War of the Worlds

[dharmon]

I liked the movie. I liked the original too. I try not to be too critical of movie stuff anymore. With the exception of a few movies, like say "Blackhawk Down" , realism gets skewd a bit for entertainment value..."Top Gun" anyone???

Anyway, it's probably the best advertising Amtrak's had in awhile.

And it certainly gives creedence to all those here that think Amtrak is critical to national defense....after all, the train was running....when nothing else was....albiet with no crew or passengers ...alive.......probably the first time Amtrak was actually on time.......


..and no one tried to beat the train across the crossing......OLI should be happy....

Dan

[dehusman]

There are two issues here, can a locomotive keep running while the
locomotive and train is on fire and can a train keep going if the crew is
gone/has been vaporized?

First part. There is nothing to stop a train if its on fire. It will keep
running until the fire burns through some critical part of the air brake,
electrical, control or fuel system or overheats to the point the water
boils/leaks out of the cooling system tripping the low water shut down.

Second part. Being a passenger engine it is probably equipped with an
"alertor" and "deadman" pedal that will stop the train if there is no crew
on the train. Some, but not all, freight engines are also equipped with
deadman's pedals and alertors.

Given that the premise of the scene is that the "walkers" are in the
neighborhood, the train being on fire an still moving is possible, since it
would have been attacked just a couple blocks away. Given that the "rays"
from the walkers turn people into dust, the crew, if dead, would not have
been able to activate the deadman's pedal and the train would have either
been stopped or be in the process of stopping shortly after being attacked.

As far as your concern that this really couldn't happen, if we were under
attack by aliens with death rays, worrying about whether or not the flaming
train would stop would not be high on my priority list. On the up side,
the probablity of being attacked by aliens with death rays is relatively
low.

The real burning question (I know, bad pun) is, what's on fire? The death rays don't catch stuff on fire (notice the people are turned to dust, but their flammable clothing doesn't catch on fire). So just what the heck is burning on the train?

Dave H.

[edblysard]

True, Scott,
But notice the creature in the original movie is a tripod, instead of a biped?
And, of course, H.G. Wells’s book wasn’t set in Southern California!

Ed

[TrainFreak409]

QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

blaaaa.... another hollywood remake of a classic that they screwed up.....what is up with hollywood...have they finaly run out of ideas? and have to do remakes? and worse yet..totaly screw them up? someone wake me up when hollywood makes good movies agin....
csx engineer

The original movie, although good, was a screw up itself. The book portrayed the monsters as tripods, not hovering saucer-like things.

[jeaton]

QUOTE: Originally posted by naterich89

In the new Steven Spielberg movie, War of the Worlds, there is a scene where an Amtrak train blows through a crossing at around 80 mph, completely on fire, locomotive and all. Near as i can tell, the loco is a GE P42.

I heard that Secretary Mineta stood up and cheered.

[M636C]

This comment reminded me of the worst example of impossible movie/TV occurrences that I saw some time ago on the opening episode of a TV show called "Lost" (or something like that). I was changing channels and found myself looking at a scene of a crashed wide bodied aircraft. There was a turbofan engine, still attached by its pylon to a short section of wing, inverted with the engine standing on the pylon in the air and STILL RUNNING! It was in fact throttling up and down at random.

Now, a couple of my concerns. Aircraft engine pylons are designed to break off on crash landing, and on the other hand, wings are not designed to break off, since they have to support the plane. Apart from this, there is the problem that the fuel is stored in the wings - if the wing has broken off and is just a stub, where is the fuel coming from?

Sorry, I just find so many such problems in movies - my favourite railroad scene being "Runaway Train" where they had to break the cab window of an F unit to get to the next unit - why not use the nose door. A 1930s British film had the hero climb over the tender of the "Flying Scotsman" express - the only train that ALWAYS had locomotives with corridors through the tender (required for the non stop journey, to change loco crews).

Movies require suspension of disbelief.

Peter

[eolafan]

It's Hollywood, so what does reality have to do with anything. Also, in my opinion the remake was good but FAR FROM GREAT! I also have the original on VHS and watch it all the time.

[edblysard]

Only takes a second for the engineer to wipe the clock with the train brake and put it in emergency...the conductor has a even simpler valve on his side.
Even if they didnt, a complete fire in the cab would, at some point, burn through a enough control component wiring to shut it down.

For the most part, Hollywood pays no attention to how trains really work, it just dosnt fit their needs...


CSXengineer...got the original War of the Worlds on DVD...much better than the remake, still makes me a little uncomfortable, even with the old school effects...
Ed

[csxengineer98]

blaaaa.... another hollywood remake of a classic that they screwed up.....what is up with hollywood...have they finaly run out of ideas? and have to do remakes? and worse yet..totaly screw them up? someone wake me up when hollywood makes good movies agin....
csx engineer

[ericsp]

I don't think the diesel engine, electrical systems, or bearings would last long if the locomotive was "completely on fire". If a locomotive did catch fire the crew would probably stop the train while the fire is small and either detach the passenger cars and move the locomotive or have the passengers get off the train.

[Anonymous]

In the new Steven Spielberg movie, War of the Worlds, there is a scene where an Amtrak train blows through a crossing at around 80 mph, completely on fire, locomotive and all. Near as i can tell, the loco is a GE P42.

My question is, if the loco is completely on fire like that, arent there systems to prevent a runaway like that? Or would those systems be burnt to a crisp by the fire?

**a note of caution** I was deeply disturbed by this scene, and I want to make sure it is impossible.