Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856701 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, September 28, 2021 3:01 PM

Can't be B&M Snow Trains for more than one reason, and that's the only thing I knew would fit.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:45 AM

ZephyrOverland

A Case of Depression Window Dressing, but with a Happy Ending....

More than a year after the Stock Market crash of 1929, American business was experiencing erosion of economic activity but was still optimistic that the better times were soon coming. A new seasonal train was introduced in this environment, but the main operating railroad had to tactfully acknowledge reality by operating this train as a temporary replacement (and upgrade) of an existing train. This facade went on for two seasons, after which the seasonal operation was permanently discontinued. But not to fear, the name that was used on this train reappeared several years later on a new seasonal train on a different route with more lasting results.

That was the name that was applied to these two trains, and what were their routes?

 

(sounds of chirping crickets....)

OK, OK... maybe its time for another clue...

The first train was established for the 1930-31 winter season.

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 22, 2021 10:03 AM

rcdrye

The Scenic Limited (MP/D&RGW/WP) was briefly renamed the Westerner for a period around 1930.  MP also used the name Westerner on a west Texas train (with T&P) at a later time.

 

A decent guess but its not the answer. The Scenic Limited and the Westerner were not seasonal trains. But you inadvertenly preceeded one of my clues, in that one railroad was involved with both trains. In the first incarnation the railroad was the primary operator of the train, based on mileage, whereas in the second incarnation this same railroad was the secondary operator of the train, again based on mileage.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:38 AM

The Scenic Limited (MP/D&RGW/WP) was briefly renamed the Westerner for a period around 1930.  MP also used the name Westerner on a west Texas train (with T&P) at a later time.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:52 PM

daveklepper

On either route, was more than one railroad involved?

 

Yes, in terms of through cars and through train operations.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:01 PM

On either route, was more than one railroad involved?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Tuesday, September 21, 2021 1:14 PM

A Case of Depression Window Dressing, but with a Happy Ending....

More than a year after the Stock Market crash of 1929, American business was experiencing erosion of economic activity but was still optimistic that the better times were soon coming. A new seasonal train was introduced in this environment, but the main operating railroad had to tactfully acknowledge reality by operating this train as a temporary replacement (and upgrade) of an existing train. This facade went on for two seasons, after which the seasonal operation was permanently discontinued. But not to fear, the name that was used on this train reappeared several years later on a new seasonal train on a different route with more lasting results.

That was the name that was applied to these two trains, and what were their routes?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, September 20, 2021 3:53 PM

daveklepper

Waiting for ZO's question.

 

So am I. Question coming soon.....

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, September 19, 2021 1:55 PM

Waiting for ZO's question.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, September 15, 2021 1:16 PM

Good to see you back, ZO!  Yes, the SF Overland was kept to a high standard, even receiving two of SP's home-rebuilt dome cars in the mid 1950s.  Summer-and-holiday only for its last two seasons, it carried the St. Louis and Denver cars until the "City of Everywhere" rework by UP broke the connections.  The mostly daytime schedule was outfitted with a coffee shop car instead of a diner.  The train was discontinued early enough to miss the Automat Buffet.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 15, 2021 11:34 AM

Would this be the San Francisco Overland? After losing its Chicago-Omaha schedule and its Chicago cars, UP eventually downgraded its portion of the train to an Omaha-Cheyenne local. SP's portion got a new lease on life as being, in essence, the San Francisco connection to the City of St. Louis, still operating with a full compliment of cars and services. Eventually, it existed in name only for several years when it was combined with the City of San Francisco.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, September 15, 2021 6:09 AM

You're overthinking a bit.  The train was a premier run before streamliners were even thought of.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:35 PM

Wouldn't have anything to do with a 39 3/4 hour train to rival the Super Chief that was stillborn when the ICC order of 1947 made the timing impossible?  That Hank Snow wrote a song about?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:22 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

With that last hint, I will say that it was the "Arizona Limited".

 

The Arizona Limited was discontinued mostly due to World War II.  The train I'm looking for was better known as a heavyweight that was eclipsed by a streamliner.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:07 AM

With that last hint, I will say that it was the "Arizona Limited".

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:46 AM

I suspect it involves a mighty fine road, a road to ride.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:34 AM

So far, so good. The train was seasonal for a couple of years in the 1960s.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 8:53 AM

Was it an SP train, interlined with another ralroad?  Were not all western railroads passenger-friendly until sometime after WWII, when the SP lost that adjective?  The Western Pacific then became unfriendly.  I could not find seasonal trains for, either, but maybe I did nlot look hard enough for the SP.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 8:02 AM

In a series of surprising moves, as this once premier western train was downgraded one of the partners not only kept up its standards but also rebuilt equipment to assign to its portion of the train's run.  Even as the train was reduced to a seasonal offering the equipment and service standards remained high, though the railroad was not known as being particularly passenger-friendly.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 6:24 AM

Considering It was my question the last time I'll withdraw it and try something different...  Give me an hour or so...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, September 13, 2021 6:58 PM

rc, the Lake Champlain floating bridges was a quiz question at least once before...

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, September 13, 2021 3:19 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
The subway that connected Logan Square with the Kennedy median was especially tight.  CTA installed bars over the windows on 6000-series cars assigned to the West-Northwest line to prevent injuries to passengers.

CTA also took all of the roof equipment (poles, trolley boards, ventilators) off the roof of former 4000 series "plushies" assigned to work service on the Kennedy line.

 

This large lake had two floating railroad bridges crossing it in the latter part of the 19th century.  One of them was replaced by a conventional swing bridge, the other remained a "floater" until the USRA took it out of service during WW I.  The bridge was never replaced.  Name the lake and the railroads involved.

 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, September 13, 2021 10:20 AM

rcdrye

CRT even had lines that were tight enough to restrict the use of certain types of its own equipment.  5000- and 6000-series cars could not operate west of Laramie on the Lake Street line before November 1962, because they would not clear the island platform station houses on the street-level line. 

 
The subway that connected Logan Square with the Kennedy median was especially tight.  CTA installed bars over the windows on 6000-series cars assigned to the West-Northwest line to prevent injuries to passengers.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, September 13, 2021 10:06 AM

Still waiting for rc's question.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 9, 2021 10:00 PM

You got the right answer, with the first catagory having two distinct electrification systems and the second only one.

Boston really belongs in the first catagory, because Amtrak provides no commuter service, and all the T's Purple service is desiel-powered.

New York has the New Haven and NJT electrifications, in addition to the DC used by everone else.

Cicago's METRA and CTA electrifications are not, at presentm compatible, even if equipment could be designed for that purpose.

Look forward to your question.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:28 AM

It looks like the categories were:

1. "heavy" , "rapid" and "light" electrification, with commuter service.  San Francisco and Boston both have projects underway.

2. "rapid" and "light" or with systems like Pittsburgh which (now) has characteristics of both.

CRT handled interchange freight on behalf of CMStP(&P) on the North Side Main Line and the Evanston and Skokie branches.  Evanston and Main Line customers lasted into the CTA era. There the clearance issue was mainly the high-level platforms, but the third rail made for restrictions.  Gauntlet track on the Main Line and both branches solved the platform problem, along with having no third rail on Main Line track 1 between Howard and Granville.

CRT and CTA shared track with CA&E's interchange freight from Laramie to Bellwood on the Garfield Park line.

CRT and CTA had historic connections on most of the major branches to receive rail, ties and other material.  The 63rd st lower yard connection is (or was) the last of those.  Because the former connection from the C&NW(UP) line between Mayfair and Evanston has been abandoned new cars are delivered to Skokie Shops by truck.

CRT even had lines that were tight enough to restrict the use of certain types of its own equipment.  5000- and 6000-series cars could not operate west of Laramie on the Lake Street line before November 1962, because they would not clear the island platform station houses on the street-level line. 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, September 9, 2021 10:10 AM

rcdrye

Both CTA and Metra Electric are physically connected to the rest of the american rail network. CTA used to have several connections - the only remaining one is at the 63rd St yard. with NS for material delivery.  Metra Electric's connection allows NICTD to use Metra to Randolph St. "Millenium Station".  CTA's 600 volt third rail is obviously not directly compatible with Metra's 1500 vdc overhead, though in the long-forgotten past the South Shore had a couple of freight motors that could be set up to run on 600 volts.

Both Metra and CTA have clearance diagrams slightly smaller than standard, which require the use of gauntlets for freight equipment to clear high platforms.

CTA's clearance diagram is quite a bit smaller than standard.

IC's suburban line also connects with the parallel IC freight and passenger lines at several locations.  This allowed Chicago West Pullman & Southern to operate on the Blue Island branch to service the International Harvester plant near Halsted Street.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, September 8, 2021 3:58 PM

Cleveland is in the second catagory today/

At one time it would have been in the first catagory IF the Union Terminal electrification had included commuter service.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, September 6, 2021 4:01 PM

.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, September 6, 2021 3:32 PM

It might be interesting to tally up the systems that have no rail connection with the general system of transportation, BUT that run on previous railroads and have physical crossings or co-location with active trains.  Perhaps a firsthand example is in Memphis, where the downtown loop has repurposed a stretch of the old IC riverfront line's double track, in fact crossing what is the active Amtrak main on the north end at grade, but at no point to my knowledge crossing over or switchable to it. 

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter