Trains.com

Whose Ready for $3.00 a Gallon Gas

11329 views
262 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:20 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BentnoseWillie

QUOTE: And why blaim the President all of the time I mean he really can't do anything without CONGRESS.

Uh - aren't he and the majorities of both houses all Republicans...?
Uh - wasn't America set up for the government to mind its own bussissness. Get them out of the way, let the free market work and gas would be cheaper.

Uh- Don't the Democrats philbuster anything they don't like.

Uh- The president doesn't right the bills.

Uh- Isn't it the Democrats stopping oil refineries from being build, from cutting down our trees, and drilling for oil, in our own land.

Uh- Gas was actually higher under Jimmy Carter, a Democrat.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Nova Scotia
  • 825 posts
Posted by BentnoseWillie on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:49 AM
Lotus - I wasn't taking sides, I was trying to understand what icmr was getting at. I guess my question is why does it matter whether one blames the executive branch or the legislative branch, when one party controls both? I really don't care which party we're speaking of, I just don't quite follow the mechanics.
B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:50 AM
No agruments with that!
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:56 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tharmeni

Put the calculators away. When I ordered my hybrid, I wasn't looking to "save money on gasoline" because I believe the price will keep going up (with some downward fits that last a few months). What I wanted to do with my beloved hybrid is buy LESS gasoline than I do now so that someway, someday, the oil companies won't run our lives like they do now. As soon as Florida's first ethanol plant (under construction) is up and running, I'll be blending it in my hybrid to even LESS gasoline.




Will you be comfortable burning ethanol made from food stuff when you know there are starving people in the world?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by oltmannd

QUOTE: Originally posted by Tharmeni

Put the calculators away. When I ordered my hybrid, I wasn't looking to "save money on gasoline" because I believe the price will keep going up (with some downward fits that last a few months). What I wanted to do with my beloved hybrid is buy LESS gasoline than I do now so that someway, someday, the oil companies won't run our lives like they do now. As soon as Florida's first ethanol plant (under construction) is up and running, I'll be blending it in my hybrid to even LESS gasoline.




Will you be comfortable burning ethanol made from food stuff when you know there are starving people in the world?


Most ethanol plants produce "wet" feed for dairy or hog farms. Roughly speaking: the solids still get fed to a farm animal, the "gas" part goes to another use.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:28 PM
the president dont controll the country, the worlds richest 100 men do. ask alan greenspan!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Southwestern Florida
  • 501 posts
Posted by Tharmeni on Friday, September 16, 2005 6:21 AM
Don: The Florida plant is going to process the stalks from sugar cane, so I doubt it is of any use as a foodstuff.

Last night I took delivery on my Hybrid Honda Civic. Averaged 48 mpg on the way home from the dealership. Read routing on it and it came into San Diego, traveled by rail to Jacksonville (apparently just before Katrina hit) and then rerouted (also via rail) to Tampa.
Before anyone gets on me about buying "Japanese" -- I had two choices in replacing my old SUV - buy Japanese and get state-of-the-art hybrid technology or buy Ford and get last-generation hybrid technology (purchased from Toyota). With a Ford hybrid, I would purchase a lot more Middle Eastern oil over the life of the car.

Where are the GM and Chrysler hybrids? Toyota and Honda have long waits for hybrids. Now GM announces a new line of full-size SUVs for 2006, but no hybrids. I just don't get it.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Friday, September 16, 2005 7:20 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by icmr

I'm ready for the gas because we have to have it so why complain about. And why blaim the President all of the time I mean he really can't do anything without CONGRESS.



ICMR MY$2.75


That's because the opposite of PROgress is Congress.

Add to that Bush's "Energy Bill" that gives big tax incentives to oil companies to look for oil, while Exxon posted the largest profit last quarter for ANY company in history.

Just what they need, more tax incentives to look for oil so they can make more money. Guess who gets to make up the difference so they can balance the Federal Budget?
Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, September 16, 2005 7:21 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tharmeni

Don: The Florida plant is going to process the stalks from sugar cane, so I doubt it is of any use as a foodstuff.

Last night I took delivery on my Hybrid Honda Civic. Averaged 48 mpg on the way home from the dealership. Read routing on it and it came into San Diego, traveled by rail to Jacksonville (apparently just before Katrina hit) and then rerouted (also via rail) to Tampa.
Before anyone gets on me about buying "Japanese" -- I had two choices in replacing my old SUV - buy Japanese and get state-of-the-art hybrid technology or buy Ford and get last-generation hybrid technology (purchased from Toyota). With a Ford hybrid, I would purchase a lot more Middle Eastern oil over the life of the car.

Where are the GM and Chrysler hybrids? Toyota and Honda have long waits for hybrids. Now GM announces a new line of full-size SUVs for 2006, but no hybrids. I just don't get it.




Using farm "scrap" helps, but I'm still not totally sold on the idea of "growing" transportation fuel in large quantities. I think ethanol is OK as a gasoline suppliment/oxygenate, but not so sure as a primary automotive fuel.

Glad to hear you hybrid is getting good mileage. Buying Japanese is OK with me! The Civic is a "mild" hybrid, right?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,024 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, September 16, 2005 7:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TharmeniWhere are the GM and Chrysler hybrids? Toyota and Honda have long waits for hybrids. Now GM announces a new line of full-size SUVs for 2006, but no hybrids. I just don't get it.

GM and Chrysler are no doubt counting on the usual American trend - People like big cars. Current sales slump notwithstanding, SUVs are here to stay. Compare the Honda Civic of today with the same model in the 70's, which was positively tiny. The American sports cars of the 50's all grew. The pony cars of the 60's all grew.

Not having looked at the new lines, I can't speak with any authority, but IMHO, I'd be you'll see certain "economy" features touted on the SUVs. And they still probably get better mileage than their counterparts of 20 years ago.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 16, 2005 9:15 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl

QUOTE: Originally posted by icmr

I'm ready for the gas because we have to have it so why complain about. And why blaim the President all of the time I mean he really can't do anything without CONGRESS.



ICMR MY$2.75


That's because the opposite of PROgress is Congress.

Add to that Bush's "Energy Bill" that gives big tax incentives to oil companies to look for oil, while Exxon posted the largest profit last quarter for ANY company in history.

Just what they need, more tax incentives to look for oil so they can make more money. Guess who gets to make up the difference so they can balance the Federal Budget?
Sorry, I know economics, that will drop the price of oil by putting a glut on the market. Very simple.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, September 16, 2005 9:27 AM
Yes 1st they have to find it. Then they have to get to market. Maybe oil found today will have a impact in 7/10 years from now & by then Saudi Arabia at least will be pumping far less oil then it produces today. Then you have China/India demands for oil to contend with as well. [:(]

I also think as this years heating season kicks in & the Exxon's of the world start to produce more heating oil & less gasoline that will also have a upward push on gasoline prices. [:(]

Originally posted by Lotus098
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: weatherford,Tx
  • 367 posts
Posted by zapp on Friday, September 16, 2005 9:46 AM
Negative! Just because they find it doesn't mean there will be a glut on the market.
They are not going to cut their own throats by flooding the market. It would simply guarantee a supply/source.
Saying it would lower gas prices is being simplistic.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098

QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl

QUOTE: Originally posted by icmr

I'm ready for the gas because we have to have it so why complain about. And why blaim the President all of the time I mean he really can't do anything without CONGRESS.



ICMR MY$2.75


That's because the opposite of PROgress is Congress.

Add to that Bush's "Energy Bill" that gives big tax incentives to oil companies to look for oil, while Exxon posted the largest profit last quarter for ANY company in history.

Just what they need, more tax incentives to look for oil so they can make more money. Guess who gets to make up the difference so they can balance the Federal Budget?
Sorry, I know economics, that will drop the price of oil by putting a glut on the market. Very simple.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:36 AM
An interesting list:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2178rank.html

Saudi Arabia has 1/4 of the proven reserves. Doubt they'll be dry in 7-10 years.

But the big surprise to me was who was in 2nd place!

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:56 AM
Where's all that oil going?

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/2174.html

US uses 1/4 of all the oil consumed

All of the EU (which has more people than the US, uses 75% of what the US uses. (hmmm. Do tax policies that discourage oil consumption acutally work?)

China uses 1/4 of what US uses (for 4x the people)

India uses 1/2 of what China uses.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, September 16, 2005 5:31 PM
.....Well gas price is lowering, but slowly.....Today, Muncie: 2.78

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 16, 2005 6:13 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zapp

Negative! Just because they find it doesn't mean there will be a glut on the market.
They are not going to cut their own throats by flooding the market. It would simply guarantee a supply/source.
Saying it would lower gas prices is being simplistic.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098

QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl

QUOTE: Originally posted by icmr

I'm ready for the gas because we have to have it so why complain about. And why blaim the President all of the time I mean he really can't do anything without CONGRESS.



ICMR MY$2.75


That's because the opposite of PROgress is Congress.

Add to that Bush's "Energy Bill" that gives big tax incentives to oil companies to look for oil, while Exxon posted the largest profit last quarter for ANY company in history.

Just what they need, more tax incentives to look for oil so they can make more money. Guess who gets to make up the difference so they can balance the Federal Budget?
Sorry, I know economics, that will drop the price of oil by putting a glut on the market. Very simple.

I only takes a very small amount to glut the market. The oil compaies relize that selling more oil makes more money. Supply and demand this increases supply, that drops the price.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Southwestern Florida
  • 501 posts
Posted by Tharmeni on Friday, September 16, 2005 7:18 PM
oltmannd - not sure what you mean by a "mild" hybrid.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: in canada B.C.
  • 49 posts
Posted by 7h9h_ on Friday, September 16, 2005 7:44 PM
at my home it is $1.20 a Liter (i live in canada)
 [br]i want to make a running model of the
Stevenson's Rocket but first I need the blue prints (the full scale)
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:21 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by oltmannd

An interesting list:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2178rank.html

Saudi Arabia has 1/4 of the proven reserves. Doubt they'll be dry in 7-10 years.

But the big surprise to me was who was in 2nd place!


We are # 2, but it is mostly heavy oil trapped in the Alberta Tar sands. It is very expensive to refine and billions of dollars are being spent to get more.
Dale
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, September 17, 2005 7:51 AM
...Friends just returned to Florida and witnessed their lowest price of gas in Georgia...{so what else is new...}, at 2.65.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:48 PM
point 1 there is a " doe-eia "crude oil price prognosis for the next time with 2 decades forward
view: oficial price increase per annum 1,1%(the barrel price will stay in a 35$/bbl range.
that is the "sandmann-view".
then we have to remark the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce world report #53
with a nice crude oil price stimulation:50$,60$,70$ and for 2010 the 100$/bbl average.

oldmannd is right;we all -worldwide- have to consume less 10% for the next five years.
10% of the total crude oil consume,not only transportation,

so everybody will decides for his-/her-self,with his/her personal behaviour, about the market price and
how much money more they/we have to spent.
sandmann or #53 !


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:26 PM
how to save the life-style ?
1.synfuel (FT-KOGASIN-process:coal/NG 2 liquid))
2.bio-/wastefuel ( can be max. 20% alternative/substitution,under natural conditions-
with GEN-OM-Design i do not know the limit )
3.water2fuel: f.e. envirofuel,ZA or aquafuel (Paul Day,GB)

4.ROCKFUEL (Hanna Awad,Libanon) probably only with PLASMA-reformer (~ GEET)

5.hydrogen on demand system (gp2000.com,a taiwan webpage describes a
water splitting cristal, effect similar chemalloy

.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 5:58 PM
how to converse a conventional car to a 250mpg hybrid in DIY manner or as
basic/secondary/high school workshop model(l):
take this plans from the patentarchiv,
de 4332378 kurt fritzsche hybrid-engine
us 4038348 harry kompanek ultra sonic engine conversion : -50% ???
de 3713905 peter rust e-motor/generator-drive : -50% ???
combinate this : 3lt.-50%=1,5lt.-50%=0,75lt.
probably
+ proepowersystems recuperator
+ us 4131171 john keyes flywheel concept
so total fuel need -theoretical- <0,5lt./100 km ergo a little over 250mpg,
but also nice is the idea of somebody called holger zeissler :
the cyclotron-car de19522794
really easy to construct,in memoriam of the us 4318449-inventor,
quantenphysician .
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 8:21 PM
say what?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:43 PM
lomero.com
rqriley
prismz
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:48 PM
pardon,loremo.com
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Sunday, September 18, 2005 1:25 PM
I welcome the higher gas prices because what will happen is that eventually, people will smarten up and quit their complaicent attitude and revolt and demand alternative fuels. This will in turn either force the oil companies to lower their prices and the governments to lower taxes or it will start a surge in bio-fuels, mass-transit and other methods to get rid of the world's dependancies on fossil fuels.

It's not as if we are running out, we have more oil in the world than we know what to do with; it is simply a money-grab that will be the oil corporatation's undoing.
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 18, 2005 5:41 PM
the crude oil price is quoted in "$" ,"dollar" language metamorphose of"thaler", S=silver/silber II =pari(this sign also to find by Yen,British Liberty Pound (Sterling)
and in many other currency BLOCKED EXPRESSION.
Karls-/or Silberthaler as "global" accepted standard currency -then our ancients changed to the Goldstandard.
There is a pari-definition of GOLD and a BUSHel wheat,
and there is a (Gregory) King(´S) Rule,also the "Paretto Pyramid",
and last but not least a casino-tool called Roulette, a mechanical emotion voltage indicator,
invented during the Mazarin/Richelieu " ABSOLUTISMUS" government by the
Marquis de Laplace.
So we got the neuronal fuzzy-logic system also called Monte Carlo Process.

Is this all important ?
Go back (virtual !!!) to the eightees- analyse with the King`s rule
the savings&loan bank system disaster.
Definition 1:
money is a . a non corrosive metal or b. an et(h)ernal value
with global acceptance and ever "mobile".

Definition 2:
money is never a. a (paper-)bill/note or b. a plasic-card, this are credits/avals,
-in the real/barter economy-without global acceptance.

the logic of the GOLDEN BANK RULE :who pays with credit can not receive honor !!!

to think about oil and the price is also to think about the U:S/global society evolution
and the physical sezession trends inside families/groups/organisations/estates and
beginning with ourself-inside us.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, September 18, 2005 5:53 PM
Wow! that conjures up images of Max Headroom![(-D]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy