Trains.com

Classic Train questions (50 years or older) Locked

81216 views
710 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, December 12, 2008 12:07 PM

The Chessie was a proposed streamliner for a daylight Washington-Cincinnati run on C&O.  It also included a Newport News-Charlottesville connecting train.  Motive power would have been a steam-turbine-electric locomotive.

At the first indication of this proposal, B&O streamstyled some heavyweight equipment to be operated as the Cincinnatian on B&O's own Washington-Cincinnati route.  The lack of patronage on B&O showed that there was no real market for Washington-Cincinnati day train.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Friday, December 12, 2008 12:17 PM

Deggesty

The first part should be easy; the second part may call for some thought.

What was the Chessie? What was the B&O's role in the decision not to operate the train?

The CHESSIE was a proposed C&O streamlined train operating between Washington/Norfolk and Cincinnati. It was to be turbined powered with streamlined steam providing the connecting power between Norfolk and Phoebe.

Budd built 46 passenger cars for the stillborn Chessie that was scheduled to go into service in September 1948 but it came to be known as the train that never was. All of the cars were sold except for four which were operated by the C&O. The rest went to the ACL, Seaboard, D&RGW, C&EI and some even went to Argentina.

The B&O introduced the Cincinnatians January 13, 1947 between Baltimore and Cincinnati and when it was found it was not making money on that route it was switched to a Cincinnati - Detroit route. The C&O had already ordered the new equipment and rather than open a service that would have not been successful they sold the equipment.

Al - in - Stockton

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, December 12, 2008 1:24 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

The Chessie was a proposed streamliner for a daylight Washington-Cincinnati run on C&O.  It also included a Newport News-Charlottesville connecting train.  Motive power would have been a steam-turbine-electric locomotive.

At the first indication of this proposal, B&O streamstyled some heavyweight equipment to be operated as the Cincinnatian on B&O's own Washington-Cincinnati route.  The lack of patronage on B&O showed that there was no real market for Washington-Cincinnati day train.

Paul, you are quick on the trigger; you beat Al - in - Stockton by ten minutes.

Actually, Phoebus was then the eastern terminus in the Hampton Roads area. By 1952, service was cut back to originate in Newport News instead of Phoebus. I rather doubt that many people rode east of the transfer point to/from Norfolk. There was also a plan to have a connecting train for Louisville, with the transfer being made in Ashland.

Neither one of you mentioned the fish tanks in the lounge cars. This was an unsuccessful idea, for the fish died. Seasick, perhaps?

So, Paul give us a question, please.

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, December 12, 2008 1:59 PM

Amtrak currently provides management services for several commuter operations.  What was the only commuter operation to be directly operated under the Amtrak banner with Amtrak equipment?

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, December 12, 2008 4:17 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

Amtrak currently provides management services for several commuter operations.  What was the only commuter operation to be directly operated under the Amtrak banner with Amtrak equipment?

Only service I can think of is the "Valpo Locals," which ran CUS to Valparaiso and return.  They were gallery-style bilevel cars, but operated by Amtrak, and I think the bi-levs even belonged to Amtrak (Would they have been exx-PRR?  Not sure).  

Amtrak, of course, is supposed to be all about intercity, not commuter. IIRC Congress cut their budget in the Eighties and it they became non-trains and a non-issue.

History, but not 50 year old history.  -  a.s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:43 AM

Al-in-Chicago is the winner.  The bi-levels were the former C&NW 700-series that operated on the Peninsula 400 and Flambeau 400. 

Your question, Al.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:49 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

Al-in-Chicago is the winner.  The bi-levels were the former C&NW 700-series that operated on the Peninsula 400 and Flambeau 400. 

Your question, Al.

Paul your question wasn't fifty years old. But it was interesting anyway.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, December 13, 2008 5:03 PM

Okay, um....what well-known passenger train of the past featured as its most expensive dining-car item the "King's Dinner"; and what souvenir was given to those who ordered and ate the whole thing? 

Should be relatively easy for this crowd!  -  a.s.

 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:54 AM

al-in-chgo

Okay, um....what well-known passenger train of the past featured as its most expensive dining-car item the "King's Dinner"; and what souvenir was given to those who ordered and ate the whole thing? 

Should be relatively easy for this crowd!  -  a.s.

 

 

Gee Al I think the "Kings Dinner" was featured on the Panama Limited and the gift you got me on was it Alka Seltzer. I have always considered myself a pretty good eater and hate to waste food but if I had eaten that dinner Alka Seltzer would have followed dessert.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:09 PM

passengerfan

al-in-chgo

Okay, um....what well-known passenger train of the past featured as its most expensive dining-car item the "King's Dinner"; and what souvenir was given to those who ordered and ate the whole thing? 

Should be relatively easy for this crowd!  -  a.s.

 

 

Gee Al I think the "Kings Dinner" was featured on the Panama Limited and the gift you got me on was it Alka Seltzer. I have always considered myself a pretty good eater and hate to waste food but if I had eaten that dinner Alka Seltzer would have followed dessert.

Al - in - Stockton

West Coast Al, you are on board with the name of the train.  But the "souvenir" -- more of a trinket, really -- was a kind of symbol of achievement (hint). 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, December 14, 2008 10:28 PM

al-in-chgo
But the "souvenir" -- more of a trinket, really -- was a kind of symbol of achievement (hint).

Or perhaps a piece of jewelry? - like maybe a lapel pin of a crown.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Sunday, December 14, 2008 10:52 PM

Perfect!  IIRC it was shaped like a "Crown Royal" crown, not the Hallmark coronet.

You get the next question -  al s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, December 15, 2008 12:19 AM

The railroad that eventually became the Santa Fe that we knew from the 1960s through 1995 was the result of many mergers acquisitions and other subsidiaries.  All but three of these were included and/or excluded from the final system more than 50 years ago.

The question is to name as many of the predecessors of the Santa Fe as possible.   These names can be those of subsidiaries, purchases, affiliates, mergers, and ownerships.   Bonus points for including the significant date(s) for the various railroads.  At least try to get a few from your brain before going "a searching" the resources.

I'll start by saying that while researching for this question I was surprised that the Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe was not fully merged into the Santa Fe until August 1, 1965!  (not more than 50 years ago).  That means even though the Santa Fe gained control in 1886 it was, at least on paper, still a separate railroad for 79 more years.  GC&SF was originally founded in 1873 and was at that time no relation to the Atchison road.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, December 15, 2008 10:02 AM

I'll start the ball rolling with the obvious candidates:

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe

Panhandle & Santa Fe

Both existed on paper for as long as they did because of the longstanding requirement that railroads which operated in Texas had to be incorporated in Texas.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Monday, December 15, 2008 2:31 PM

This should keep the ball rolling with the following AT&SF subsidiaries.

Arizona & Utah Railway

Atlantic & Pacific Railroad

California Arizona & Eastern

California & Southern

New Mexicao & Arizona Railroad

New Mexico & Southern Pacific Railroad

Santa Fe & Grand Canyon Railroad

Santa Fe Pacific

Santa Fe Prescott & Phoenix

Sonora Railway

Verde Valley Railway

Western Arizona Railway

Thats all I came up with.

Al - in - Stockton

 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, December 15, 2008 7:53 PM
user="SSHEGEWISCH

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe - Yes, talked about above.
Panhandle & Santa Fe -  Yes, March 1, 1899

user="passengerfan"

Arizona & Utah Railway - Yes, unknown dates
Atlantic & Pacific Railroad - The BIG one 50% of stock January 31, 1880
California Arizona & Eastern
California & Southern - Yes, October 16, 1880
New Mexicao & Arizona Railroad - Yes, October 15, 1882
New Mexico & Southern Pacific Railroad - Yes, April 15, 1880
Santa Fe & Grand Canyon Railroad - Yes, August 15, 1901
Santa Fe Pacific - Yes  don't have a date - successor to the Atlantic & Pacific
Santa Fe Prescott & Phoenix - Yes, March 14, 1895
Sonora Railway - Yes, October 14, 1880
Verde Valley Railway - Yes, chartered as non-operating subsidiary 1911, deeded December 31, 1942.
Western Arizona Railway - Yes, subsidiary, 1906

I don't have the CA&E...

This is about 1/3 of them.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 7:44 AM

Wichita Southwestern, 1872

Kansas City, Topeka & Western, 1875

Kansas City, Lawrence & Southern Kansas, 1880

Chicago, Santa Fe & California, 1886

Chicago & St. Louis, 1886

Los Angeles & San Gabriel Valley, 1887

St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado, 1887

St. Louis County Railroad, 1887

Denver Circle Railroad,1888

Eastern Oklahoma, 1899

Denver, Enid & Gulf, 1907

Colorado Midland, 1890

San Francisco & San Joaquin Valley, 1898

Pecos Valley & Northeastern, 1901

Santa Fe, Prescott & Phoenix, 1901

Arizona & California Railway, early 1900s

Central California Traction, with SP and WP, 1928

Kansas City, Mexico & Orient, 1928

Elkhart & Santa Fe, 1930s

Fort Worth & Rio Grande, 1937

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:23 PM

user="wanswheel"

Wichita Southwestern, 1872  Yes, affiliate from Newton to Wichita and then on to Pratt
Kansas City, Topeka & Western, 1875  Yes, Leased connections east.
Kansas City, Lawrence & Southern Kansas, 1880  Yes, but what 3 railroads merged to form this one?
Chicago, Santa Fe & California, 1886 Yes, December 3
Chicago & St. Louis, 1886  Yes, aquired by the Chicago Santa Fe & California.  Most confusing name because of the "New York Chicago & St. Louis" and the "Cleveland Cincinnati Chicago & St. Louis."
Los Angeles & San Gabriel Valley, 1887  Yes, September 11
St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado, 1887 Santa Fe purchased Dec 16, 1899.  Turned over the Frisco.  Was operated by the Frisco, until the SF SLSF receivership.   Ended up going to the Rock Island.  I believe it was eventually known as the "St. Louis Branch" of the RI.
St. Louis County Railroad, 1887 Santa Fe purchased in Feb 16, 1899 and changed  the name to St. Louis Kansas City & Colorado  in December 16, 1899.
Denver Circle Railroad,1888  Yes, I would have said 1887
Eastern Oklahoma, 1899 Yes, but I question the date
Denver, Enid & Gulf, 1907 Yes, came through the Eastern Oklahoma (above)
Colorado Midland, 1890 Yes, which class 1 railroad did not own the Midland at one point or another?Approve
San Francisco & San Joaquin Valley, 1898 Yes, July 22
Pecos Valley & Northeastern, 1901 Yes
Santa Fe, Prescott & Phoenix, 1901 - already listed
Arizona & California Railway, early 1900s - Yes July 10, 1910
Central California Traction, with SP and WP, 1928 - hmmm I don't have this one.
Kansas City, Mexico & Orient, 1928 - Yes October 19
Elkhart & Santa Fe, 1930s - Yes, November 15, 1931
Fort Worth & Rio Grande, 1937 - Yes March 

I have about 15 more in my list.  There are a couple of significant ones missing - maybe they are too obvious because after they were owned they were split back out.   Then there is the one that had an engineering marvel.  The others are pretty obscure.  Then another significant one shared with another major railroad.

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Wednesday, December 17, 2008 1:28 PM

Pueblo & Arkansas Valley, 1875

Denver & Rio Grande, 1878

Oklahoma Central, 1900s (EO)

Texas, Louisiana & Eastern, 1900s

Gulf, Beaumont & Kansas City, 1900s

Eel River & Eureka, 1900s

California & Northern, 1900s

California & Nevada, 1904

Northwestern Pacific, with SP, 1907

Illinois Northern, 51% with CB&Q, NYC & PRR, 1947

Toledo, Peoria & Western, with PRR, 1957

Oklahoma City-Ada-Otoka, 1962

Re: Kansas City, Lawrence & Southern Kansas.

Leavenworth, Lawrence & Galveston?

Ottawa & Burlington?

Kansas City & Olathe?   

Re: St.Lou, KC & Colorado. Book says bought 1887, sold 1899.

Re: Eastern Oklahoma. Book says chartered July 24, 1899.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:29 PM
Well the computer just ate my long reply so just the basics.....

wanswheel"

Pueblo & Arkansas Valley, 1875  <<-- This is the one I was looking for.  This is the railroad that built the famous hanging bridge over the Arkansas that the D&RGW is often credited with.
Denver & Rio Grande, 1878 <<-- Yes Another one of the Big Ones I was looking for.
Northwestern Pacific, with SP, 1907  <<-- This is the joint owned one I was looking for.

>> What railroads comprised the Kansas City, Lawrence & Southern Kansas.

Leavenworth, Lawrence & Galveston?
Ottawa & Burlington?

Kansas City & Olathe?   

This is basically correct.  However re-reading that section I see I wasn't correct.  The LL&G became the KCL&SK.  The other two combined with it to form the "Southern Kansas". 

Re: St.Lou, KC & Colorado. Book says bought 1887, sold 1899.
Yes, Confusing and convoluted.  I am not certain any of the books are correct.  I believe it was sold to the Santa Fe 1899.  One reference agrees - http://www.atsfry.com/easternarchive/meades/stlouisk.htm It seems like somewhere sometime I saw the actual legal document making this transaction.  However, it was also confusing and right now I am unable to relocate it. 

Re: Eastern Oklahoma. Book says chartered July 24, 1899.
Yes, but was it the Santa Fe chartering it as a subsidiary or affiliate?  I think it was totally independent for a while.  It did own the Guthrie, Crescent and Enid Railway before the Santa Fe got it.

The other BIG one I was looking for was FRISCO!    When I was growing up in Kansas I wondered why the Frisco had so much parallel track with the Santa Fe. 

Wanswheel definitely got the largest number - so his turn for the next question. 


 


 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:58 PM

Two paragraphs from History of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway

"When Gould disrupted Colorado traffic arrangements for the Atchison, Strong moved to destroy Gould's "monopoly" in St. Louis. On January 26, 1887, The New York Times announced the purchase by the Atchison of the St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado Railroad, a fifty-mile line from St. Louis to Union, Missouri. Further, reported The Times, the Atchison planned to extend the StLKC&C from Union to the new Kansas City-Chicago "airline," giving the ATSF entrance into St. Louis; the residents of St. Louis were "tickled." Gould then discovered in April that Robinson's surveyors were in the field between Pekin and St. Louis with unannounced plans to build to St. Louis from Chicago. Strong gave an additional indication that the Atchison meant business when he bought the St. Louis County Railroad that summer. The St. Louis County operated a five-mile long switching and terminal line in the city. Gould became convinced that Strong would counter every new piece of construction, and an unwritten truce soon prevailed; both men brought their construction programs to a halt. The Atchison's orphan line in St. Louis remained isolated until it was sold in December 1899. Years later the Santa Fe would again seek entrance into St. Louis; but in the late 1880s the battle shifted from construction to the rate structure."

"In 1899 the Santa Fe operated two lines through the "Twin Territories": the main line from Arkansas City, Kansas south through Guthrie and Purcell to Gainsville, Texas; and the panhandle route across the northwestern corner of Oklahoma Territory. Ripley decided that the greatest immediate need was to tap the farm areas on either side of the main line. He chartered the Eastern Oklahoma Railway on July 24, 1899, with $2.2 million in capital; and for the next five years this subsidiary constructed branches of great importance. A new line began at Newkirk in Oklahoma Territory and went east and then south paralleling the main line, which was about forty to fifty miles to the west, passing through Shawnee before regaining the main at Pauls Valley. The new line was designed to carry heavy freight traffic, and Dun ordered culverts to be constructed of stone and masonry with a maximum grade of .6 percent. The Eastern Oklahoma also built a line from the territorial capital at Guthrie east to Stillwater. In 1904 the Eastern Oklahoma bought a line from Pauls Valley west to Maysville and Lindsey, and later acquired the Oklahoma Central, which operated 128 miles of road west from the coal center of Lehigh through Ada to Purcell and Chicasha. Another purchase gave the Atchison a valuable feeder west of the main line and north into Kansas; the Eastern Oklahoma bought the Denver, Enid and Gulf Railroad in 1907, and thus acquired 161 miles of track from Guthrie through Enid to Kiowa in southwestern Kansas. When President Theodore Roosevelt signed the act merging the "Twin Territorries" into the state of Oklahoma in 1907, the Santa Fe had a firm hold on rail traffic through the middle third of the new state."

[Copyright 1974 Keith L. Bryant, Jr.]

What city was the first west of the Mississippi to have train service to the east? Trains pulled by locomotives on a bridge across the river.

Bonus question: What railroad + classic train contains a word that is a genre of music, and repeats it twice as a syllable? Hint: It goes (went) through the city in the unbonus question.

Mike

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:11 AM

wanswheel

What city was the first west of the Mississippi to have train service to the east? Trains pulled by locomotives on a bridge across the river.

Bonus question: What railroad + classic train contains a word that is a genre of music, and repeats it twice as a syllable? Hint: It goes (went) through the city in the unbonus question.

Mike

 

Davenport, IA - in 1856

Rock Island - Rocky Mountain Rocket

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:30 AM
wanswheel

What city was the first west of the Mississippi to have train service to the east? Trains pulled by locomotives on a bridge across the river.

Bonus question: What railroad + classic train contains a word that is a genre of music, and repeats it twice as a syllable? Hint: It goes (went) through the city in the unbonus question.

Mike

Davenport, IA with the completion of the CRI&P bridge over the Mississippi from Rock Island, IL.

Mark

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, December 18, 2008 11:25 AM

Some more pics including Milw 261 and the Hiawatha observation car.

http://joelemay.rrpicturearchives.net/locThumbs.aspx?id=33598

ZephyrOverland posted first and of course the Rocky Mountain Rocket.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, December 19, 2008 1:00 PM

What passenger train was named after a train station?

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, December 19, 2008 7:21 PM

ZephyrOverland

What passenger train was named after a train station?

Was this an NYC train that was named for Grand Central Terminal? I have a vague, vague memory of such, but cannot remember an exact name.

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, December 19, 2008 7:40 PM

Deggesty

ZephyrOverland

What passenger train was named after a train station?

Was this an NYC train that was named for Grand Central Terminal? I have a vague, vague memory of such, but cannot remember an exact name.

Johnny

 

That's right - the train was called the Grand Central and ran around 1940.  Your turn to ask a question.

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, December 19, 2008 8:01 PM

Here's one that may not be so easy. Back in 1893, the eastern and southern railroads had many different sleeper lines to Chicago for people who wanted to go to the World's Fair that was held there that year. One line went from Mobile to Chicago, and the passengers could get off at the World's Fair grounds or at the station "directly in front of the Auditorium, Victoria, Richelieu and Leland hotels...." if they wanted to. This line did not go through Birmingham or Atlanta or through western Tennessee. It could still have been used even in the sixties, but it is now broken. What roads handled the car, and what were the junctions? You can give the names of the roads as they were in the sixties, or as they were in 1893.

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, December 20, 2008 6:50 AM

There was a Chicago-Mobile sleeper that operated on the Georgian-Humming Bird into the 1960's on the following route:  Chicago-C&EI-Evansville-L&N-Mobile.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter