Trains.com

Those train guys

28436 views
257 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:52 PM
Euclid
This seems to have begun when Murphy Siding confirmed what Norm had said about moderators being told to favor the railroaders when they engaged in disputes with non-railroaders
Just got back from vacation and was surprised to see this thread unlocked! As to the quote above, Murphy Siding confirmed nothing. Stop putting your words in my mouth. Speak for yourself. Thank you.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, June 15, 2014 11:04 PM

schlimm

edblysard

So, if Kalmbach as a company doesn’t gain anything from this conspiracy, then the moderators must have gotten something, right?

Not sure what that would be, seeing as how Murphy had already quit being a mod, and Jeff Wimberley quit over this, as did another mod, so I doubt they “won” anything other than heartburn and headaches….and the folks who were moderated, most of whom were railroaders, I don’t see where we won anything either.

So, again, if there is a conspiracy or a bias, who wins, and what do they win?

There appears to be some revisionist history in all the verbiage of exchanges.  1. The person who suggested a conspiracy was the former moderator who generally sides with a subset of the railroaders, not an outsider. 

I would hope that we can not only be civil in our posts but also tolerant of disagreements with each other and neither make personal attacks nor take criticism personally.

 I don't know about revisionist history, but I can add some clarity.  Every time the the discussion gets so far out there as to be unbelievable, is the time where I stop taking things so seriously.  I suggested the "conspiracy"  in jest, to point out just exactly how silly the whole thing sounds.  And stop calling me Shirley!

     I'm trying to be civil to every one right now (even those not in on the conspiracy).  I guess I still need to do some research on cabals, though. Wink

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Monday, June 16, 2014 7:17 AM

Convicted One

BaltACD
Complainers complain!

I actually think that  complaint inclination behavior ( such as we are talking  about here)  is rooted in control-obsessive personality types. They actually believe it is their prerogative to decide what others are permitted to discuss.

It's a way to curtail points of view not in harmony with their own preferred outlook. THAT is why simply "not clicking on the thread that offends me" is not good enough for them. Not only do THEY not want to read opposed points of view, but they don't want others thinking free thoughts, either.

 
Good one, Convicted.
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Monday, June 16, 2014 8:22 AM

Murphy Siding

I guess I still need to do some research on cabals, though. Wink

My wife had cabal when we got married, I let it lapse. We now use just rabbit ears for broadcast, but most often get dvd's, our library lets us borrow up to 7 dvd's per person for a week. My wife still thinks it's free, even when she gets the property tax bill.

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, June 16, 2014 3:22 PM

Wait a minute, we have a cabal now?

What the heck happened to the cadre?

I go off for a few days, Murphy takes a vacation, and when we come back, everything has changed….so what’s next, ya’ll gonna change the secret handshake too?

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 16, 2014 3:37 PM

Cabal  [kuh-bal]:

noun:

1. a small group of secret plotters, as against a government or person in authority.
2. the plots and schemes of such a group; intrigue.
3. a clique, as in artistic, literary, or theatrical circles.
 
verb (used without object), ca·balled, ca·bal·ling.
4. to form a cabal; intrigue; conspire; plot.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, June 16, 2014 3:50 PM

   I think a guy on a car racing message board I belong to had it figured out:  "What's a guy got to do to get along in this place?  Belong to one of the cliches?"

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 16, 2014 4:04 PM

I think we're doing pretty good....we put the FUN in dysfunction.  Stick out tongue

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Monday, June 16, 2014 4:47 PM

Two point question:

Is it ignorance or apathy? Big Smile

Norm


  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, June 16, 2014 5:29 PM

 I don't know, and who cares?Stick out tongue

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Mason City, Iowa
  • 901 posts
Posted by RRKen on Monday, June 16, 2014 8:13 PM

Murray

Cabal  [kuh-bal]:

noun:

1. a small group of secret plotters, as against a government or person in authority.
2. the plots and schemes of such a group; intrigue.
3. a clique, as in artistic, literary, or theatrical circles.
 
verb (used without object), ca·balled, ca·bal·ling.
4. to form a cabal; intrigue; conspire; plot.

You know what happened to the Gang of Four in China!

I never drink water. I'm afraid it will become habit-forming.
W. C. Fields
I never met a Moderator I liked
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 16, 2014 8:15 PM

RRKen

You know what happened to the Gang of Four in China!

I know.....they became the Lennon Sisters and went on to have a long career with Lawrence Welk.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Mason City, Iowa
  • 901 posts
Posted by RRKen on Monday, June 16, 2014 8:17 PM

Murray

RRKen

You know what happened to the Gang of Four in China!

I know.....they became the Lennon Sisters and went on to have a long career with Lawrence Welk.

Thank you Myron, thank you boysa

I never drink water. I'm afraid it will become habit-forming.
W. C. Fields
I never met a Moderator I liked
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:13 PM

Murray, thank you for supplying that definition of cabal. I wasn't sure if it was how we get our television or a form of Jewish mysticism.

Anyway when you brought up caballah you said "about three (or so) individuals who have not been associated with this forum for as long as most of us have been", and since I haven't been active on this forum, or even this site, very much, I wondered if you were counting me in that cabal. Are you? And who are my coconspirators? Or is that kookooconspirators?

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:01 PM

gardendance

Murray, thank you for supplying that definition of cabal. I wasn't sure if it was how we get our television or a form of Jewish mysticism.

Anyway when you brought up caballah you said "about three (or so) individuals who have not been associated with this forum for as long as most of us have been", and since I haven't been active on this forum, or even this site, very much, I wondered if you were counting me in that cabal. Are you? And who are my coconspirators? Or is that kookooconspirators?

You're safe Pat.  I know you from the other website.  Cool

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:42 PM

dakotafred
Good one, Convicted.

Like I always say: Never argue with a fool on an internet message board. Because they will only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. Which is why I tend to just let them ramble on, unengaged. Don't give them a platform from which to preach.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:12 PM

Murray

You're safe Pat.  I know you from the other website.  Cool

Is that a good thing or a bad thing? And why does your emoticon have sunglasses? It looks like a sun already, and makes me think there's another, brighter sun nearby. Call me old fashioned, but I think we did it better in the old days with just a colon and a parenthese. Although I can understand people might get a sore neck from leaning their head sideways, or a broken comupter from tilting the monitor sideways, to make it look more like a smiling face. Or a Canadian Pacific emblem that looks like Pac Man.
Remember, if someone tries to tell you "a book isn't electrons on a screen, it's paper and ink and binding and leather covers", just tell them "no it's not, it's triangles on clay tablets".

Convicted One

Which is why I tend to just let them ramble on, unengaged. Don't give them a platform from which to preach.

Can we give them a diving board from which to jump?

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, June 19, 2014 11:50 AM

Quoting gardendance: "And why does your emoticon have sunglasses? " Because this is the emoticon for "cool."

Johnny

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy