QUOTE: Originally posted by Old Timer I'm sorry that you think I don't grasp the situation. In reality, I grasp it very nicely, thank you.
QUOTE: Originally posted by CSSHEGEWISCH Factors to be considered include the added cost of maintaining two sets of maintenance facilities at any location where steam would be operated unless steam and diesel operation would be strictly segregated.
QUOTE: Originally posted by AnthonyV To Michael Sol: I find your analysis of railroad dieselization facinating, especially the data per revenue ton shown earlier. However, I do not understand your definition of inflation index.
QUOTE: Based on data from several sources (Inflationdata.com is one), inflation from 1944 to 1962 resulted in a 75 percent increase in prices. Applying this to your locomotive cost data of $0.42 per ton in 1944 results in a cost of $0.74 per ton in 1962, which is exactly the cost you show for 1962. Stated another way, overall locomotive costs were the the same in 1962 as in 1944 expressed in constant dollars. Obviously, this is only true if the data that I used is applicable to a railroad.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Old Timer Sayeth futuremodal: "For someone who claims to disdain this whole topic, you sure are putting in a lot of commentary." Well, not as much as Mr. Sol; but you're right. It is a waste of time, so I'll quit. Thanks for the motivation to do so. Old Timer
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73 Old Timer, feltonhill- Thank you for your posts on this thread about the N&W and the PRR. I really enjoyed reading them. Futuremodal- Old Timer is far more knowledgeable on this topic than you or I, and has had over 30 articles published in Trains magazine.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Old Timer There are lots of studies - the Brown is one example - that arise from someone waking up in the morning with a conclusion in mind and thinking "Wow -- maybe if I can get me some statistics and massage them right, I can support my conclusion and get me some publicity and money thereby!" The Brown obviously is one. First, it amounts to a rationalization after the fact. It formed no conclusion useful to anyone except those interested in establishing a revisionist view of history, a parallel universe, if you will.
QUOTE: Originally posted by AnthonyV Your interpretation of the data is that the lack of savings from the Diesel investment resulted in a reduction of the MOW budget. Allow me to suggest a different interpretation of the data - Loss of revenue caused the reduction in MOW expenditures. It would seem to me that if locomotive expenditures remained constant in real terms, it should not have affected the MOW budget.
QUOTE: Originally posted by AnthonyV Michael: Interesting points. I would like to get a copy of Brown's study. What is the full reference? Thanks Anthony V
QUOTE: Originally posted by germanium May I pose some questions for you knowledgable gentlemen ? The diesel locomotive at the time of Mr Brown's study was still a relatively new tool, and like most new tools expensive in purchase costs and spares per unit, whereas the the steam locomotive was a known quantity. Did the relative simplicity of steam flatter it in terms of maintenance costs, whereas the diesel needed first-class maintenance etc (including hiring/retraining the specialists to service it) ? In the ru***o acquire diesels, was standardisation overlooked, thus acquiring umpteen diesel classes and inflating maintenance costs ? Many steam maintenance and servicing facilities were probably old and fully depreciated, thereby flattering steam maintenance costs - is this a tenable assumption? Lastly, how would the costs of a modern-day diesel fleet compare with Mr Brown's steam cost figures (allowing of course for inflation etc) ?
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Murphy, you had asked a question directly about Brown's study a whiile back. I'm not ignoring you. I looked through about five boxes of old electrification and related studies over Christmas and couldn't locate Brown's study. Only 15 more boxes to go. My fear is that I took Brown's study out of the boxes a couple of years ago and put it "someplace where I wouldn't lose it." Wherever that might be, I am sure it is still there. However, I will come up with it one way or another and see what it actually says regarding your quaery. I'm not 100% sure that was my question. I asked about how the dieselization process worked fo Santa Fe, with the *bad water* issues that I've read about. Thanks Best regards, Michael Sol
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Murphy, you had asked a question directly about Brown's study a whiile back. I'm not ignoring you. I looked through about five boxes of old electrification and related studies over Christmas and couldn't locate Brown's study. Only 15 more boxes to go. My fear is that I took Brown's study out of the boxes a couple of years ago and put it "someplace where I wouldn't lose it." Wherever that might be, I am sure it is still there. However, I will come up with it one way or another and see what it actually says regarding your quaery. I'm not 100% sure that was my question. I asked about how the dieselization process worked fo Santa Fe, with the *bad water* issues that I've read about. Thanks
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Murphy, you had asked a question directly about Brown's study a whiile back. I'm not ignoring you. I looked through about five boxes of old electrification and related studies over Christmas and couldn't locate Brown's study. Only 15 more boxes to go. My fear is that I took Brown's study out of the boxes a couple of years ago and put it "someplace where I wouldn't lose it." Wherever that might be, I am sure it is still there. However, I will come up with it one way or another and see what it actually says regarding your quaery.
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73 Futuremodal- Old Timer is far more knowledgeable on this topic than you or I, and has had over 30 articles published in Trains magazine.
Take a Ride on the Scenic Line!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.