nanaimo73 wrote:CP was talking about having heritage units back in the 1990s. One was supposed to be D&H, but it seems they only have heritage locomotives with the old CPR scheme around.
They do keep at least one unit still painted in the D&H lightning scheme.
EJE818 wrote:I say CN should do a WC painted SD70M-2 and give it the lightning stripe like the OLS SD45s have. I also think a orange and black IC painted SD70M-2 would look pretty nice. Lets not forget DM&IR and B&LE. A maroon and gold DM&IR painted SD70M-2 would look pretty nice. Concerning NS, lets not forget they bought the former RailCruise America Fs and are planning to repaint them into Southern colors. I don't really know what paint schemes would be good for GTW and DWP heritage engines since their paint schemes are almost exactly alike.
HERE HERE and the two paint schemes are alike if you take off the noodles!
The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad
"Ruby Line Service"
KBCpresident wrote:Thanks! Now 2 railroads have heritage units. Did Norfolk southern paint it that way or did they just not RE paint it?
It is my understanding that 4610 wore standard NS colors from the time it was built in '89 until it was repainted with the current scheme in 1994 to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Southern Railway.
That is a Commmemorative Paint Scheme on an EMD built GP59 in the late 1980's commissioned by Norfolk Southern to honor a long time employee. I forgot his name.
The Canadian National could have one of their new locomotives painted or decaled with four logos on the long hood: CN CV GT DWP
Andrew
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
KBCpresident wrote:I agree. One question though... whats 4610?
NS 4610 is a colorful commemorative "Southern" paint scheme as seen here
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=151264
One or the other, please, especially on the GT unit. The UP messed it all up.
There are still a few ex-MILW units around, still patched. The 20-year old black paint is starting to wash off. CP was thinking about redoing a GP40 back into MILW colors. Nothing ever came of it. Darn shame.
Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com
The concept for the Grand Trunk Western Scheme is great start.
Try seperating the Olive Green and the Blue with a graphic shape in yellow to add a visual dynamic, similar to the seperating feather on the UP-WP Heritage unit.
Here goes- I hope I don't offend anyone
FRESH FROM THE SHOPS
Dave Howarth Jr. Livin' On Former CNW Spur From Manitowoc To Appleton In Reedsville, WI
- Formerly From The Home of Wisconsin Central's 5,000,000th Carload
- Manitowoc Cranes, Manitowoc Ice Machines, Burger Boat
cnr wrote:Heritage units? Just put a GT noodle and a CV noodle on some CN units they got. Voila, heritage units.
Why stop at the CN family scheme GM styling group created for GTWs F3s? There's the original DM&IR maroon scheme, BCRail, and Pacific Great Eastern's schemes. PGE started out with yellow(?) with red striping early, prior to adopting the green it used for twenty years.
The Newfoundland Railway (3'6") had a very basic black on its only Diesel, reputed to be ex-US Army. Does anyone have 411 on it? Do I have to dive into the stack of boxes and find the ancient X2200 Newfoundland roster, or the GE/Whitcomb (and others) narrow gauge unit listings. Perhaps when I'm off for the holidays, I'll take the plunge.
The CN/GTW/CV/DW&P 1950's Scheme on Locomotive models built by EMD and MotivePower unit is a way to make the first Heritage Units.
Andrew Falconer wrote: The only former railroads under the CN banner that would seriously qualify for Heritage Units are Central Vermont, Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific, and Gulf, Mobile & Ohio.
The only former railroads under the CN banner that would seriously qualify for Heritage Units are Central Vermont, Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific, and Gulf, Mobile & Ohio.
??? CN has been around over 100 years........they just retired the oldest continuly operated electric units here a coupla years ago..................theres their classic f unit paint jobs..............yea i think the CN its self qualifies........
Andrew Falconer wrote: Everybody, What are you suggesting?SD70M-2 units in the Central Vermont 1970's, Duluth, Winnepeg & Pacific, and Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Schemes?ES44DC units in the Illinois Central 1960's and British Columbia Railway 1970's schemes?That is the only thing I can imagine for Canadian National Heritage Units.Please, be even more descriptive. Andrew
Everybody,
What are you suggesting?
SD70M-2 units in the Central Vermont 1970's, Duluth, Winnepeg & Pacific, and Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Schemes?
ES44DC units in the Illinois Central 1960's and British Columbia Railway 1970's schemes?
That is the only thing I can imagine for Canadian National Heritage Units.
Please, be even more descriptive.
Someone would die if CN painted an SD70M-2 in DWP and IC schemes. I garuntee it.
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
KBCpresident wrote: tree68 wrote: And just for the record, HTML tags don't work here. Forum code resembles it, but uses [].As for the heritage unit idea, methinks you'd have to go back a ways to find more than has been mentioned.On the other hand, CSX and NS might have some interesting subjects to choose from. There's still a lot of BNSF predecessor stuff still on the rails. I can think of the GTW, DM&IR, WC, GM&O, and CV.Hey BNSF railfan, what happened to your post titled "."
tree68 wrote: And just for the record, HTML tags don't work here. Forum code resembles it, but uses [].As for the heritage unit idea, methinks you'd have to go back a ways to find more than has been mentioned.On the other hand, CSX and NS might have some interesting subjects to choose from. There's still a lot of BNSF predecessor stuff still on the rails.
And just for the record, HTML tags don't work here. Forum code resembles it, but uses [].
As for the heritage unit idea, methinks you'd have to go back a ways to find more than has been mentioned.
On the other hand, CSX and NS might have some interesting subjects to choose from. There's still a lot of BNSF predecessor stuff still on the rails.
Hey BNSF railfan, what happened to your post titled "."
The only thing abut that, there are still alot of DMIR and WC units running around.
CN should do heritage units, and they should be Grand Trunk Railroad- Canadian Northern Railway- National Transontinental Railway and Intercolonial Railways. Of course these engines were mostly steam engines in black and some electric engines, also in black. But it's the real CN heritage. hehehe
I like the idea of CPR doing a D&H- a MILW- a SOO and a TH&B as heritage units, but paint them as they were as close to possible even if it is on new big units.
The only UP heritage unit I liked was the CNW.
tree68 wrote:And just for the record, HTML tags don't work here. Forum code resembles it, but uses []. As for the heritage unit idea, methinks you'd have to go back a ways to find more than has been mentioned. On the other hand, CSX and NS might have some interesting subjects to choose from. There's still a lot of BNSF predecessor stuff still on the rails.
tatans wrote:What heritage? Canadian or American ? ? Remember Canadian National Railway was a Government of Canada run institution for years( a little bit of good old Canadian socialism) so what heritage would these locomotives represent? Oh, do you mean not CN but one of the American owned railroads CN bought, that makes sense. Interesting to find out if CN is a good corporate citizen eh?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.