Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856732 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, October 17, 2016 5:08 PM

I left out the B&M's southbound-only use of CV between Brattleboro and East Northfield MA and NYC's Harlem Division from Woodlawn NY to GCT.  The route via White River Jct. used joint CV track from White River Jct to Windsor VT as well.

Most folks probably took the B&M from Concord to Boston's North Station, then an MTA train to either Back Bay (as currently practiced from the Downeaster to the rest of the Amtrak system) or to South Station to take a Shore Line NYNH&H train to GCT (on the NYC past Woodlawn). NYNH&H engine change at New Haven CT unless FL9s were used.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, October 17, 2016 4:28 PM

With the Clairmont Junction connection in place, why would anybody go north to White River Junction.   Never knew anyone who would go that way.  The Clairmont Jc connection is correct, but you left out one obvious change of railroad ownership on the way to GCT.   What is it?   What changes occured to the train at that point?

You left out the practical rout that most people ended up using, because of frequency of service.   No Concord - NYCity passenger rail journey is possible at the moment, but if one is to be available in the near future, this should be the one.  Be thorough with all changes requird.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, October 16, 2016 12:57 PM

Concord NH to GCT practical routes

Concord - B&M - White River Jct VT - B&M - Springfield MA - NYH&H - New York GCT. 

Train change at WRJ, through cars from WRJ with engine changes at Springfield and New Haven. Depending on era and train could have RDCs Concord-WRJ, or WRJ-Springfield (change at Springfield).  NYNH&H could run through New Haven with FL9s, or had an RDC connecting with a Shore Line train.  B&M trains had mostly 4-6-0s and 4-6-2s, with one train (that required a change in Springfield) getting Central Vermont power.  In the diesel era F2 F7 and GP7 from EMD, RS3 from Alco.

Concord - C&C (B&M) - Claremont Jct NH - B&M - Springfield - NYNH&H

Gas Electric or steam with open platform coaches Concord-Claremont Jct, same as above south of Claremont Jct (all connecting trains came from White River Jct)

Operated as B&M until 1955, Claremont and Concord until end of service 1956 or 1957.

You could also go Concord NH - B&M - Ayer MA (via Lowell) and connect to a B&M train for Greenfield MA, where you could get a train (from White River Jct, or a local) to Springfield MA.  Or you could change at Worcester to a Bostan and Albany train to Springfield...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, October 16, 2016 1:45 AM

Staying with Concord, NH, to travel to New York City's Grand Central Terminal, threre were three (or four if you count the Day Express direct route and the State-of-Maine via Providence route as separate) routes that were practical and useful and used, and yes, I did use all three not just railfanning.  Name change of train locations and through cars or trains traveling berween to different railroads and all other engine changes encountered on the two other routes.  Name equipment if you can.   Be thorough, beyond the obvious.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, October 15, 2016 6:46 PM

Please go ahead - I thought I had already given the OK.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, October 15, 2016 2:18 PM

rc:  still waiting for your ok to ask the next

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, October 9, 2016 12:34 AM

I suspect that at that time it ran from Washington, like the Montrealer.  In fact, during the time when I rode, 1939 - 1963, there was usually one, sometimes two, sleepers that were interchanged with the Monrealer/Washingtonian, Washington - Bangor or Portland sleepers. But when I rode it, and I rode it both to and from Concord and to Portland, it originated and terminated at Grand Central Terminal. My first aned most following trips, 1939 - 1949, were to and from summer camp in New Hampshire, and then in Maine.  At the end, the train was combined with the Owl from Providence to New York.

Later. just before and after WWII, a summer-only train, the East Wind, provided Washington - Maine service.  I do not know if it had a Concord connection. Never road it.   The State of Maine also carried coaches.

During most of WWII, after some time in 1942 until end-of-summer 1945, the State-of-Maine equipment ran round trip each day, running a daytime service as The Day Express, with Pullman seating daytime sold as parlor-car seating.  This train did not serve Providence, but used the direct Groton - Worcester line.  It did have the thru Concord car, if my memory is correct.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, October 9, 2016 12:17 AM

State of Maine Express is on the list of PRR named trains. 1929 to 1931.

http://www.prrths.com/newprr_files/Hagley/PRR%20NAMED%20TRAINS.pdf

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, October 8, 2016 7:36 PM

State of Maine is the train, and Concord NH is the neighboring capital city. Coming up with the question's phrasing was the hard part on this one.  The State of Maine lasted until 1961.  B&M and NYNH&H bought new cars for it as late as the mid-1950s.  Depending on the year the Concord connection also drew Boston-Concord locals.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, October 8, 2016 11:43 AM

I should note that the train ran via Providence, over what is now the Providence and Worcester, rather than the direct line from Groton up to Worcester, where interchange with the Boston and Maine occured.  This was a political move to prevent Rhode Island from forcing the New Haven to hand over the P&W lease to the Boston and Albany - New York Central System to break the NYN&H monopoly on Providence traffic from anywhere or so I was told.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, October 8, 2016 11:38 AM

Of course, and I rode it, the particular sleeper, more than once, the State of Maine's sleeper to Concord, New Hampshire.   New Haven and Boson and Maine, although the train continued on the Maine Central from Portland to Bangor.  The sleeper was cut off on the B&M at Lowell or Ayer, and picked up by a Boston - White River Junction train and carried to Concord.  This involved a reverse in direction at Lowell or Ayer.   I am uncertain if Lowell or Ayer were passenger stops for sleeping car passengers.  Often, in steam days during WWII, the coaches on the train from Boston and reverse were the familiar wood open-platform cars, the B&M being the last large user of such equipment, and the power could be a 2-8-0 or 2-6-0.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, October 7, 2016 1:11 PM

The only Pullman on the train I'm looking for that wasn't to or from the train's namesake state was destined to the capital city of its neighboring state, not to the capital city of one of its neighboring states.

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, October 7, 2016 9:57 AM

I find nothing in yout question that defines namesake as the name of a state and not a city located in a particular state.   But so be-it, if that is what you mean.

State could mean a countroy?   Like the Penn Texas with a thru sleeper to Mexico City?   But the Penn Texas, TexasEAgle, and Texas Speical may have had a drop sleeper that ended up only going to Oklahoma City.  Even the Texas Zephyr or Tesxas Chief.

In fact, if I had to pick just one, it would be the Texas Chief.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, October 7, 2016 9:24 AM

Read the question carefully - the train's name has to do with a state - and there's a small twist in the question as well.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, October 7, 2016 8:45 AM

PRR Cincinnati Limited, through sleeper to (me from) Nashville, TN

L&N Cn- Nsh

Oneof those cases where I went to the job-site by plane and returned by train.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, October 6, 2016 3:31 PM

I'll stick with trains and states - this train, in addition to the coaches and Pullmans headed to and from its namesake carried a "Daily except Saturday" Pullman for its neighboring state's capital city.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, October 6, 2016 7:59 AM

That's it! It was a pretty nice train--observation (radio), coaches, and diner. It was the local between Chattanooga and Nashville, but the night train was the local between Nashville and Memphis.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, October 6, 2016 6:28 AM

How about the "Lookout" (for Lookout Mountain)?  Chattanooga-Memphis via Nashville.  Leaving Chattanooga the line scrapes the Tennessee/Georgia Line, crossing into Georgia and back into Tennessee three times, into Alabama (to hit Bridgeport and Stevenson), then back into Tennessee before finally heading northwest toward Cowan, Tullahoma and Nashville.  Nashville Chattanooga and St. Louis did the honors.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 8:49 PM

Myron, I am flabbergasted--and glad that the powers that were decided against Dixie Streamliner. I doubt that many people who rode the Dixie Flagler had any idea as to who Henry Flagler was--but I knew when I first came across the train name, in 1951 (in the first ACL passenger timetable that I saw). I never saw the Dixie Flagler, but I did see the Dixie Limited as it backed into Chattanooga one morning in 1957.

Back around seventy years ago, there was a day train beween what was, I believe, the fourth largest city in a certain southern state and the largest city in the state, and passed through the state capital on the way. The train was named for a mountain just outside the smaller city. Name the cities, the mountain, and the states the train passed through. For extra credit, tell how many times it passed through each state.

 

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:05 PM

rcdrye

It looks like the gap between Henry M Flagler service and Dixie Flagler service was very short.  Did the train actually run as Dixie Streamliner?

 

No.  When the Chicago-Miami service started, the train was named Dixie Flagler.  To the best of my knowledge, the Dixie Streamliner label existed only for a few months before the service actually started, in mid-to-late 1940.

Myron Bilas

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 12:52 PM

It looks like the gap between Henry M Flagler service and Dixie Flagler service was very short.  Did the train actually run as Dixie Streamliner?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 12:33 PM

Deggesty

There was already the Dixie Limited, so that would not have been the name. Dixie Streamliner seems a bit too much for me, but I cannot think of anything else.

 

Well Johnny, Dixie Streamliner actually is the answer.  Below is a link to one of the October 1940 articles that talk about the new trains:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=9E0bAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XUwEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6303%2C5088247

Again, I don't know if Dixie Streamliner was only a placeholder or if they were serious about the name.

This happened once before on the Dixie Route.  In mid-to-late 1912 reports were being circulated of a new Dixie Route train, the Dixie de Luxe, running from Chicago to Palm Beach.  But in January 1913 the Chicago-Jacksonville Dixie Limited was inaugruated instead.  Unfortuntately, the reasons the Dixie de Luxe became the Dixie Limited are lost to history.

Johnny, you get the next question.

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 12:22 PM

Dixie Wind, Dixie Breese, Spirit of Dixie, Dixie Spirit, Pride of Dixie?

first-t-last choice

Oh! Dixie Lightning. Dixie Meteor, Dixie Star, Dxie Comet

Dixie thunder would not work, loss of sleep suggested.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:37 AM

There was already the Dixie Limited, so that would not have been the name. Dixie Streamliner seems a bit too much for me, but I cannot think of anything else.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 9:43 AM

daveklepper

Thanks for the hints:   Dixie Flyer

 

 

No, the Dixie Flyer was running as a conventional train at this time.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 9:07 AM

Thanks for the hints:   Dixie Flyer

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 8:49 AM

Its time to finish off this question, since its been hanging around for so long plus, unfortunately, I will have to deal with the effects of Hurricane Matthew for the next few days here in South Florida, including the possibility of not having power for some time.

Here is the original question:

 

ZephyrOverland

When the Chicago-Miami coach streamliners were announced in mid-1940, the FEC train set that operated as the Jacksonville-Miami Henry M. Flagler was to be repurposed as the Dixie Route's contribution to this new service.  As the name Dixie Flagler was applied right before the trains inauguration, what was the original name of this train as it was announced a few months earlier?

 

One hint was that, for the most part, Dixie Route trains had "Dixie" in them.

Another hint is that the other word was used by a number of railroads to imply an up-to-date type of service.

The answer is also mentioned in the book I recently co-authored, "From the Midwest to Florida by Rail, 1875-1979", published by PRRT&HS.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, October 3, 2016 4:32 PM

Deggesty

The Dixie Arrow? Of course, "Arrow" was a PRR name, and the Florida Arrow was a PRR-L&N-ACL winter season train to Miami.

 

No, that isn't it.  That name would make for strange bedfellows.

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, October 3, 2016 3:39 PM

The Dixie Arrow? Of course, "Arrow" was a PRR name, and the Florida Arrow was a PRR-L&N-ACL winter season train to Miami.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, October 3, 2016 10:53 AM

RME

This is fun because most of the print references (and few if any Internet ones I've seen) even hint at this.

FEC had an employee contest to name the Jacksonville-Miami train (that became named the Henry M Flagler).  But Cox notes that the etched nameplates for that name were only taken off when the power started being used on the "Dixie Flagler" - it seemed strange to me that he'd mention the contest but not the 'working title' of the service.  "Dixieland" of course was only applied to the train in 1954, with sleepers.

I've seen references to "Chicago-Miami Streamliner" as what may be an ETT name for the train -- could that be what they used as a placeholder in 1940?

Where's Mike and his period newspaper access when we need it??

 

The fact that FEC switched nameplates when they did makes sense, by that time the Dixie Flagler name was the official one.

The earlist newspaper mention of the Chicago-Miami coach services was in May 1940, when FEC made the initial announcement.  I think that the railroad jumped the gun, since at the time the other participating railroads were still working on or completing their due diligence in creating these trains.  FEC bought two sets of all-coach lightweight trains; one became part of ACL's interstate Champion trains, while the other one became the intrastate Henry M. Flagler.  I'm speculating that FEC saw the financial returns of their train sets and decided that they could make more money utilizing the Henry M Flagler trainset in a Champion-like operation (longer distance, multiple roads).  So they were hot-to-trot in getting the new Chicago-Miami operation started ASAP.

Further announcements of the new Chicago-Miami services were made in October 1940, giving more detailed information about the trains and services, including the new names, South Wind, City of Miami, and the name I'm looking for.  This is where things get hazy.  I do not know if the train name I'm looking for was intended to be the final name, or was there a last minute change of heart by the Dixie Line operators to apply the name Dixie Flagler.  I have seen several articles with the initial name, but I have not come across any advertisements that would contain same. 

Myron Bilas

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter