Trains.com

Railfanning With High Gas Prices -- SMART START--What it is and what it does.

8572 views
137 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:42 PM
Thanks for the link.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:07 PM
I read today in Discover mag. that a study from the 1998 International Conference for Technology Assessment determined if no energy subsidies were in place, gasoline at that time would have been priced in the $15 per gallon range at the pump.

If this assessment is reasonably true, then I guess complaining about today's prices is of little merit. If these incentives didn't exist, we'd be living in a different world. Maybe rail would be living high on the hog.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:16 PM
...I watched the President's speech yesterday regarding his several plans in an attempt to get gasoline prices under control or soften them a bit....and requested help from several areas, etc....I then noted no more than 2 hrs. later here in our big town of Muncie, the price at several locations RAISED 15 cents plus....Maybe our local oil Co's didn't get the word....

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:27 PM
Gee! Thanks for the LINK! It rocks.

Although it only shows a few cents differents in my area.

Im sorry that other thread went badly, I thought maybe just mabye we can work it properly without the trouble. But oh well.

Be safe out there.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:46 PM
Here is a link to to previous thread, which was locked. It was locked because a few forum member began talking wreckless politics. Please keep political comments to yourself in this thread.

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=13781

Notice that the original thread was started in March of 2004 with gas prices at that time being $1.69 for regular unleaded. We are now currently about $1.30 over the price from just 2 years ago.

If you read that thread you will see where the $3.00 a gallon was predicted long before last summer. You will also read that the oil companies have already (back in 2004) set a target for $5.00 a gallon. I don't think we will see 5 buck a gallon gas this summer, however, I can see it going well above the current 3 bucks a gallon maybe all the way to $4.00.

The previous thread also discussed how the oil prices affected railroads. We also discussed alternative fuel methods.

We as a country need to do something NOW to begin to lessen our dependence on foreign oil We import 2/3 of the oil we consume.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:21 PM
The link doesn't show the places I usually patronize.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:06 AM
Actually hopefully u all are aware that our gas price is still quite cheap when compared with other countries? In the UK they pay $6.00 per gallon. Also if you say gas prices are up $0.70 per gallon from last year that means if you drive say 40 miles per day to commute or 200 miles per week & your car averages 22MPG you are using 9 gallons per week & paying $6.30 per week more then you paid last year for the same gasoline. If you compute that to a yearly amount that is like only $300.00 more per year for you gas from last year. Now if you factor in the trickle down effect that will be coming then naturally that yearly increase will spike a bit.

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:15 AM
I rode my bicycle to work this morning in order to avoid filling the empty tank on one of our two vehicles. Probably shed a pound or two in the process. I need to do that more often, especially if I ever want to challenge Carl on the yearly bicycle mileage total.[:D]
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:14 AM
Are we still in a railroading forum? I've yet to see anything in this thread that deals with railroading or the activity of railfanning.

The reason I mention this is because this too will most likely lead down the road of political discussion.

Bergie
Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:20 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed

Actually hopefully u all are aware that our gas price is still quite cheap when compared with other countries? In the UK they pay $6.00 per gallon. Also if you say gas prices are up $0.70 per gallon from last year that means if you drive say 40 miles per day to commute or 200 miles per week & your car averages 22MPG you are using 9 gallons per week & paying $6.30 per week more then you paid last year for the same gasoline. If you compute that to a yearly amount that is like only $300.00 more per year for you gas from last year. Now if you factor in the trickle down effect that will be coming then naturally that yearly increase will spike a bit.


The prices in the UK are so high because of the taxation, not prices set by the "oil companies".

As far as the effect on railfanning for me, I have taken to strapping on the Camel Back and walking along one of the trails in Colorado Springs that parallel the UP/BNSF joint line. I guess it is a healthier way to persue the hobby anyhow.
Smitty
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 131 posts
Posted by BurlingtonJohn on Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:38 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Bergie

Are we still in a railroading forum? I've yet to see anything in this thread that deals with railroading or the activity of railfanning.

The reason I mention this is because this too will most likely lead down the road of political discussion.

Bergie

I had hoped to make several major railfan related road trips this summer from northeast Missouri ... one to Colorado (Caboose Hobbies & the Colorado RR Museum), one to Texas (Age of Steam RR Musem in Dallas and to photograph certain CB&Q/FW&D steam locomotives) and the other to northern Minnesota, following the former CB&Q main from Illinois to the Twin Cities.

Unless prices come down significantly, I will stick close to home.

Regards,
Burlington John

THE site for American Freedom Train fans http://www.freedomtrain.org

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:46 AM
Bergie
The link between being a railfan and the cost of gasoline is very real to me as I have had to cancel both trips to IRM as well as a planned visit to Pennsylvania to Strasburg, The National Toy Train Museum and the RR Museum of Pennsylvania. I see no evidence of overtly political content here.Respectfully I dont think its a realistic worldview to place an imaginary division point between the cost of oil and being a railfan and then imply there is no linkage between the two. Whether it is recognized or not, the cost of gasoline does impact my activities and consequently those museums, hotels, tourist lines that depend on my discretionary spending and ability to get where I am going. I think that, looking on the amount of posts, is a big issue to your readers as well as users of this forum. I hope you reconsider your views on this.

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:48 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BurlingtonJohn

QUOTE: Originally posted by Bergie

Are we still in a railroading forum? I've yet to see anything in this thread that deals with railroading or the activity of railfanning.

The reason I mention this is because this too will most likely lead down the road of political discussion.

Bergie

I had hoped to make several major railfan related road trips this summer from northeast Missouri ... one to Colorado (Caboose Hobbies & the Colorado RR Museum), one to Texas (Age of Steam RR Musem in Dallas and to photograph certain CB&Q/FW&D steam locomotives) and the other to northern Minnesota, following the former CB&Q main from Illinois to the Twin Cities.

Unless prices come down significantly, I will stick close to home.

Regards,
Burlington John


Until


Heck, Caboose Hobbies and the Colorado Railroad Museum are only about an hour away from me, but I now have take gas into consideration.
Smitty
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:02 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wallyworld

Bergie
The link between being a railfan and the cost of gasoline is very real to me as I have had to cancel both trips to IRM as well as a planned visit to Pennsylvania to Strasburg, The National Toy Train Museum and the RR Museum of Pennsylvania. I see no evidence of overtly political content here.Respectfully I dont think its a realistic worldview to place an imaginary division point between the cost of oil and being a railfan and then imply there is no linkage between the two. Whether it is recognized or not, the cost of gasoline does impact my activities and consequently those museums, hotels, tourist lines that depend on my discretionary spending and ability to get where I am going. I think that, looking on the amount of posts, is a big issue to your readers as well as users of this forum. I hope you reconsider your views on this.



The locked thread was very valid until the last few pages when a few members started into the political area. If you actaully read the previous thread then you will agree.

Remember there were 4 or 5 other "gas" thread during the last year but none of them addressed railroading or the price of diesel and how it effected the railroads, my previous thread did that and more. The current price of oil does affect the railroads as fuel and labor costs are the two biggest costs the railroad faces. It basically effects everything in this country and many other countries around the world.

I have stated that the price of gas does effect my railfanning. I know it does some others too. If any one thing good does come of it, I hope it is the increase of passengers for Amtrak and VIA.

Because of my lack of vacation days this year I can not take an Amtrak trip. However, I do hope to do so in 2007. The last reports I have seen do indicate an increase in overall Amtrak ridership. I would imagine this in part is due to the current price of oil.





  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:08 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Bergie

Are we still in a railroading forum? I've yet to see anything in this thread that deals with railroading or the activity of railfanning.

The reason I mention this is because this too will most likely lead down the road of political discussion.

Bergie


If it does so then please get rid of the post and the poster and not the thread. Please, please, please. It is generally the same people who inject politics into such a thread.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:18 AM
jhhtrainsplains,

I too am considering that perhaps an Amtrak trip is is my future travel plans. When I began to seriously think about this trip, it dawned on me that the price of oil will eventually increase the cost of a ticket. I think the earlier we book it the cheaper the trip will be.

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:18 AM
It is a simple fact that the amount of oil on the planet is limited, therefore ways have to be found to circumvent this. There seems to be a belated recognition of this in some quarters, hence the growth of interest in light rail/rapid transit systems. How do we accomodate those on limited incomes who are hurt by this ???? This pertinent comment I feel sums it up -
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes
The current prices are hurting many people, some of which are having to choose between food and gasoline, or medicine and gasoline.

This is something that politicians collectively have to resolve, without pushing any particular agenda. Hopefully this might mean an increase in rail traffic and railways, lots of lovely railfanning, drool, drool !!!!!
Steam making a comeback ????
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:25 PM
Some thoughts and personal observations on high gas prices...

Reposted from another forum:

Just an aside, last night on the local news, featured a story of Europeans visiting the US and laughing at all the whining about high gas prices, to them these prices are downright cheap in comparison. So much so that one of the interviewies was driving Route 66, complete with big American muscle car, and grinning that it only cost him $300 in gas so far. I think the biggest problem is that we've ignored our dependency on oil for so long that we now are having to face the dilema of that dependancy.

When asked what Americans can do to about these high gas prices, one interviewie summed it up nicely, "buy smaller cars"

To me this is the crux of the problem, we are spoiled absolutely rotten when it comes to our cars. I grew up in the 70's when all cars were smaller, and the then typical SUV was the now "small" Jeep Cherokee. We all drove smaller cars, I drove a V-dub for close to 10 years, a Civic after that and a Samurai for 10 years after that, guess what, I got by fine. My current truck (Frontier Crew) is the biggest thing I've ever owned, and I'm seriously considering trading it in for something more affordable. I like my truck but at 20 mpg and a $50 fill up, maybe its time for ME to make a positive change and get a PT cruiser or a Scion Xb. I can still carry most of the stuff I currently use the truck for, get better milage, and save some $.

To me, these high prices are a combination of a jittery world oil market thanks to the middle east situation, a limited refining capacity, and increased world demand for this limited supply. Now the one constant in this that will not go away no matter how much we cry is the last one, India and China are using more oil with each year, and that is not going away. Maybe we can build more refineries, yeah, they'll be up and running in 10 YEARS! I doubt more than one or two would be built becasue why would the oil companies spend any money to make their bottom line smaller? Its in their own best interests to keep a strangle hold on supply and keep their profit margins in the very black for as long as they can. So they dig up Anwar, so what?, thats 3-5 years away even if they started tommorow, and it would STILL be stuck in the refining bottleneck and prices would STILL be high due to the increasing world demand of a still limited supply of refined product. Most comment I've heard is that, yes. oil prices are high, but so is supply of crude. Its the other jittery stuff keeping prices way up there, not crude avalabilty.

There are options out there. Dont like putting $100 in gas in that Hummer H2 every week, well you were stupid enough to buy it in the first place, so trade it in (You'll still get a few bucks for it, dealers are giving minimum Bluebook for them (which is nothing) out here) and buy something smaller (and more reliable). In the market for a new vehicle? Dont buy a Toyota Tundra, buy a Tacoma. Dont buy that Ford Exploder, buy the Ford Escape. Get the idea?

Want ultra high milage? Prius, Civic, Scion Xa, Focus, Aveo.

Want cool + milage? PT Cruiser, HHR, Scion Xb.

Need a crewcab pickup truck? Frontier, Tacoma, Colorado, Durango

All get at least 20mph hwy or better. To me, theres no real excuse for most of the big giant trucks and SUVs out there (dont tell me about your boat/horse trailer/camper/job requirements yadayada--I said "most"), all could be easily downsized to a smaller more efficient vehicle with no real loss of comfort or performance. Its all getting over this stupid notion of entitlement, that somehow its our god-given right ot drive giant cars and pay nothing for gas, no it isnt, wake up and smell the coffee!

I FULLY expect to be paying $4 a gallon before this summers end. And will be doing so again next summer, and get used to it, the cheap gas fueled days of wine and roses are a long GONER! Whining about it will do this: Zip, Nada, Nil, Nyet, Nuthin'. So the sooner we all accept that and make changes on our own, the less painfull it will be for all of us.

My point is that if you knowingly buy a car that gets crappy milage, dont whine about it. Like me and my truck, I knew it was a gas-hog when I bought it, and we've had high prices in the past so its not like you were'nt forewarned that gas prices could go thru the roof again. Difference this time, is that they won't come down much again.

Now as to effect on railfanning:

Alot of us are going to have to stratigize our outings. I for one always try to combine outings. If I'm going to one of my favorite sites, I'll try to do any chores or stops (OHS, Sav-on, Home Despot) I can along the way, and while I'm watching or waiting, I don't sit with the engine idleing anymore. If I'm going to somewhere and can sneak in some trainspotting along the way I'll do that also. I'm also seriously considering trading in my truck for a more fuel efficient vehicle, a PT Cruiser or a Scion Xb, both would allow me to carry all the stuff I currently move around in my truck while still giving me a greater savings in gas cost. Its up to us to make things work for ourselves, waiting for the world change in your favor will get you nowhere. So I'll make the changes I can that work for me. I dont plan on stopping what I enjoy doing just because gas prices go up and down, but I can make descisions that will benifit me.

PS Note there are no intentional Political comments, blame, fingerpointing, or flaming, in any of the above commentary, j ust viewpoints on the real world things affecting our daily lives, and how we are the masters of our own destinies, and some small things we can do ourselves to deal with these real world affects of the world we live..[:D]

Welcome to the 21st Century Boys and Girls! Not what we expected is it?[;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:32 PM
Amen, Brother Vic!

Our (wife and I) main vehicle is a Dodge Grand Caravan mini-van- gets 24 MPG on the highway and can haul our daughter's furniture, including her single bed, to and from college. I think it's safe to say at this point that we will never own an SUV, or even a pick-up. When we want to run around in style and don't have to worry about a large payload, we take our other vehicle- a Pontiac Bonneville SSEI. It gets even better mileage, up around 26 MPG on the road, but has more muscle than I will ever need (supercharged).

Even with those vehicles and their better-than-average mileage, we're still struggling to keep fuel expenses down. I'm seriously considering doing all my local railfanning this summer from the seat of my bicycle. It might take me an extra 30 min. to an hour to get to and from the action, but my pocketbook as well as my health will most certainly benefit.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Thursday, April 27, 2006 5:29 PM
Brian - As a matter of idle curiosity, what taxes are levied on your vehicles ? In Great Britain we have fuel duty, Road tax (which is supposed to pay for highway maintenance), and of course the obligatory insurance.

Dennis Franklin.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Michigan
  • 11 posts
Posted by signmasters24 on Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:10 PM
I love fanning in my Ford Ranger but it's a 4X4 and even with a 3.0L engine it's not great on gas, so I end up driving our old Dodge Carvan 3.3L. Our trip to Rochelle and a few yards in Chicago this weekend we spent $130.00 for gas(not kidding), the point is we had a great time and we would do it again, but next time we might have to take our Carrvan or walk (ha ha). Lucky we had 3 free nights at Red Roof Inn so that saved us, we took our owen food and drinks and didn't have to buy flim, you got to love digital. I did buy a lock gas cap. I like to hear any ideas to help save gas rail fanning. I keep my truck tuned, tires about 1 1/2 pound over unless I'm on a long trip or its hot. don't carry any extra weight, start out slow keep my speed down and turn off my truck as soon as I can. I still can't get my wife to push (yet). Stay safe, have fun, rail fan rule!
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:21 PM
Own a 2005 Dodge Magnum, Hemi 5.7 MDE(multiply displacement engine)
Get on average normal highway (to and from work) 27 to 29 MPG.
On extended trips over 200 miles, I have gotten 32 MPG at a constant 70 mph, with the A/C.
In town driving, averages 17 to 21 mpg, depending on how much I hot rod it.
Entire car is computer controlled, doesn’t even have a throttle cable, as are all the LX platform cars from Dodge, the Magnum, Charger and the 300...and if we are lucky, the Challenger next year!
Point to this?
Well, if Dodge of all companies can make a 4400 lb station wagon haul butt like this thing, then turn around and get better gas mileage than most small cars...why not apply the same concept to OTR trucks, or...hey, how about trains?
I know, I know...but think about it...first, they don’t really spend all their time in run 8, and at idle, they are dragging all the pistons around for no real reason...all you want to do is keep the batteries charged and the train line charged...so why not shut off the cylinders you don’t really need, when you don’t need them?
Dodge does it the easy way...they lock the lifters in the closed position, shut off the injectors to 4 of the 8 cylinders when the demand on the engine falls into certain parameters...then rotates the four shut downs amongst all the cylinders to keep piston and ring wear even...and you never even notice it happening.

Just got my car back from the body shop(long, frustrating story there) and while they had it there, I had them check the soft wear and install the newer package...tweaks the stereo system some, adjust the proportioning on the front to rear brake ratio, shift points on the tranny changed, fun stuff....and I ask my man to download the event recorder.
Yup, they got those too, but it only keeps the last 10 seconds, then loops thru and starts over, unless you tell it not to.
Which he did...we went on a little run with him in the passenger seat with his laptop.
Found a surprising thing...this car spends almost as much time running on 4 cylinders as it does running on 8.
Also found that the car shifted gears over 100 times in under three minutes at 60 mph...it would measure the data from all the sensors, and "choose" a gear that gave the best mileage.
Along with adjusting the injectors almost constantly....

So, if Dodge can fit all this technology into a box about the size of my wife’s purse, what is stopping GE or EMD from applying the same concept to a diesel locomotive engine?
Granted, locomotives for the most part have no transmission, but that is by design, not necessarily an absolute.
You could gear a diesel to an alternator to keep the alternator spinning at the required speed, while easing back on the diesel, it just hasn’t been necessary up till now.
And you can shut off cylinders not needed in a diesel.
I know, diesels are most efficient when running at a high, constant speed, but again, that is a design choice, not an absolute there, either...it has just always been easier that way, and there was no need to do it differently.

What I am driving at is this...we have pretty much reached the end of squeaking any more useable HP out of today’s existing locomotive technology, short of making them bigger just because we can, there is no where else to go with it.
Unless someone invents a cheap superconductor magnet and wiring system for locomotive alternators and DC traction motors, we have reached the pinnacle of this fixed design.

I am betting we will see more MDE technology in automobiles within the next two or three years...Dodge already wised up and put the MDE 5.7 in its most popular pick up, and I got a feeling if GM and Ford survive as a auto makers, they will have something close to it in a year...I was expecting Nissan and Mazda to introduce theirs at the Auto Show, but they are still in the R&D step...

So, as a nod to Bergie's not so subtle nudge about trains, lets debate the chances of something like this technology being applied to current locomotive designs...or future ones for that matter.
Anyone know if something like this was ever tried before?
Adjustable, or on demand injectors?
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Thursday, April 27, 2006 8:35 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by germanium

Brian - As a matter of idle curiosity, what taxes are levied on your vehicles ? In Great Britain we have fuel duty, Road tax (which is supposed to pay for highway maintenance), and of course the obligatory insurance.

Dennis Franklin.


It's no different than what we have over here, I think, other than maybe the percentages- but then I'm not an expert. I'm sure there are other members who pay greater attention to the details of how much the government gets out of our passion for independent personal transportation.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 28, 2006 10:44 AM
My next vehicle will most likely be a Hybird. I would like something along the lines of a small to medium sized truck. I hope in the next year or two they have some good choices along those lines.

That way, I could actually railfan some if I kept my foot out of it. [:o)]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 28, 2006 10:57 AM
Gas Hog tax (more of a flat rate fee per vehicle with a bigger than you need motor), Sales taxes are about it in addition to all the license, title and doc. fees.

As to Ed's post...I could never understand why more vehicles aren't made like his. Back when the new Chevy HD's were first coming out in '01 the new big block motor was rumored to have technology similar to that...all 8 when you needed it, only 4 when you didn't but it never came around. It's nice having the power when you do need it, but when you're out cruising down the highway in the more than often flat lands I'd appreciate a little more mileage.

If gas does go much higher I'm considering trading my truck off for a diesel pickup. 15-20 mpg as opposed to the 8-11 I get now makes a little more sense. Plus its fairly easy to tweak your diesel for more power and still get the same if not better mileage. And if worse comes to worse, I can use the farm fuel to avoid paying the taxes on the fuel. [;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 29, 2006 12:42 AM
Just for the record, our current prices range from $2.83 or regular unleaded to $3.03 for premium unleaded. I am actually very surprised the price has remained such for about a week now.

It has not gone up. It has not gone down.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 29, 2006 1:05 AM
$2.89er and holding in these parts, has been for a bit over a week now.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Saturday, April 29, 2006 7:49 AM
Around $2.95 in SE Florida[:(]

QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

$2.89er and holding in these parts, has been for a bit over a week now.

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:37 AM
This may be met with a few sarcastic responses, but I think the price will drop considerably now. ($.20-$.30) There has been a lot of speculation the last couple of weeks, and none of the nay-saying is coming true (Iran, Iraq, and so on). It isn't just the price of oil that has risen, but the price of all commodities. These prices can't be maintained, they are irrational and will eventually have to be brought in check. And, once the price drops below $2.60 a gallon, all of these fake politicians from both parties clammoring for 'investigaitons' and so on will disappear. Until the next time the price goes up. Every time gas goes up certain people claim price fixing and excess profits are to blame. Then the price goes down and silence reigns supreme. They may be right, they may not be, but I wi***hey would actually follow through and investigate it once so they can get it out of their system.
You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:38 AM
Oh, and yes it sucks to rail fan with high gas prices. You have to get a vehicle with a nice big engine to chase trains around here and that isn't too good for the wallet. [:D]
You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 29, 2006 11:34 PM
There was an article today in the local paper about Exxon's current profits. They were not a record but close to it.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 30, 2006 4:52 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by solzrules

This may be met with a few sarcastic responses, but I think the price will drop considerably now. ($.20-$.30) There has been a lot of speculation the last couple of weeks, and none of the nay-saying is coming true (Iran, Iraq, and so on). It isn't just the price of oil that has risen, but the price of all commodities. These prices can't be maintained, they are irrational and will eventually have to be brought in check. And, once the price drops below $2.60 a gallon, all of these fake politicians from both parties clammoring for 'investigaitons' and so on will disappear. Until the next time the price goes up. Every time gas goes up certain people claim price fixing and excess profits are to blame. Then the price goes down and silence reigns supreme. They may be right, they may not be, but I wi***hey would actually follow through and investigate it once so they can get it out of their system.


I was going to say it in an earlier post, but I thought I had better not. Unfortunately it's true how it's workin out. Almost as if we're being 'tested' to see how much we'll really tolerate.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, May 1, 2006 9:36 AM
Seen this AM, regular $3.43
Cheapest payed, yesterday $3.21

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 1, 2006 9:44 AM
Railfanning and the High price of gas is pointless.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 1, 2006 9:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by vsmith

Seen this AM, regular $3.43
Cheapest payed, yesterday $3.21


Heck I remember when we could pay just 43 cents a gallon. [;)] [8D]

When it hit $1 a gallon we all thought it was nonsense then. I would gladly pay a buck a gallon now.

Did I hear someone say, "Those were the days?" [:)]

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, May 1, 2006 10:15 AM
....Let me relate a comparison: My family built and opened an Esso Station back in 1938 and it was located over in western Pennsylvania. I remember a promotional sign indicating 6 GAL FOR 1.00....!! That's about 16.6 cents a gal. Of couse taxes were minimal then which is a big difference.
Item: We now have a 2nd super Wal-Mart store here in Muncie.....and the new one has a gas staion....Now, we're seeing a new pricing attitude in the city. Being familiar with a Wal-mart located station in the Mt. Dora area of Florida I know they are VERY competitive in pricing and it's happening here now...! We have been noted for having the highest prices around the area most of the time and now with the "incentive" of the new W M station I'm seeing a different pricing structure over much of Muncie. Yesterday I noted several locaions with $2.67 per gal....{That's cheap...??}, so we've seen the new "kid" in town effect pricing here.....

Quentin

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 762 posts
Posted by kolechovski on Monday, May 1, 2006 10:46 AM
Well, at 2.99 a gallon here, my railfanning is over. It sucks, because NS is reconstructing a route around here, and there's a lot of work action I could be seeing.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, May 1, 2006 11:12 AM
$3.94 9/10 at the Silverwood store. Yea boy. Did 500 miles worth of railfanning this weekend and it cost $70. Lowest price I saw was $3.20 in Hesperia.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, May 1, 2006 12:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....Let me relate a comparison: My family built and opened an Esso Station back in 1938 and it was located over in western Pennsylvania. I remember a promotional sign indicating 6 GAL FOR 1.00....!! That's about 16.6 cents a gal. Of couse taxes were minimal then which is a big difference.


In 1938, $10 a week was considered good money! So 10% of your paycheck going to a tank of gas was still a big slice of the pie, of course in L.A. in 1938 you could still take the PE everywhere so who needed a car.[;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 1, 2006 12:59 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

$3.94 9/10 at the Silverwood store. Yea boy. Did 500 miles worth of railfanning this weekend and it cost $70. Lowest price I saw was $3.20 in Hesperia.


***, you are one dedicated dude. lol

Price went down here to $2.85. Yay
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, May 1, 2006 1:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

$3.94 9/10 at the Silverwood store. Yea boy. Did 500 miles worth of railfanning this weekend and it cost $70. Lowest price I saw was $3.20 in Hesperia.


***, you are one dedicated dude. lol

Price went down here to $2.85. Yay


It's a tough job but somebody has to do it.[:D]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, May 1, 2006 4:42 PM
vsmith....Yes, I know 1938 was totally different conditions compared to now. We were still in the clutches of the great depression and work was still scarce. But I remember that was a good price for a customer at the time.
That new business did manage to make a go of it and then in a few years the Pennsylvania Turnpike {first 160 miles}, became a reality and removed a lot of through traffic from Rt. 30 where the station was situated. Of course then WWII reared it's ugly head and it was mothballed for the duration and opened again in 1946. Business operated for 45 years before it was sold out of the family.
A painting exists of it in the Westmoreland Arts Museum in Greensburg,Pa. that was done while it was closed for the war duration....

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 1, 2006 5:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

$3.94 9/10 at the Silverwood store. Yea boy. Did 500 miles worth of railfanning this weekend and it cost $70. Lowest price I saw was $3.20 in Hesperia.


***, you are one dedicated dude. lol

Price went down here to $2.85. Yay


It's a tough job but somebody has to do it.[:D]


It's a good thing you quit smoking a while back. Now you can use that money you saved by not buying a pack of smokes and buy A gallon of gas. lol [B)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 1:34 PM
The noon news carried an article today about a man in California who was converting vintage Benzs into vegetable oil burning cars. [:0] The conversion cost about $700 but he stated that you could buy vegetable oil in bulk for about $2.00 to $2.50 a gallon. He also was selling some of the vintage Benzs and aother guy said he paid about $6,000 for one of them.

This is exactly what we need going on. People trying out new things and bring them to market. Of course only if they actually work.

Diesel itself gets about 30% greater milage than gas and diesel sales are rising. The benefit of vegetable oil over diesel is no pollution, or so they say.



  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 3:39 PM
....also the exhaust smells like French Fries!

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 3:43 PM
Makes me laugh seeing our friends over the pond rant about high Petrol/ Diesel prices - design your cities better around the transport of the proles chaps. Petrol hs broken through the £1/litre here which equates to about $6 a UK gallon.

And rising......
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 4:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

$3.94 9/10 at the Silverwood store. Yea boy. Did 500 miles worth of railfanning this weekend and it cost $70. Lowest price I saw was $3.20 in Hesperia.


***, you are one dedicated dude. lol

Price went down here to $2.85. Yay


It's a tough job but somebody has to do it.[:D]


It's a good thing you quit smoking a while back. Now you can use that money you saved by not buying a pack of smokes and buy A gallon of gas. lol [B)]


[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 5:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cogload

Makes me laugh seeing our friends over the pond rant about high Petrol/ Diesel prices - design your cities better around the transport of the proles chaps. Petrol hs broken through the £1/litre here which equates to about $6 a UK gallon.

And rising......


It's higher priced over there because you call it "Petrol". [:p]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 7:01 PM
Today it was $2.879 at one of the Stations but that's okay because I ride my Bike Railfanning.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 7:19 PM
That UK price includes many sevices we don't get here when we purchase "Petrol"....We pay plenty of taxes but not near what you folks across the pond do. No wonder you're Go-Jo is so high.....

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 9:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by vsmith



....also the exhaust smells like French Fries!





FUNNY [:D] [:D] [:D]

They actually pointed that out too. [:o)] [;)] [:p]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 3, 2006 8:58 AM
Prices are again nearing $75 a barrel. [:(!] [:(] [:(!]

U.S. pump prices are rising, with U.S. drivers now paying about 14 percent more to fill their tanks than a year ago. We all remember last year's $3 a gallon, so with that in mind and knowing we are now 14% above last year any one want to predict when we hit $4 a gallon? [?]


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 4, 2006 6:30 AM
Its expensive whatever. To fill up my knackered motor (1.6) costs about 40 quid now. At the weekend I am having to driver from Cog country to Mid Wales and back to pick up a few bits of furniture and knock up a few inheritance points as one set of parents are doing the sensible thing and emigrating.

That will cost around £100-£120 in juice. Makes the 60odd quid train ticket look reasonable in comparison doesn't it?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 4, 2006 9:22 AM
Yesterday while I was out I noticed our Kroger (here some of our Kroger Grocery Stores also have gas stations our in front of the grocery stores) gas station had finally raised it premium unleaded price to over $3 a gallon. They are usually one of the lowest priced stations in the area. But with that raise it puts them ahead of many of the area gas stations. Also if you have a Kroger card and buy over $100 a month of groceries then you get a discount (10 cents a gallon) on your gas.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 4, 2006 9:26 AM
I find for once I am one lucky dog in terms of railfanning, at least at this phase of my life. I live along the Cumberland Mountain area where the CSX runs from Nashville towards Alabama, and has to cross through the Cumberland tunnel pusher district. It's all single track through my part of Tennessee, and passing tracks galore......active pushers on literally every train going over the mountain through the tunnel....and constant traffic. All I have to do is sit in any of a couple chosen locations within 10 miles of my house, and the action goes right past me.

Regards! Michaelson[:D]
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, May 4, 2006 4:21 PM
In the last two days gas here in Chula Vista went from $3.25 to $3.40 a gallon.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 5, 2006 3:51 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

In the last two days gas here in Chula Vista went from $3.25 to $3.40 a gallon.


We have not had a big rise in the last few days or so, therefore one must be coming. [:(]

It would not surprise me if gas hit $4 a gallon by Labor day. [;)]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 8, 2006 9:28 AM
Funny thing is going on lately. The price of oil continues to go up and down. However, our prices have stayed about the same for a period of time now. This is not making sense. When the price of oil goes up the gas stations almost immediately raise their prices. But when the price of oil drops our gas prices stay about the same. Has anyone else noticed this lately? [?]

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Monday, May 8, 2006 9:31 AM
It's been dropping here- we're down to $2.659 a gallon.

I think sometimes the retailers will slow-roll a price drop so that they can get some of the profit, at least for a little while.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 8, 2006 9:33 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

Funny thing is going on lately. The price of oil continues to go up and down. However, our prices have stayed about the same for a period of time now. This is not making sense. When the price of oil goes up the gas stations almost immediately raise their prices. But when the price of oil drops our gas prices stay about the same. Has anyone else noticed this lately? [?]




Yep - same this side of the pond too. They put the price up at the first sniff of a rise in the price of crude, when it drops it takes a good few weeks for the pump price to follow suit. They're making a tidy sum from that little wheeze!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, May 8, 2006 9:41 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

In the last two days gas here in Chula Vista went from $3.25 to $3.40 a gallon.


We have not had a big rise in the last few days or so, therefore one must be coming. [:(]

It would not surprise me if gas hit $4 a gallon by Labor day. [;)]




I was thinking more likely by a $4 peak right before July 4th, then a drop back down to 3.50ish for the rest of the summer then another more prolonged $4 spike from Sept 1 till they change back to "winter" formula in Oct.[V]

Hey ya know those $350million dollar retirement packeges dont grow on trees, someones got to pay for them.[:(!]

Time to consider trading in the truck before it gets too many miles on it![:0]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 8, 2006 1:39 PM
One of the latest gas station ideas is a fuel bank. [:0]

You choose a grade of gasoline and lock it that price for "x" number of dollars or gallons. It is pay in advance and you get a gasoline "card" for that station. When you purchase your gas you swip your card and the amount is deducted from your account.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 9, 2006 11:17 AM
I have now seen several tv news articles on the fuel banks. Both the national news and the local news has carried stories on it. I don't know of any in my area. Anyone know of any operating near them? [?]


And gas is going down according to recent articles. I am not sure where tho, it sure has not gone down here more than a cent or two, if that. [:(]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:44 AM
I had to have a tired fixed about a week ago and while in the waiting room picked up a magazine to read. One of the stories I read was about Canada and its attemps to get oil from way up north. The same article also told of the US looking to obtain oil from oil sands or shale. I am not sure now which magazine I even picked up.

So much for the lower prices that were predicted. Oil has been going up again.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 13, 2006 10:21 AM
Get Your Hummer Now Or Else [:o)]

GM announced Friday that the 2006 model year will be the last of the H1 Hummers. The very last H1 is expected to be built in June.

The H1 was getting only 10 miles to the gallon but GM stated the gas milage was not the cause of the H1's demise. They stated the people who bought the H1s were not concerned about gas prices. A current model of the H1 (H1 Alpha) sells for $130,000 to $140,000.

Getting this monster off the road is a step in the right direction. However, I doubt that too many soccer moms will be effected by it. [:o)]



  • Member since
    March 2001
  • From: New York City
  • 805 posts
Posted by eastside on Saturday, May 13, 2006 4:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by blhanel

It's been dropping here- we're down to $2.659 a gallon.
The cheapest gasoline I ever bought was in Clinton, IA in '69 -- 25 cents a gallon. (That's $1.36 in current prices.) Even back then that was startlingly cheap and memorable because I had a 427 'Vette to fill. Back home in Illinois it was about 45 cents/gal.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:39 AM
Yesterday I noticed that gas has come down a few cents around my area. Mind you it is ONLY a few cents. Regular unleaded is currently $2.75 while premium unleaded is $2.95.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:11 PM
That's funny, we're currently headed the other way around here. Up to $2.799 a gallon, IIRC.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

Yesterday I noticed that gas has come down a few cents around my area. Mind you it is ONLY a few cents. Regular unleaded is currently $2.75 while premium unleaded is $2.95.





We just dropped another [2c] . Our regular unleaded is now $2.73 a gallon. And what is amazing is we are approaching the first of our so-called Summer Holiday.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 4, 2006 10:12 AM
I noticed recently that our regular unleaded price is down into the mid $2.60s. It depends upon where you buy your gas but $2.65 to $2.69 (for regular unleaded) is getting common locally.

It is nice that the price has lowered some because the UP 844 drew many people to see it on its latest trip. I even chased it a little. [^]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 10:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

I noticed recently that our regular unleaded price is down into the mid $2.60s. It depends upon where you buy your gas but $2.65 to $2.69 (for regular unleaded) is getting common locally.

It is nice that the price has lowered some because the UP 844 drew many people to see it on its latest trip. I even chased it a little. [^]





Things are going about the same again. Funny though how a rumor can make it go up in price over night by it takes days or even weeks to come down in price.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: IA, usa
  • 351 posts
Posted by railfanespee4449 on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:10 PM
You know what rocks?
1-I can BIKE to the tracks any time I want!
2-I live 2.5 miles from a buy double-track UP mainline
3- IT'S SUMMER BREAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Call me crazy, but I LIKE Zito yellow. RAILFANESPEE4449
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:15 PM
I was just reading a new article about the future of gas prices in the United States. Here are a few items from that article:

* The government says gas prices may fall soon

* But before you ru***o buy a gas guzzler, be aware they also forecast the price will hit $2.76 a gallon this summer – a new record for the period of time

* That’s 14 cents more than the April forecast, currenly prices are up 76 cents from the same time a year ago

* Gasoline prices will average $2.76 a gallon for the coming summer driving season

* That's up 39 cents from 2005's summer and a nickel higher than the Energy Information Administration forecast a month ago.

* Prices currently exceed $3 a gallon in 10 different states




  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: IA, usa
  • 351 posts
Posted by railfanespee4449 on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:17 PM
Old thread=[|)][B)][V][:(!][banghead][banghead][|(][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][#offtopic][2c][banghead][%-)][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][soapbox][#offtopic][:-^][zzz] in that order
Call me crazy, but I LIKE Zito yellow. RAILFANESPEE4449
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:31 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by railfanespee4449


Old thread




2 months = old LOL LOL LOL


You might want to remove a few of your "smileys" or at least leave a blank between some of them please. That is what makes the page drawn out and hard to read. Thanks.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by railfanespee4449
(His Smilie post. I took them all out to make room)

Just a little off topic......

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 8, 2006 10:46 AM
Off Topic? No sir!

The price of oil/gas has a big impact upon my ability to go railfanning. It does on many people. Unfortunately as the price goes up people must choose between other things as well, such as gas or food, or gas or medicine.

The railroads themselves are effected by the price of gas/oil too. The two largest expenses of a railroad are gas/oil and labor costs. Maybe that is why our COLA this time is nothing but a joke. Only we are not laughing.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Thursday, June 8, 2006 11:30 PM
No ***, I meant his post about OUR topic being off topic.....if that makes sense. In either case, Im agreeing with you.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 9, 2006 12:46 AM
Thanks George

I expect the price of oil/gas to resume its upward trend any time now. All it takes is a rumor and it shoots up overnight. [:(!]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 12, 2006 11:07 AM
Our gas prices are again on the way up. They are currently $2.79 to $2.99 a gallon. The premium grade of unlead is just under $3.00 a gallong so the roller coaster is going back up.

Here is part of a news article I was just reading.


If the United States is going to end its addiction to oil, the fuel station of the future might look like Pearson Ford Fuel Depot.

Along with gasoline and diesel, the one-of-a-kind station - part of a dealership near busy Interstate 15 - offers a full range of clean-burning alternative fuels from ethanol to propane to BioWillie, a brand of biodiesel made from soybeans and promoted by country music legend Willie Nelson.

The station isn't profitable yet. But co-owner Mike Lewis said that could change if oil prices force consumers to seriously consider other fuels - especially in San Diego, which regularly pays among the nation's highest gas prices.

There are pumps labeled "E85" and "compressed natural gas" along with recharging stations for people with electric cars.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 18, 2006 11:19 AM
Here is some info about companies who are developing ethanol.

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jun2006/nf20060612_5577_db016.htm?campaign_id=search


Currently ethanol is not reducing the price or demand for gas/oil. Some articles I have read said it is actually jacking the price up some. [:0]

I hope to post some more info on ethanol in the next few days that will give us more info about it.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:51 AM
Some current gas prices from around the world. Prices are for regular and in US dollars.

Caracus . . . . . . $0.12

Kuwait . . . . . . . . $0.78

Mexico . . . . . . . . $2.25

China . . . . . . . . . $2.40

South Africa . . . . . $3.70

Australia . . . . . . . $3.70

Japan . . . . . . . . . $4.93

Germany . . . . . . . .$6.10

Italy . . . . . . . . . . . $6.15

Belgium . . . . . . . . $6.33

Hong Kong . . . . . . $6.54

Norway . . . . . . . . . $6.99


















  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:23 PM
Update on our gas prices: Last week I purchased fuel for 2.58....and now today, for 41 cents more I can purchase it....Yes, today it's 2.99. Supply and demand....Bunk...!! Greed and manipulation is more like it. Most likely getting us all ready for the big 4th holiday time.

Quentin

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:19 PM
I've been intrigued by this this thread for some time.

No politics - I have certain views that I won't impose upon you but just have a little look at what is going on in Caracus, Venezuela. Thank you to the politically literate who have spotted a certain connection.

The price of diesel does'nt seem to factor into this thread. I realise that you American chaps don't tend to go for diesel autos. Could anyone explain why, out of curiosity?

I drive a diesel auto here in the UK which cruises happily at about 85MPH, and does 500 miles on a full tank. I own an ALCo S1 which is based about 160 miles from my home and can make the round trip on just over half a tank.

My eyes water when I read what is considered to be acceptable fuel consumption in earlier posts....
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:34 PM
.....I really don't see a very wide advantage to owning a diesel automobile compared to a good 3 L gasoline engined powered one....Cost of maintenance is higher and more often....Price of the diesel fuel is really not an advantage now.....rank smelling exaust from diesel vehicles....to park in the garage....Some problems with starting and operating under severe winter temps.....I understand a diesel produces more work from a gal of fuel than does a gasoline engined vehicle but the advantage is very narrow here now....Just some thoughts. And recently I drove my 3 L V-6 gasoline engine automoble 420 miles before refueling....and the tank was not empty at that point. Gauge was indicating about 1/4 remaining in the 18.5 cap. tank.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:22 PM
If we could only harness the hot air expended on the site?

Not to mention the methane we could recover from all the BS!

Just a general observation.

Simcox
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:39 PM
Originally posted by Simon Reed

The price of diesel does'nt seem to factor into this thread. I realise that you American chaps don't tend to go for diesel autos. Could anyone explain why, out of curiosity?

Simon: Diesels don't really like colder weather. In the northern climes,we have blended fuel.#2 #1 diesel, to keep from jellying

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, June 30, 2006 10:48 AM
...One more thought....Initial cost of vehicle is higher. {The diesel one}.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 5:01 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

Here is some info about companies who are developing ethanol.

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jun2006/nf20060612_5577_db016.htm?campaign_id=search


Currently ethanol is not reducing the price or demand for gas/oil. Some articles I have read said it is actually jacking the price up some. [:0]

I hope to post some more info on ethanol in the next few days that will give us more info about it.





OK

I am going to start the info I promised but just have not had time to post. I have a series of questions and some answers about ethanol that are interesting. You can make your own judgement on ethanol after reading the info I will post.

Here we go.

High gas prices are making other fuels increasingly attractive, one alternative fuel that has received much attention is ethanol. Some hail ethanol, which can be derived from many plants including corn, wheat, barley and sugarcane, as a savior of American energy policy, while others see it as a fad popularized by its heavily subsidized corporate backers.

The reality is complex. Though still a tiny industry compared to gas, ethanol could become a more prominent part of the U.S. and world fuel supply in coming years.

Still, as ethanol's public profile rises, there's plenty of misinformation swirling around and a host of questions. What exactly is ethanol? How is it made and used? And is it really a viable alternative to gas? Here's what you need to know now.

I will start the questions tomorrow. [;)]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 5:27 PM
I hear that the china thing is causeing gas prices to severely go up.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 5:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

Here is some info about companies who are developing ethanol.

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jun2006/nf20060612_5577_db016.htm?campaign_id=search


Currently ethanol is not reducing the price or demand for gas/oil. Some articles I have read said it is actually jacking the price up some. [:0]

I hope to post some more info on ethanol in the next few days that will give us more info about it.


I don't use ethanol anymore. Regular unleaded is cheaper.
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
Posted by chicagorails on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 5:29 PM
about 100 plants operating now, with around 50 or more being built and in early stages.

will there be enough corn for cows and cars?? more farm land is being gobbled up by suburbs and malls.

what if there is a bad drought?? no corn, back to oil.

takes 3 gallons water to process i gallon eth. some towns fighting plants from being built cause of fear of low water tables and drought.

i dont see any problems with the use of solar cars. they had solar vehicles on the moon so why not here? answer, the oil billionares want to stay billionares!!![:(]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 6:12 PM
I just hearn that crude hit an all time high of $75. Gas prices are up too $3.oo now.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 7:05 PM
Right...crude today was a bit over 75 dollars a bbl.....and gasoline price here in central Indiana is now 3.09....Diesel: 3.09

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 8:53 PM
I noticed last week that our gas prices went back up and we lost EVERYTHING that was gained over the last month or so. We are again at $2.79 for regular unleaded and $2.99 for premium unleaded. I will have to look tomorrow and see what our price has jumped to now.

Isn't it funny how QUICKLY the prices will rise on bad news but good news seems to have little effect upon lowering the higher prices? !

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 9:43 PM
We're at prices now that almost a year ago they were using excuses such as "it's the fault of Katrina, etc....}. We all know what some of the reasonings are....and it's not supply and demand. Just two weeks or so ago we were purchasing N Leaded here for 51 cents a gal less then today....!!!!

Quentin

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: In the heart of Winnipeg
  • 224 posts
Posted by Trainmaster.Curt on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 9:48 PM
Well, i don't have a liscense or a car. But i do have a trusty Italian Fiori bicycle, and the CPR main line and the CEMR Pine Junction are all in biking distance(Was just railfanning there today), and the CNR main line is biking distance from my place. Plus many buses in Winnipeg run close to rail routes, so i am lucky. But i guess for the rural country railfan, a car is a must.
TMC (CNR Mixed train GMD1 1063 with combine coach) (Remember always at Railway X-ing's, (Stop, Look and Listen!)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chicagorails




takes 3 gallons water to process i gallon eth. some towns fighting plants from being built cause of fear of low water tables and drought.


i dont see any problems with the use of solar cars. they had solar vehicles on the moon so why not here? answer, the oil billionares want to stay billionares!!![:(]




This question does mention that the water is seperated from the alcohol mix. What is then done with the water I don't know. However, it possible could be used again there in the process.

I agree with your second statement. THAT is exactly why nothing has been done much more than lip service from our elected officials for the last 30 some years.


Here is today's segment for the questions and answers. The source was an AOL News Article.



What exactly is ethanol?


The fuel is derived from plants through a fairly straightforward process. In one common method, corn is first ground into a fine powder, mixed with water, and then heated. An enzyme is then added to convert the mixture into sugars before yeast is added to ferment it. The resulting liquid, called "beer," is about 10% alcohol. A distillation process then separates the alcohol from the rest of the mixture before the remaining water is removed. The result is essentially pure alcohol. A small amount of gas is added to render the liquid undrinkable. Then the fuel can be used by itself or as a supplement to gasoline to power cars.

Ethanol has three advantages, at least in theory: It's renewable, it can be domestically produced, and it burns cleaner than gas. The world's largest producers of ethanol are the U.S., which makes it primarily from corn, and Brazil, which mashes the stuff out of sugarcane.


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 6, 2006 11:14 AM
How much energy is used to distill Alcolhol Vs the net amount recived?

I mean you use fertiliser derived from oil to grow the corn,,,energy to pump water to irrigate the corn,,,tractor fuel to harvest the corn. Diesal to power the trucks and the trains to deliver it and natural gas to boil and distill the beer into ethonal...
Now you have to use more diesal to power the Unit trains to deliver the Fuel to a tank terminal and then tanker trucks to get it to the gas station....When do you break even?

Oil in tractors to harvest the corn
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 7, 2006 9:59 AM
Here is the next question and answer. I hope as we do these that we do learn something. [;)]



Beyond high gas prices, why is everyone talking about ethanol?


It's becoming an increasingly important part of the fuel supply, and has the potential to become still more crucial. President George W. Bush and members of Congress have expressed support for ethanol use. And this spring, refiners in parts of Texas and the Northeast have been replacing a gasoline additive called MTBE (for methyl tertiary-butyl ether) with ethanol. MTBE, a chemical used to oxygenate fuel, can contaminate drinking water. Ethanol, which does not present the same danger, can serve the same purpose in fuel.

That's not all. The 2005 energy bill requires that the U.S. boost its ethanol production to 7.5 billion gallons by 2012, up from about 4 billion in 2005. This sounds like a whole lot of ethanol, but bear in mind, last year the U.S. slurped up almost 140 billion gallons of gas.




  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 8, 2006 10:49 AM
I noticed that our prices went up 2 cents a gallon about 3 days ago. Now we are at $2.81 for regular unleaded and $3.01 for premium unleaded. I have a feeling this time it won't drop like it did last time. I think we are stuck at this price or even more for the rest of the summer.

Does anyone know if the gas reserves that were promised to be released have been released ??? [?] I would think if they have that our price would have come down some.

Now for the next question and answer.



Are there any problems with ethanol?


Oh, yes. Ethanol can't travel in pipelines along with gasoline, because it picks up excess water and impurities. As a result, ethanol needs to be transported by trucks, trains, or barges, which is more expensive and complicated than sending it down a pipeline. As refiners switched to ethanol this spring, the change in transport needs has likely contributed to the rise in gas prices. Some experts argue that the U. S. doesn't have adequate infrastructure for wide ethanol use.

Also, ethanol contains less energy than gas. That means drivers have to make more frequent trips to the pump.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, July 8, 2006 11:37 AM
...There doesn't seem to be any easy answers for our high price of fuel Jim.....I've read articles that it requires almost as much energy to create ethanol as can be benefited from it. Understand vehicles using it produce less mpg too.....
Our N L gasoline reg. price {last evening}, was still at 3.09.....and Diesel at some places was the same amount. They are getting us conditioned when we {if ever}, find prices at say...2.75, will make us ru***o it believing they have a bargin for us.

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Saturday, July 8, 2006 2:32 PM
And a lot of thsoe articles use old data from the 1970s....

Every new plant built today is more efficient. And on the plus side, the source is easily renewable. (can't say that with oil)

Subsidize a farmer or subsidize a Saudi.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 9, 2006 9:40 AM
Here is today's question and answer. This deals with what modelcar was talking about yesterday. [^]



Doesn't producing ethanol on a large scale use a great deal of energy?


Yes. Some ethanol skeptics have even argued that the process involved in growing grain and then transforming it into ethanol requires more energy from fossil fuels than ethanol generates. In other words, they say the whole movement is a farce.

There's no absolute consensus in the scientific community, but that argument is losing strength. Michael Wang, a scientist at the Energy Dept.-funded Argonne National Laboratory for Transportation Research, says "The energy used for each unit of ethanol produced has been reduced by about half [since 1980]." Now, Wang says, the delivery of 1 million Briti***hermal units (BTUs) of ethanol uses 0.74 million BTUs of fossil fuels. (That does not include the solar energy -- the sun shining -- used in growing corn.) By contrast, he finds that the delivery of 1 million BTUs of gasoline requires 1.23 million BTU of fossil fuels.

Producing ethanol could get more efficient soon as new technologies help farmers get more corn per acre of land and allow ethanol producers to get more of the fuel from the same amount of corn. The companies developing new corn technologies include chemical giant Dupont and Monsanto, which sells genetically modified seeds as well as chemicals for protecting crops.


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:47 PM

The current news is reporting that oil is topping $76 a barrel.  I expect we will see a rise in the price of gas by tomorrow night at midnight.  How much?  My guess is anywhere between 1 to 3 cents a gallon.  Currently in my local area our prices range from $2.81 for regular unleaded to $3.04 for premium unleaded. 

And now for the next installment in the guestions and answers about Ethanol.

 

So where can I find ethanol?


There's a good chance you're using it already. It's mixed into gas in many regions of the country including the corn-belt Midwest, and states like California and New York which had already banned MTBE. The regions making the transition this spring are the Northeast and parts of Texas.

Cars in the U.S. can normally drive on E10, a mixture of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline, that is sometimes called gasohol. It's how Americans usually take their ethanol. Relatively few cars available here are "flex-fuel," meaning that they can run on much higher concentrations of ethanol. The fuel E85, which is 85% ethanol, is sold at some gas stations concentrated in the Midwest.


 

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
Posted by chicagorails on Thursday, July 13, 2006 1:00 PM

things are heating up again in the mideast, and north korea and iran and lebanon and isriel are not getting along so this spells higher oil prices on the market. go solar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, July 13, 2006 1:31 PM
Well last year if gas was $2.40 per gallon & now it is $3.00 that is a difference of $0.60 per gallon which mean for every 10 gallons you buy it cost only $6.00 more then it did last year. If you have say a car that gets you 20 miles per gallon then you can go 200 miles before filling up again. I would think most rail fanners do there rail fanning near there home so I would say for a big $6.00 bucks more then last year they can still railfan. Even if you do 1,000 miles your additional cost would be only $50.00 more vs last year. 2,000 miles would be $100.00 more then last year.based on my equation 

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
Posted by chicagorails on Friday, July 14, 2006 12:04 AM
well these higher oil prices spell one thing for rrs and thats more buisnessSmile [:)]
 if oil reaches 100 dollars a barrell, will the rrs be able to handle a 25% or more increase in truck trailer and domestic container traffic??Question [?]   whats the limit the average double tracks mainline rrs can handle in 24 hours?  100? 125? 150? 175? 200? ....................time to tripple track!!!Shock [:O]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 14, 2006 7:02 AM
Naa. Higher gas prices mean that the public will drive much less. And won't spend as much as they use to. I for one thing I have already cut back on my Railfanning by 90%. Allan.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 14, 2006 10:25 AM

Go back to the original Railfanning and High Gas Price thread which was started over 2 years ago and check out the prices listed in it.  Don't just consider what gas prices were last year, but take into account what they were 2 years ago.  Right now, people are having to make hard choices when considering gas prices and other things which they need. 

I hope people view this thread as a way to teach about the current alternatives which are available now.  We must do more than we are currently doing to lower our dependence upon oil.  As more and more people look to Hybird vehicles their cost will come down and be more affordable.  I will definately consider one in another year or two when I look to replace my current 97 Ford Ranger.

And now for today question and answer about Ethanol.

 

Is ethanol cheaper than gas?


Surprise, surprise, it isn't. The move this spring by more regions to use ethanol means that demand has spiked, driving up prices. On Monday, the New York harbor price was around $3 per gallon compared with about $2.28 for gasoline (before being mixed with ethanol). In other words, for now ethanol is helping to increase prices at the pump, not to push them down.

So ethanol production and distribution are also controlled by market forces, right? Only to a certain degree. In addition to heavily subsidizing the ethanol produced domestically, the U.S. government levies a 54 cent per gallon tariff on imports from other countries, such as Brazil, a lower-cost producer. This, of course, discourages the U.S. from importing cheaper ethanol.

 


 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, July 14, 2006 2:38 PM

Yes, Jim and the gasoline price side of it is increasing too....Just last evening crude reached 78 plus dollars a bbl and already today {this morning}, here in Muncie it went to 3.00 a gal for N L Regular.

So I hate to imagine just where it really is headed.  Now especially with the new unrest and almost complete breakout of new fighting in that area {mid east}, once again....It looks to me at least for a while like we're on the way up in price....maybe close to 4 bucks a gal.  We don't know how far ranging this mid east fighting might extend once again.  So crude up....stocks down....That's not too good for incumbents in an election year.  Not good for anyone.

Quentin.

PS....Anyone know if M. Hemphill is still in Iraq....?

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, July 14, 2006 3:47 PM

Quentin,

I don't know if Mark is still in Iraq, but I did notice all his posts disapeared again.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, July 14, 2006 8:56 PM

.....I noted too we don't see any more of his posts.

Quentin

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, July 14, 2006 8:59 PM

....Another glitz.....I just had to write the post above twice as the first time I tried to send it I got...."SERVICE UNAVAILABLE''....and then lost it of course and had to re do it....

Quentin

Quentin

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 1,721 posts
Posted by james saunders on Friday, July 14, 2006 9:07 PM

Friday morning fuel was $A1.369 a LITRE, and that afternoon it was $1.225 a LITRE, explain that. and as I believe that is about $6.50USD. maybe more?

James, Brisbane Australia

Modelling AT&SF in the 90s

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, July 14, 2006 9:17 PM

.....James:  I've not said hello on here to you yet....We're in central Indiana, USA and enjoy hearing the news from down under.  So our greetings from Muncie.

Quentin

Quentin

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 132 posts
Posted by CNW534 on Friday, July 14, 2006 9:19 PM

I have a Ford Explorer Sport Trac with a 4.0 litre V-6.  It takes exactly one 15-gallon tank to get to Rochelle and another to get back home.

I thought I'd try a tank of E85.  It was 20% cheaper than regular unleaded.  I had to stop in Janesville to fill up.  I got 25% less MPG with the E85.  It ended up costing me MORE for cheaper fuel. Sigh [sigh]

Mark

You should see what an SD70ACe does to a dead fish!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: US
  • 26 posts
Posted by sarahd on Friday, July 14, 2006 9:43 PM
LOOKING AT EVERYONES RESPONSE I HAVE TO ADMIT I'VE GOT IT PRETTY GOOD;MY JOB TAKES ME DOWN OLD ROUTE 66 EVERYDAY,MY COMPANY PAYS THE GAS ON THE VEHICLE I DRIVE AND I GET TO WATCH ALL THE TRAINS GOING BY ON THE BNSF MAINLINE. I DRIVE A TRANSIT BUS OUT TO SILVER LAKES WHICH IS FIFTEEN MILES OUT OF VICTORVILLE,CA HALFWAY TO BARSTOW. MANY TIMES I HAVE EXTRA TIME SO I CAN SIT BY THE MAINLINE AND WAIT FOR THE TRAINS. ITS REALLY COOL,SINCE I AM NOT TOO BUSY AND IN ORO GRANDE I ALMOST ALWAYS GET CAUGHT AT THE CROSSING WAITING FOR A TRAIN.THEN THOSE BNSF TRAINS ALWAYS ALOT OF THEM,THANKS TO MY JOB I CAN RAILFAN AND CRUISE WITH THE TRAINS EVERYDAY. GAS AT 3.31 A GALLON;TOO MUCH.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 1,721 posts
Posted by james saunders on Friday, July 14, 2006 10:21 PM
 Modelcar wrote:

.....James:  I've not said hello on here to you yet....We're in central Indiana, USA and enjoy hearing the news from down under.  So our greetings from Muncie.

Quentin

 

Thanks for the greetings Big Smile [:D] i look forward to conversing more

Regards,

James, Brisbane Australia

Modelling AT&SF in the 90s

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Nineveh Junction, NY
  • 23 posts
Posted by zinker on Saturday, July 15, 2006 3:06 PM
I haven't had time yet to read this entire thread, but I do have a resource that may be of interest. This is;

<http://permaculture.com> - "alcohol can be a gas".

Their FAQ is worth reading.

http://permaculture.com/alcohol/faqs.shtml

I heard an interview with David Bloome from permaculture.com on a radio talk show a few weeks ago and he made a lot of sense to me.

It should be noted that this is a very politically charged issue. The very first post on this thread which bemoaned the injection of politics into the discussion was itself pretty political. It would be impossible to discuss this intelligently without getting into the politics of energy policy. I could only hope that the discussion stays reasoned and intelligent - regardless of the viewpoints raised.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Saturday, July 15, 2006 3:29 PM
 jhhtrainsplanes wrote:

Go back to the original Railfanning and High Gas Price thread which was started over 2 years ago and check out the prices listed in it.  Don't just consider what gas prices were last year, but take into account what they were 2 years ago.  Right now, people are having to make hard choices when considering gas prices and other things which they need.   

 

Saw something on the news last week that said Americans are paying 355 million dollars more a DAY for gas than they were 3 years ago.

 

 

Bert

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 17, 2006 8:58 AM
I JUST HEARD ON CNBC THAT THE PRICE OF CRUDE COULD GO AS HIGH AS $200.00 DOLLARS A BARREL WITH IN THE NEXT 3 TO 5 YEARS WHICH COULD PUT GAS PRICES UP WELL OVER $10.00 TO $15.00 A GALLON. ALLAN.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, July 17, 2006 9:11 AM

...It's almost impossible to speculate what crude prices will be down the road....Look at the political mess we have in the mid east now...Will it be stopped, will it escalulate into all out war....Iraq.....Iran....So many variables out there now.  No way of knowing.  Right now, it sure doesn't seem good for a good normal cycle going forward.  We sure hope this fighting mess can be quickly stopped before it ruins the world economy.  Of course all the personal disruptions, loss of life, etc....Terrible.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, July 17, 2006 11:06 AM
In my first post on this thread I was saying I was considering trading in my Frontier crewcab for a Scion or a PT cruiser...well I did it got a Scion xB...got tired of feeding the pickup truck.
 
Its as big inside as the Frontier, gets 35mpg, drives like a sports car, is quieter, and so is a really fun car to drive. So now maybe I can start doing more driving trips with my camera...Wink [;)]
 
PS Talking about cars and milage...
 
I recommend a movie that will show you how promising technology can be absolutly crushed by the status quo.... "Who Killed The Electric Car" is a fascinating documentry looking at the EV1 how it was built by a research wing of GM and what caused it to be not only removed from the road, but crushed and shreaded to remove all trace of it by an industry suddenly very frightened by the new technology that could have in a few years posed a serious contender to the gas engine. I wasn't a fan of electrics before, I've driven a few of them and yes the limited range was serious drawback, but the long term potential was definetly there. After seeing this, I was surprised, but not shocked, at the myriad of forces that doomed these cars...watch it and you'll understand why Japan still has the American market firmly in their grip and why GM may go the way of the Studebaker in a couple years...
 
If you cant make it to the theater, keep an eye out for it at the Blockbuster in the next couple months.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 17, 2006 12:35 PM

Thanks all for the comments to the thread. 

My dad has said for years that there was a carburetor developed many years ago that would get 50 mph, but the auto makers bought the patent and surpressed it.  Considering they can get at least 35 now why not 50?

Here is the next and last question and answer on Ethanol.

 

Why not eliminate the tariffs?


Well, the idea behind the tariffs is to foster domestic production of ethanol. But amid the ongoing furor over high gas prices the idea of repealing the levy has gained momentum in Washington. Though it would probably annoy ethanol producers like agricultural giant Archer Daniels Midland, removing the tariffs could have some benefits. It would help ease price pressures and would likely encourage Brazil to boost its ethanol production. However, it's probably not a short-term solution.

Brazil is undergoing an ethanol revolution far more drastic than that in the U.S. Flex-fuel cars which can run solely on ethanol are widely available and the ethanol supply is short enough that the government recently reduced the mandatory ethanol content in gasoline from 25% to 20%.


  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, July 17, 2006 2:24 PM
Not sure from all that I've read on Ethanol that it's reduced milage in a given vehicle and price comparison is giving us much of an advantage by using it as far as the price goes....It of course would allow us to use a supply of fuel that we create right here at home.  That is an advantage.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Burlington, WI
  • 1,418 posts
Posted by rvos1979 on Monday, July 17, 2006 2:44 PM
NBC 15 in Madison recently did a test of straight gas vs. E10 in a stock Ford F250, the results were quite surprising in that the truck used less E10 than straight gasoline.  The testing body did point out that this could vary from vehicle to vehicle.

Randy Vos

"Ever have one of those days where you couldn't hit the ground with your hat??" - Waylon Jennings

"May the Lord take a liking to you and blow you up, real good" - SCTV

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:00 AM

 rvos1979 wrote:
NBC 15 in Madison recently did a test of straight gas vs. E10 in a stock Ford F250, the results were quite surprising in that the truck used less E10 than straight gasoline.  The testing body did point out that this could vary from vehicle to vehicle.

I certainly don't have all the answers, I am not sure I have even one of them.  However, the point of my railfanning and high gas prices threads have been to encourage discussion and seek to encourage use and developement of alternative methods of energy NOT just to complain about the high prices of gas.  Two years ago when I introduced the first high price gas thread several people had to jump in and start other high price gas threads.  Last year the same thing happened, just as now it is happening again.  I am not sure what purpose having multiple threads on the same issue accomplishes, other than robbing post and comments from the original thread.

High gas prices are here to stay.  That is what the oil companies wanted, and that is what they are getting.  Back in 2004 I posted about the $3 a gallon mark that was coming, and it certainly did.  In the same post I also pointed out that the next target the oil companies were headed for was $5 a gallon.  I don't think we will see $5 a gallon this year.  However, I certainly think we might see $4 a gallon before the summer driving season is over.  It might be short lived, but I think we might see it.  Any bad weather in the Gulf will certainly help bring about the $4 a gallon mark just as Kitrina did for the $3 a gallon price. 

Next summer, Katy bar the door.  Who knows at this point. 

Now my question to you forum members is this.  What are you doing to help converse gas/oil?  What are you doing to help encourage alternative methods of energy? 

In the next few days I will rehash some of the things the railroads are doing to conserve fuel.  My railfanning and high gas price threads  are and  were more than just complaints, they are/were means of educating the forum member on these topics.  We can all certainly learn together.   Wink [;)]

Keep checking in, and please post if you can add something useful to the current topics.

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:37 AM
Jim one reason I traded the truck is was specificly this reason, Gas hitting $4 or higher before years end. At 35mpg at least I'll be in better shape, I currently CAN afford the truck I had, even at $50 a tank, but I have a nasty habit of paying attention to whats going on, and the notion that I had better get rid of the truck while it still had a high bluebook resale was a big motivating factor. If gas hits $4, which I'm sure it will, suddenly that $50 is closer to $70, and if your driving a big SUV or Pickup you could be looking at anywhere from $80 to $100 a tank. If it goes to $5? well thats going to be a real killer for most people. there was a story out here about people selling belongings at the pawn shop to get gas money, thats getting scary! Of course the story didnt point out just what they were driving. I can guess though, all you have to do is watch the used car dealer infomercials here, almost everything their pushing is the big SUVs, and they've been selling them for dirt cheap! a 2001 Tahoe for only $8K?
 
What gets me is that even at $3.30 a gallon people are still clinging like grim death to their giant SUVs. I predict next summer gas will get to $4 and stay there, Detroit will collapse into a black hole of bankruptcy, Ford and Diamler/Chrysler might survive by quickly importing high milage models from Euorpe, but GM will try to survive by paying people to buy their now obsolete giant SUVs and monster pickup trucks. I see a HUGE decade of disaster for GM leading to either bankruptcy and the end of Americas largest manufactuerer led to demise by its own hubris, and inability to adapt. -or- we'll suddenly see all these high milage and "new" technology vehicles (like a 300mile range EV1) that they've been sitting on for decades suddenly hit the market and save them from the brink.
 
Time will tell.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:22 PM
I've been toying with writing editorials to the paper on this same subject for some time now. But for now I think this forum will do.

I think there's way too many people out there that forget the very fundamentals of economics when it comes to fuel. Supply vs Demand. If you use more, the price will go up. If you use less, the price will go down. I specifically remember hearing a bit on the radio not too long ago. A guy called in and basically stuck up for the big SUV's because "he could afford it". He said that his salary was over 6 figures a year and that he had no problem filling up his Escalade. What killed me was the comment he made basically stating that "See what a higher education can afford you to do?" That struck a nerve in me because this moron was only painting a self portrait of his stupidity. If that higher education had taught him anything it'd be that just because he has the money to afford to be able to drive a gas-guzzler, if he used less fuel, prices would drop and he could spend that money on other, more desirable things. Not only that, other people would have money to be able to buy the goods/services that his company offers and he'd ultimitely be even richer, right? (I don't know what he does for a living, but as an assumption...)

Now, back to the topic of the thread, railfanning. I drive a '99 Ranger that is flex-fuel capable and unlike many people I bet, I actually use that feature. Starting last summer when the first E85 gas station opened up here in town I started using it in my truck. At that time E85 was $.30 cheaper than regular so the comparison in price/mileage was close. I continued to use it until about December when I couldn't get my truck to start one day. I believe it was because the ethonal froze, but I'm not sure. I don't know the freezing point compared to gasoline, but thats my assumption. After the truck sat in the sun for a day, I finally got it to start and I went back to gasoline for the rest of the winter. Once the spring weather hit I decided to go back to E85 for awhile. Prices had gone up since last year and I was now paying the same for ethenol as I would gasoline. But money wasn't my point. I figure that if I use the fuel, Ethenol companies would see the demand for the ethenol and eventually produce it cheaper until it was far more financially reasonable to use it instead of gasoline.

I have however stopped using ethonal because it has had some bad side effects on my truck. More often than not I get a bad sputtering and a real lack of acceleration. I believe that is what fouled up my spark plugs so bad last year that it would hardly start. But I still believe the technology is there and it's a great thing to invest in.

As for railfanning. Well, I certainly don't go on as many trips as I used to although thats because of a lack of time more than anything. But when I am tooling around town looking for trains, I usually try to pick one place and sit there. I know people that constantly move around checking out lighting and locations for each train, coming back to the same locations many times. All that does is burn gas. Just find a good spot and stay there. Maybe have a plan to end up at a certain place. I just go along from one spot to the next down the line until I'm there, rather than hopscotching all over the place. And chasing trains is never a good idea when you're trying to cut back on fuel. Lots of quick starts/stops, exessive speeding to get ahead of the 60mph train. We all know there's been those times where we've looked like the officers on Cops, weaving in and out of traffic, flying across fields and small creeks  and driving 110mph trying to chase down a train. I am going to Illionois next week with a friend to explore the BNSF Chilli sub for a couple days. But instead of taking my truck which would allow us to cross-country if needed and get into other places a car can't, we're taking his Accord, which gets close to 30mpg I believe, rather than my truck which is closer to 20-23 on the highway, 18 when railfanning. It's simple things like that that can cut down on railfanning costs and also help the economy at the same time.

-Greg Lavoie
Webmaster
www.fwarailfan.net

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 21, 2006 12:37 AM

Thanks Greg.  Your post is just what we need.  It shows you did something to try and help.  Every bit helps.

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
Posted by chicagorails on Friday, July 21, 2006 6:18 AM
ethonol is good, a temporary solution to a permanet problem, feeding internal combustion poluting engines.
  what happens when a big drought occurs in the corn belt? no ethnol,back to oil.
  the big companies like adm, will controll prices like exon does now.
  will you trade a hamburger for a gallon of ethnol?  cows  vs  cars,compete for corn.
  
   and the cars keep on polluting,eating away ozone, melting the north,south ice caps.


answer is clear,cleam.    hydrogen vehicles, solar, battery you charge at home or plug in at mc donalds,or on road charges off hood,trunk,solar cells.  plug in at walmart.  lowes.   while you are shopping your car is charging.  while you eat,car charging.

how safe is a 100 unit train of ethonol? if one car crashes they all go, chain heaction? a whole town whiped out,ouch!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 21, 2006 10:24 AM

Once again, thanks for all your posts.  Please keep them coming.

Our gas prices again took a hefty increase but I can't right now remember how much.  Premium unleaded, I think, is now $3.10 or $3.12, with regular unleaded approaching $2.90.  Our area is normally one of the cheaper areas also, so it is very possibly that even regular unleaded is $3. a gallon somewhere around here (especially near the interstate off and on ramps).

Now as promised, here is a little info on what railroads are doing, AND have been doing for years to cut back on the use of diesel fuel.

Smart Start is the name of one system that will monitor many factors and shut down an ideling diesel engine.  Some of the things it monitors are the battery, air brake pressure, and outside air temp.  The outside air temp must be above a certain degree or the system will not shut down the unit, this prevents the unit from freezing in cold weather.  Another important item it monitors is the air brake pressure.  If the unit is shut down and the air brake pressure falls below a set mininum then the system will start the engine so the compressor can recharge the air and bring it back up.  (It is not hard to find a gladhand with a leaking gasket thus loosing a small amount of air which eventually will cause the system to loose air and need recharging.)   Smart Start will also monitor the battery and if the battery drops too low then the system will start the engine to recharge the battery.

All of the new widecabs have a system which will do this.  The name may not be Smart Start but most of the systems by any name will monitor these major items and shut down or restart the engine when needed.  Many of the older engines, when they receive an overhaul, get equipped with a Smart Start (or another brand) system.  Thus even 30 or 40 year old engines now also have the same capability.  This feature does save the railroads a lot of money on diesel fuel.  On engines which do not have the feature, the railroads would like the employees to shut down motors which will not be used in a reasonable amount of time. 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 21, 2006 12:45 PM

I work part time in the Auction House and see those trucks sell like hotcakes.

SUV sales are steady. The nicer ones sell.

We are getting Hybrids into the lot and frankly Im being somewhat converted to some of them. I prefer high performance vehicles with big power; gas cost be damned. But these Hybrids are slowly coming on to the scene and are getting pretty durn good.

Other vehicles like the 300C with the massive V8 and big power will gut itself and run on 4 instead of 8 on the freeway when it senses a chance to save a little gas. I see this in some trucks as well.

I tried hard to stay out of the thread but wanted to state that we as a Nation are going to have to divorce ourselves from Gasoline and Desiel for on road use. Now is the time to do it because it will take us decades to adapt and I dont think we have unlimited oil in the earth.

Where I am there are alot of people with big trucks and large cars. They hardly slowed down during the 3.00 gas last year and show no signs of conserving or curtailing the speed or daily use. I think when we get to 4.50 gas and beyond we will start to feel it as a State and perhaps Nation as a whole.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 21, 2006 3:05 PM
 vsmith wrote:
In my first post on this thread I was saying I was considering trading in my Frontier crewcab for a Scion or a PT cruiser...well I did it got a Scion xB...got tired of feeding the pickup truck.
 
Its as big inside as the Frontier, gets 35mpg, drives like a sports car, is quieter, and so is a really fun car to drive. So now maybe I can start doing more driving trips with my camera...Wink [;)]
 

You got an xB? I'm jealous. I've wanted one for a year or two. I might get one later on, when I really need it. What color is it? Any extras on it? Contact me off-list if you want.


Matt
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Friday, July 21, 2006 6:47 PM
Just filled up my tank, which was almost completely dry and paid $3.15 per gallon and the fill up cost me (well, actually my company expense report, heee, heee) $48.48....AAARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHH!  Thank God for company cars!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 22, 2006 11:16 AM

Hello All.

Once again I would like to thank everyone who has contributed to this thread.  I would also like to thank you all for not using it as a complaint thread (as the other copycat high price gas thread has been) and for not injecting politics (as the other thread has also done) into the discussion.  Thank you all so very much for helping to keep this thread on topic and for your comments on alternative methods of energy.

The railroads have experimented off and on for many years seeking other methods of fuel other than diesel.  We have seen a variety of experiments tried by both BN (before the BNSF merger) and UP.  So far nothing has given much hope other than the current Green Goats.  I don't think the Green Groats are all that the railroads have hoped they would be either.

As always your comments (not complaints) on this subject are encouraged and welcome.   Smile [:)]

 

 

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy