It must be one of the Connecticut Company lines between Danbury and East Norwalk. A good question as to whether these cross-country Connecticut Co. lines were truly interurbans, but still most would consider them as such, even though the equipment really was not different than local streetcars.. Distances were short, and speeds were slow, with the Shore Line Trolley Museum's RofW pretty typical. It might have been a line between Danbury and Norwalk or East Norwalk, or between any of these cities and Meridan or Bristol. The covered bridge shared with a steam road branch line suggests New England, and the New Haven did allow its Connecticuct Co. subsidiary to share branch-line tracks in specific locations. That "part of the electrificaiton still exists", suggests the main Metro North Conn Dot New Haven line, with the Danbury Branch, which was double track electrfied, now single and diesel. And the main line is now 12,500 60 Hz and not 11:000V 25 Hz AC.
I would note that some consider the Shaker Heights to be an interurban. I don't. It is a rapid transit line with light rail, formerly streetcar - type equipment. It did of course share bridges with the Cleveland Terminal electrfication.
Also in Butte, the Butte Anacona and Pacific had local a streetcar and interuban subsidiary, I think the interurban ran to place named Sela. Undoubtadly there were some shared bridges, possibly not only with BA&P, but also with the electrified Milwaukee Road as well.
daveklepper As for the first question, a correct answer, but not the one you probably are looking for, are all the bridges on the IC suburban between Central Station, Roosevelt Avenue, 12th Street Chicago and Kensington Junction, where the IC tracks themselves are still used by the last of the Insull interurbans, the South Shore, which certainly was an interurban, if now regarded as a suburban railroad. I would assume that there is at least one major bridge on that line, over a river or canal, not just street overpasses. I IC suburban is an electrified steam operation.
As for the first question, a correct answer, but not the one you probably are looking for, are all the bridges on the IC suburban between Central Station, Roosevelt Avenue, 12th Street Chicago and Kensington Junction, where the IC tracks themselves are still used by the last of the Insull interurbans, the South Shore, which certainly was an interurban, if now regarded as a suburban railroad. I would assume that there is at least one major bridge on that line, over a river or canal, not just street overpasses. I IC suburban is an electrified steam operation.
As a longtime South Shore rider, I will vouch for the fact that there are no bridges other than street overpasses on the IC electric line from Randolph Street to 115th Street (Kensington). IC crosses the Little Calumet River at about 132nd Street and the South Shore crosses the Calumet River on its own line near Lake Calumet Harbor where it parallels 130th Street.
The bridge I'm looking for is double track with highway lanes hanging outside the trusses (Think Huey Long bridge). Both electrifications were DC, but different voltages.
You say part of the electrification still exists, but not on this bridge. So, what DC elecctrfications are there that are electrified steam railroads? Only the New York Central's, the Long Island Railroad, the Lackawanna's converted to AC (a good canditate, since it was rebuilt), and the IC, and the South Shore,. if your consider that a steam railroad electrified, which is pretty far fetched but OK. The South Shore may have shared a bridge with the Northern Indiana interurban on the eastern outskirts of South Bend, possibly the track now used as a freight industry siding and for conenction to the NYC and/ or GT, with the passenger trains and electrification now running to the Airport on a different alignment. The Long Island did have electric service to Country Life Press, now just for New York and Atlantic diesel freight service, and possibly this includes a bridge that one of the Long Island trolley lines also used. The only electric abandonment on the New York Central was the Getty's Square Branch, and it did not share any right-of-way with the Third Avenue streetcar system, none of whose routes could be described as interurban, even though they did cross county and city boundaries. I am not aware of any reduction in electrified mileage of the DL&W electrification.
Or do you wish to consider the H&M an interurban line? (Officially it was a railroad, practically it is an interstate heavy rapid transit line.) Possibly its old alignment to the Newark Park Street terminal, actually PRR trackage, not H&M, since everything west of Journal Sq. Jersey City yard was PRR oowned, including the original Park Street elevated terminal, included a bridge that the D&LW electric trains once used but do not now with some line relocation. Both DC and different voltages.
I wasn't aware of the DL&W/H&M bridge, though H&M wasn't really an interurban. Like your previous question about the QRL&P, think "North American". As an added detail, there was a track connection between the interurban and steam road on the east end of the bridge. The bridge is on the edge of a large city, and the home base of the interurban was on the "wrong" end of the bridge. I'm pretty sure the remainder of the 2400 volt DC electrification was changed to AC in the 1990s - in fact the public agency that now runs it shared the work on the AC/diesel design NJT has for former DL&W lines. The bridge in question lost its electrification in the early 50's, and the interurban in 1955.
DL&W and H&M shared a bridge???? Where and when? I can't concieve of where or why of this. Also, H&M could not be considerd interurban but rapid transit. Interurban indicated single or double single car sets but not trains; often just a motorman or motorman and conductor only crews; single track between cities or towns; low station platforms; fare collected on board.. Rapid transit, such as H&M, was train sets, double track, motorman plus conductor and maybe other trainmen, high level platforms at specific stations; fare collected at station turnstyles.
I am wracking my brain and can't think of where the DL&W and H&M would have shared a bridge. At Kearney, in the Meadows, the two come close together with H&M sharing an underpass area at one point. There is no place else the two get close enough to need to share space.
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
Thinking North American, you are undoubtadly referring to the CN Bridge leading to Montreal Island, locaton of the City, and used by the old Montrealer-Washingtonian and Ambassador to reach Central Station, possibly used by today's Amtrak Adorondak, but the old Laurentian, Red Wing, and Alloouette, used a different (CP) bridge to Miontreal West and Windsor Station. I believe today's VIA Ocean uses the bridge, plus lots of freight. I was not aware that the existing Deux Montains electrification ever ran south of Central Station, but it you say it did, I have to believe you. The interurban was the Montreal and Southern Counties, which was a CN subsidiary or at least partly owned by CN, and it also handled freight and there definitely was a track connection on the mainland side of the bridge . I ran M&SC No. 9 green wood interurban car at the Branaford Trolley Museum, now the Shore Line TrolleY Museum. I am prettty familiar with that line, even though I never rode it. But the idea that the CN Mt. Royal Tunnel electrification at one time extended south is news for me, and any information you can provide will be welcome. I think the bridge had three tracks, with the interurban only requiring one track.
Henry. I think you are right that the PRR-H&M joint service and the DL&W did not share a bridge. There is a point where their rightofways, today, are adjacent, as you know.
daveklepper Henry. I think you are right that the PRR-H&M joint service and the DL&W did not share a bridge. There is a point where their rightofways, today, are adjacent, as you know.
I kinda recollect that the PRR and H&M had two Hackensack bridges and shared at least one, the northern most of the two perhaps, probably about a mile west of Journal Sq. complex. And I remember the wire over the 3rd railed H&M track right adjacent to the DL&W at Kearney where the Corridor went overhead...it was a scant couple hundred feed. Saw Tube trains on the track, but never a PRR train under the wire there. The Broker, incidenlty, was always seen on the bridge further south and higher than the rest of the trackage in the area. Smoke or Sharks...loved to pace the Broker!
daveklepper is correct. The Victoria bridge was electrifed to the wye in St. Lambert where CN steam (or in the case of the Green Mountain Flyer, Rutland steam) took over. For a good photo of the changeover see Jim Shaughnessy's "The Rutland Road". The electrification was never used for suburban purposes, only mainline, and was removed after the end of team, or maybe after the opening of Central Station replacing Bonaventure. Today's Adirondack and Ocean use it, and the Montrealer used it from 1972 to 1995. According to my M&SC book, the track connection was only on the east (St. Lambert) end. At some point in the teens, a proposal was floated to make a connection on the Montreal end to allow bidirectional running on the bridge, which is quite long. Between the requirement for left hand running and having incompatible electrical systems, nothing came of it. The GT/CN had the tracks inside the truss, M&SC was single track on the outside.
The CN replaced M&SC service with diesel service in 1955 using FM C-liners and rebuilt heavyweight coaches. M&SC 504 and 610 are on display at the Seashore Trolley Museum (STM also has 621).
Montreal & Southern Counties Railway
wanswheel's great photos prompted me to look up dates in J.R Thomas Grumley's "Montreal & Southern Counties Railway Co." (Bytown Railwy Society 2004) and William Middleton's "When the Steam Railroads Electrified" (Revised, Second Edition Indiana University Press 2001). The suggestion to use the inbound GT track was made in 1921, prior to the electrification, so the incompatible electrifiation wasn't an obstacle to using the GT's track. The Central Station to Turcot Yard electrification was in place from 1943 to 1958, handling trains from the new Central Station to the Maritimes and Vermont (CV, Rutland) . The M&SC dropped service into Montreal over the victoria Bridge June 1955, and all service October 1956. Serves me right for not checking before offering the quiz. The Adirondack does use the bridge, which has a very interesting detour bridge over the St Lawrence Seaway canals on the east end, probably dating to Seaway construction(and post-electrification.
Glad to catch up on an electrication extension that I hqd forgotten. TRAINS had an article on Central Station about 40-50 years ago, which I read, and certainly the whole electrification history must have been included. But I had long forgotton that history.
Again, Henry, the PATH tracks that had the wire were PRR tracks with everything west of JOurnal Sq. yard owned by PRR. And steam, electric freight, diesel, and MP-54's all used the line, inlcuding Lehigh Valley steam and diesel.
Soooooooo........Next question: Name the last two sets of TRUE INTERURBAN CARS built for North American operation, OTHER THAN THE 1700 CLASS PCC'S FOR PITTSBURGH RAILWAYS. (Which provided true interurban service Pittsburgh to and from Charleroi-Roscoe and Washington, PA.
Railway Co., dates, routes used. Any problems with them should also be mentioned.
Both sets post WWII!
Oh, yes, H&M was owned by the PRR and all their underwire running on 3rd rail was on PRR tracks.
As for the question about last true interurban cars. You have excluded the Pittsburg Ry's cars but where do you place the SEPTA High Speed Norristown line (Phila. and West) or the 101 and 102 Media and Sharon HIll trolley lines and the NJT RIver LIne Camden to Trenton and some of the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail over former lines Erie-NYC (WS)-O&W and over CNJ's Newark Branch? There could be good arguements for them being interurbans between towns and over private rights of way. Would you, therfore, consider qualifying "interurban" as performing steam road services and not just passenger?,
Illinois Terminal's stramliners should count. CA&E's "St. Looies" (451-460) were delvered in 1946 and could train with the Pullmans and Cincinnatis.
rc, you are correct and listed two groups of real interurban cars, cars that operated across country, and not just within the suburbs of one city. Shure, the NJT River Line is a diesel interurban line, but I think it was pretty obvious that I meant classic interurban, and that means electric power. I would also classify the new St. Louis light rail line to Belleville as a true interurbna line, and the Denver Light Rail line to Boulder, which does replicate the route of a classic interurban, but neither of these operated 50 years ago, the subject of this forum.
rc: Can you describe in detail the problem with the IT cars and why they were not the success the Electroniners were for the North Shore?
What was the distinctive characteristic of the CA&E cars, unlike other CA&E and North Shore steel cars?
The H&M was a separate company and if the PRR had part ownership, it was a minority ownership. The Newark - Hudson Terminal was a jointly operated through service with half PRR crews and half H&M crews. 50 cars were owned by PRR and 50 idejntacle cars by H&M. This applied to both the Gibbs cars and the post WWII air-conditoned K-class. The cab signal and ATC equipent from the 1930's was taken from the Gibbs cars and reinstalled in the K's. All track west of the Journal Sq. yard was PRR-owned, and the yard and all track east H&M-owned.
The biggest problem I know of with the IT cars was that they wouldn't fit on some of IT's trackage. IT had 55 foot radius curves in the subway wye in St. Louis. The cars could take the curves as singles, but not as a train. There was a similar problem that kept them from operating in Peoria, requiring IT to use an older car as a shuttle from East Peoria to Peoria.
The CA&E cars had fishbelly sides and arched roofs. The fishbelly sides allowed a wider carbody without hitting the El platforms. Like the IT cars and North Shore's Electroliners (which also had fishbelly sides) they came from St. Louis Car.
Ask the next question. YOu do not mean fishbellysides. Fishbelly sides are like the wood Sante Fe cars that were rebuilt as steels with sides extending below the side sills in the area where truss rods were in wood cars to provide addidtional strength. The older IRT subway cars, including the GIbbs cars, that originally did not have center doors, got fishbellies when rebuilt with center doors to restore strength. But the cars originally built with center doors did not need this type of side.
Commonly, the type of side the postwar 1946 C&AE cars had is called curved-side. It was typical of some older horsecars and streetcars, revived with "Cincinnati Curved Side cars," and allowed a thiner side wall with great strength, as well as the additional roominess you mentioned.
The Santa Fe cars had fishbelly underframes. You are correct that the CA&E's postwar cars had curved sides like the Cincinnatis (See Wheeling 639 at the Seashore trolley museum www.trolleymuseum.org ). CTA's 5000 series articulateds had similar sides, often referred to by Chicago area fans as "fishbelly". The Electroliners had them, too.
Now for the question. Which Milwaukee Road train handed off sleeping cars to two different CP subsidiaries at two different places?
rcdrye The CA&E cars had fishbelly sides and arched roofs. The fishbelly sides allowed a wider carbody without hitting the El platforms. Like the IT cars and North Shore's Electroliners (which also had fishbelly sides) they came from St. Louis Car.
First things first, it's called the "L". An El is an elevated rapid transit operation in New York that predated the subways. CTA equipment beginning with the 6000 series has had curved sides or a similar design that allows a wider carbody that still clears the platforms. The width difference is most obvious on the first 130 6000 series cars with flat doors.
I think the overnight Chicago - St. Paul PIoneer Limited had a through sleeper on the SOO that may have continued through to Vancourver or at least to Calgary or Winnipeg. Handed over at St. Paul. If this is correct, I will get to work on the second half of the question.
As far as I know, the only one of the "fast" Chicago-Twin Cities carriers to handle sleepers for the Soo/CP was the C&NW on the Viking in the 1930s. I'll give you the Soo as one CP subsidiary, though (but where was the car going?) The Soo connection, which in later years ran less than daily, came off in the late 1950s, the other one hung on until the late 1960s.
I was hoping someone else would come up with the correct answer. I tired exploring CP hiltory on the web, but did not find the specific information. But I still have to take the time to explore CMStP&P history.
rcdrye Now for the question. Which Milwaukee Road train handed off sleeping cars to two different CP subsidiaries at two different places?
The Copper Country Limited
Chicago-Calumet sleepers were sent via the Duluth, South Shore and Atlantic from Champion, MI and a Milwaukee-Marquette, MI sleeper was also exchanged with the DSS&A at Republic, MI.
There was also a Chicago-Sault Ste. Marie sleeper that ran via the Soo east of Pembine, WI.
rcdrye As far as I know, the only one of the "fast" Chicago-Twin Cities carriers to handle sleepers for the Soo/CP was the C&NW on the Viking in the 1930s. ...
As far as I know, the only one of the "fast" Chicago-Twin Cities carriers to handle sleepers for the Soo/CP was the C&NW on the Viking in the 1930s. ...
The C&NW did operate through Soo/CP sleepers via the Viking, but the C&NW also operated a through train for the Soo/CP, the summer only Chicago-Vancouver Mountaineer.
So, rc, next question pleased. Glad you provided the answer!
ZephyrOverland has the correct answer. The Copper Country Limited carried Pullman sleepers for Sault Ste Marie (Pembine WI, MSP&SSM) and Calumet MI (Champion MI, DSS&A). Since the Soo ran its own sleepers, this may have been the only Soo Pullman operation.
So, ZO, nest question. Sorry rc.
Here's the question.....
There were at least three instances where you could have traveled from the southwest to the northeastern part of the U.S. via more or less connecting trains that had the same name. Name the trains, railroads and endpoints.
I think you get the nod for the toughest questions - at least that tax guys like me who only go back a little more than 50 years...
The only pairing I could come up with was Erie's Atlantic/Pacific Express (Hoboken - Chicago) paired with the Pacific Limited (C&NW or CM&SP (1920's) and UP/SP Chicago - San Francisco. Pretty long wait in Chicago, at least westbound.
I tried to create something with a Southwestern, but could only get NYC-St. Louis (NYC) and Chicago/Milwaukee - Kansas City(MILW). Amtrak ran 3&4 as the Southwest Limited before it got re-Chief-ed.
BTW I had forgotten the Milwaukee-Marquette sleeper, which I'm pretty sure was exchanged at Champion as well, since DSS&A didn't get to Republic. In the last few years of the Copper Country as a DSS&A train, the power choice on DSS&A rails was MILW units (FP7s or GP9s) or DSS&A RS1s. I have to assume any Soo units assigned after 1961 (if any) were GP9s.
After a lot more thinking I came up with the Blue Arrow/Blue Dart (NKP Cleveland - St. Louis) and the Bluebonnet (Frisco/Katy, St. Louis - various texas cities).
If you don't sweat the southwest part you have the B&O's Columbian (J.C. - Washington -Chicago) connecting with the CMSP&P's Columbian (Chicago - Seattle/Tacoma)
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter