Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What's NOT Made in China?

13611 views
109 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:07 PM
Let's see...I have 2 G&L guitars, 2 Fender guitars, 1 Gibson and 1 Washburn guitar, all U.S. made. They do cost more, but they're worth every penny. Couldn't buy any today, though I'd love to. All were bought before outsourcing took my wifes' position (software eng). A lot of focus on "labor costs", no focus on the bloated execs salaries. The up side, she used to pay $20+k income tax on her salary, now she pays $0. Multiply by several million unemployed, for the forseeable future. Maybe that will get someone's attention someday.

smyers
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Thursday, August 26, 2004 5:58 PM
<<Sure we may have more people employed today but that is because the average person is working more than one job. Just thing back when this country was an industrial super power, only one person had to work, the wife could stay home, or the husband could, now both have to work to try and make ends meet. >>

You're thinking of a dream world. First of all, the conditions you are talking about only existed in this country from about the end of WWII to the mid 60's. There is no way that life has always been like that in this country.

Let's also look at what life was like then, what our expectations were.

The average home was about 900 square feet. Now the average for new homes is over 2000 square feet. People then felt lucky if they had ONE color television. Now everyone has several. It used to be routine to have 2-3 children share one bedroom. Now it seems almost a God-given right that every child has his/her own room. A two car family was a rarity, a three car family almost unheard of. Now two cars is the standard and three cars is not uncommon. I could go on and on, but I think you get my drift.

The reason so many families have two wage earners is because they want a higher living standard than what we had in the 50's. Is that a good choice? I'm not sure that it always is, but it is everyone's right to decide for themselves.

Does this country have some economic problems? Yes, I agree that it does. The distribution of wealth in this country is skewing more and more towards the top 10%. I believe we need change in tax policies to limit the deductibility of executive compensation. I believe we need more companies with profit-sharing plans for their employees. Stockholders and executives should not be the only ones to profit when a company does well. The men and women who do the work of the company should also share in its success. So yes, I think this country could use some change in its economic policy.

But I also think overall the average American is FAR BETTER off than 50 years ago.

-Jerry
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:57 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Roadtrp

<<Sure we may have more people employed today but that is because the average person is working more than one job. Just thing back when this country was an industrial super power, only one person had to work, the wife could stay home, or the husband could, now both have to work to try and make ends meet. >>

You're thinking of a dream world. First of all, the conditions you are talking about only existed in this country from about the end of WWII to the mid 60's. There is no way that life has always been like that in this country.

Let's also look at what life was like then, what our expectations were.

The average home was about 900 square feet. Now the average for new homes is over 2000 square feet. People then felt lucky if they had ONE color television. Now everyone has several. It used to be routine to have 2-3 children share one bedroom. Now it seems almost a God-given right that every child has his/her own room. A two car family was a rarity, a three car family almost unheard of. Now two cars is the standard and three cars is not uncommon. I could go on and on, but I think you get my drift.

The reason so many families have two wage earners is because they want a higher living standard than what we had in the 50's. Is that a good choice? I'm not sure that it always is, but it is everyone's right to decide for themselves.

Does this country have some economic problems? Yes, I agree that it does. The distribution of wealth in this country is skewing more and more towards the top 10%. I believe we need change in tax policies to limit the deductibility of executive compensation. I believe we need more companies with profit-sharing plans for their employees. Stockholders and executives should not be the only ones to profit when a company does well. The men and women who do the work of the company should also share in its success. So yes, I think this country could use some change in its economic policy.

But I also think overall the average American is FAR BETTER off than 50 years ago.




Yes, the wages in this country are all going too much for that rich 10%.

But I believe that globalization has it's BIG disadvantages in the long run, unfortunatly, few companies today see that, while the big CEO's whine about $23 million "not being enough" Heh, most CEOs don't deserve a dime to their name, some (but very few) actually do their job the way it was supposed to be done.

Anyways, globalization has these long-term problems:

Huge tax decreases on the government. First you have many companies paying almost no property taxes now that their plants are overseas, plus those companies have to pay a lot less insurance benefits now, which leaves many services we take for granted without enough money to fully operate. Then the government can't charge those layed-off workers with income tax, and have to pay a LOT of people a $300-$400 unemployment check until they get a job. The government doesn't like to be without money, and this definently doesn't help. (Where do you think the bulk of that multi-billion dollar deficet came from, along with war on terror costs?)

Decreased industrial capacity. The cycle is a never-ending one. First you lay off workers, then our raw-material suppliers get that much less business, then the company also moves it customer support team to India, (And I don't by any means want to talk to someone I can't even understand, let alone cooperate with a country who is just as ornery as the rest of the Middle-East.), So now you're left with people unemployes in the industrial and telecommunications sectors. That leaves a lot of [censored] off people around, and the list just keeps getting bigger every day. If the government won't serve to the majority of the people in America who are already mad in this country, they're crazy. (of course, anyone could have told you they're crazy.[:(!])

But I wouldn't be so passive about globalization. Fight aganst it, get other people against it, get yourself and others buying as many American-made products as possible, and refuse to do any business with companies who move their suppor groups to India. If the majority of the people start doing this in AMerica, those businesses who aren't very loving of the country that let's them even exist won't have much business, will they? And after all that, send this company a letter, tell everyone you know to send them letters saying you will refuse and encourage others to refuse to buy their products because they're made in China, Mexico, etc. Now of couse non of this would do any good unless you had about 300,000+++ other people doing the same thing, but it's a start.

China can go to [censored] for all I care because I am going to refuse to buy anything made by Black & Decker, Wal-Mart, Irwin, and other worthless companies, and I'm going to get as many other people as possible to do the same. In fact if you're reading this I'd consider it. Those of us with kids or grandkids need to give them something in the future, preferably nothing from China, India, or Mexico.


And note that i don't mind trade with our friends in the world like Germany, England, Canada, or Australia! If it's made by people getting the same treatment and wages as American workers, and there is a American-made alternative, that's what trade should be limited to!




  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Roadtrp
[brLet's also look at what life was like then, what our expectations were.

The average home was about 900 square feet. Now the average for new homes is over 2000 square feet. People then felt lucky if they had ONE color television. Now everyone has several. It used to be routine to have 2-3 children share one bedroom. Now it seems almost a God-given right that every child has his/her own room. A two car family was a rarity, a three car family almost unheard of. Now two cars is the standard and three cars is not uncommon. I could go on and on, but I think you get my drift.



Dare we mention that most cars were sold with rubber mats on the floor instead of W/W carpeting. Radios (AM) were optional equipment. Automatic transmissions were optional equipment, not standard. For that matter, until about the mid 1960's, heaters were optional. Air conditioning was a luxury reserved for the few who were willing and had the money to spring for it. Cruise control and intermittent wipers were unheard of and almost nobody except those in the luxury car market had power windows. There were no remote keyless entry systems and there were basically 4 models - 2 door sedan, 2 door convertible, 4 door sedan and station wagon. A car was considered well equipped if it had a radio, a heater and white sidewall tires (thank God those died a peaceful death).

Andre


It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 27, 2004 12:07 AM
A talk radio station here in Detroit had a couple of the on-air personalities bitching about the reduction of manpower by using automated answering systems instead of a real live person answering the phone. They don't think it is right for someone to save time, money, and labor, if they can. When they got to the commercial break, the first commercial was one of the personalities talking about the underground sprinkler system with rain sensor and automatic fertilizing capabilities. I thought how ironic, he just did for himself what these corporations are doing-cut out the labor by going to automation. People just don't think, do they!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 27, 2004 1:25 AM
I was watching some news program on tv the other day, I don't remember which one. They were in China, interviewing the plant manager of an automobile assembly plant.

The man admitted that thier vehicles are of such poor quality, that they could never be sold in America. He went on to say that they are working hard to correct the quality issues, and he hopes that within 10 years they will have a quality product for export to western nations.

Any of you MBA types or those retirees with your fat ATT pensions have any comments?

Jim
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Friday, August 27, 2004 6:37 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ironmine

I was watching some news program on tv the other day, I don't remember which one. They were in China, interviewing the plant manager of an automobile assembly plant.

The man admitted that thier vehicles are of such poor quality, that they could never be sold in America. He went on to say that they are working hard to correct the quality issues, and he hopes that within 10 years they will have a quality product for export to western nations.

Any of you MBA types or those retirees with your fat ATT pensions have any comments?

Jim



This is precisely the same process that Japan went through in the late 50's/early 60's. One of the ironic things about this is that the Japanese learned their quality lessons from W. Edwards Deming, an American. In fact, Deming is revered among Japanese industrialists. If the Chinese learn their quality lesson from the Japanese, they will have had good teachers. You going to blame the Chinese for trying to put out a quality product ?

In contrast, we created a bunch of scum-sucking, bean counting, MBA financial types who never have and never will understand anything about manufacturing. These types still rule.

Incidentally, I don't have a fat a-- pension. I have a 401k. It's there because I spent LESS than I made during my working life and saved the rest.

P.S. I was laid off from my job. The thing that kept THAT from hurting is that I spent LESS than I made during my working life and saved the rest. I haven't had a paycheck in 3 years. I have no intention of looking for anything other than a seasonal part time job.

Andre

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 36 posts
Posted by d4fal on Friday, August 27, 2004 10:05 AM
I've noticed the proliferation of "Made in China" lately, too. As a rule, I buy local before I even consider made in some far off land. It keeps jobs at home, employing our own neighbors and all that.

I do have a problem with buying anything made in any Asian country. I know that this could be considered racist, but these countries by far do have a bad reputation for civil rights abuses, and their track record does not show that things will improve anytime soon. "Made in Canada or USA" covers just about anything I ever want to buy, if I can't get it within a few miles of my home, that is.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 27, 2004 10:41 AM
Hello Andre

No, I don't blame China for trying to make a quality product. I blame China for being a Communist hell hole, for using its citizens (including children) as slave labor, for not caring about becoming a good member of the world community, for selling weapons systems and dangerous technologies to anyone that wants them, for all the counterfeiting of the world's products that they do. These things, and others. Don't confuse Japan, or South Korea, with China.

I agree with you concerning MBA's.

Like you, I have a 401k, and have tried to save as much as possible. But I read a couple of comments that seemed to come from some people that worked for the ATT's all their life and recieved that big pension with health benefits, and want to tell the rest of us that the world is still peachy. They are out of touch and tick me off. (Is ATT still even in business?, barely.)

Like you, a job that I worked at for 27 years is gone. Supplied and maintained industrial equipment. Went out of business because there is such less demand for industrial equipment. My job before that, in a machine shop, also went out of business for lack of work. I started my own little business ... I have no health insurance. I wish I could just take it easy like you, but I have kids that I would like to put through college. What's one year at a state university this September? 25k.

My oldest son enters college in 2 years. I was so pleased with his interest in mechanical engineering. But if all our manufacturing will be in China, just how many ME's do we need, I sometimes wonder.

I guess we could all just work for the government.

Jim
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Friday, August 27, 2004 11:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ironmine


I guess we could all just work for the government.

Jim


Jim,

I don't think you would like that much better. I work for a state supported university. Because of state budget deficits the university appropriation has been savagely cut over the past few years. Hundreds of jobs were eliminated. We went two years without any salary increase. Our health insurance contribution more than doubled. This past June we finally got a raise. It was a whopping 2%. They increased our parking expense and our insurance costs far more than they increased our salary.

My point?

Things are tough right now in ALL sectors of employment. The business cycle is at a down point now, but I am hopeful it will recover. I personally think foreign trade is not to blame for all our economic woes, but you are certainly entitled to your opinion. I worry about how tax reductions and war expenditures have created massive budget deficits, but I don't want to get into a political discussion about that.

Economic times change, and we have to roll with the punches the best we can. I still would far rather be in the U.S. than any other country on earth.

P.S. I'm not retired, and I don't have an MBA.

[;)]

-Jerry
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Southwest US
  • 438 posts
Posted by Bikerdad on Friday, August 27, 2004 12:45 PM
I'd like to point out that those who are proud they have 401Ks yet bitching about greedy CEOs and stockholders are complaining about themselves!

There's lots of stuff not Made In China, just as there's lots of stuff that is. China lost 3 times as many manufacturing jobs as we did during the 1990s! Yeah, its amazing what updating technologies can do.

China is no longer truly a Communist country. It would be far more accurate to describe them as reverting to the ancient imperial mandarin society. Yes, it is repressive, yes, the human rights abuses are legion, and yes, I avoid buying Chinese products when I can. Its a gamble right now, will the awakening desires for freedom and wealth of the Chinese people move quickly enough to stave off the risk of their burgeoning economic power? I think it will...

Those who want to protect jobs, get a grip. Do you know WHY the American candy industry is disappearing, moving to Canada? Because we've been protecting the sugar producers. As a result, sugar in America costs almost twice the world market price. Gee, what's a CEO who's responsibility is to the shareholders to do? Pay twice as much for raw materials as the guy in Toronto?

Globalization is, on the whole, a good thing. Yes, there are problems, but then, industrialization had its problems as well.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 10, 2004 12:41 AM
Several companies do manufacture items "MADE IN THE USA" like Stewart or Bowser. However, many business have taken business to CHINA for plastic injection, assembly etc due to affordability. Quality control is important to the many manufactures who are competing in this tough market of model railroading. Customers demanding everything to be ready to roll and manufacturing one of every engine ever made painted in every road name only to purchase at below wholesale. Rivarossi originally made in Italy made major improvements on their locomotives drive train and weighting only after sending the manufacturing over to CHINA in 2001. Nevertheless, the cost of change, low profit margins and recent purchase of ARNOLD N scale cause bankrupcy even with lower manufacturing cost. LIMA since purchased Rivarossi/Arnold and are making a better product today than 10 years ago. The newcomer " Broadway Limited" made in South Korea is doing a superb job of making highly detail locomotives with full sound in both DC and DCC modes that is the envy to nearly every other manufacture trying to copy the operation of both DC and DCC modes with full sound quality. Many parts still are made in China to keep cost down, profits high while providing wonderful trains that have received superb reviews. Other manufactures such as MEHANO imported as IHC International Hobby Corporation is made in Slovenia. Small custom handcrafted locomtives can be found made across the United States too like Ron LaFever in Paris, Texas who builds customs CLIMAX locomotives that out perform those manufactured even in Brass. http://www.lafeverclimax.com/ From Small Businesses to large manufactures and importers, there surely is a train for you.

The United States has lost a great deal of manufacturing overseas on nearly every product ever produced on our soil. My VOLVO has parts made in the USA and Sweden. Radio in Japan, tires from South America. We could cover issues like American Labor Unions, Federal Trade Agreements, Economics and the many concerns to supporting another country's economy. Often too, the American Copy being manufacture else where is done to better spec's improving the original product. And truly just as often we can purchase an item that surely should be labeled "WORTHLESS" regardless of where it was made. Foriegn manufacturing for American business is not something new either. During the 1930's the US shipped tons of scrap steel to Japan which in turn made items for the United States. Today, scrap recycled metals are crossing into Mexico via TFM "TEX-MEX" only to be turned into products for manufactures in the United States. such as the Worlds largest Off Shore Oil Rig, MADE IN TEXAS:

Although the important issue is enjoying model railroading. The Quality time that you will enjoy with your son's and your friends as you build your collection and layout. I would recommend reviewing http://www.greatesthobby.com/ as a start and then working with your local hobby store or small on line business that can afford the time and concern to your issues. World economics is always trading off and manufacturing parts and supplies have moved from Austria, to Yugoslavia, to Japan and currently a great deal to CHINA. However, the enjoyment of that special locomotive with it's light brightly seen remains fasinating and exciting regardless of where the parts started out. Often the drawings and design began with an American or German Engineer with a wonderful idea that made DREAMS COME TRUE for the many of us know as Model railroaders.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Friday, September 10, 2004 8:29 AM
Some years ago, I visited a number of the model factories in Hong Kong (then still a British colony) and one in China. In China, the workers were generally married women, working to earn money for basic home appliances, refrigerators and washing machines, and colour television sets. Most of them were from poor rural areas, and worked for a couple of years to get those things most Americans would regard as neccessities, then returned to their home areas. This might not still be the case, but these people are not the generals who ordered the Tien An Men massacre. These are more likely to be the victims of a government that isn't even really Communist any more, if it ever was. Some of the women brought their younger children to work, because there were no child minding centres or Pre-schools to send them to. The factory I visited didn't even have a paved road to it. It was in the middle of a very recently converted rice paddy. These people are working hard for not much money. They aren't trying to hurt anyone in America, they are just trying to earn a living. But China is developing, just as America did. By now, I'm sure the workers are being paid more and enjoying better conditions. More of the roads are paved, and maybe they are saving for their first automobile. When I visited, the design and toolmaking was done in Hong Kong, where the workers were better educated, at least partly as a result of the British having guided the education system. Hong Kong has a sort of elected government, not truly democratic, but there is an elected opposition, something they don't have in Beijing yet. The Chinese will progress toward the conditions in the USA. I have a Chinese TV station on my cable service, and there are commercials for the usual things, and US Movies are shown, with dubbed dialog. Until then, the economic rationale of comparative advantage will work. The Chinese will do jobs that Americans won't do, because they are willing to work for lower wages because their expectations are lower and their expenses less. But the Chinese can't do the advanced engineering that can be done in the USA. They couldn't build a spacecraft to test the Solar wind, or get it back to Earth (although maybe they could have supplied a battery that would have released the parachute). The US will have to concentrate on the things it does better than the rest of the world. The government may have to assist those industries that need to change, and encourage the new industries for the new era (but you will find that this is happening, regardless of the political color of the day). But we must not idolise the past. It never was that good (except in model form).

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 10, 2004 9:10 AM
It's interesting and confusing at the same time. On another topic I complained about the apparent going away of the Athearn Blue Box kits (made in America). I think the overwhelming response was that the RTR (which this thread identifies as being made in China - I have no way to check this out) was a better deal and a step forward. Which is it?

An earlier post said that we should only buy American products and this will get the attention of manufacturers. Unfortunately the vast number of American consumers, including model railroaders, aren't going to do that. We, as a country and as model railroader (as a whole) have become people wanting instant gratification. When was the last time you saw a significant number of articles in any model railroading mag that talks about starting with a 30.00 engine (Athearn blue box - made in America), adding 30.00 of detail parts (made in America) and a couple hours of work to get a smooth running well detailed engine? People are more into buying 10 RTR Kato or RTR Athearn engines.

I for one would prefer buying a couple of dozen blue box hoppers and over time increasing their level of detail than purchasing a couple of dozen RTR (higher price and not made in the US). Unfortunately, the majority of my fellow model rails don't think that way.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Friday, September 10, 2004 9:55 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C
.............. The US will have to concentrate on the things it does better than the rest of the world. The government may have to assist those industries that need to change, and encourage the new industries for the new era (but you will find that this is happening, regardless of the political color of the day). But we must not idolise the past. It never was that good (except in model form).

Peter


Yes, and trying to prevent change leads eventually to economic ruin.

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 10, 2004 7:17 PM
I don't mind buying things made in Canada, Australia, England, Germany, or Italy, it's Mexico, South America, and SE Asia that I have problems with.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Friday, September 10, 2004 9:30 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89

I don't mind buying things made in Canada, Australia, England, Germany, or Italy, it's Mexico, South America, and SE Asia that I have problems with.


Why?
-Jerry
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: US
  • 15 posts
Posted by nkpltrr on Friday, September 10, 2004 10:01 PM
It is becoming harder to find items not made or assembled in China. China is making tons of money off us and then they have the audacity to hold one of our planes captive and then return it only after they stripped it clean of the technology. What did America do? Nothing but apologize to China for spying on them. ? That is why I avoid buying items made in China. However, unless you live in a cave and cook on a wood fire, you will eventually have to buy a made in china item. It is sad that our USA companies have gone to overseas for manufacturing and left us to be buyers. Someday the money will run dry and there will be no buyers because we will have no jobs to earn money.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 10, 2004 10:04 PM
I'm assuming that Christopher has problems with Mexico, South America and SE Asia because of the standard of living that most factory workers have there as opposed to those in Canada, Australia, England Germany or Italy. Of course I hate to think what the cost of a Atlas/Kato/Proto engine would be if it were made in a factory in England!

The manufacturers are going to respond to what their customers want. As long as they think they can make more profit by manufacturing higher detailed items in low wage countries, that is what they are going to do. Have everyone that is buying these things switch over and purchase the same amount of product from Athearn (blue box), MDC, detail associates etc. then the manufacturers would adjust accordingly.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Friday, September 10, 2004 10:22 PM
[
QUOTE: Originally posted by dkelly

I'm assuming that Christopher has problems with Mexico, South America and SE Asia because of the standard of living that most factory workers have there as opposed to those in Canada, Australia, England Germany or Italy.

I think you have probably correctly predicted Christopher's point of view.

I guess where I think differently is that if we allow the 'third world' nations to progress, someday ALL world trading partners will have a standard of living more like that in the U.S. We will approach the point where every nation's products are truly competitive with every other nation's products on a global scale. This will benefit everyone economically, and have one HUGE additional advantage:

How many people owning their own home, having 2 Color TV's (one large screen) and two fairly new vehicles in the garage will want to be a suicide bomber?

Absolutely Zero!! The ultimate way to defeat terrorism is to make life decent enough that no one anywhere would consider a suicidal terrorist act.
-Jerry
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Along the old Hannibal & St.Joe
  • 94 posts
Posted by cisco1 on Friday, September 10, 2004 10:56 PM
Started to write a short contribution and suddenly had two pages! Yes, support those who have the guts and determination to keep producing goods here at home. No, don't get caught up in the political smoke screen from Washington and the media. The big money runs these two and hides what they don't want us to see. Yes, write those companies who are moving jobs out of this country. Phone them if possible too. Make your presence known at political rallies,etc. Get involved. It's not just for our future but our childrens' too. Finally, has anyone considered the cooperative model for business?
It works because everyone from the management to the workers to the consumers gets a piece of the pie. All profits after expenses are divided among the members according to years of membership and amount of product consumed. Anyone want to start a new manufacturing plant here? I'll contribute to the cause. It may not be in the thousands of dollars but I wonder what 50 or 100 of us could do? Probably ANYTHING we put our minds to! Chris
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 10, 2004 11:13 PM
cjm89 said: "That is exactly what "scares" me; 1. Someday everything in the USA will be foreign made, even Kellog's cereal is now made in Canada! (???)"

There is a huge Kellogs plant right here in Landisville ( Lancaster County ), PA They get so much in and out by Rail that N/S keep a crew there on site. So all is not lost. I live close by depending on which way the wind blows you smell Cornflakes, or Twizzlers ( Hershey Foods ) or the poop the spread on the fields. Dave
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 8:03 AM
China is making money off of us? And then they hold our plane hostage? Funny thing. I don't remember China forcing American companies to manufacture stuff there. I dare say that in the big scheme of stuff China is not making as much on each sneaker made there as this country would if it were made here. Manufacturers are there because they can increase their bottom lines by being there because of a higher profit margin and the fact that American consumers like the results of stuff being made there. (how much would a name brand sneaker cost if made here in America?)Political rallies? Write the manufacture? None of this works. If people truly want a manufacturer to stop doing business in a certain country . . . . say China, then there is a simple solution. Stop buying its product. You can write a CEO a hundred letters today . . . but it's a waste of time if you just turn around and buy the product anyways. These are corporations . .. . they are concerned with one thing . . . the bottom line.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Saturday, September 11, 2004 10:34 AM
Announced yesterday, the State of Missouri is opening an office in China. The stated reason for this is that the Chinese market represents the 5th largest export trading partner for MO business and they want to get a larger share. The Chinese market will very likely become the largest single export market for goods made in the USA within the next decade. As individuals, feel free to boycott Chinese made products, but don't expect US business to ignore this huge market opportunity.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 11:37 AM
Simon,

Very very interesting. Missouri is becoming proactive and chasing new markets for its products. It would be interesting to see what kind of stuff gets sold to China.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Saturday, September 11, 2004 1:41 PM
Beer and cigarettes [:D] According to the press release MO is the 20th state to open such an office.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 7:40 PM
Dkelly:
A shoe, or anything else for the most part, would cost no more if it was made in the USA instead of China to consumers. New Balance makes some of their shoes in the USA, and they cost no more than Nikes, K-Swiss, Scethcers, etc. The whole reason companies go overseas is because they get cheap materials and labor over there, and once it get on American soil the company sells it for the price that a USA-made equivalent costs. The excess money goes into the company brass's pockets.

Simon 1966:

And there are 40 states with their welfare offices in India.[V]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 10:02 PM
Simon,

Maybe I didn't write that clearly. A previous post talked about how China is making tons of money from us and then capture one of our military planes and alleges that it is spying. I meant to say . . . no one is holding a gun to China's head and focing them to make stuff. Why are they? Because the profit margin can be higher to the manufacturer (and not just the brass . . but the stockholders also) even if the cost to the consumer is the same (or even lower). I do think, though that stuff made overseas does at time lead to lower costs to the consumer. How much a handmade brass engine cost the consumer if it were made in the U.S.? I dare say it would be more expensive than one made in China/Korea etc.

Also - I didn't know that New Balance were made in America. Of course what would their prices be if they advertised as much as Nike etc?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 10:11 PM
New Balance has (I think) about 6 plants throughout the USA, some of their shoes are made in China because they can't get all the materials they need over here. I'd rather NB pay American workers 10 times what the Chinese get paid than advertise 10 times as much, anyways.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 11:26 PM
cjm

I agree totally. New Balance should be rewarded. Of course New Balance has an uphill battle against Nike etc. Why? Because they are making less profit on each sale due to their increased costs of employeeing American workers. It is this higher profit on unit sales that allows Nike etc to pay sports starts millions of dollars to wear their shoes which in turn leads to even more sales. (Of course Model Railroad manufacturers don't have spend money on sponsorship - unless Proto 2000 became the official engine of the 2005 NMRA convention!) What can New Balance do? How can it compete? The difference in cost to the manufacturer should lead to Nike etc to offer sneakers at a price break, but they have to dish out money for sponsorship etc. How much is that? Back in B-School I read a case study where one of the jeans companies in the early 80's was spending 75 cents of every dollar in sales in advertising! Since MR manufacturers don't have that problem, they can cut the cost to consumer and increase its sales that way.

Bottom line, I agree with you . . . I'd rather NB pay American workers 10 times what the Chinese get paid than advertise 10 times as much . . . . but what does the majority of the American public want? I dare say as soon as someone as Michael Jordon, Britney Spears and the Olsen twins put their names on something . . .people fall over themselves to buy it.

I want to buy American made MR products, but it is getting harder and harder to do so. There is another topic on this forum discussing how hard it is to get their hands on blue box and MDC kits. If model railroaders put their money where their mouths are, it would only make economic sense for the manufacturers to put American made products on the shelf.

It's up to us.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!