the considerably less than enthousiastic implementation of the EU open access directive much traffic now goes via Germany. Italy was thought of by many in the Netherlands as not quick to implement EU directives but at least on this score they are in the midfield. Belgiumand France are lacking.
Presumably we will see ever increasing freight traffic to the new countries in middle and eastern Europe as their economies keep improving. Due to the efficient and strategically located ports along the North Sea compared to detours to the Baltic or Mediterranean Seas this will become a major corridor.
Occasionally passenger traffic will lose out to freight, even during rush hours. The Utrecht - Arnhem line in the Netherlands lost a local to create more paths in the timetable for freights from IJmuiden (Corus steelworks) / Amstrdam and Rotterdam.
One other point of interest: more and more old border crossing are seeing a comeback of passenger and even freight service. In the Netherlands: Nieuweschans - Leer in the north (Germany, passenger and freight) and Enschede - Gronau (Germany, passenger). In the south it is Heerlen - Aachen (passenger, Germany). Maastricht - Liege is going to be upgraded to full Belgian intercity status with, probably, hourly service.
Murphy Siding wrote: I'm of the conclusion that in Britain, the passenger business is the main business of the railroads, and freight is secondary. Is this true of the continent also? And further, what are the main freight hauls and corridors in Europe? What is it?/Where does it come from?/Where does it go?-that sort of thing? Thanks
marcimmeker wrote: Presumably we will see ever increasing freight traffic to the new countries in middle and eastern Europe as their economies keep improving. Due to the efficient and strategically located ports along the North Sea compared to detours to the Baltic or Mediterranean Seas this will become a major corridor. Marc Immeker
Murphy Siding wrote: marcimmeker wrote: Presumably we will see ever increasing freight traffic to the new countries in middle and eastern Europe as their economies keep improving. Due to the efficient and strategically located ports along the North Sea compared to detours to the Baltic or Mediterranean Seas this will become a major corridor. Marc Immeker It would appear that Germany would be the crossroads of a whole lot of future traffic? Are railroads there aniticipating growth from the east? Thanks
Yes they are, the problems arise in the countries formerly behind the Iron Curtain, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary. In some cases old freight flows are disappearing which will create space for new ones. But passenger traffic is increasing as the citizens standard of living rises, Also even though the infrastructure is there, it needs a lot of upgrading. And the new members of the EU aren't as wealthy as the old members, the EU is making loans but there isn't enough to go around. Many US and European multinationals are opening new factories in Eastern Europe to take advantage of lower costs. For example Trinity Industries(the US railcar builder) bought and then sold, Wagon Swidinica in Poland which is now the largest freight car builder in Europe. Fiat has an automobile factory in Poland, Volkswagen built a new factory in Slovakia, etc. One of the longest regular traffic flows right now is for Ford, carrying high-cube autoparts containers from Cologne to Instanbul running 3 times per week
One of the longest regular traffic flows right now is for Ford, carrying high-cube autoparts containers from Cologne to Instanbul running 3 times per week
The new 'Orient Express' maybe?
Tony
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.