Trains.com

Classic Railroad Quiz (at least 50 years old).

740832 views
7952 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, July 13, 2018 9:51 AM

daveklepper

Technically meeting your definitions, but probably not what you are asking for are the Zepjyrs.  The Twin Zephyrs were the CB&Q's entry into the high-speed (for the day) north-south Chicago - Twin Cities market.  Later the name Zephyr, which certainly had become trendy by the itme, was applied to the east-west California Zephyr, which did run on the CB&@, but also on the D&RGW and WP, either one the "other railroad,"    Or you could just wait for the post CZ days for the RGZ, Rio-Grande Zephyr, just one railroad, not including the CB&Q.  With the Zephyr name still "trendy" as in Amtrak's San Francisco Zephyr.

 

Zephyr is not it.  If you reread my original question I stated that five years separated the two start dates for the trains I'm looking for.  The Twin Cities Zephyr and California Zephyr inauguations were separated by 13 years.  Also, I used "trendy" to refer to the type of service the second train was offering, not to the name itself.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, July 13, 2018 4:47 AM

Technically meeting your definitions, but probably not what you are asking for are the Zepjyrs.  The Twin Zephyrs were the CB&Q's entry into the high-speed (for the day) north-south Chicago - Twin Cities market.  Later the name Zephyr, which certainly had become trendy by the itme, was applied to the east-west California Zephyr, which did run on the CB&@, but also on the D&RGW and WP, either one the "other railroad,"    Or you could just wait for the post CZ days for the RGZ, Rio-Grande Zephyr, just one railroad, not including the CB&Q.  With the Zephyr name still "trendy" as in Amtrak's San Francisco Zephyr.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, July 12, 2018 11:13 AM

New question....

 

There was a passenger train name that was applied to a north-south service that signaled the initial entry of the sponsoring railroad into higher speed services.  Five years later, the same name was applied to an east-west train of another railroad, signaling its entry of a type of service that was trendy at the time.

 

Name, railroads and routes, please. 

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, July 2, 2018 8:36 PM

Dug into some more timetables to give a better answer.  Milwaukee had three daily Chicago-Omaha trains in 1948, with schedules that might actually have worked for local passengers.  The 1955 "Cities" move left a fleet in each direction, all set up for evening departure from Chicago, and early afternoon arrival from western points, with middle-of-the-night stops in Omaha.  As an interesting footnote, Milwaukee's 1948 Omaha trains had numbers between 102 and 108, all of them used later by "City" or "Challenger" trains.

In 1948 C&NW had 10 trains a day between Chicago and Omaha.  21 and 22, the old "Pacific" still carried an L.A. sleeper (via the Pony Express). In 1957 there were two - daytime 3/4 and overnight (with a 6-6-4 "American" sleeper) 5/6.  The Daytime Kate Shelley 400 between Chicago and Cedar Rapids filled in some of the space on the eastern end.

SP's connection to 21 and 22 had been downgraded to mail trains by 1948.  The through 1948 Overland (27-28) was reduced after 1955 to an Ogden-Oakland train that got sleepers from the City of St. Louis, and further reduced to seasonal by 1960 (SP did rebuild some prewar coaches into domes specifically for the Overland).  The Gold Coast was simply discontinued.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Monday, July 2, 2018 7:27 PM

Yeah I don't know what makes me sicker...the demise of the Milwaukee, the total collapse of the Rock Island, the fading away to nothing of the New York Central or the discovery that the Emperor has no clothes with the Pennsy. Those were very traumatic times. 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, July 2, 2018 4:29 PM

Miningman
My understanding is that it really did not turn out that way at all.

Nope.  Milwaukee had to repaint all of its passenger equipment in UP armour yellow (even C&NW hadn't done that) and maintain an otherwise pretty empty line to Omaha to passenger train standards for 16 years.  UP continued to prefer C&NW as a freight connection (while simultaneously pretending to be interested in the Rock Island).  On the other hand Milwaukee played a bad hand pretty well from the customer's point of view until around 1968 - about the same time Burlington gave up as well.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Monday, July 2, 2018 12:15 PM

rcdrye--OK...thanks for this. Thinking the Milwaukee took on declining passenger trains because 1) stick it to the C&NW 2) prestige 3) most importantly, assume enhanced and greatly expanded freight connections with UP by this good faith gesture and therefore advancing both 1) and 2) not to mention greatly increased revenues. 

My understanding is that it really did not turn out that way at all. 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, July 2, 2018 11:56 AM

Miningman

rcdrye-- can you please explain why UP switching to Milwaukee would doom the secondary trains? 

 

Milwaukee had its own bunch of Chicago-Omaha trains such as the Midwest Hiawatha.  By 1955 C&NW was participating in the "City" trains, the Overland, the Gold Coast, and unnamed 5 and 6 which were essentially mail trains.  5 and 6 continued to operate on the C&NW for several years after 1955 but with no through passenger cars.  Mail from 5 and 6, along with westbound mail from CB&Q 11 and mail from other carriers (but not Milwaukee!) was handed off to UP at Council Bluffs Transfer for a few years after 1955.  Milwaukee dropped its own Midwest Hiawatha, carrying the Sioux Falls coaches in the Challenger.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Monday, July 2, 2018 9:42 AM

rcdrye-- can you please explain why UP switching to Milwaukee would doom the secondary trains? 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, July 2, 2018 9:06 AM

ZO has found the "Gold Coast".  Even though the Gold Coast was primarily intended to service smaller cities and towns (it had dozens of conditional stops) it still carried several Pullmans, including the Washington cars and one from St Louis (Wabash, via Omaha).  There was even an observation listed that ran from Salt Lake City to Oakland.  Never a "streamliner", the Gold Coast did get some lightweight equipment as the 1950s progressed.  UP's move to the Milwaukee in 1955 doomed through operation of secondary trains, so the Gold Coast was quietly discontinued, along with through operation of the San Francisco Overland.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, July 2, 2018 7:53 AM

Answering s question, yes, the Edposition Flyer did run until the inauguration of the California Zephr and then ceased.  Some of the Budd equipmenet that formed the five trainsets for the CZ showed up in operation of the EF in its last months of operation.

I never rode Silver Rapids on the CZ or PRR.  I rode it once, roomette,  Albany - Detroit on the Penn Central on the combined post-20th Century "Steel Fleet."

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Sunday, July 1, 2018 8:36 PM

rcdrye

I don't see the name Pacific in the 1948 listings or UP timetables.  This train name hearks back to an era before the CP and UP were built.  Despite the train's second-tier status, it had a very high-class name.  The train dated back before the war and may have inherited the Pacific's sleepers by 1948, before they were dropped altogether.  For a helper, there's a 1951 UP timetable on the net that's readable, though the transcon sleepers were gone (from that train, anyway) by then.

 

The Pacific was a Chicago-San Francisco train in 1946, but by 1948 it was cut back to Chicago-Ogden and handling cars to/from Los Angeles via the Pony Express and Portland via the Portland Rose.  In the December 1948 Official Guide, the UP entry shows the Pacific consist listing lumped together with the other two trains, numbered 21-17-37 and 22-18-36.

Another possibility for your question would be the Gold Coast.  It handled the Washington-San Francisco sleepers that were operated on the Pacific.

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, July 1, 2018 7:54 AM

I don't see the name Pacific in the 1948 listings or UP timetables.  This train name hearks back to an era before the CP and UP were built.  Despite the train's second-tier status, it had a very high-class name.  The train dated back before the war and may have inherited the Pacific's sleepers by 1948, before they were dropped altogether.  For a helper, there's a 1951 UP timetable on the net that's readable, though the transcon sleepers were gone (from that train, anyway) by then.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Saturday, June 30, 2018 11:35 AM

rcdrye

This C&NW/UP/SP train was below the top tier, but still important enough in the early postwar era to be used for transcontinental sleepers.

 

Would this be the Chicago-San Francisco Pacific (a modernization of the old Pacific Limited name)? In the immediate postwar years it handled several Washington-San Francisco transcons from the PRR and B&O.  The Pacific was part of a heavyweight "City of Everywhere" operation, as its schedule and consists meshed with those of the Portland Rose and Pony Express, providing a Chicago/Kansas City/Denver-West Coast service.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 141 posts
Posted by 3rd rail on Saturday, June 30, 2018 12:54 AM

I want to say the M&NA in Arkansas.. not sure date or exact location

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, June 29, 2018 8:09 PM

The train I'm looking for was a C&NW/UP/SP train.  It lasted until the big CMStP&P migration in 1955, though the transcon cars only lasted to 1950. Washington cars to and from the PRR (on Washington connections of 2nd tier PRR trains).  The CZ did get a through sleeper that alternated between the NYC and the PRR - the PRR's contribution was a Budd-built 10-6 that was very nearly identical to CB&Q/D&RGW/WP cars, with California Zephyr on the letterboard, PRR on the end tabs and "Silver Rapids" on the nameplate.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, June 29, 2018 4:12 PM

The only other route that I can think of is the Burglington-D&RGW-WP route--whoicd did have through sleepers on the California Zephyr. I cannot get to any of my Guides older than the February 1950, so I cannot check for schedules before the CZ was inaugurated. Did the Exposition Flyer run until the CZ came into service?

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:49 AM

The San Francisco Overland was still top tier.  The train I'm looking for took quite a bit longer to make the trek than either the City of San Francisco or the Overland, and was roughly the equivalent of the Portland Rose in stature.

The train took 22 hrs 40 minutes longer than the City, and 14 hours longer than the Overland.  Transcon sleepers were gone by 1951.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, June 27, 2018 8:32 PM

The San Francisco Overland Limited carried two New York-San Francisco sleepers, via the New York Central, and one via the Pennsyvania.

The November 1950 Guide gives conflicting information as to the accomodations in the car handled by the PRR--the PRR and the UP list a 10-5 and the C&NW and SP list a 10-1-2.

The PRR car was handled on the Gotham Limited wb and on the Admiral eb, and the NYC car was handled on the Chicagoan wb and on the Lake Shore Limited eb.

Three nights and a dqy going west, and a day, three nights and a morning going east.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, June 27, 2018 4:20 PM

This C&NW/UP/SP train was below the top tier, but still important enough in the early postwar era to be used for transcontinental sleepers.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, June 27, 2018 12:17 PM

Amtrak used the same maneuver for the "City of San Francisco service/California Zephyr" between 1971 and 1979, after which "West Cheyenne" station was located at Borie and quickly renamed Borie. (Removed in 1983, new version in use 1990-1997 for Pioneer/Desert Wind).  I remember one trip around 1977 when the air and signal hoses weren't tucked into the SDP40F's pilot pockets when they were run around the train in Denver.  UP sent some mechanical dept. guys over from the Cheyenne engine facility with big pipe wrenches to get them off what was now the lead unit so the train could proceed west.

I'll post another question later today.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, June 27, 2018 7:57 AM

Yes, you have the answer. As long as the trains from Kansas City bypassed Cheyenne, the only backing was in Denver.

You can be sure that during the period that the trains ran into Cheyenne passengers wondered why the cars were running backwards.

I made several trips which involved that operation--on one of them the train took the long way from Cheyenne to Laramie--and we had to wait for a westbound freight that went right up the hill when we reached the junction at the top.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, June 27, 2018 7:23 AM

Denver and Cheyenne are obviously the two points.  Two of the trains were the City of St. Louis and the Portland Rose.  The other one was probably the City of Portland, which soon stopped running via Denver, with the CofD cars running as a separate train west of North Platte.  The CofStL and CofP had run via Borie before this.  The loss of much of the mail contract resulted in UP moving nearly all switching of mail cars to Cheyenne.  Some of it had formerly been done in Green River and Ogden. 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, June 26, 2018 8:02 PM

Deggesty

In November of 1967, what three name trains to the West Coast had the engines put on the rear at one point and ran thus for 104 miles, at which point the engines were returned to the front of the train? Name the trains and the two points.

 

Ah, me; I did not read through my post before I sent it--so I corrected it after seeing in my email.

Johnny

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, June 26, 2018 7:58 PM

In November of 1967, what three name trains to the West Coast had the engines put on the rear at one point and ran thus for 104 miles, at which point the engines were returned to the front of the train? Name the trains and the two points.

Johnny

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, June 26, 2018 8:27 AM

After the California Zephyr was discontiniued, and the WP became freight-only, three times a week the two combined Zephrys, the Kansas City and the Nebraska, had a third train added, the "California Service - Rio Grande Zephyr" to Salt Lake City and for a while to Ogden (just a coach and a sleeper St. L. City - Ogden.  This arrangement lasted until Amtrak.

The replacements for the articulated coaches were lightweights purchased from the C&NW, overhauled and painted silver to match the Budd equipment. The last of the heavywieght long-distance CB&Q cars were retired around the same time.

See my CZ-RGZ thread, or possibly it is D&RGW-CB&Q on this forum for photos.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,015 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, June 26, 2018 7:34 AM

Johnny has the correct answer (like I didn't give it away with the departure time!).  Train 11's front section was the Fast Mail, CB&Q's connection to UP's mail trains at Omaha, a service that dated to 1883.  Made up of baggage cars, occasional flexivans, and two working RPOs, it ran westbound only, the mail equipment returning in various other trains to Cicero yard to avoid CUS charges.  The middle section was the Kansas City Zephyr, the last the Nebraska Zephyr, using one of the former Twin Zephyrs.  The Nebraska Zephyr continued on to Lincoln.  The Fast Mail was discontinued with the loss of the mail contract in 1967.  The Zephyrs were around until the BN merger and Amtrak, though the Twin Zephyr trains came off in 1968.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:01 AM

Guys, this is surely the 'City of Everywhere' so wittily referred to in Kratville's book on the UP Streamliners.  My copy is buried in storage and furosemide interferes with any fun research on a phone, so someone with the details can list them correctly.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, June 25, 2018 8:57 PM

Oh, yes, the Kansas City Zephyr apparently made use of the prewar cars, but from what train, I do not know--unless it was an orignal Twin Cities Zephyr.

Johnny

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, June 25, 2018 8:39 PM

All that I could find, using the October 1967 Guide, leaving Chicago Union Station at 11:00 am were the Nebraska Zephyr and the Kansas City Zephyr, which were combined as far as Galesburg. Was the first train a mail train that ran just to Omaha (the Nebraska Zephyr ran to Lincoln)?

Johnny

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter