Trains.com

Has a GG1 ever been restored to running order?

29224 views
153 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 110 posts
Posted by kevikens on Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:12 PM
God alone knows how many GG1 s I rode behind or paced along side US route 13 in my father's car (yes you could get that Nash Ambassador up over 90mph). I always thought that the G was the locomotive that won WW II for the US. Considering how much wartime traffic was carried by the Pennsy and how much of that traffic wound up on the electrified lines of  Eastern ports  for overseas shipment I can imagine no single locomotive that did as much for the war effort. In addition to all that critical freight think of all the military and government personnel who moved on that Washington NYC corridor almost always pulled along by a G. The Pennsy worked those motors almost to death. They could and did haul enormous passenger and freight consists day in and day out with the sparsest of maintenance. Nothing seemed capable of  halting the GG1 ( ok, the occasional fine snow flake could short them out) until the DEP was created. They could easily excede their rated horsepower and could move a lot faster than the PRR would ever like to publically admit. I don't know if any of your readers ever heard this story but as I got it there was an engineer working for NJT on the North Coast Line where the last G's served out their final years in the early 1980's. He was undoubtedly as close to retirement as his former pennsy motor because he and his engine went out in a blaze of glory. As the G hauled commuter train joined the NEC near Rahway it encountered a NYC bound clocker pulled by one of the new AEM 7's easily doing 100mph plus. I guess the old guy wanted to show that Swedish meatball what the old girl could do and opened her up. The two drew along side each other and the G stayed with the AEM 7 all the way through Elizabeth to Newark. Shortly after this both the engine and engineer ended long distinguished careers. In my mind the Pennsy and the GG1 are forever linked as the railroad and locomotive that made the rail industry the major means of moving people and goods in the mid 20th Century America. As for restoring one to running condition there is a gentleman named Bennet Levin who beautifully restored two former PRR E8s that have run excursions of PRR varnish here in the Northeast. He owns a rail car rebuilding plant that sits right along side the NEC in Philly, the Juniata Terminal. If anybody could restore a GG1 it would be this person. I wish I could persuade him to try. Anyway I nominate the GG1 as the most significant locomotive to ever move a train in America and if any locomotive deserves to rise from the scap heap and run again it's the G.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 200 posts
Posted by penncentral2002 on Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:07 AM
Although it would be wonderful to see a GG1 running again, I'd just settle for seeing some of the preserved GG1's getting at least comestic restorations.  For example, the one at the Virginia Museum of Transportation would look great with a fresh coat of paint.  The B&O Museum should realize how many people on their train rides comment on the GG1 there - maybe they would treat it better then if they realized how popular it was (especially given its unique history).  Would love to see it restored (if only comestically) and put on display at Union Station!
Zack http://penncentral2002.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 575 posts
Posted by alphas on Friday, November 10, 2006 3:38 PM
I saw thousands of trains being hauled by them in my time.   I preferred the solid yellow stripe Pennsy went to rather than the original.   The solid stripe really brought out the colors in the keystone design and definitely got your attention.   Whoever had them changed to the Penn Central worms design should have been required to spend the rest of their life cleaning up the graffiti on all railroad equipment.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, November 10, 2006 2:04 PM
 StillGrande wrote:
There are 2 at the PRR museum in Strassburg.  One is inside and is really nice.  The other is outside and is rusting quietly.


There's 3 if you count the one they own at the Harrisburg Amtrak station.  But I hear the 4800 is getting a new coat of paint, and one of them is getting a fixed and repainted interior.  (I think 4935, but don't quote me)

Now, can we find a home for the two at Cooperstown Jct? 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 102 posts
Posted by motor on Friday, November 10, 2006 12:22 PM

 spbed wrote:
I was at the train station in Matawan NJ when it departed on it last trip. Clown [:o)]Tongue [:P]Big Smile [:D]

My son said there is one at the RR Museum of Penn in Strasburg PE. He sent me a T-shirt from their with the GG-1 on it in PRR colors.
[

 

There is.  I saw it when I visited the RRMofPA 18 months ago.

My first AMTK ride (PHL to NYP in 1973) was pulled by a black GG1 with Penn Central markings.

motor

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Alexandria, VA
  • 847 posts
Posted by StillGrande on Wednesday, November 8, 2006 3:04 PM

 adrianspeeder wrote:
The one is Stasburg PA is very nice looking. The Pennsy hit a home run with that loco.

Adrianspeeder

There are 2 at the PRR museum in Strassburg.  One is inside and is really nice.  The other is outside and is rusting quietly.

Dewey "Facts are meaningless; you can use facts to prove anything that is even remotely true! Facts, schmacks!" - Homer Simpson "The problem is there are so many stupid people and nothing eats them."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 7, 2006 6:47 PM

As Tom said, 4935 looks great in Brunswick Green:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=61935

Dave

 

 Fireflite wrote:
The RR Museum of Pennsylvania has three GG1's in its collection. Number 4935 is on display in the rolling stock hall. The 4935 has had a complete cosmetic restoration to its as-built 1943 appearance, including very shiny coat of Brunswick Green paint with the original 5 gold stripes. It was first restored in 1977, and donated to the museum by Russell Wilcox in 1983. If you think you don't like Brunswick Green, pay this motor a visit and it'll make you a believer. (Note that an electric locomotive was a 'motor' to PRR man.)

The 4800, the prototype, aka "Old Rivits" is on display in the outside yard. It was owned by the Lancaster Chapter NHRS until donated to the museum in 2000, which explains why the 4935 had dibs in the spot inside. It was the only example with rivited rather than welded body, hence the nickname. I believe this engine is still wearing Tuscan Red with five stripes (somewhat faded now). I think most fans like this paint scheme best, though only 10 units ever wore it, and the 4800 wasn't one of them. Interestingly, this engine one of group re-geared for freight service. It went to PC, then Conrail, and wore both a unique Bicentennial scheme and Conrail Blue.

The museum's third GG1 is 4859, currently on display in the Amtrak station in Lancaster, PA. Read more at http://www.rrmuseumpa.org/about/roster/gg1.htm.

The 4877 was last operated by NJ Transit and was restored to Tuscan Red a few years before its retirement. Its now owned by the United Railway Historical Society, and is in storage in NJ Transit's Hoboken yard. Another unit is on display next to the fairgrounds in Syracuse, NY, and last I knew there was one at the National Railway Museum in St Louis.

Tom

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 10 posts
Posted by screamingman13 on Tuesday, November 7, 2006 6:27 PM

Back to the topic of running a GG1, here's my idea of the best resteration:

1) Change the transformer coolant from mineral oil or PCBs to silicone oil or liquid glycol, the same coolant as used in the Acelas.

2) Repair any frame defects or other rust/corrosion problems.

3) replace what is probably cloth-insulated wire with rubber insulated wire.

4) Who said anything about a HEP plant, we're talking about excursion runs, not a full-time return to revenue service.

5) Upgrade cab signaling, although the NYC-DC line hasn't changed much, probably still has the position light signals (yes it does, i've got a picture of it, next to an E60)

I also heard that there is a 25Hz line somewhere in the Gulf Coast region, or what about the electrical outfit in Arizona, the NEC isn't the US's only electrified line.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Mastic, N.Y.
  • 51 posts
Posted by art11758 on Thursday, December 29, 2005 4:25 PM
Dave wrote:
I believe some of the old 60Hz to 25 Hz rotary converters are still in use by Amtrak, but most substations use efficient rectifier-inverter electronic converters.

I think they just removed one of those from Sunnyside yard in the last two or three months. There were several structures beside the LIRR tracks that were razed and one of them had what appeared to be a large electric motor inside it. Could that have been one??
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,261 posts
Posted by emdgp92 on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:47 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by msernak

No Amtrak GG1 was ever painted for MOW. There were several E44's painted Silver and black for MOW. Can anyone confirm if the E44's ever ran for Amtrak?


Here's an E44 in 1987:

http://www.geocities.com/su_carbs/trainpix/e44.jpg

...and the one in Strasburg in 1992:

http://www.geocities.com/su_carbs/trainpix/e44.gif

The one at Strasburg has since been moved inside the museum, and painted in its original PRR colors.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Alexandria, VA
  • 847 posts
Posted by StillGrande on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed

[My son said there is one at the RR Museum of Penn in Strasburg PE. He sent me a T-shirt from their with the GG-1 on it in PRR colors.

Originally posted by CHPENNSYLVANIA
[


There are 2 there. One inside in display condition. One outside rusting away.
Dewey "Facts are meaningless; you can use facts to prove anything that is even remotely true! Facts, schmacks!" - Homer Simpson "The problem is there are so many stupid people and nothing eats them."
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:30 PM
Thanks for the answer daveklepper.

Do you know why there is a change in tension between New Haven and New Rochelle? It would be simpler, in my opinion, to have the whole line electrified with the same system. Has it to do with the system from New Haven into GCT?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:25 PM
No Amtrak GG1 was ever painted for MOW. There were several E44's painted Silver and black for MOW. Can anyone confirm if the E44's ever ran for Amtrak?
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:13 PM
Looks great for a locomotive stored outside!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 12:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrnut282

The website posted earlier listing GG1's did not mention #4882 at the NYC National RR Museum in Elkhart, IN. It is painted black with the PC "mating worms" logo. The picture makes it look in fair shape, but I believe it is stored outside an the photo may be old.


I was at Elkhart several years ago and the GG1 is outside


[:D]

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:47 AM
I was in that area a couple of years ago and the line was electified at least to Long Branch. Didn't chase the line, so can't say any more than that.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:18 AM
Not 50 cycle power. It was 25 cycle, or accurately 25 cycles per second.

Many railfans assumed it was 50 cycles per second because the characteristic noise is 50 cycles per second since their are both a positive and a negative peak in power (peaks) every single cycle, so you get two peaks of power every 1/25th of a second, making the noise 50 Hz even though the current is 25 Hz.

50 Hz is the general frequency used in Europe, including most modern electrications, just as 60 Hz is used in the USA.

The old AC electrifications in Europe, with lots remaining in Switzerland and Austria, are 16-2/3 Hz

Hz stands for Herz, a pioneer scientist in ac power generation, and is an international standard for a short way of saying cycles per second.

The New Haven generated its own 25 Hz power at Cos Cob.

Today all electric railways use purchased power. I believe some of the old 60Hz to 25 Hz rotary converters are still in use by Amtrak, but most substations use efficient rectifier-inverter electronic converters.

Regarding the North Jersey Coast electrification. I rode it many times when it was 25 Hz and used by GG-1's. (When I was at Fort Monmouth in 1951 and 1954, K-4's still hauled the trains form Penn Station south of South Amboy.) I had the pleasure of riding an MU trains which ran under the 25 Hz catenary to Rahway, and then the 60 Hz to Red Bank. I understand the electrification now goes beyond Red Bank, but someone should tell me how far: To Long Branch, to Sea Girt, or all the way to Bay Head Junction?
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:15 PM
The website posted earlier listing GG1's did not mention #4882 at the NYC National RR Museum in Elkhart, IN. It is painted black with the PC "mating worms" logo. The picture makes it look in fair shape, but I believe it is stored outside an the photo may be old.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: North of Philadelphia
  • 2,372 posts
Posted by tmcc man on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:26 PM
I saw the GG1 at the Pennsylvania Railway museum a few year ago. That is on heck of a Loco and an engineering feat.
Colin from prr.railfan.net
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

The PRR used 50 cycle power that it generated itself primarily at Conowengo Dam on the Susquehana river. The idea was that people couldn't steal the power becasue it makes lights visibly flicker. AMtrak changed over to the new voltages around the time of the AEM-7.


I did not know about that little tidbit. Thanks!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,261 posts
Posted by emdgp92 on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:11 PM
I was in the cab of the GG1 in Altoona during the PCRRHS convention in 2004. I felt it was a bit cramped and very dark. I knew that Strasburg had 2 G's there...but I didn't know that they also had the one in Lancaster. Did any GG1s get painted in Amtrak's MoW scheme? I might have seen orange ones around Philadelphia years ago....but the memory is a little fuzzy there.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:10 PM
The PRR used 50 cycle power that it generated itself primarily at Conowengo Dam on the Susquehana river. The idea was that people couldn't steal the power becasue it makes lights visibly flicker. AMtrak changed over to the new voltages around the time of the AEM-7.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:09 PM
The GG1 that crashed into Union Station and fell into the basement was the 4876. This was one of the last GG1's that operated for New Jersey Transit. This motor still survives somewhere in a Baltimore area railyard and it's future is bleak. From what I understand it was supposed to go the the Baltimore RR Museum but they did not want it. I wish I had the room.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:38 PM
Answering the question:

Boston - New Haven 60Hz 25000V

New Haven - New Rochelle (Metro North): 60Hz 12500V

New Rochelle - Harold Tower (Suynnyside) 60Hz 25000V

Harold Tower - Washington Union Station (the PRR tracks) 25Hz 11000V

A restored GG1 can run between New York and Washington, but not east-north of New York.

GG1's required more maintenance than the E60's and AEN7's that replaced them.

They were last used in New Jersey Transit service, NY-South Amboy.

I believe Rahway (junction of JerseyCoast line with NEC) to S. Amboy and beyond to Rewd Bank or Sea Girt is now 60Hz, 12500V prohibiting GG1 use.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Sunday, December 25, 2005 10:31 AM
In a book I got for Christmas, the GG1 is mentioned. The author writes the GG1s have been sidelined becaus Penn Central changed juice (in the Northeast Corridor) from 11kV/25 Hz to 25 kV 60 Hz.

Is that really true? I always thought, parts of the NEC still run with the 11kv/25Hz-system, and the PCB in the transformers plus increasing unreliability were the causes for the sidelining of the GG1's
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 23, 2005 12:18 PM
Really, since volunteers would probably be running it, the Union thing only comes into play with the station you're going to in Washington.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 33 posts
Posted by Eric Stuart on Saturday, July 23, 2005 7:58 AM
Hmm - are your unions that strict? Would they not agree to the occasional exceptional run? - we're not talking about frequent operations, I presume.
One other possibility: don't the DOT have a test track somewhere, that would be off-line for TU activities. Or has that gone?
I realise all these restrictions would make the expence of rehab less viable, but ....
Just some ideas!
Eric in the UK
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 15, 2005 6:03 AM
Folks, don´t forget the GG1 in Green Bay, Wisc. Standing close to a BIG BOY!.
It´s most unlikely that either one of them can run again. At least under own power.
But I like the idea that a GG1 is "pushed around". This would come at least a bit
close to old times, at least to see a GG1 running (or rather moving).
For such special trips, the problem of the small cabs should be "forgotten"
since this would be no regular(=often) trips.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 3:52 PM
For Train Junky29 and Roger38

Agree fully with you. My thoughts were just made up quickly. I am sure that IF I were on the board I could come up with atleast 100 projects to work on.

Thanks for your imput. Don't hold your breath waiting to read about me being appointed. Bush has had 6 years to get his act together to do it and I am a card carrying Republician.

***
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:19 PM
Tom: I must have done my visit {summer of '83}, right before the 4800 was moved outside at the Pennsylvania Museum....The place was almost new then and I'm almost certain the photos I took of the GG-1...{inside the building}, are of "old rivets".......
....Welcome to the forum.

Quentin

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy