Trains.com

The designated (off-topic) Ukraine war thread Locked

32302 views
802 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,657 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, April 9, 2022 2:16 AM

Ukraine is getting an S-300 antiaircraft system from Slovakia. About time. Maybe the dam will break and other countries will join in.

Here is a video of the system being loaded on - wait for it - a train - for shipment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNEStBdM7EI

The US is providing Slovakia a Patriot battery as replacement.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,370 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Saturday, April 9, 2022 8:02 AM
Nothing anyone says on this thread is going to make a bit of difference.
 
Meanwhile, millions of Ukrainians have had their lives wrecked, their families torn apart, and their loved ones killed or wounded.
 
Come on!  You’ve got $100.  Donate it and buy some food, bandages, clothing, whatever for these victims of Russian aggression.
"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,597 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Saturday, April 9, 2022 10:45 AM

greyhounds
Nothing anyone says on this thread is going to make a bit of difference.
 
Meanwhile, millions of Ukrainians have had their lives wrecked, their families torn apart, and their loved ones killed or wounded.
 
Come on!  You’ve got $100.  Donate it and buy some food, bandages, clothing, whatever for these victims of Russian aggression.
 

+1 And thanks, Ken.

Pitch in and donate (or help) whatever you can. Some refugees are starting to show up here.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,657 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, April 9, 2022 10:57 AM

Already have.  Donated several weeks ago. And will continue.

We have an acquaintance who is a legal immigrant from Ukraine. He seeved in the Ukraine Army as a field medic before coming to America. He has gone back to serve, leaving his wife and children here. Of course, he and his wife still have family in Ukraine.

Contact almost any Greek (Eastern) Orthodox Carholic Church in your area and they will almost surely have a fund raiser going as well as collecting any type of clothing and other supplies that a refugee will need.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,546 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, April 9, 2022 11:00 AM

CMStPnP
I said or implied his opinion was open to question.  So we obviously have a very major disagreement on what constitutes an unbiased expert on a subject matter area.

No, what we have is a 'disagreement' on what, supposedly, was in question about his opinion, or what your reasons (or knowledge) to question that opinion might be.

Has nothing to do with 'credentials', but it does have to do with knowledge or experience or reading other sources.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,177 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, April 9, 2022 11:26 AM

How will NATO Respond if Russia
Uses Nukes in Ukraine?
 
 
NOTE: From this point to the link below is from that linked article by Ivo Daalder.
 
"Putin may ramp up his war in Ukraine – here’s how Nato should respond"
 
 
"It is vital Moscow understands that escalation will not be risk-free, and expects a proportionate response"
 
"Ivo Daalder is the president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. He served as US ambassador to Nato between 2009 and 2013"
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Previously, I posted some hypothetical questions just to find out what the NATO method or doctrine requires as a possible NATO military response if Putin radically escalates the conflict in Ukraine.  On the face of it, I would not expect that NATO would not respond at all because it would not be an attack on NATO. 
 
However, in this video, Ivan Daalder sheds light on this issue by saying that if Russia escalates in by using nuclear or chemical weapons in Ukraine, NATO will respond militarily. 
 
The author lists the hypothetical scenarios that Russia might execute and then states how NATO should/would respond.  He lists these scenarios in order of seriousness from least to most.  In each case, the author first describes the escalatory action by Russia (in red), followed by the NATO response (in blue):
 
Russian escalation:  The [unintended] possibility of a missile hitting NATO territory.
 
NATO response:  Take out the launcher or aircraft that sent the missile.
 
Russian escalation:  Bomb an industrial chemical or biological research facility and blame the resulting damage on Ukraine [I assume this includes cases of untargeted collateral damage]. 
 
NATO response:  Let such an escalation go unanswered. At the very least, it should take out the forces responsible for bombing the facilities with surgical strikes.
 
Russian escalation:  Use industrial chemical agents such as chlorine or ammonia to target civilians.
 
NATO response:  Impose a real no-fly zone to prevent further Russian aerial attacks.  If needed, attack Russian aircraft and air defenses threatening NATO planes.
 
Russian escalation:   Use actual chemical weapons (such as mustard gas or sarin nerve agents), biological agents, or even a nuclear weapon.
 
NATO should come to the direct defense of Ukraine – deploying its air, ground and naval forces to ensure Russia’s defeat and the full restoration of Ukraine’s independence and sovereignty.
 
The author concludes with this comment:
 
“No one wants to start world war three. But Putin should know that if he escalates, Nato’s calculation of risks and rewards will change. Letting Moscow know that Nato would come to Ukraine’s direct defense under these circumstances would not only be legal and legitimate, but necessary to demonstrate to Russia and others that escalation does not pay.”
 
What is unclear to me is whether NATO doctrine actually requires these responses or if the author is simply recommending that NATO tell Russia that NATO will respond as listed.  I assume that the doctrine does not require the listed responses.  However, I must also assume that NATO is free to make these Reponses as their option, and might very well decide to make the responses. 
 
In any case, the author seems to assume total protection from the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction, as shown by his complete exclusion of any possibility that if Russia escalates, and NATO punishes them, Russia will not escalate further. 
 
This condescending attitude completely denies that while NATO can defeat Russia in conventional warfare, Russia still retains the ability to make NATO/U.S. disappear in one afternoon.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,546 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, April 9, 2022 11:38 AM

Ron, if you are not familiar with 'autocatalytic war' you should read up on it.  Been a 'thing' even since the original cross-pollination of Douhet with Borden in 'There Will Be No Time'.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Saturday, April 9, 2022 12:52 PM

Overmod
No, what we have is a 'disagreement' on what, supposedly, was in question about his opinion, or what your reasons (or knowledge) to question that opinion might be. Has nothing to do with 'credentials', but it does have to do with knowledge or experience or reading other sources.

Agree and you have to read the exchange in entirety not just read the last post and you would see I made that point throughout as well among other valid points.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,546 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, April 9, 2022 12:58 PM

CMStPnP
Agree and you have to read the exchange in entirety not just read the last post and you would see I made that point throughout as well among other valid points.

I have not yet seen where you comment in detail where you disagree with the 'source', with reasons why.

It is perfectly OK to say '...that statement doesn't pass my smell test' (or similar opinion comment) just as it was to say that in your opinion accountants sometimes manipulate semantics.  It's always ethically better to back up opinions with some source material or even references, but if you say it's your opinion, no one should do other than state why their opinion is contrary... and of course back that up with facts, references, etc. if they intend readers to trust, or accept, their opinion 'more'.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Saturday, April 9, 2022 2:18 PM

Overmod
I have not yet seen where you comment in detail where you disagree with the 'source', with reasons why.

Have you looked?

From 1 post above, though I made the comment several times across several posts in various ways.    But here it is again.

I believe NATO and their historical timeline.    This guy is not only pushing a book but selling himself as an "I told you so" victim.   Which disqualifies himself as being objective, in my view.    Further he is giving his own personal opinion, it is not official nor is it expert. 

On top of all that you misinterpreted what he is saying.   He is not saying Russia is in Ukraine because of NATO he is saying it will become a war with NATO.....look at his book which claims the same thing. 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Saturday, April 9, 2022 2:35 PM

Overmod
It is perfectly OK to say '...that statement doesn't pass my smell test' (or similar opinion comment) just as it was to say that in your opinion accountants sometimes manipulate semantics.  It's always ethically better to back up opinions with some source material or even references, but if you say it's your opinion, no one should do other than state why their opinion is contrary... and of course back that up with facts, references, etc. if they intend readers to trust, or accept, their opinion 'more

Sorry the quote feature has issues for me, not sure if it is the website or the laptop.

No your missing the point on Accountants.    Accounting is a general field roughly analogous to a general practicioner of medicine.    Would I take my pet Donkey to a GP for advice?    No I would not.   Hence conveying someone as an "expert" because they have knowledge in a general area is overkill in my view.    Additionally, if we are talking military there is usually a designation of SME in an area in addition to rank or title (wasn't LTC Vindiman an SME?   Wasn't it so designated?).    The argument is moot though for an informal discussion forum which is opinion based by nature.    As I stated many times over and over, this is not an academic forum for peer review.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Saturday, April 9, 2022 9:45 PM

I am not sure I am interpreting the audio correctly but.....    These men appear to claim they are not even in the Armed Forces but were just plucked off the street in Russia and given uniforms and rifles and put into Eastern Ukraine..........so in military terms.....I think they call that recruitment by a "press gang".    It is an old technique from the 1800's or before, surprised it is still used.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV9DLy2NI_8

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,082 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, April 9, 2022 10:08 PM

CMStPnP
I am not sure I am interpreting the audio correctly but.....    These men appear to claim they are not even in the Armed Forces but were just plucked off the street in Russia and given uniforms and rifles and put into Eastern Ukraine..........so in military terms.....I think they call that recruitment by a "press gang".    It is an old technique from the 1800's or before, surprised it is still used.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV9DLy2NI_8

Wasn't 'Impressment' one the the 'fighting points' between the USA and Britain during the War of 1812 - where the Brits were capturing US merchant ships and 'impressing' those sailors into the British Fleet.

I believe Hitler impressed civilians off the street into the defense of Berlin.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, April 10, 2022 12:35 AM

BaltACD
Wasn't 'Impressment' one the the 'fighting points' between the USA and Britain during the War of 1812 - where the Brits were capturing US merchant ships and 'impressing' those sailors into the British Fleet. I believe Hitler impressed civilians off the street into the defense of Berlin.

I think your right but I am not a Naval Historian I believe it was partly due to the British stopping our ships to search or interrogate and then leaving with a good portion of said crew as new British Naval Recruits. 

Some of the stories from the video sound bizarre.   One guy said he found himself in Russian territory (my take is he got lost near a border or something) and then the next thing he knew he was in the Russian Army in that Armored Personnell Carrier.     

There are whole entire Russian Army units refusing to mobilize saying the orders are illegal.   There was another youtube video on an elite Airborne unit in the far East of Russia that refused to mobilize.    No idea how they are handling that but I hope they are not using press gangs to fill the gaps.

I am starting to wonder if Putin followed the proper procedure to declare war.   He first did not call it a war.   Additionally he got this "Security Council" to second his decision.    Which I never heard of that Security Council until this whole Ukraine thing came up.    What happened to the Russian legislature and a formal declaration of war?    Beats me what their official process is though.

Another scary item is the Ukrainian Army fighting East.    There is no real geographical obstacle between the Eastern Ukrainian border and Moscow.   If they break through the Russian lines will they stop at the border?   I wonder if they have given assurances to the West in that regard.......or not.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,888 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, April 10, 2022 1:01 AM

Has anyone been able to construct a railway map of Ukraine showing locations that are severed?  It would be interesting to see how those lines are surviving.  Also the connections to other countries.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,082 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, April 10, 2022 1:38 AM

CMStPnP
...

Another scary item is the Ukrainian Army fighting East.    There is no real geographical obstacle between the Eastern Ukrainian border and Moscow.   If they break through the Russian lines will they stop at the border?   I wonder if they have given assurances to the West in that regard.......or not.

If they would - it would only prove how inept Putin's Russian military is.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,177 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, April 10, 2022 8:37 AM

CMStPnP
Another scary item is the Ukrainian Army fighting East.    There is no real geographical obstacle between the Eastern Ukrainian border and Moscow.   If they break through the Russian lines will they stop at the border?   I wonder if they have given assurances to the West in that regard.......or not.

Why do you refer to that as a scary item?

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,597 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Sunday, April 10, 2022 9:27 AM

CMStPnP
Another scary item is the Ukrainian Army fighting East.    There is no real geographical obstacle between the Eastern Ukrainian border and Moscow.   If they break through the Russian lines will they stop at the border?   I wonder if they have given assurances to the West in that regard.......or not.

Do you seriously think that is likely to occur? I realize this is your speculation so no sourcing is necessary but one wonders where you came up with such a notion.

Sam1 is not here, of course. You attacked a person unable to defend his many opinions on Amtrak finances in a rather snide way. Now you say he was not an expert. My contention is that he had years of experience in the world of corporate accounting and finance at a high level. Does anyone else on here have anything close to that?   Do you?  He always said that without access to all the Amtrak records, no one including himself could accurately determine how Amtrak apportioned overhead costs. He was not some bookkeeper or guy using QuikBooks. In other words, in that field, by training and experience, he was a professional. 

You work in IT apparently and I would consider you knowledgeable, i.e., an expert. Although I have been an end user of computers and software for 40 years, I would never suggest I am an expert in IT/IS. 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, April 10, 2022 9:29 AM

Euclid
Why do you refer to that as a scary item?

Well, it depends on what military units are between Moscow and Ukraine's border but if they have the capability to approach Moscow by land,   Moscow would do everything it's power to stop an invasion of it's capital.    We'll have to wait and see.    The S300 air defense system is portable and can be act as an umbrella and move with advancing troops.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,177 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, April 10, 2022 10:02 AM

CMStPnP

 

 

 
Euclid
Why do you refer to that as a scary item?

 

Well, it depends on what military units are between Moscow and Ukraine's border but if they have the capability to approach Moscow by land,   Moscow would do everything it's power to stop an invasion of it's capital.    We'll have to wait and see.    The S300 air defense system is portable and can be act as an umbrella and move with advancing troops.

 

I understand, but if Ukraine wants to risk the consequences of invading Russia, it is their call.  So, if Ukraine is willing to do it, why do you say it would be scary? 
 
You seem to be suggesting that it would be wrong for Ukraine to act offensively in addition to their effort at defense.  Aren’t both part of war? 
 
Just because NATO is limited to only defense, why should Ukraine likewise limit themselves?
 
Russia is using both offence and defense.  Why shouldn’t Ukraine to the same?
  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,597 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Sunday, April 10, 2022 10:39 AM

Euclid has cited and linked several persons who are or have been involved in leadership positions with NATO or a policy group. If that doesn't make them more expert with this situation, what does?

You have not been linking to any sources. You attempt to disqualify a former (recent) NATO deputy andUK General because he wrote a book several years ago. So for you is writing  books a disqualification for being considered to have a degree of expertise on that subject?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, April 10, 2022 11:38 AM

charlie hebdo

Euclid has cited and linked several persons who are or have been involved in leadership positions with NATO or a policy group. If that doesn't make them more expert with this situation, what does?

You have not been linking to any sources. You attempt to disqualify a former (recent) NATO deputy andUK General because he wrote a book several years ago. So to you are writing  books a disqualification for being considered to have a degree of expertise on that subject?

 

The NATO experts should know what they're talking about, but would be giving their opinions with a slant towards their way of thinking-no? Once you mention policy group, well, right or wrong,there you're talking about a group that was formed to slant things their way.

Either way,those guys would know a lot more about the subject than any of us. Whether they are giving us the straight dope or not cannot be confirmed.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,903 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, April 10, 2022 11:41 AM

Euclid
I understand, but if Ukraine wants to risk the consequences of invading Russia, it is their call.  So, if Ukraine is willing to do it, why do you say it would be scary?    You seem to be suggesting that it would be wrong for Ukraine to act offensively in addition to their effort at defense.  Aren’t both part of war?    Just because NATO is limited to only defense, why should Ukraine likewise limit themselves?   Russia is using both offence and defense.  Why shouldn’t Ukraine to the same?

Usually, we do not just give weapons away for use without restriction.   We have restrictions on their use and distribution, sometimes.  Though I do not know if that was a restriction for Ukraine.    I would tend to think we still had restrictions, even for Ukraine.    We'll see how it unfolds.    If we do have restrictions on their use and Ukraine breaks those terms, not going to reflect positively on Ukraine and could even impact ongoing support for Ukraine.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,546 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, April 10, 2022 2:32 PM

Euclid
 
Another scary item is the Ukrainian Army fighting East.    There is no real geographical obstacle between the Eastern Ukrainian border and Moscow.   If they break through the Russian lines will they stop at the border?   I wonder if they have given assurances to the West in that regard.......or not.

Why do you refer to that as a scary item?

Putin, and some of his apparent advisors, have made it clear from nearly the outset that they view 'donations' of weapons by NATO or NATO countries to be tantamount to acts of war, they reserved to themselves the right to interdict such donated weapons before they could reach Ukraine, and they at least threatened strategic-level retaliation should there be "problems" with such strikes.

Active invasion of Russia by Ukrainian forces, especially enabled by weapons like S-300s donated from NATO countries, is scary to me on that basis alone.

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,575 posts
Posted by Backshop on Sunday, April 10, 2022 3:49 PM

Overmod

Putin, and some of his apparent advisors, have made it clear from nearly the outset that they view 'donations' of weapons by NATO or NATO countries to be tantamount to acts of war, they reserved to themselves the right to interdict such donated weapons before they could reach Ukraine, and they at least threatened strategic-level retaliation should there be "problems" with such strikes. 

What Russia "threatens" and what they do, are two different things.  No way would Russia attack any NATO countries to destroy any weapons provided to Ukraine.  They know that they couldn't handle the retribution.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, April 10, 2022 3:52 PM

I think the Ukraine invading Russia and heading towards Moscow is just a short step away from tilting at windmills. If anything, wouldn't the Ukraine want to start by taking back the Crimea that Russia had seized previously?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,177 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, April 10, 2022 4:48 PM

Overmod

 

 
Euclid
 
Another scary item is the Ukrainian Army fighting East.    There is no real geographical obstacle between the Eastern Ukrainian border and Moscow.   If they break through the Russian lines will they stop at the border?   I wonder if they have given assurances to the West in that regard.......or not.

Why do you refer to that as a scary item?

 

Putin, and some of his apparent advisors, have made it clear from nearly the outset that they view 'donations' of weapons by NATO or NATO countries to be tantamount to acts of war, they reserved to themselves the right to interdict such donated weapons before they could reach Ukraine, and they at least threatened strategic-level retaliation should there be "problems" with such strikes.

 

Active invasion of Russia by Ukrainian forces, especially enabled by weapons like S-300s donated from NATO countries, is scary to me on that basis alone.

 

Yes, I too find it scary.  The whole thing is scary because there is a good chance we will be drawn into a war with Russia. I only asked the question as to why CMStP&P felt Ukraine invading Russia was scary to find out if he meant there was something that prevented them from doing so.  He did reply that we may have restrictions on how Ukraine uses the weapons we send them.  I can see that being possible.
 
But also, when Ukraine went into Russia a couple weeks ago to attack that fuel depot, I found it interesting how CNN covered that.  They did not exactly seem to want to say it, but their comments clearly meant that they disapproved of Ukraine’s action inside of Russia.  They sounded like they felt it was a reckless escalation of the conflict that threatened NATO/U.S.  They acted like it was also unfair to Russia because it broke some kind of rule that required Ukraine to only fight defensively like NATO is required to do under their Article 5.  But again, they did not really explain their objections.
 
 
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,177 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, April 10, 2022 4:59 PM

Murphy Siding

I think the Ukraine invading Russia and heading towards Moscow is just a short step away from tilting at windmills. If anything, wouldn't the Ukraine want to start by taking back the Crimea that Russia had seized previously?

 

Generally, as far as reasons for Ukraine to go into Russia, the point would be to inflict more pain on Russia than they are receiving from Ukraine defense when Russia invades Ukraine.  Both defense and offense play a part in defeating an enemy.  Ukrain started out seemingly overmatched by Russia, so it was natural to concentrate on defense.   But Ukraine's determination plus more weapons is proving that Ukraine is capable of also going on the offense.  

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,082 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, April 10, 2022 5:40 PM

The old saying - Don't be the one to start a fight, be the one that FINISHES IT.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, April 10, 2022 6:22 PM

Euclid

 

 
Murphy Siding

I think the Ukraine invading Russia and heading towards Moscow is just a short step away from tilting at windmills. If anything, wouldn't the Ukraine want to start by taking back the Crimea that Russia had seized previously?

 

 

 

Generally, as far as reasons for Ukraine to go into Russia, the point would be to inflict more pain on Russia than they are receiving from Ukraine defense when Russia invades Ukraine.  Both defense and offense play a part in defeating an enemy.  Ukrain started out seemingly overmatched by Russia, so it was natural to concentrate on defense.   But Ukraine's determination plus more weapons is proving that Ukraine is capable of also going on the offense.  

 

That makes zero sense.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy