Yes, the George Washington was confirmed ... a year and a half ago. Walthers' HO scale GW has since been manufactured, shipped, and sold out.
And the opener of this thread was posted almost 7 years ago. 7 name trains ago. Before anyone else gets the wrong idea about this discussion being about an upcoming train, I'm locking the thread.
If you have any information about what Walthers is planning on releasing in the future, rather than the past, start a new thread. This one's done.
--Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editorsotte@kalmbach.com
The Jet ClipperI personally think that it's going to be an NYC train. Think about it;
They are going to model years where they have motive power. (In this case E-8 Units) Designing steam is no longer in walthers/proto's roundhouse *takes hat off*
Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions
Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!
****, this is quite an old tread!
Lemme add my two cents into this...
I personally think that it's going to be an NYC train. Think about it;
Back when the 1953-era Broadway Limited in 2011ish (I don't know the exact year), the 20th Century Limited was already out for 2-3 years. Hey, how long has this current Broadway run? 2 years? Interesting...
Seeing that they seem to be fond of the late 50's trains (Broadway, Capitol Limited, George Washington), I say a 20th Century/Commodore Vanderbilt is on the horizon.
Also, they cancelled all of the NYC Cigar Band E8's that were supposed to be released with the C&O, Southern and Illinois Central units. Coincidence; I THINK NOT!
Well the new name train is the C&O's George Washington. It's a fine choice. But toward the later years, "The George" became somewhat of a mutt. It becomes a cool excuse to add different configs. I just wish they had a dome car on it.I much prefer the earlier years of "The George" when it was pulled by steam. But that would mean Walthers would have to make steam again.http://www.trainweb.org/fredatsf/C&OGW50.htm
ManOWarSorry to be such a late comer to this conversation but I'm curious about the reason why Walther's won't touch the Nancy Hank's?
Probably due to its Jim Crow segregation.
Dave
Just be glad you don't have to press "2" for English.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ_ALEdDUB8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hqFS1GZL4s
http://s73.photobucket.com/user/steemtrayn/media/MovingcoalontheDCM.mp4.html?sort=3&o=27
I'd wager the Nancy Hanks is poisoned as a prospective Walthers name train for one major reason.
Just wish Walthers had taken your advice. I am presently modeling the Central of Georgia and esp. the ¨Nancy Hanks¨ as my wife went to see the last running of the Nancy Hanks II which used a pacific 4-6-2 to pull the carriages from Atlanta to Jonesboro back in 1971 (the last run of the Nancy Hanks II). From Jonesboro, GA, the e-7 diesels took over the job and pulled the carriages from Jonesboro to Savannah. Sure wish I had been there for that last run, but I was in Vietnam during that time. Now my wife wants me to add some carriages with the Nancy Hanks and/or Man of War heralds. I will try to find some undecorated carriages, pullman, lounge, combine and a Wabash dome to add to the consist. I already have a Mantua heavy pacific that I will letter with the number 750 which was the steamer used from Atlanta to Jonesboro; I´ll have to add a Central of Georgia herald to the tender to keep the wife happy with my railroad layout. It is getting hard to find Nancy Hanks´ decals with the horses´ head with the horse shoe beneath. I was searching and came across this article while I was searching for the Nancy Hanks´ heralds and passenger car striping. Cheers to all who model the southern US railroads eventhough some are now defunct. It is my understanding that the CofG was bought by Southern railroad which was then sold to Norfolk Southern.
I already model the Southern Railroad Crescent Ltd. and have a nice Mehano Mikado to pull my three carriage consist. Since I´ve been modeling the Crescent Ltd. I´ve decided to add the Central of Georgia at the whims from my wife to model the Nancy Hanks. Guess I´ll have to find some sorta E-7A to repaint to add it to the Central of Georgia. I seem to have a folder full of information on the Central of Georgia, which includes the roster of all the steamers and diesels they ever owned, including maker and types of engines.
HO and Lionel 027
Im still waiting for a Pere Marquette.
Imho, if Walthers desides to have a "south" or "southeastern" based passenger streamliner it would likely be the Southern Crescent (post 1950s). This beautiful prototype train featured mostly Budd cars (which Walthers already produces) and can be run in mulitple railroad time periods (1950s-transition era, 1960s-horsepower wars era, and 1970s Amtrak era) which means a greater variety of modelers. Sadly, there had been specualtion that had it not been for the fatal wreck of the Southern Crescent in 1978 in Virginia, President Graham Claytor would have continued running it as it did produce a small profit.
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
RedGrey62 Pamela Streamliners of the West, North and East are way over represented in model railroading. I am still hoping and waiting for Walthers to model long overlooked trains like The Crescent (1950 edition), The Tennessean (1950 edition), and The Texas Eagle (1952 edition). As a child I never understood why the model train industry had a blind spot in the South and Southwest when it came to modeling passenger trains. >:-( I agree (mostly) with your assessment (I would consider all the various Santa Fe trains in the southwest). I think it comes down to marketing as almost all the trains that are mass produced are transcontinentals or originate/terminate in high population cities. Therefore the manufacturer has a broad base of modelers that may want the train as it ran through their territory. Even the road I model, the CB&Q, one would think they only ran the Pioneer and California Zephyr. Fortunately there are options to model the various trains but some cannot be modeled without tracking down, and paying for, high end brass models or serious kitbashing. I believe if a manufacturer would come up with a "modular" way to build streamlined passenger cars, either Budd or Pullman Standard, they could build the majority of cars of the various trains. The basic shell for a Budd car (aside from diners, baggage and domes) is the same for sleepers and coaches. The differences are the window arrangement, undercar applinaces, skirting (full, partial, or none) and roof vents. Of course the interiors would be arranged differently but they could be modular too. I know there are other subtle differences but the cars would be anywhere from 95-100 percent correct as opposed to another Santa Fe prototype with another RR name on the side. After all that, I would love to see more southern and additional southwestern roads done. While I was in Tennessee, I was seriously considering modeling the Hummingbird. However, I think the smaller trains need to be even more accurate than the transcons and I just couldn't find anything close enough. Ricky
Pamela Streamliners of the West, North and East are way over represented in model railroading. I am still hoping and waiting for Walthers to model long overlooked trains like The Crescent (1950 edition), The Tennessean (1950 edition), and The Texas Eagle (1952 edition). As a child I never understood why the model train industry had a blind spot in the South and Southwest when it came to modeling passenger trains. >:-(
Streamliners of the West, North and East are way over represented in model railroading. I am still hoping and waiting for Walthers to model long overlooked trains like The Crescent (1950 edition), The Tennessean (1950 edition), and The Texas Eagle (1952 edition). As a child I never understood why the model train industry had a blind spot in the South and Southwest when it came to modeling passenger trains. >:-(
I agree (mostly) with your assessment (I would consider all the various Santa Fe trains in the southwest). I think it comes down to marketing as almost all the trains that are mass produced are transcontinentals or originate/terminate in high population cities. Therefore the manufacturer has a broad base of modelers that may want the train as it ran through their territory. Even the road I model, the CB&Q, one would think they only ran the Pioneer and California Zephyr. Fortunately there are options to model the various trains but some cannot be modeled without tracking down, and paying for, high end brass models or serious kitbashing.
I believe if a manufacturer would come up with a "modular" way to build streamlined passenger cars, either Budd or Pullman Standard, they could build the majority of cars of the various trains. The basic shell for a Budd car (aside from diners, baggage and domes) is the same for sleepers and coaches. The differences are the window arrangement, undercar applinaces, skirting (full, partial, or none) and roof vents. Of course the interiors would be arranged differently but they could be modular too. I know there are other subtle differences but the cars would be anywhere from 95-100 percent correct as opposed to another Santa Fe prototype with another RR name on the side.
After all that, I would love to see more southern and additional southwestern roads done. While I was in Tennessee, I was seriously considering modeling the Hummingbird. However, I think the smaller trains need to be even more accurate than the transcons and I just couldn't find anything close enough.
Ricky
I guess I'll pull the trigger this round.
"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination."-Albert Einstein
http://gearedsteam.blogspot.com/
ITS OFFICIAL!!! I just got my new Walthers flyer and they and announed the Empire Builder as their next passenger train. 10 cars with an F7 A-B-B-A set of locomotives for power.
See pages 26 and 27 of their new flyer.
Ira
wjstix I would think Walthers Pere Marquette train wouldn't be interesting to that many modellers, at least I'd think there would be more people interested in a train on the SAL, ACL, Southern, CofG etc. - especially one of the long-distance trains running from the North to Florida. Yet Walthers did the Pere Marquette train.
I would think Walthers Pere Marquette train wouldn't be interesting to that many modellers, at least I'd think there would be more people interested in a train on the SAL, ACL, Southern, CofG etc. - especially one of the long-distance trains running from the North to Florida. Yet Walthers did the Pere Marquette train.
Modeling Conrail, Amtrak and NJ DOT under the wires in New Jersey, July 1979.
personally, I love these name trains. As an early Amtrak modeler, everytime they come out with a new name train, its usually a car I can use for my own prototype consists. If i'm lucky, they even make the car in Amtrak phase I, though i've had to custom paint a few. It beats building core kits!
ManOWarthe Central of Georgia, the Georgia RR and affiliates A&WP, WRofA)
Texas Zepher They candidly told me they were shy of doing any trains from the Southeast. Apparently SE road names don't see well in general.
They candidly told me they were shy of doing any trains from the Southeast. Apparently SE road names don't see well in general.
I suppose SE road names don't do well becasue they do so few of them that they never get a following. Kind of like everyone models ATSF, UP, or Pennsy because that's they mostly make. Self fullfilling and so forth.
Left Coast RailI assume you're an HO modeler. I'd look to Broadway Limited for Zephyr cars.
Walters Proto 2000 pretty much is the PA leader and there are plenty out there. The Faribanks Morse are more of a brass item.
I assume you're an HO modeler. I'd look to Broadway Limited for Zephyr cars. I've seen that Walthers are going to come out with a U.P. Executive train although the E units won't have ditch lights and only a few of the cars are close to being accurate for the rivet counters amonst us. Walters Proto 2000 pretty much is the PA leader and there are plenty out there. The Faribanks Morse are more of a brass item. The manufacturers like to make and sell stuff that uses molds which require slight re-tooling and accessories in order to keep production costs down.
I talked, at length, to the Walther's representatives at a train show in March (RMD TCA March 1 in Denver). They candidly told me they were shy of doing any trains from the Southeast. Apparently SE road names don't see well in general. When I pressed they did say a re-run of the UP Cities of was a very good possibility as it had sold out so quickly, but they did not give any hints of what the next new thing would be. I dropped a hint for the Denver Zephyr.
When I told them they were coming out with stuff too quickly, it seems they had also never thought of people like me who model the trains not a specific road. Apparently they figured someone who bought the El Capitan would not consider buying a Broadway Limited. So they overlapped them making it too expensive for me to buy all of each.
I also said they needed to get off the E and F unit motive power and get some PAs or FM units to pull the named trains.
(no idea why this font is so small!?)
Zombie or walking dead topic - never heard that before - maybe I need to find that forum and read it more. Other - non-train forums call it "necro-ing" a topic, in some forums it's against the rules to "necro" a long dead topic. I always thought it an odd term; necro meaning dead basically so to necro a topic in plain terms would be to make it dead? Not raise it from the dead? Who knows.
Rio Grande. The Action Road - Focus 1977-1983
Interesting seeing this thread. Imho, as mentioned, there's nothing wrong with bring up an older topic as long as the newer posts add new info or interesting points to the discussion.
Anway, I realize the chances are slim, but I hope that Walthers would consider running another batch of Metroliners in the Penn Central scheme. There were a number of modelers interested as this was the version that the Metrolinenr first entered service in with a number of them remaining in that scheme well into the Amtrak era.
I would have purchased the Pennsy set and changed out the decals, but the price tag was far too steep. Purchasing the Amtrak version to disassemble and strip the shells was suggested, but it's not a scenario that I relish.
For me, it's ironic as I was one of the modelers requesting Walthers and other manufacturers to produce the Metros starting in the mid 2000s.
I know Walthers likes to concentrate on a particular train, and doesn't show any interest in the whole roster of any single railroad. However, their new P-S 10-6's seem to be breaking that pattern. They're not doing entire trains for most of the roads that used these cars, such as NKP, D&RGW, B&O, etc. I'd like to think this is the way they want to go in the future, but I'm not getting my hopes up. They did the Broadway Ltd., which gave us several usable PRR cars; but the lounge and tail car were unique to the Broadway and were not quite the same as the much more numerous lounges and tail cars used on other PRR trains such as the Spirit of St. Louis, the Liberty Limited, and the Cincinnati Limited. A P-S 14-4 would also be nice, lettered for MoPac, T&P, SL-SF, Katy, B&O, KCS, and perhaps a few others. That would take us a ways forward in putting together a Penn-Texas. And lest we forget, Walthers never released its Plan 4140 sleeper in L&N lettering on a Tuscan red car for interliner service over the PRR. That was a lost opportunity.
The Nancy Hanks would be awesome. I have a good friend that is a former engineer on the CofG, and has been really wanting some prototype Central passenger equipment in plastic.