Trains.com

Oil Trains & Lag Screws

27526 views
426 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Saturday, June 4, 2016 3:59 PM

Euclid

The train must not have been equipped with the new ECP brake systems called for in the recent mandate. 

 

 

And?

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, June 4, 2016 1:46 PM

Euclid

The train must not have been equipped with the new ECP brake systems called for in the recent mandate.

The Red Herring surfaces again.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, June 4, 2016 1:43 PM

schlimm

It sounds like he is saying it's no big deal.  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3625325/The-Latest-Fire-evacuation-remains-derailment.html

the tank cars that derailed were newer model CPC-1232s

 

Got it in one.  As an aircraft type (combat aircraft) the big difference is the greater duration of the fire when heavy oil is involved.  At least the responders don't have to worry about four Mk82s and a Vulcan-load of 20mm ammunition.

During this same time frame we lost a Blue Angels FA18 and pilot, plus a Thunderbird F16 with a successful ejection.  The Thunderbird didn't burn, the Blue Angel did.

I've also seen an 8,000 gallon fuel trailer erupt like Mount St Helens when it lost a right-of-way argument to a train at a grade crossing.  The USAF driver thought the ground man was signalling him to cross, when in fact that Nihon Kokutetsu employee was signaling for the steam loco on the far end of the cut to come ahead...

Big, nasty-looking fires that are contained are no big thing.  I learned how to fight shipboard oil fires as a cadet.  OTOH, a wildfire fueled by dry grass and brush, blown along by the usual desert wind...

Chuck (desert dwelling ex Merchant Marine cadet)

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, June 4, 2016 1:16 PM

The train must not have been equipped with the new ECP brake systems called for in the recent mandate. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, June 4, 2016 1:10 PM

It sounds like he is saying it's no big deal.  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3625325/The-Latest-Fire-evacuation-remains-derailment.html

the tank cars that derailed were newer model CPC-1232s

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Saturday, June 4, 2016 12:23 PM

No offense chuck, don't understand what your trying to say.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, June 3, 2016 11:23 PM

Big fire, big mess - no injuries reported.  Just saw the report on local TV news.

So now all the anti-big oil folks will drive in from near and far to protest.  In the process, they'll probably burn more petroleum than the fire.  Meanwhile, how many fuel and hazmat rubber-wheelers will be involved in accidents today...

Chuck

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Oil Trains & Lag Screws
Posted by Euclid on Friday, June 3, 2016 6:31 PM

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy