QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C Murphy, Britain refers to the United Kingdom, consisting of England, Scotland, Wales and five counties in Northern Ireland. The flag, the "Union Jack" consists of superimposing the red square cross of England, the white diagonal cross of Scotland (on blue) and the red diagonal cross of Wales. Northern Ireland misses out, as usual.
James, Brisbane Australia
Modelling AT&SF in the 90s
QUOTE: Originally posted by futuremodal QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C Britain refers to the United Kingdom, consisting of England, Scotland, Wales and five counties in Northern Ireland. The flag, the "Union Jack" consists of superimposing the red square cross of England, the white diagonal cross of Scotland (on blue) and the red diagonal cross of Wales. Northern Ireland misses out, as usual. Couldn't the UK at least make the Union Jack with a green background for us poor ol' Eirelanders? I guess adding a four leaf clover is right out! QUOTE: If you are talking about the the English, you are referring only to people from south of Carlisle and east of the Severn river (more or less - my geography isn't that good, and for simplicity I'm ignoring Cornwall which isn't really English either) So is Cornwall the British equivalent of our Rio Linda? QUOTE: In the UK, a similar problem exists in that they believe all Americans are "Yankees" while most people realise this term is limited to the North East of the USA. Actually, them Northeasterners are a bunch of Tories who still wi***hey were subject to the Crown. How else can one explain Ted Kennedy, Jim Jeffers, and Hillary Clinton, et al?
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C Britain refers to the United Kingdom, consisting of England, Scotland, Wales and five counties in Northern Ireland. The flag, the "Union Jack" consists of superimposing the red square cross of England, the white diagonal cross of Scotland (on blue) and the red diagonal cross of Wales. Northern Ireland misses out, as usual.
QUOTE: If you are talking about the the English, you are referring only to people from south of Carlisle and east of the Severn river (more or less - my geography isn't that good, and for simplicity I'm ignoring Cornwall which isn't really English either)
QUOTE: In the UK, a similar problem exists in that they believe all Americans are "Yankees" while most people realise this term is limited to the North East of the USA.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C Murphy, Have you tried this site http://www.12csv.com/index.htm It deals with the British class 37 and equivalent Australian built locomotives. There were nearly 300 English Electric locomotives built in Australia as well as many imported from the UK. These are widely spread now. The Australian built locomotives were equivalent to EMD and Alco export units, and were US style hood units. Some of my photos are on this site, too! M636C Most things I've read about Austrailian diesel locomotives lead me to believe that American designs were more prevelant that British designs, is that so? Does Australia have any home-grown diesel locomotive builders? Thanks
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C Murphy, Have you tried this site http://www.12csv.com/index.htm It deals with the British class 37 and equivalent Australian built locomotives. There were nearly 300 English Electric locomotives built in Australia as well as many imported from the UK. These are widely spread now. The Australian built locomotives were equivalent to EMD and Alco export units, and were US style hood units. Some of my photos are on this site, too! M636C
QUOTE: Originally posted by Townsend I used to live in Zimbabwe up until about 15 years ago. I was only 11 when i last left the county but i was already aware of railways. I remember seeing English Electric locos working in multiple with American locos. I have since found out that the English Electric loco was based on the BR class 40 but its 2000hp 16 cyl engine was derated to 1600 hp due to altitude. I dont know if the old boys are still going but i doubt it. There were also some English Electric locos im Zimbabwe that had a nose a bit like an F unit at one end and a narrow long hood behind it like a GP unit, ithing they were classed DE 4, and some very similar locos were suplied to Kenya in the 1960's and are still in use i think.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding I have a fair amount of railroad and locomotive books . I'd be happy to go and look for some info. Is there any specific type,or country you had in mind? You're right-if you get just a little bit off the norm, information gets sparse. A lot of times, a railroad book will have a picture,page or even a chapter about something out of the ordinary. Where are you in Minnesota?
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73 Murphy, Have you looked at these ? http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locationList.aspx?Level=3&ID=UK
QUOTE: Originally posted by RPRiebe Gents: This is my first day, technically due to the clock, second, here and I am hoping that you may have some information as to railroad books. Are there any books, that deal with, other than the U.S., British or France, singular, Diesel locomotives from the fifties world-wide; especially the carbody passenger units. There seems to be a fair amount of info on English speaking countries early Diesels, but sporatic, info on the export units, or early units built in non-english speaking countries. Even the internet seems to be lacking on info on most countries first diesel beyond the very early box units. Sorry if this is a too general enquiry, but whilst one can find a great deal of books on steamers, the diesels that followed do not seem to be to heavily written about, at least not in books still available. Thank you for your time, Bob
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding QUOTE: Originally posted by Tulyar15 QUOTE: Originally posted by Railroading_Brit The railways in Wales, Scotland and England are all run as one pretty much. Northern Ireland is a little different as (I think) they may have a different gauge - certainly the railways in the Republic of Ireland (south of the border) are broad gauge. There's no bridge or tunnel across the Irish Sea so any interchange involves either sea or air travel. The Northern Ireland Railways is still a state owned, vertically integrated company, as is Iarnrod Eireann, its counterpart in the Irish Republic. The Irish standard gauge is 5' 3" which was chosen as a compromise between the 4' 8.5" of the Dublin and Kingstown (now Dun Laoghaire) Railway and the 6' 2" of the Ulster Railway. (An official from the Irish Office of the then UK Govt rounded these figures to 4' 6" and 6' and took the average, which is 5' 3". The only other countries where this gauge is found are certain Australia states (Victoria I think) and Brazil, where Irish builders were employed. The political border between Northern Ireland and the Republic is the border between the two rail companies but the Belfast - Dublin service is operated jointly with NIR crews working thru to Dublin and IE crews to Belfast. Nowadays the two companies not only use the same stock and locos but the stock used is painted in the same livery. The NIR have a large fleet of DMU's used on Belfast commuter services, these also run across the border to Dundalk. Sometimes when a major sporting event takes place in Dublin, particularly a 6 Nations Rugby match, these DMU's will be pressed into service for extra trains and IE sometimes borrow them to put on extra local services. Another case of American ignorance on my part[*^_^*]: I didn't think the two Irelands got along with each other. It appears the area has settled down somewhat. Thanks
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tulyar15 QUOTE: Originally posted by Railroading_Brit The railways in Wales, Scotland and England are all run as one pretty much. Northern Ireland is a little different as (I think) they may have a different gauge - certainly the railways in the Republic of Ireland (south of the border) are broad gauge. There's no bridge or tunnel across the Irish Sea so any interchange involves either sea or air travel. The Northern Ireland Railways is still a state owned, vertically integrated company, as is Iarnrod Eireann, its counterpart in the Irish Republic. The Irish standard gauge is 5' 3" which was chosen as a compromise between the 4' 8.5" of the Dublin and Kingstown (now Dun Laoghaire) Railway and the 6' 2" of the Ulster Railway. (An official from the Irish Office of the then UK Govt rounded these figures to 4' 6" and 6' and took the average, which is 5' 3". The only other countries where this gauge is found are certain Australia states (Victoria I think) and Brazil, where Irish builders were employed. The political border between Northern Ireland and the Republic is the border between the two rail companies but the Belfast - Dublin service is operated jointly with NIR crews working thru to Dublin and IE crews to Belfast. Nowadays the two companies not only use the same stock and locos but the stock used is painted in the same livery. The NIR have a large fleet of DMU's used on Belfast commuter services, these also run across the border to Dundalk. Sometimes when a major sporting event takes place in Dublin, particularly a 6 Nations Rugby match, these DMU's will be pressed into service for extra trains and IE sometimes borrow them to put on extra local services.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Railroading_Brit The railways in Wales, Scotland and England are all run as one pretty much. Northern Ireland is a little different as (I think) they may have a different gauge - certainly the railways in the Republic of Ireland (south of the border) are broad gauge. There's no bridge or tunnel across the Irish Sea so any interchange involves either sea or air travel.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding How did the Government go about nationalizing the railroads? Did they buy out the private owners,or maybe the railroads were in bankruptcy anyway? Thanks
QUOTE: Originally posted by Townsend . GWR fans generally have a chip on each shoulder and say things like "there are two ways to do something, the GWR way and the wrong way"
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73 Thanks Murphy. First of all, I'm wondering about the Groupings that took place (1948 ?). From what I understand there were over 100 different companies operating until the 1920s when a bunch of mergers brought the number down to about 30 or 40. I believe after WW2 the Government forced the strong railways to take over the weak resulting in 4 railways. I think they were the Southern, the Great Western, the London, Midland and Scottish and the 4th up through Newcastle. Could someone please tell me the rough geographic areas each covered ? I am also wondering about how these railways aquired their steam locomotives. In the United States most of the railways designed their own locomotives (along with the builders) and told one of the three builders (Lima, Baldwin or ALCo) what to build. Did the railways in the U.K. build their own steam or were there builders, and who designed the locomotives ? When did the 4 railways stop acquiring steam, and did they stay with Belpaire fireboxes till the end ? Thanks. Murphy Siding, My laziness results from spending 1 or 2 hours a day with this mess- http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=44086 Hopefully I'll be done this week.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.