Trains.com

AMTRAK VS. CSX CAYCE, SC 2 4 18 REPORT RELEASED 7 23 19

7079 views
221 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Sunday, January 5, 2020 9:00 PM

BaltACD

 

 
charlie hebdo
Either it is that way or not.  Seems there are different opinions when it should be a fact.  In any case,  if guys are only getting six hours of sleep weeks at a time, itenot only a hard life,  it's unsafe.  Hence collisions such as discussed here with the crew asleep. 

 

What part of 10 hours UNDISTURBED rest before being available for the next call are you overlooking.  What happens during those 10+ hours is in the hands of the employee.

Back when Joe hired out, the HOS law was much different.  Total legal time On Duty was 16 hours. The 8 hours between register off and mark up where the 8 hours of rest, despite having been called 6 hours after the register off.

Outside of having T&E employees working 8 to 5 with a hour for lunch - there is no perfect way to protect the service requirements of the transportation public.

 

Instead of getting snippy,  try reading Joe's post about hours as a younger worker.  I think the T&E folks know more about their work conditions than you. 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, January 5, 2020 9:49 PM

charlie hebdo
 
BaltACD 
charlie hebdo
Either it is that way or not.  Seems there are different opinions when it should be a fact.  In any case,  if guys are only getting six hours of sleep weeks at a time, itenot only a hard life,  it's unsafe.  Hence collisions such as discussed here with the crew asleep.  

What part of 10 hours UNDISTURBED rest before being available for the next call are you overlooking.  What happens during those 10+ hours is in the hands of the employee.

Back when Joe hired out, the HOS law was much different.  Total legal time On Duty was 16 hours. The 8 hours between register off and mark up where the 8 hours of rest, despite having been called 6 hours after the register off.

Outside of having T&E employees working 8 to 5 with a hour for lunch - there is no perfect way to protect the service requirements of the transportation public. 

Instead of getting snippy,  try reading Joe's post about hours as a younger worker.  I think the T&E folks know more about their work conditions than you. 

Snipper.  You forget - I dictated when crews got called.  I have heard every excuse real and imagined for the last 26 years I worked,  T&E service is not a easy life for anyone involved in it, the employee or their family.  There is no way just telling someone what 'the life is' can adequately describe it - you tell people what the life is and they think, "I got it".  Until they experience it, first hand and in real time they don't have a clue; once they get that clue, many leave for other forms of employment and more power to them - they know what they are made of and it is not of railroad mettle.  Railroading is not a easy life.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, January 5, 2020 9:53 PM

BaltACD

 

 
Lithonia Operator
Yes, both of those are bad policies.

I agree wholeheartedly about the effectiveness of having people work on short rest. Hospitals do this with medical residents also. I'm sure we don't even want to know about a lot of things done by bleary-eyed/brained doctors. Humans need rest.

 

Trainees are not being called on 'short rest'.  HOS rest requirements apply to all employees in T&E service, those working and those training.  Where a trainee would get separated from a trainer is where when the trainer marks off his position on the board is, say, 5 times out - ie. 4 other turns will be called before the trainer.  If the trainee marks off and is head out, he will get called on the next available train after he has acrewed the required rest - that could be with his 'trainer' or any other one in the pool.

Currently crews involved in freight T&E service are required to have 10 hours UNDISTRUBED rest.  They cannot be called by the callers until 10 hours 1 minute from their last registered OFF time.

 

That phone can be ringing at 10 hours exactly.  For example, I tied up at 1600 hrs (4pm) this afternoon.  At 0200 (2am) my phone can be ringing to be on duty at 0330 or 0400 depending if I'm at home or away from home.  Sometimes it happens. sometimes it doesn't.  More likely when away from home for me.

Jeff

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, January 5, 2020 10:02 PM

jeffhergert
 
BaltACD 
Lithonia Operator
Yes, both of those are bad policies.

I agree wholeheartedly about the effectiveness of having people work on short rest. Hospitals do this with medical residents also. I'm sure we don't even want to know about a lot of things done by bleary-eyed/brained doctors. Humans need rest.

 

Trainees are not being called on 'short rest'.  HOS rest requirements apply to all employees in T&E service, those working and those training.  Where a trainee would get separated from a trainer is where when the trainer marks off his position on the board is, say, 5 times out - ie. 4 other turns will be called before the trainer.  If the trainee marks off and is head out, he will get called on the next available train after he has acrewed the required rest - that could be with his 'trainer' or any other one in the pool.

Currently crews involved in freight T&E service are required to have 10 hours UNDISTRUBED rest.  They cannot be called by the callers until 10 hours 1 minute from their last registered OFF time. 

That phone can be ringing at 10 hours exactly.  For example, I tied up at 1600 hrs (4pm) this afternoon.  At 0200 (2am) my phone can be ringing to be on duty at 0330 or 0400 depending if I'm at home or away from home.  Sometimes it happens. sometimes it doesn't.  More likely when away from home for me.

Jeff

With the automation that has been put in to crew calling function - the exact 10 hour call is more likely.  When a caller actually had to dial the call, it generally took the extra minute.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Sunday, January 5, 2020 10:32 PM

It's not just about the work conditions  for crews,  it is also about safety, which suffers. You may know all about dispatching but not about neuroscience.   Crews falling asleep and running into the rear of other trains is one fatal consequence.  Clearly the work conditions should be studied and people with the applicable knowledge and creativity can find a better system. It's not going to come from within an industry that has a "this is the way we have always done it" attitude as Oltmann calls it. He ought to know. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, January 6, 2020 7:24 AM

charlie hebdo
Crews falling asleep and running into the rear of other trains is one fatal consequence. 

Fatigue has become a watchword in the world of HOS.  But they still haven't figured out circadian rhythms...

And that's been one of the major bugaboos - If you work an eight hour day, even ten hours of uninterrupted rest means you could be back on duty in, say, twelve hours, for a twenty hour turnaround.  Several days of that turns your day upside down, and even the mandatory longer rest that will intervene isn't enough to allow for recovery before your start it again.

There are numerous variables in the HOS rules - most of which do little to ensure truly well-rested crews. 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Monday, January 6, 2020 7:29 AM

Maybe consider longer shifts with longer down time.  For example,  10 hrs on X4 days/wk or even 13 X3?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, January 6, 2020 7:43 AM

One problem is the variability of the shifts.  As was discussed previously, a day's work might be determined by either the clock, or by mileage.  One day a person could work 12 hours due to traffic or other factors, and the next day just four or five because they caught a nice through freight with no mitigating issues.  

Ideally, it would be a 9-5 world, but that just doesn't happen in railroading.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Monday, January 6, 2020 9:49 AM

tree68
 
charlie hebdo
Crews falling asleep and running into the rear of other trains is one fatal consequence. 

 

Fatigue has become a watchword in the world of HOS.  But they still haven't figured out circadian rhythms... 

That is my understanding too.  Twenty or thirty years ago, it was believed that the tiredness symptom from night work was simply due to not getting enough sleep during the day.  It made sense because it is hard to sleep well when the rest of the world is up and doing things.  And if you have errands to run, they have to be run in the day when stores are open.

But now they have found that the problem of tiredness comes from interrupting the circadian rhythm, and simply getting more sleep during the day won’t solve the problem.  This is called Shift work sleep disorder (SWSD).

The only solution is to either be a person who naturally does not succumb to SWSD or to not work nights.  This requires extensive testing to find the people who are susceptible to SWSD or not susceptible to it.  And then those who are found susceptible are either successfully treated or taken out of any service deemed to be a danger if performed by those with SWSD.

Recently, widespread employee testing has been proposed as the starting point for solving the railroad fatigue problem.  But this is highly contentious because it threatens employees with possible job loss.  Testing for SWSD has been debated at a very high level, and so far, it has been rejected.  But the problem as defined as being SWSD has the industry boxed in to the testing as being the essential remedy.  If testing is rejected, how to you solve the problem?  

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, January 6, 2020 3:18 PM

tree68
 
charlie hebdo
Crews falling asleep and running into the rear of other trains is one fatal consequence.  

Fatigue has become a watchword in the world of HOS.  But they still haven't figured out circadian rhythms...

And that's been one of the major bugaboos - If you work an eight hour day, even ten hours of uninterrupted rest means you could be back on duty in, say, twelve hours, for a twenty hour turnaround.  Several days of that turns your day upside down, and even the mandatory longer rest that will intervene isn't enough to allow for recovery before your start it again.

There are numerous variables in the HOS rules - most of which do little to ensure truly well-rested crews. 

When shippers regulate their shipping needs based on circadian rhythms, so will the railroads.

The 'other side' of the rest question that no one wants to talk about - how much less do employees earn because of the increased required rest.  The modification that was made to the HOS laws in 2015 or thereabouts with the changed rest requirements of the 10 hours undisturbed rest and some other limitations on maximum hours in a 7 day period and so called limbo time had the effect of decreasing the earning POTENTIAL by about 27% from the way things were before the latest changes.

Remember T&E employees work for money, not prestige.  Prestige doen't pay the family bills.  In fact, outside the Board Room, most all railroad employees, rank and file and Officials, work for money not prestige.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, January 12, 2020 3:21 PM

BaltACD
The modification that was made to the HOS laws in 2015 or thereabouts with the changed rest requirements of the 10 hours undisturbed rest and some other limitations on maximum hours in a 7 day period and so called limbo time had the effect of decreasing the earning POTENTIAL by about 27% from the way things were before the latest changes. Remember T&E employees work for money, not prestige. Prestige doen't pay the family bills. In fact, outside the Board Room, most all railroad employees, rank and file and Officials, work for money not prestige.

I've worked with a lot of people in a couple of terminals, and I can count with the fingers of one hand, how many people preffered the old way.  Most of them are people up to their eyeballs in debt.  That 6 for 8 stuff was rough.   Hardly anyone misses it (me included).

Money can be nice, but a lot of people don't want to spend their entire lives out here, either.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Sunday, January 12, 2020 3:43 PM

zugmann

 

 
BaltACD
The modification that was made to the HOS laws in 2015 or thereabouts with the changed rest requirements of the 10 hours undisturbed rest and some other limitations on maximum hours in a 7 day period and so called limbo time had the effect of decreasing the earning POTENTIAL by about 27% from the way things were before the latest changes. Remember T&E employees work for money, not prestige. Prestige doen't pay the family bills. In fact, outside the Board Room, most all railroad employees, rank and file and Officials, work for money not prestige.

 

I've worked with a lot of people in a couple of terminals, and I can count with the fingers of one hand, how many people preffered the old way.  Most of them are people up to their eyeballs in debt.  That 6 for 8 stuff was rough.   Hardly anyone misses it (me included).

Money can be nice, but a lot of people don't want to spend their entire lives out here, either.

 

A generational difference in values and lifestyles not limited to railroad employees, BTW. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy