Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

849911 views
8168 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, October 31, 2009 10:19 PM
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:46 PM

Since the 20 questions format seems to have caught on, I'll try my hand at one.

I'm thinking of a passenger train. What was its name, route and over what RR or RR's did it run.

Mark

 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:55 PM

KCSfan

I really should wait for an answer to the last question. But, since we've got quite a few left, I can't resist taking a shot at a hunch I have.

Was it the CN's Caribou running on Newfoundland between St. John's and Port-Aux-Basques?

Mark

Very Good Mark you guys are getting. better. I rode the Caribou better known as the Newfie Bullet its last year in service and went back the following year and rode two of the three remaining services through the Loop the name escapes me at the moment. They had a lot of interesting rolling stock as far as passenger equipment went. There was a lot of it boarded up in St. Johns the last time I seen it. I understand that the National Museum in Ottawa has a number of pieces of the rolling stock. You sure do appreciate tightlock couplers after riding a train not so equipped.  

Your question.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 4:47 PM

I really should wait for an answer to the last question. But, since we've got quite a few left, I can't resist taking a shot at a hunch I have.

Was it the CN's Caribou running on Newfoundland between St. John's and Port-Aux-Basques?

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 4:35 PM

Was at least one terminal of the train a city on one of the Maritimes (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia & Prince Edward Island)?

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 4:04 PM

KCSfan

Since the railroad's name does not contain the name of a body of water we can eliminate the Canadian Pacific.

Was the railroad the Canadian National?

Mark

8) Yes
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 3:25 PM

Since the railroad's name does not contain the name of a body of water we can eliminate the Canadian Pacific.

Was the railroad the Canadian National?

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 3:13 PM

KCSfan

Was it a Canadian train?

Mark

(7) Yes
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 3:11 PM

KCSfan

Did the RR have a state in its name?

Mark

(6) No
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 3:09 PM

Was it a Canadian train?

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:41 PM

Did the RR have a state in its name?

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:25 PM

KCSfan

Did the RR on which the train ran have a city in its name?

Mark

(5) No
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:21 PM

Did the RR on which the train ran have a city in its name?

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:14 PM

KCSfan

Did the train run on a single RR as opposed to being handled by multiple roads?

Mark

(4) Yes
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:11 PM

Deggesty

Is it a Southern Railway System train?

Johnny

(3) No
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 1:11 PM

Did the train run on a single RR as opposed to being handled by multiple roads?

Mark

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, October 31, 2009 1:09 PM

Is it a Southern Railway System train?

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 12:58 PM
KCSfan
wanswheel

Is either of the terminals a passenger station in a city that has a river bridge in the Central Time Zone?

Incidentally I see RR singular and not RRs plural in the set up, so that's a given. Thanks.

Very good!  You just eliminated Chicago and all the cities on the Mississippi  with one question.

Did the train run east of the Mississippi River?

 

(3) Yes
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 11:32 AM
wanswheel

Is either of the terminals a passenger station in a city that has a river bridge in the Central Time Zone?

Incidentally I see RR singular and not RRs plural in the set up, so that's a given. Thanks.

Very good!  You just eliminated Chicago and all the cities on the Mississippi  with one question.

Did the train run east of the Mississippi River?

 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:11 AM
wanswheel

Does the railroad's name contain the name of a body of water?

(2) No
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:35 AM

Does the railroad's name contain the name of a body of water?

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:29 AM
wanswheel

Is either of the terminals a passenger station in a city that has a river bridge in the Central Time Zone?

Incidentally I see RR singular and not RRs plural in the set up, so that's a given. Thanks.

(1) No
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Friday, October 30, 2009 7:47 PM

Is either of the terminals a passenger station in a city that has a river bridge in the Central Time Zone?

Incidentally I see RR singular and not RRs plural in the set up, so that's a given. Thanks.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Friday, October 30, 2009 7:03 PM

Let's try another twenty questions with some rules in place. Must be a North American RR and train. Can be Freight or Passenger and must be at least fifty years old. Please no WAGs. 

If it's OK than here is my question I am thinking of a train? Name the train RR and terminals?

Al - in - Stockton 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, October 30, 2009 4:01 PM

passengerfan

The Northern Pacific was another and one of the trains was the North Coast Limited.

Was the third the Soo before it reached Chicago. The only Soo train I can think of was the Mountaineer.

Al - in - Stockton

 

Congrats! You got the other two!

The Chicago-Seattle-Portland Northern Pacific North Coast Limited operated on the C&NW (via Madison and via Milwaukee at various times) from about 1909 until WW1.  I believe NP routed only the North Coast Limited via C&NW.  NP's other western trains either were operated only to/from St. Paul or went to Chicago via the Burlington during this time period.

The Soo/CP Chicago-Vancouver Mountaineer was operated on the C&NW in the 1930's and I think right after WW2.  The Soo operated the Mountaineer on its own Chicago-Minneapolis rails from the trains inception in the 1920's, but I think the C&NW was used because of better traffic potential from the C&NW service areas.

You get to ask the next question.   

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Friday, October 30, 2009 3:50 PM

The Northern Pacific was another and one of the trains was the North Coast Limited.

Was the third the Soo before it reached Chicago. The only Soo train I can think of was the Mountaineer.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, October 30, 2009 3:24 PM

KCSfan

Zephyr,

Your original question stated that the CNW was the eastern partner for at least three western transcontinental services. By definition I think a transcontinental service would be one running between the east and west coasts and since the CNW obviously didn't run east of Chicago, I'm confused. I must be missing something so help me out please.

Mark 

 

 

Mark,

I'm using the term "transcontinental" as it has been used by individuals, the media, and the railroads for the past 100 years or so.   When people refer to the first transcontinental, they refer to the Union Pacific/Central Pacific Sacramento-Omaha line which allowed an individual to travel between the east and west coasts by train.  When someone talked about a transcontinental train,  it was understood to mean a Chicago/St. Louis/New Orleans/Minneapolis-west coast run.  I think the confusion lies in the term "eastern partner" when I made reference to the the C&NW.  When I wrote the original question, in my mind the C&NW was the "eastern" partner (or handled the eastern portion) of the Chicago-west coast services that I have in mind.  What I should have asked is:

Name three Chicago-west coast services that the C&NW was involved with. 

And as I had mentioned, you got the first answer, the UP Overland Route.

Pardon the verbosity.  

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Friday, October 30, 2009 2:34 PM

Zephyr,

Your original question stated that the CNW was the eastern partner for at least three western transcontinental services. By definition I think a transcontinental service would be one running between the east and west coasts and since the CNW obviously didn't run east of Chicago, I'm confused. I must be missing something so help me out please.

Mark 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, October 30, 2009 2:12 PM

KCSfan

ZephyrOverland

The Chicago and North Western was the eastern partner for at least three western transcontinental services.  Name the connecting railroads and one or two trains for each service.

I think you meant Chicago to West Coast not transcontinental services.

Chi - San Fran    CNW/UP/SP    City of SF & SF Overland

Chi - LA             CNW/UP          City of LA & Challenger

Chi - Seattle       CNW/UP          Portland Rose & City of Portland

Mark

 

No, I did mean transcontinental (as in Chicago - west, not east coast-west coast) services.  You named one - the UP/SP Overland Route.  The C&NW was involved with two other services with other railroads.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Friday, October 30, 2009 1:06 PM

ZephyrOverland

The Chicago and North Western was the eastern partner for at least three western transcontinental services.  Name the connecting railroads and one or two trains for each service.

I think you meant Chicago to West Coast not transcontinental services.

Chi - San Fran    CNW/UP/SP    City of SF & SF Overland

Chi - LA             CNW/UP          City of LA & Challenger

Chi - Seattle       CNW/UP          Portland Rose & City of Portland

Mark

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter