Trains.com

Classic Railroad Quiz (at least 50 years old).

741834 views
7952 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, October 22, 2012 1:28 PM

daveklepper

My guess it was the Royal Palm, Southern and NYC, from Detroit to Jacksonville, throught to Miami via the FEC in the off-season only.

Nope....There were time periods when the Detroit-Jacksonville sleeper(s) on the Royal Palm was extended to Miami, but the majority of the time it was during the winter season.  There were also time periods when the Miami sleeper ran year round. 

The sleeping car line I'm thinking of consistently expanded in the summer and contracted in the winter.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, October 22, 2012 11:09 AM

My guess it was the Royal Palm, Southern and NYC, from Detroit to Jacksonville, throught to Miami via the FEC in the off-season only.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, October 22, 2012 8:36 AM

Next question -

Traditionally,  passenger train service to Florida increased in the winter months.  Trains and sleeping car lines which ended at Jacksonville during the spring, summer and fall months were extended during the winter months to points on the east and west coasts of Florida.  But there was at least one sleeping car line that bucked the trend, in that its line was extended in the summer months and returned to a shorter run in the winter months.  Name the off season and on season sleeping car line and which train was it carried on to and from Florida (the car was carried on connecting trains south of Jacksonville.)

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:30 PM

I agree - ZO should take it from here.  BTW the UP sets were apparently drawbar-connected - as far as I can find out all the others had cnventional couplers even if they had wide end openings.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:34 PM

Wait--ZO answered more than rcdrye; he not only named the fourth road that ordered new sets, he also named the roads that bought used sets and operated them.

Johnny

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:30 PM

Rob, you have it. UP and C&O ordered full diner and kitchen-combos. I ate breakfast in one of the diners that the IC bought, and I had forgotten about the ACL combos.

I think that Amtrak operated the full diners in conjunction with regular diners that had been reworked to serve as cafeteria cars; I ate in such on the Crescent in 1984, and my wife and I ate in such on the Silver Star in 1989; we may eaten in such on the Silver Meteor also in 1989--I really do not remember. On Amtrak, we were not allowed to carry our trays to a table a waiter carried them.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:04 AM

rcdrye

  The PRR Budd kitchen/diners survived to see Amtrak service (often on the Broadway Limited!) but not HEP conversion.

I was fortunate to ride in one of those Budd diners on my first Amtrak trip in 1972 on the Broadway.  In the mid 1980's I saw a pair still in Pennsy colors at the Illinois Railway Museum, of all places.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, October 18, 2012 6:25 AM

The fourth was the UP.  It had a bunch of prewar articulated kitchen/diners, but it bought two new sets (non-articulated) from ACF in 1953 for the City of Denver, which were delivered with a single car number for each pair.  SCL occasionally operated the ex-ACL dining room cars without the kitchens as entertainment cars on the Florida Special.  PRR had cars from ACF, Budd and their own shops.  The PRR Budd kitchen/diners survived to see Amtrak service (often on the Broadway Limited!) but not HEP conversion.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:21 PM

Deggesty

While on the subject of diners and kitchens, what railroads (four of them) had full diners and kitchen-combinations built for them, and what other railroad operated such combinations (these were NOT articulated sets)?

Non articulated kitchen cars and dining room cars were built for the PRR, NYC and the C&O.  Eight sets were built for the C&O, but were sold immediately: 2 sets for the IC, 2 sets for the ACL and 4 sets for the NYC.  Later on the NYC sold its ex-C&O sets: 2 sets went to the IC and the other two went to the B&O,

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:18 PM

rcdrye

All of SPs other articulated cars were delivered between 1937 and 1941.  They were used just about everywhere after their original assignments ended, at least a few of them making it into Amtrak service with stainless steel sides, the red stripe buffed off and a blue square with Amtrak and the car number on the side.

Those cars would include the Lark Club triple unit Kitchen/Dorm-Dining-Lounge combination and the units for the Daylight (Coffee Shop-Kitchen-Dining room).

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:49 PM

Rob, I was going to ask what other train, already in service before the war, had new articulated sets built for it--but you answered the question.

While on the subject of diners and kitchens, what railroads (four of them) had full diners and kitchen-combinations built for them, and what other railroad operated such combinations (these were NOT articulated sets)?

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:25 PM

Right route, right railroad, only one of the trains (My fault on the question - The only photo I have seen of the 3-unit cars on the Shasta had a pre-war set from another Daylight. I went back and checked my source to make sure).  One set of the postwar cars were advertised as Cascade Clubs, naturally enough on the Cascade.  Still - you answered correctly as asked, so please ask the next question.

SP 10262-10263-10264 and 10265-10266-10267 were delivered in May or June 1949 by Pullman-Standard for the Shasta Daylight, inaugurated July 10, 1949.

66 seat Coffee Shop - Kitchen Unit - 66 seat Dining Room Unit

SP 10280-10281-10282 and 10283-10284-10285 were delivered in August 1949 by Pullman-Standard for the Cascade, inaugurated August 13, 1950.

Dormitory Kitchen - 44 seat Dining Room - Tavern Lounge

All of SPs other articulated cars were delivered between 1937 and 1941.  They were used just about everywhere after their original assignments ended, at least a few of them making it into Amtrak service with stainless steel sides, the red stripe buffed off and a blue square with Amtrak and the car number on the side.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:29 PM

In 1949, Pullman Standard built two three-unit sets for the SP to operate between Oakland and Portland. These cars, Coffeshop-Kitchen-Diner sets, were built for the Shasta Daylight, which was a post-war train which left its origin (Oakland or Portland) in the morning and arrived at its destination (Portland or Oakland) before midnight.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:42 PM

I would think steam heat was required at least half of the year... Now that I'm home and got the map out I realized Lac La Biche is on the Waterways line.

Early streamliners often had articulated cars in their train sets.  Except for the mid-1950s experimental lightweeights (Talgo, Train X etc.), only one postwar train got new articulated cars as part of its consist.  Name the RR, train and, of course, endpoints.  Bonus for the marketing designation of the articulated cars. Turbotrains don't count for this one.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:17 PM

I meant to add that unlike most mixed trains, I believe the passenger cars on the Muskeg Mixed were steam heated and thus carried directly behind the locomotive. I haven't found any pictures to confirm this but I think it unlikely stoves would be adequate in the harsh Alberta winters. This would make switching freight cars enroute a bit more difficult so perhaps it was done only when train heat was required.

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:54 PM

The train was unofically known as the "Muskeg Mixed" and ran on the Northern Alberta Ry. between Edmonton and Waterways, AB (a hamlet of less than 1000 pop.) a distance of 304.7 miles. In fact it was two mixed trains in each direction -  NB train #21 ran from Edmonton to Lac la Biche and #23 from there on to Waterways; SB #24 ran from Waterways to Lac la Biche and #22 from there to Edmonton. The passenger cars ran through over the entire route and were transferred from one train to another at Lac la Biche. NB trains left Edmonton at 9:30 am and arrived in Waterways at 9:00 the next morning - 23 hrs 30 min - ave. speed 13 mph. SB trains  left Waterways at 10:00 am and arrived in Edmonton at 2:35 pm the next afternoon - 28 hrs 35 min due to a long layover between trains at Lac la Biche - ave speed 10.7 mph. OG's in the late 30's noted that,"Nos. 21,22,23 and 24 carry First Class Coaches, Dining Cars and Standard Sleepers".

The Muskeg Mixed ran until 1989 but had lost its dining cars and sleepers long before that time. I personally know of no other mixed train that carried a diner and for this reason alone it's too bad Lucius Beebe didn't include it in his book, Mixed Train Daily

Rob was the first to identify the railroad and the route so the next question is his.

Mark

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:32 PM

Mark, the Dawson Creek train had, in 1930 and in 1950, a cafe car from Edmonton that apparently was turned wherever the two trains met.

The Lac la Biche-Waterways train, which left Lac la Biche Wednesday night and Waterways Friday night, had first class coaches, Standard sleepers and a diner (in 1930); I find no mention of its being a mixed train in any of the Guides I looked in. It took about fourteen hours to travel the 170 miles  between the two in 1930--in 1950 (no diner then), it took about ten and a half hours.

I wonder if there was any ballast under the track.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:27 PM

The other main route went from Edmonton to Waterways.  The third option was the Lac La Biche branch.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:30 AM

Northern Alberta Rys. is the road all right but you have the wrong route. The Dawson Creek train carried sleepers in the late 30's but didn't have a diner. Try again.

Mark

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:13 AM

February 1950 Guide: 24 hours from Edmonton to Dawson Creek (495.2 miles); 22:55 from Dawson Creek to Edmonton--no mention of being mixed, though it may well have been mixed later. After my morning walk, I may look at later Guides.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:26 AM

Since UP trains to Lewiston ID would have to use it, how about the Camas Prairie from Riparia WA to Lewiston (Joint UP/NP)?

Otherwise I would have to guess the Northern Alberta Railways lines north of Edmonton (joint CP/CN after 1929).  The Dawson Creek mixed ran until the mid-1970s, though not with sleepers or diners.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:23 AM

Today's hint: The railroad that ran this mixed train was jointly owned on a 50/50 basis by two other major railroads.

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:39 PM

cv_acr

The line up to Churchill on Hudson Bay was a Canadian National line. I'm not quite sure who originally built it, probably Canadian Northern. This line did run sleepers. I don't know a lot of the details of the passenger operations along this line in days gone by, but this could be a candidate.

Sorry Chris, but the former Canadian Northern line is not the one I'm looking for.

Mark

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 9:00 AM

A shorter option might be the Covington - Hot Springs mixed on the C&O, which carried sleepers into the 1950s at least.  Although a diner on a mixed might be unique, sleepers on mixed trains were once fairly common.  The Woodstock (VT) Railway regularly carried New York (NH/B&M) Pullmans on its mixed trains into the 1920s.  Some of the D&H trains to Adirondack resorts were also mixed.  I seem to remember that the Santa Fe's Grand Canyon branch trains were mixed in the last couple of years they ran, though they might not have carried sleepers at that point.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Canada
  • 1,820 posts
Posted by cv_acr on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:32 AM

The Algoma Central never went near Hudson Bay. Oh there were plans at one point, and at one point the name of the railway was Algoma Central and Hudson Bay Railway, but those plans were abandoned by 1914 when the railway was completed to its northern terminus of Hearst where it connected with the National Transcontinental Railway (later Canadian National) although the "and Hudson Bay" wasn't officially dropped from the name until the 1960s. (Note that the Hudson Bay part of the lettering never appeared on any equipment and the reporting marks were always AC. The only place you'd actually find the full "Algoma Central and Hudson Bay Railway" name would be on paperwork.)

Also the Algoma Central never rostered sleeping cars of any sort at any point in its history (except for converted maintenance of way bunk cars).

The line up to Churchill on Hudson Bay was a Canadian National line. I'm not quite sure who originally built it, probably Canadian Northern. This line did run sleepers. I don't know a lot of the details of the passenger operations along this line in days gone by, but this could be a candidate.

Today this line is operated by the Hudson Bay Railway.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:15 AM

Not the Algoma and Hudson Bay.

The scheduled times for this route of several hundred miles equated to an average train speed of about 12 mph. - a bit faster northbound than southbound. That speed very likely made this the slowest sleeping car route on the continent. 

Mark

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:26 AM

I would guess it would be the Algoma and Hudson Bay up to Churchill, or whatever the northern end of the line was.   Or some other Canadian northern development railroad that ran a train one a day each way.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Monday, October 15, 2012 10:11 AM

rcdrye

You two should come up with a joint question (I'm sure it would be a doozy...)

This is my best attempt to come up with a doozy of a question.

It was rare to find a mixed train that carried sleepers and rarer still to find one that carried a dining car. In the late 1930's the consist of the mixed train I have in mind included both a sleeper and a diner. I'm not sure when these cars were dropped and think they may have continued in operation into the 1940's. What railroad ran this train and what was its route?

Mark

  

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, October 15, 2012 9:54 AM

That would make it Mark's question.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, October 15, 2012 7:30 AM

I am happy to defer to RC.    Dave

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter