Trains.com

Bad train pictures

77223 views
2468 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:38 AM
Congratulations on getting that star Bob and Nace!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:38 AM
Congratulations on getting that star Bob and Nace!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, December 14, 2003 11:49 AM
The rules of the railroad will specify whether the engines are shut down. If its below 40 deg then none of the engines will be shut down. If its above 40 deg then they may shut down all but the lead unit to keep air on the train.

The new crew will do a set and release test on the train to make sure the brakes are all working and they have a continuous trainline. That involves charging the trainline, making a brake reduction, seeing the reduction on the rear end, checking the leakage and releasing the brakes to see if the pressure comes back up on the rear end.

If the train has crossing cut and its been sitting more than 4 hours then any portions that were detached from the engine will need a full blown initial terminal air test.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, December 14, 2003 11:49 AM
The rules of the railroad will specify whether the engines are shut down. If its below 40 deg then none of the engines will be shut down. If its above 40 deg then they may shut down all but the lead unit to keep air on the train.

The new crew will do a set and release test on the train to make sure the brakes are all working and they have a continuous trainline. That involves charging the trainline, making a brake reduction, seeing the reduction on the rear end, checking the leakage and releasing the brakes to see if the pressure comes back up on the rear end.

If the train has crossing cut and its been sitting more than 4 hours then any portions that were detached from the engine will need a full blown initial terminal air test.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, December 14, 2003 2:00 PM
Yes, Ed, coolant temperature is another consideration in the automatic shutdown/restart devices on some of these locomotives, but you being a Texan and all you probably haven't had to deal with that too much ;-). UP has retrofitted a lot of GP38s, SD38-2s, and GP15-1s with a "Smart Start" system.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, December 14, 2003 2:00 PM
Yes, Ed, coolant temperature is another consideration in the automatic shutdown/restart devices on some of these locomotives, but you being a Texan and all you probably haven't had to deal with that too much ;-). UP has retrofitted a lot of GP38s, SD38-2s, and GP15-1s with a "Smart Start" system.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, December 14, 2003 4:19 PM
Hey, it got down to 27 degrees last night, for a whole three hours.
Of course, its 60 degrees now, but...
Tomorrow it will get to 72.
No place but Texas.
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, December 14, 2003 4:19 PM
Hey, it got down to 27 degrees last night, for a whole three hours.
Of course, its 60 degrees now, but...
Tomorrow it will get to 72.
No place but Texas.
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 4:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Hey, it got down to 27 degrees last night, for a whole three hours.
Of course, its 60 degrees now, but...
Tomorrow it will get to 72.
No place but Texas.
Ed
Yeah Ed, but what about the summer when it gets up over 100 and you need a snorkel to breathe in the humidity? Up here in Maryland...er...never mind.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 4:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Hey, it got down to 27 degrees last night, for a whole three hours.
Of course, its 60 degrees now, but...
Tomorrow it will get to 72.
No place but Texas.
Ed
Yeah Ed, but what about the summer when it gets up over 100 and you need a snorkel to breathe in the humidity? Up here in Maryland...er...never mind.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, December 14, 2003 6:04 PM
What, you mean no one in Maryland had gills?
Ed[:D]

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, December 14, 2003 6:04 PM
What, you mean no one in Maryland had gills?
Ed[:D]

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:18 PM
Back when I was growing up in the 60s and 70s many railroads were in decline but I do remember seeing FREIGHT trains zipping by at about 75-80 mph in parts of New York and later Florida. I've been always a pretty good "visual" gauger of speed, even as a kid. Today, I've seen many "cab interior pictures of the modern EMD locomotives. Just above the engineer's seat are decal words: Maximum Speed 70 m.p.h. I was really surprised as I remember reading stories of Santa Fe cowls "ripping" at 90mph pulling the Super C years back. Is this 70 mph some type of restriction put on by: the government, the railroads, or EMD? Are the gear ratios lower than in the old -2 series? Seaboard Coast LIne freights pulled by SD45s and SD40-2s could push 80mph on some stretches back in the 70s. Thanks for your patience and anwers!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:18 PM
Back when I was growing up in the 60s and 70s many railroads were in decline but I do remember seeing FREIGHT trains zipping by at about 75-80 mph in parts of New York and later Florida. I've been always a pretty good "visual" gauger of speed, even as a kid. Today, I've seen many "cab interior pictures of the modern EMD locomotives. Just above the engineer's seat are decal words: Maximum Speed 70 m.p.h. I was really surprised as I remember reading stories of Santa Fe cowls "ripping" at 90mph pulling the Super C years back. Is this 70 mph some type of restriction put on by: the government, the railroads, or EMD? Are the gear ratios lower than in the old -2 series? Seaboard Coast LIne freights pulled by SD45s and SD40-2s could push 80mph on some stretches back in the 70s. Thanks for your patience and anwers!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:49 PM
AntonioFP45-

When talking about the physical limits of a particular locomotive, it's all about gear ratios.

Some railroads have placed arbitrary speed limits on their trains, reasoning that the extra few minutes that would be gained by running at 60 or 70 mph compared to 50 are not worth the huge amounts of fuel needed to achieve those speeds, which due to normal operating conditions that exist on most railroads today (congestion and overburdoned system), the amount of time that a train could run at those speeds (considering acceleration and deceleration times) would be very minimal.

When the UP and BNSF were running test trains trying to attract the UPS business a few months ago, they used specially geared locomotives.

The government speed restrictions are placed in terrirory where passenger trains operate. The type of train control systems used (ATS, ATC, cab signals, PTC, etc) determins how fast (by government standards) a train can operate in a given territory.

On the CNW, we used two different systems: ATS on the suburban district's North line (to Kenosha, WI) and the Northwest Line (to Harvard, IL). The federal mandated speed limit for ATS was 79mph. ATC was used on the West Line (to Geneva, IL). I did not operate on the West line, and therefore am not certain as to the federal limitations of that system.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:49 PM
AntonioFP45-

When talking about the physical limits of a particular locomotive, it's all about gear ratios.

Some railroads have placed arbitrary speed limits on their trains, reasoning that the extra few minutes that would be gained by running at 60 or 70 mph compared to 50 are not worth the huge amounts of fuel needed to achieve those speeds, which due to normal operating conditions that exist on most railroads today (congestion and overburdoned system), the amount of time that a train could run at those speeds (considering acceleration and deceleration times) would be very minimal.

When the UP and BNSF were running test trains trying to attract the UPS business a few months ago, they used specially geared locomotives.

The government speed restrictions are placed in terrirory where passenger trains operate. The type of train control systems used (ATS, ATC, cab signals, PTC, etc) determins how fast (by government standards) a train can operate in a given territory.

On the CNW, we used two different systems: ATS on the suburban district's North line (to Kenosha, WI) and the Northwest Line (to Harvard, IL). The federal mandated speed limit for ATS was 79mph. ATC was used on the West Line (to Geneva, IL). I did not operate on the West line, and therefore am not certain as to the federal limitations of that system.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • 118 posts
Posted by Granny74 on Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:45 PM
I heard that a certain section of track had a 79 mph limit. Does the track weight determine a restriction as to train speed limit? I understand that there are many other things involved, but is the track weight one of the considerations?
Bob from AZ
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • 118 posts
Posted by Granny74 on Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:45 PM
I heard that a certain section of track had a 79 mph limit. Does the track weight determine a restriction as to train speed limit? I understand that there are many other things involved, but is the track weight one of the considerations?
Bob from AZ
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 12:09 AM
While we are on the topic:
Why 79mph and not 80mph?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 12:09 AM
While we are on the topic:
Why 79mph and not 80mph?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, December 15, 2003 1:44 AM
79 mph is the max the Federal governmment will allow without additional signal protection that freight RR's don't want to provide.

Many freight cars are unstable at high speeds so going faster than 60 mph is a moot point.

As someone else pointed out it takes a whole lot of gas and horsepower to get to higher speeds. For very little return in revenue.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, December 15, 2003 1:44 AM
79 mph is the max the Federal governmment will allow without additional signal protection that freight RR's don't want to provide.

Many freight cars are unstable at high speeds so going faster than 60 mph is a moot point.

As someone else pointed out it takes a whole lot of gas and horsepower to get to higher speeds. For very little return in revenue.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, December 15, 2003 7:16 AM
Weight of rail can often be a factor in allowable speed for a given section of track. It is definitely a factor in weight restrictions. Lighter rail is more flexible and consequently easier to move around by the equipment running on it.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, December 15, 2003 7:16 AM
Weight of rail can often be a factor in allowable speed for a given section of track. It is definitely a factor in weight restrictions. Lighter rail is more flexible and consequently easier to move around by the equipment running on it.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, December 15, 2003 9:01 AM
The UP had to adjust overspeed limits on its "Gold Streak" UPS service, but the locomotives have stock gear ratios, the same as any other engine of that .

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, December 15, 2003 9:01 AM
The UP had to adjust overspeed limits on its "Gold Streak" UPS service, but the locomotives have stock gear ratios, the same as any other engine of that .

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 9:41 AM
So is there a HUGE difference between 79 and 80 MPH?


Oh last night here it went down to 04 degrees, and yes that's in F degrees .
today the high is about 31
it's exactly 23 here right now.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 9:41 AM
So is there a HUGE difference between 79 and 80 MPH?


Oh last night here it went down to 04 degrees, and yes that's in F degrees .
today the high is about 31
it's exactly 23 here right now.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, December 15, 2003 9:46 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevinstheRRman

So is there a HUGE difference between 79 and 80 MPH?


Oh last night here it went down to 04 degrees, and yes that's in F degrees .
today the high is about 31
it's exactly 23 here right now.


Well shaa....becasue in alot of states, 15 mph or more than the posted speed limit becomes reckless driving instead of just speeding. So if the speed limit is 65mph and the train is only doing 79 mph, the highway patrolman gives him a ticket for 14 mph over. Anything more and bam ...reckless driving. [:)]
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, December 15, 2003 9:46 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevinstheRRman

So is there a HUGE difference between 79 and 80 MPH?


Oh last night here it went down to 04 degrees, and yes that's in F degrees .
today the high is about 31
it's exactly 23 here right now.


Well shaa....becasue in alot of states, 15 mph or more than the posted speed limit becomes reckless driving instead of just speeding. So if the speed limit is 65mph and the train is only doing 79 mph, the highway patrolman gives him a ticket for 14 mph over. Anything more and bam ...reckless driving. [:)]

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy