Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856732 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, October 3, 2016 10:37 AM

daveklepper

So......was it Dixie something?   Or something Dixie? 

 

That's the nature of my original question....

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Sunday, October 2, 2016 4:53 PM

This is fun because most of the print references (and few if any Internet ones I've seen) even hint at this.

FEC had an employee contest to name the Jacksonville-Miami train (that became named the Henry M Flagler).  But Cox notes that the etched nameplates for that name were only taken off when the power started being used on the "Dixie Flagler" - it seemed strange to me that he'd mention the contest but not the 'working title' of the service.  "Dixieland" of course was only applied to the train in 1954, with sleepers.

I've seen references to "Chicago-Miami Streamliner" as what may be an ETT name for the train -- could that be what they used as a placeholder in 1940?

Where's Mike and his period newspaper access when we need it??

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, October 2, 2016 8:41 AM

So......was it Dixie something?   Or something Dixie? 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, September 30, 2016 11:39 AM

daveklepper

More guesses, Dixie Special, Dixieland Special?

 

No and no....it is true that for most of the 20th Century the Dixie Route utilized the word "Dixie" in their name trains.  

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:42 AM

More guesses, Dixie Special, Dixieland Special?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:30 AM

daveklepper

Just a guess, Miami Flagler or Florida Flagler?

 

No and no...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 29, 2016 6:44 AM

Just a guess, Miami Flagler or Florida Flagler?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 6:48 PM

daveklepper

It was renamed the Dixieland before it was discontinued.  Could this also have been its initial name?

 

Nope.  When the Dixie Flagler started the Dixieland was a winter season train.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:05 AM

It was renamed the Dixieland before it was discontinued.  Could this also have been its initial name?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 5:08 AM

daveklepper

The Henry M. Flagler

 

Nope.  The name Henry M Flagler was utilized when the FEC consist was used in Jacksonville-Miami service.  When it was announced that the consist would be used as the Dixie Route's contribution to the new Chicago-Miami coach service, it was introduced under a different name.  Im looking for that name.  As I stated in my original question, the name Dixie Flagler was introduced near its inaugural run, so the name I'm looking for existed only for a new months.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 4:05 AM

The Henry M. Flagler

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 PM

When the Chicago-Miami coach streamliners were announced in mid-1940, the FEC train set that operated as the Jacksonville-Miami Henry M. Flagler was to be repurposed as the Dixie Route's contribution to this new service.  As the name Dixie Flagler was applied right before the trains inauguration, what was the original name of this train as it was announced a few months earlier?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:06 PM

wanswheel

Myron, with either of those you win. I had wrongly believed William K. Vanderbilt's description of a train inaugurated on Sept. 29, 1929.

  

I guess NYC's publicity department didn't do their due dillgence when they boasted that the Commodore was the first train named after an individual.  Most likely, the naming of a major NYC train the Commodore Vanderbilt signaled to the rest of the industry that this type of nomenclature was legitimate and acceptable, for about this time and beyond a slew of trains named after individuals were established. 

New question coming up in a day or so...

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:25 AM

Myron, with either of those you win. I had wrongly believed William K. Vanderbilt's description of a train inaugurated on Sept. 29, 1929.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:22 AM

wanswheel

What train was the first to be named for an individual?

 

I'm going to offer two possibilities:

Flagler Limited - Jacksonville-Miami - FEC (established around May 1925)

OR

De Witt Clinton - Detroit-Buffalo - MC (established around early-mid 1926)

Myron Bilas

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Monday, September 19, 2016 5:43 PM

What train was the first to be named for an individual?

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Monday, September 19, 2016 4:23 PM

That's it, the "17th Street Wreck."

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Monday, September 19, 2016 11:58 AM

1262 was actually 1282.

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Sunday, September 18, 2016 6:27 PM

OK, nobody liked that one.

How about this - describe the wreck in this song: http://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/download_file.php?param1=7000&param2=7360

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Monday, September 12, 2016 6:30 PM

Where and when did the longest train of pine lumber ever run in California operate?  (Extra points for the number of cars involved, and the locomotive type)

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, September 9, 2016 6:41 AM

RME, you're up!

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 8, 2016 10:57 PM

Next?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 2:48 PM

Rutland's four 4-8-2's (90-93) were among the lightest built, completed in 1946 by Alco.  B&O built 10 more 4-8-2s in 1947 and 1948 at Mt. Clare shops - new frames, who knows where the rest of the parts came from.

Rutland's Mountains were effectively retired with the 1953 strike that also ended passenger service.  One 2-8-2 lasted a while longer as a stationary boiler at Rutland.

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 2:21 PM

rcdrye
These 4 post WWII Alco-built engines were the last commercially built versions of a major dual-service type, but were the smallest and lightest of this type in the USA. Ten more of this wheel arrangement were built in a class 1's shop in the two years after these were delivered.

Surely you mean REbuilt, if you mean the streamlined class K2s. (Not 4-8-4s, Dave, but looked a LOT like them...)

 

The four Alco locomotives had to be Rutland's (from 1946).

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 10:44 AM

Were not the last 4-8-4's built in the USA actually built for Mexico? And these were the smallest and lightest of the type built in the USA, as well as the last steam built new for the NdeM.   And after they were built, the Reading built its 4-8-4 T1's in its own shops, which were the last 4-8-4's built in the USA.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, September 5, 2016 4:58 PM

rcdrye
These 4 post WWII Alco-built engines were the last commercially built versions of a major dual-service type, but were the smallest and lightest of this type in the USA. Ten more of this wheel arrangement were built in a class 1's shop in the two years after these were delivered.

It goes without saying that these were also the road's last steam engines.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Sunday, September 4, 2016 11:28 PM

Terrific articles Wanswheel...answers all my questions on this. What a great read and all stuff I did not know about. A real find.

 Now I got myself a day behind in packing! I'm too old for this packing nonsense. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, September 4, 2016 9:35 PM

File to enlarge map http://maps.bpl.org/download?image=06_01_011518&full=1

Significance of the big Frisco railroad merger, NY Times May 24, 1903

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9807EFDE1639E433A25757C2A9639C946297D6CF

B.F. Yoakum in charge, NY Times, NY Times, Dec. 8, 1905

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9905E7DC113AE733A2575BC0A9649D946497D6CF

Stories of friction in Rock Island, NY Times, Nov. 21, 1909

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9C0DE4DC143EE033A25752C2A9679D946897D6CF

Rock Island to let go the Frisco Line, NY Times, Nov. 27, 1909

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9F01E5DD1239E733A25754C2A9679D946897D6CF

Rock Island sells the Frisco Line, NY Times, Dec. 2, 1909

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D05E0D81630E733A25751C0A9649D946897D6CF

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, September 4, 2016 6:44 PM

These 4 post WWII Alco-built engines were the last commercially built versions of a major dual-service type, but were the smallest and lightest of this type in the USA.  Ten more of this wheel arrangement were built in a class 1's shop in the two years after these were delivered.

The Frisco-Rock Island-Chicago & Eastern Illinois combination wasn't a merger, but a stock arrangement that somehow skirted the Sherman Anti-trust Act.  When SL-SF went bankrupt in 1913 following some years of low traffic (Frisco's traditional western outlet, the AT&SF, was aggressively upgrading its own lines) the receivership and reorganization ended the combination.  Frisco did reasonably well on its own, lasting until the 1980 merger with Burlington Northern - the same year the Rock Island was abandoned.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Sunday, September 4, 2016 6:11 PM

Just to get back to Yoakum for a second....under his leadership the Frisco grew iin size enormously and then allied itself by combining with the Rock Island to form a 19,000 mile system the largest at the time. In the editorial posted by Wanswheel it is said that Yoakum "loomed over" Gould, Harriman and even Hill! Wall Street referred to the "Yoakum Lines". Seems to me we have not heard enough about this fellow. Also I would mention that the Frisco itself has to be one of the most overlooked lines by railfans. Locals and enthusiasts may disagree but a railroad of this importance never gets the coverage of SP, UP, and so on. This railroad was the heart of America! 

Does anyone out there know what happened to the Frisco- Rock Island combined lines? That sounds like a real winner. History sure did not go that way. So what happened? 

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter