Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856718 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 7:35 PM

KCSfan

In the winter of 1937 if you wished to travel in a drawing room between Detroit and Florida east coast cities you had a choice of several different trains and routes. Name these trains, the roads over which they were routed, and the cities between which each participating RR handled these trains/cars.

Mark 

The following is from the March 1937 OG:

Southland - Detroit-Miami car - 10 Section, 2 Compartment, 1 Drawing Room
Wabash Detroit-Ft Wayne (sb Mid City Express/Southland, nb - unnamed train)
PRR        Ft. Wayne - Cincinnati  (New Southland)
L&N        Cincinnati-Atlanta
CoG        Atlanta-Albany
ACL         Albany-Jacksonville
FEC        Jacksonville-Miami (SB carried on Miamian, NB carried on Flroida Special)


Flamingo - Detroit-Miami car - 10 Section, 2 Compartment, 1 Drawing Room
Wabash Detroit-Ft. Wayne (SB unnamed Detroit-St. Louis train, NB unnamed PRR/Wabash Chicago-Detroit train)
PRR        Ft. Wayne-Cincinnati (SB via Chicago-Cincinnati Union; NB via Cincinnati-Richmond and Richmond-Ft. Wayne train)
L&N         Cincinnati-Atlanta
COG        Atlanta-Albany
ACL         Albany-Jacksonville
FEC         Jacksonville-Miami (both ways via Havana Special)


Florida Sunbeam - Detroit-Miami car - 6 Compartment, 3 Drawing Room
MC/B4            Detroit-Cincinnati (SB via Florida Sunbeam-Royal Palm, NB via Michigan Special)
Southern Ry Cincinnati-Hampton
SAL                Hampton-Miami


Royal Palm - Detroit-Jacksonville car - 10 Section, 2 Drawing Room
MC/B4            Detroit-Cincinnati (SB via Florida Sunbeam-Royal Palm, NB via Michigan Special)
Southern Ry Cincinnati-Jacksonville


Ponce de Leon - Detroit-Miami car - 10 section, 2 Drawing Room
MC/B4            Detroit-Cincinnati (via Ponce de Leon both ways)
Southern Ry Cincinnati-Jacksonville
FEC                Jacksonville-Miami (via Havana Special both ways)

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 11:53 AM

Good job ZO, you've nailed this one. We anxiously await your next question Sir.

Mark

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, March 18, 2011 3:08 AM

passengerfan

We are still trying to answer the Santa Fe Streamliner Question?

If no one else jumps in I will print the list this evening.

Al - in - Stockton

I bumped into the above from some time ago.  In the absence of fresh queries would it be okay for us to appoint West Coast  Al (aka 'passengerfan') as "da man" for the next question, assuming he wishes to pose one?  Are you da man, West Coast Al !  I myself will reluctantly volunteer the next question if folks okay it but I don't think it is the caliber of the recent questions.   -  Chicago al     Big Smile 

BTW and P.S.: -- I can't find the "Eleanor Roosevelt" site despite searching.  Can anyone advise?  - a.s.

If you prefer not to use this forum to reply, I can be reached directly at smalling_60626@yahoo.com

 

 

 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, March 18, 2011 9:30 AM

al-in-chgo

I bumped into the above from some time ago.  In the absence of fresh queries would it be okay for us to appoint West Coast  Al (aka 'passengerfan') as "da man" for the next question, assuming he wishes to pose one?  Are you da man, West Coast Al !  I myself will reluctantly volunteer the next question if folks okay it but I don't think it is the caliber of the recent questions.   -  Chicago al     Big Smile 

Al, the question you're referring to goes back to April of 2009.....

I'm still in the process of getting together the next question.  Please bear with me.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, March 19, 2011 10:43 AM

West Coast Al here. As some already know this time I am up to my --- in the swamp with alligators. Actually I am busy doing taxes for my clients and don't really have time to participate but I look in to see whats going on when I can.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Sunday, March 20, 2011 7:46 AM

The question we've all been waiting for......

In 1954 the Sunset Limited was the first train ever in American Railroading to do what?

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, March 20, 2011 5:04 PM

ZephyrOverland

The question we've all been waiting for......

In 1954 the Sunset Limited was the first train ever in American Railroading to do what?

It seems to me that the Sunset Limited was the first train to enter the New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal, which was the first true union station in New Orleans since all the roads with passenger service used it. In 1953, I came into NOLA from Baton Rouge at the IC/GCL station, and left for Birmingham from the NO Terminal Station. The next time I was in the Crescent City, in 1960, I arrived on the L&N, left on the KCS, returned on the KCS, and left on the Southern--all at one station.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Sunday, March 20, 2011 5:59 PM

Deggesty

 

 ZephyrOverland:

 

The question we've all been waiting for......

In 1954 the Sunset Limited was the first train ever in American Railroading to do what?

 

It seems to me that the Sunset Limited was the first train to enter the New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal, which was the first true union station in New Orleans since all the roads with passenger service used it. In 1953, I came into NOLA from Baton Rouge at the IC/GCL station, and left for Birmingham from the NO Terminal Station. The next time I was in the Crescent City, in 1960, I arrived on the L&N, left on the KCS, returned on the KCS, and left on the Southern--all at one station.

 

You got it!  The Sunset Limited was the first train to arrive at the New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal, on January 8, 1954.  Johnny, the next question is yours.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, March 21, 2011 7:04 PM

New question: in 1950, the Sunset Limited and the Cascade were re-equipped with lightweight cars. All of the sleepers on the Sunset  were 10 roomette-6 double bedrooms--but five of these cars were different from the rest (as two of the 10-6's on the Cascade, and five 10-6's built for the City of San Francisco were). How were these cars different?

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Monday, March 21, 2011 7:52 PM

Blunt ends.

Plan 9522A.....SP9025 through SP9029.

Confused

 

 

 

 

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, March 21, 2011 10:39 PM

FlyingCrow

Blunt ends.

Plan 9522A.....SP9025 through SP9029.

Confused 

Right, Bob; bluntly stated. Now for the benefit of the younger contributors, will you describe and explain the why of the blunt ends as you propound a new question? Incidentally, I was not aware of the two for the Cascade or the five for the CSF until recently. I recall watching the Sunset back into NOUPT once or twice in the sixties, but I do not really recall noticing the blunt end.

Johnny

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 5:36 AM

I could have answered the question if I had been quick enough, but as I remember, the trains did not have observation cars, but the assigned rear sleeper had the rear end without diaphragm and with an end mcuh like square-end observation cars, possibly lacking the two typical large windows.  Saw these cars but never rode in one.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Along the Big 4 in the Midwest
  • 536 posts
Posted by K4sPRR on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:44 AM

Despite the popularity of the swallowtail or round end observation cars the railroads became weary of them because they could only be placed on the end of the train, there was no vestibule allowing access to other cars.  In addition putting the train together at various end points at times required a special move to properly place the car.

Blunt end cars, despite those built with unsightly vestibule doors became more the thing in the late 40's, early 50's.  The PRR built  blunt end cars that did not have vestibule doors, their reasoning was visibility, many passengers would complain about the reflection of the windows on round end cars creating glare and not being able to enjoy the view.

Santa Fe RR send their round end cars back to Pullman to be converted to the more practicle blunt end.  The B&O also bought into the blunt end to include doors giving the cars more versatility in their use.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:54 AM

K4sPRR

Despite the popularity of the swallowtail or round end observation cars the railroads became weary of them because they could only be placed on the end of the train, there was no vestibule allowing access to other cars.  In addition putting the train together at various end points at times required a special move to properly place the car.

Blunt end cars, despite those built with unsightly vestibule doors became more the thing in the late 40's, early 50's.  The PRR built  blunt end cars that did not have vestibule doors, their reasoning was visibility, many passengers would complain about the reflection of the windows on round end cars creating glare and not being able to enjoy the view.

Santa Fe RR send their round end cars back to Pullman to be converted to the more practicle blunt end.  The B&O also bought into the blunt end to include doors giving the cars more versatility in their use.

The SP and UP blunt end cars that were the answer to the last question were different than the blunt end observation cars you mention.  The UP/SP cars were basically 10 roomette, 6 double bedroom sleepers with one end sheathed like a blunt end observation car but without the vestibule, windows or any lounge car facilities.  I think the reason these cars were built because, besides aesthetics, was economics.  It was a way for the railroads to increase lounge car revenues.  If a Pullman-operated observation lounge car was utilized, Pullman would get to keep the lounge car revenues.  The Cascade had a railroad owned and operated triple unit diner and lounge car and as a result, the SP got to keep all of the lounge car revenues.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the City of San Francisco utilized full railroad owned and operated lounge cars. 

I don't know if these cars ever received vestibules on the blunt end for mid-train operation.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:03 PM

ZephyrOverland

I don't know if these cars ever received vestibules on the blunt end for mid-train operation.

Do you mean buffer plates and diaphragms? These cars did have vestibules at what was the front end, so they could be boarded without having to pass through another car. I am not certain, but I believe that they did have buffer plates so they could be connected at the rear.

The observation cars (square end) for the 1956 Denver Zephyr had a diaphragm with buffer plate aswell as two windows and a door.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:06 PM

Deggesty
 ZephyrOverland:
I don't know if these cars ever received vestibules on the blunt end for mid-train operation.

Do you mean buffer plates and diaphragms? These cars did have vestibules at what was the front end, so they could be boarded without having to pass through another car. I am not certain, but I believe that they did have buffer plates so they could be connected at the rear.

Those cars did have the buffer plates and diaphragms on the boarding side of the car, but originally there was no buffer plate and diaphragm on the blunt end side - just a service door and a drumhead.  I assume that eventually all of the blunt end sleepers did receive a regular pass through door and buffer plate and diaphragm.

This PDF link is to a Coach Yard brass ad that shows one of the cars as originally delivered:

http://www.thecoachyard.com/PDF/COSF.pdf

This link shows one of the cars with the buffer plate/diaphragm added:

http://archived.ggrm.org/about_the_museum/passenger/images_passenger/sp9053end.jpg

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:13 PM

For what is worth column, and this may or may not be important, I remember that tat least one of the former Pennsy square obs cars had a full diaphragm on the observation end.  I recall seeing at New York Penn station sometime around 1970 and in the middle of a train. The reason I remembered so well is I had bought one an Atlas N scale model of it .  Rgds IGN

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:04 AM

Mountain View and Tower View were the blunt-end obs for the Broadway and never got buffer plates or diaphragms.  Others (PRR) did.   Including, I believe, the Senator and Congressional Budd blunt-end observation cars.   The New Haven took the Merchants Limited ROUND END observation cars, and cut train doors into the ends and equipped them with diaphragms and buffer plates so they could  be used mid-train.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:03 PM

Well, since I "think" it's my time to ask another question and , in the spirit of all this "observation" chat....

Who operated the only (I know of) baggage-obs ????  Hmm

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:28 PM

FlyingCrow

Well, since I "think" it's my time to ask another question and , in the spirit of all this "observation" chat....

Who operated the only (I know of) baggage-obs ????  Hmm

The Rock Island.  I believe it was the chair-observation "Missouri" that received a baggage section in the observation end.  The car was utilized in doodlebug runs.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Thursday, March 24, 2011 1:08 AM

ZephyrOverland

 FlyingCrow:

Well, since I "think" it's my time to ask another question and , in the spirit of all this "observation" chat....

Who operated the only (I know of) baggage-obs ????  Hmm

 

The Rock Island.

I'm sure Z.O. is right but just to keep the pot boiling it sounds like something the old SAL might have done on its old line thru Bradenton FL, hooked to a "Dude." 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, March 24, 2011 5:34 AM

I think the AT&SF had one loghtweight for use with a doodle-bug all headend car, an articulated doodle-bug at at that.

But in addition, the Waterloo Ceder Falls and Northern had two such cars at one time, and I rode one in the summer of 1952 with Ray DeGroot and "Giggles" Watson from Waterloo to Ceder Rapids and back and, next day, Waterloo to Waverly and back.   This was a heavy wood interuban car, engineer on a normal front platform, a baggage compartment, a coach section with regular two-and-two-seating, a parlor section with stuffed leather-covered movable armchairs, and brass-railed observation rear platform to which one could move two of the chairs in good weather. 

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:45 PM

Z.O. is right.

The old Texas Rocket obs.....with a baggage door cut in the forward side.     However, no other changes so you'd see this thing rumbling out of Kansas City Union Station with the M&E getting a really good view of the scenery.   Was most peculiar.

All yours Z.O.

PS...I saw it in the consist of #39 once spliced between a Rock Island ex-troop sleeper and an SP 3 door heavyweight two-tone grey mail storage car.   Bizarre isn't the word.

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:38 AM

FlyingCrow

All yours Z.O.

The Dixie DeLuxe was the original proposed name of what Chicago-Florida train?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:13 PM

this is just a SWAG but I'll say the Dixie Flagler.

Mark

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:43 PM

I'll weigh in  with the City of Miami

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:31 PM

The South WInd

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:31 PM

KCSfan

this is just a SWAG but I'll say the Dixie Flagler.

Mark

nope...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:31 PM

daveklepper

I'll weigh in  with the City of Miami

nope...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:31 PM

henry6

The South WInd

nope...

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter