John Busby wrote: What I don't like is when someone I did not ask tells me what I should do and buy as far as my hobby goes.When I need help or want advice I am quite capable of asking, it would seem some people just don't get we all build our railways the best we can with the skills we have. If others don't like it I figure they have the problem not meregards John
What I don't like is when someone I did not ask tells me what I should do and buy as far as my hobby goes.
When I need help or want advice I am quite capable of asking, it would seem some people just don't get we all build our railways the best we can with the skills we have.
If others don't like it I figure they have the problem not me
regards John
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
Hi 4884 big boy
I see it this way
Is the loco I want available good RTR yes Buy it, NO look at kits, is the kit simple yes Buy it No forget it. do I need to scratch build said loco yes then my MRR don't need it.
It is not what you buy or what you build yourself that creates the model railway but how the collective whole is blended together.
What inspired on30francisco to dig up this thread after a year and a half of dormancy?
Anybody else notice?
I'm getting a lil' annoyed here. LOL
Ted M.
got trains?™
See my photos at: http://tedmarshall.rrpicturearchives.net/
The worst thing about just about any hobby is the people who want to impose "my way" on everybody else.
If you like RTR, fine.
If building locomotive/rolling stock/structure kits floats your boat, hooray.
If you like some combination of the above, swell.
Whatever keeps somebody happy and active in the hobby is what matters!
Craig
DMW
We all tend to look at models and how we acquire them differently. For whatever reason they gave an opionion on the RTR SD60, it could have been ignored by you. Just because someone believes they have to built kits to have an exact correct model overlooks the fact that many of us do not have the ability or need to build our own. You will find this at many large clubs also since the older members might be building kits instead of purchasing RTR. I have always believed a comment like you heard is the lack of how the hobby works on their part. We would not have any selection of trains to purchase if everyone felt the need to build their own models from scratch.
Having belonged to an older established club as my first real operating experience, I heard a lot of comments about how their varney locomotives did not have problems like the new and latest brass we were running experienced on the layout. The best way to handle that type of comment is to ignore them. Get over the fact that we have varied tastes and interest in this hobby and most any other things that all of do every day. I used to ask more questions of the person to have them point everything they think is wrong with the model. Sometimes, they are not as swift as they want you to believe.
If you like the RTR, buy it and enjoy the hobby. Most of us tend to purchase RTR that need some upgrades but that is the quickest way to enjoy the experience.
Don Gibson wrote:'LOCOMOTIVE (and other) KIT'S have alway's been 'minority' items for the hobby. LaBelle, Ambroid, and Intermountain's 'Craftsman' kit's primary appeal is to those with ''Look what I Built" motivation ... or possibly a hidden Masochistic streak - so what is wrong with that? ATHEARN's longtime popularity has been based on 'Shake the box' kit's that were cheap. (I wonder if there are still Athearn engine's running without their railing's that required soldeing?).Dealer's have to stock what SELLS - if they want to stay in business.If WE want to pay someone to assemble our product's for us (Chinese labor) that's our option. For those choosing to do their own, there is BOWSER, INTERMOUNTAIN, and other small specialty companies - but only if you hurry. Does anybody remember when car kit's were a block of wood or stripwood?
Don,By the thousands those old Athearn units solider on and will for years to come..
Oddly I don't know of anybody that solder their Athearn handrails.
And time was modelers did indeed like to show their lastest kit built locomotive or car..That gave way to their newest brass locomotive and that gave way to todays RTR.
Oddly RTR is nothing new as many smart mouth model modelers think.
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"
4884bigboy wrote:I'm getting really sick of people putting down RTR equiptment. Just the other day I was looking at getting an Athearn RTR SD60 and the 3 guys I was talking with gave me a dirty look and said "Don't go wasting your time on that Athearn or Kato or Atlas***, buy a kit and build it yourself". This made me lose it. I replied "Well, I don't really have the time to build kits, not to mention locomotive kits are usually somewhat challenging, and the RTR is way better looking than I could ever make it look". They were infuriated by this and yelled "How are you ever going to know if you don't do it yourself!?" After that they made a quick leave. What's the big deal with RTR locomotives and rolling stock? They offer a quick way to get your trains running and look great. I would consider Kato locomotives RTR, too, even if you do have to apply the detail parts. Most people including myself just don't have the time, the skills or the patience to build kits. And mind you I'm just talking locomotives (kit rolling stock is fun, but RTR is nice once in a while). So lay off, pro-kit builders.Anyone else feel the same way as me?
Heres's how you solve problems such as this: Ask them, politely of course, when was the last time they hand/scratch built or assembled their rolling stock ( I.E. their car, truck, suv).
That should shut them up. RTR doesn't sound bad then? Oh, ANd stay away from chevy, honda and porsche because they are just crap. A Caddillac is better and so is KIa.
I like to take it run it right away. I have aslo built a few rolling stock Athern BB (oh hte horror!)
-G .
Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.
HO and N Scale.
After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.
QUOTE: Originally posted by on30francisco If it wasn't for Bachmann's line of RTR On30 locos, I probably wouldn't be into this scale. I really enjoy scratchbuilding rolling stock and structures using stripwood and detail parts, however, if there's an RTR product available for something I want at a reasonable price, I'll buy it. I have also built some rolling stock and structure kits and enjoy them. Some of the RTR products available today are very detailed and sometimes cost less than it would to scratchbuild them. In those cases I will buy RTR. What I strongly dislike is assembling very finicky and intricate parts (such as truck frames). If a kit involves this kind of assembly, I will buy an RTR version. Although I enjoy building things, I also like running trains. The rolling stock that I scratchbuild must operate flawlessly - even if it involves omitting or compromising some details.
Have fun with your trains
QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out. Sorry lets try again! I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing. Kinda twists your brain around, doesn't it? I think I learned this in abstract algebra, or perhaps it was in Partial Differential Equations. Don't go to school for thirty years and they go and change EVERYTHING. I remember specifically being told that 0/0 was NOT 1 but that was a long time ago. I thought (i) was going to come up in this, I never did get that square root of -1 stuff. That's probably why I became a mechanic.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out. Sorry lets try again! I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Actually, that's the tricky thing. In some fields of higher matheimatics the definition that any number divided by itself equals one is "superior" to the rule that any number divided by zero is undefined. So the correct answer to zero divided by zero equals one. That's one definition used in some higher mathematical fields. But usually it's just considered indeterminate. So there is no real answer - it depends on what you're doing. Kinda twists your brain around, doesn't it? I think I learned this in abstract algebra, or perhaps it was in Partial Differential Equations.
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out. Sorry lets try again! I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!)
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out.
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D] But isn't it that by definition anything divided by itself is 1? Engineer in me is also coming out.
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350 QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1? You can divide by zeroand any number divided by zero is infinity! (Pure Mathematics) Sorry Engineer coming out[:D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D] I am sure any number divided by itself is one for all but zero, then it is infinity. But it has been a few years since leaving University. I remember something about using this in design a forth order Chebychev Filter (Excuse the spelling!) Could it be zero divided by zero equals 1?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero) Actually, there is one exception to that rule, where you can divide by zero. Anybody know what that exception is, and what the resultant value is (besides me, I mean)? [:D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm (except you really cannot divide by zero)
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
QUOTE: Originally posted by timthechef I'm a kit builder too. I"m worried that kits are dissapearing from the market. I have to go to e-bay to find a simple steam engine kit. I've been trying to get chimneys for my railroad station project and can't find any at my local hobby stores. I understand that kits and scratch building is not for everybody, I'm just worried that the products in the hobby that I love are dissapearing.
QUOTE: What gets me annoyed are people putting down Athearn. I've said it once, I'm gonna say it again " You can't go wrong with Athearn!'
QUOTE: Originally posted by BRAKIE