Trains.com

Canadian Pacific Norfolk Southern Merger

42333 views
557 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Monday, November 9, 2015 7:08 PM

ChessieCat123

Control of a major piece of national infrastucture by a foreign corperation that is essentional to our national defence does not sit well with many people.

 

 

And the old IC, GTW and Soo are not "essentional to our national defense"?  A ridiculous argument.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, November 9, 2015 6:22 PM

I'll believe it when I hear someone from CP or NS  announce it. "Unidentified sources" sounds too much like the custodian at CP HQ may have overheard somethng and whispered it to a rookie reporter..  

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Brooklyn Center, MN.
  • 702 posts
Posted by Los Angeles Rams Guy on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:45 PM

I, too, think NS would be a much better choice as opposed to CSXT.  At the same time, however, I have a feeling that this is all merely a sideshow without substance; hiding the "real" talks that are going on.

"Beating 'SC is not a matter of life or death. It's more important than that." Former UCLA Head Football Coach Red Sanders
  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Minneapolis, MN
  • 9 posts
Posted by PaulN2719 on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:44 PM

As far as I am concerned, CP has totally screwed up the Soo Line and especially the DM&E.  The only way this works is if NS people are in charge.  But if EHH is in charge, heaven help us.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:37 PM

ROBERT WILLISON

Is cp still run by hunter Harrison? If so he shut down cp steam program in 2013 and was then very critical of ns program.

Hunter is on his last legs age wise and won't be in the job of CEO much longer hence I think he wants his legacy to be the guy that finished the transnational railroad merger wave which started back when KCS and UP bid over Mexico's railways.

As for the choice.   I think NS is a much stronger partner for CP than CSX would have been.   CSX would be a better pairing for BNSF or UP.     I don't think UP is even interested in a another merger with it's Mexican holdings.     So the question is will BNSF attempt a purchase of CSX?    CSX keeps repurchasing it's stock trying to get the valuation up for some reason........so maybe CSX is not interested in a merger with a Western railway?

Maybe after this merger wave some visionary will finally connect the Alaska railroad with the rest of the continent and possibly extend the standard gauge systems Southward through Guatamala into South America???

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:27 PM

Is cp still run by hunter Harrison? If so he shut down cp steam program in 2013 and was then very critical of ns program.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:16 PM

Maybe the merger is good, maybe not, but it seems sad to have the NS  (and all its predecessor lines) taken over by a foreign railroad.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,199 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:13 PM

It's certainly doable but CP better bring lots and lots and lots of cash, eh?

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:12 PM

Last I heard, not going to happen.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:05 PM

Norm48327

 

 
schlimm
Can't you read? Both articles are clear, but CNBC either typoed or erroniously put 'United' for 'Union', obviously.

 

So is mud somedays. Wink There are time we have to wonder what they really meant. It's pervasive in the media to use wrong words. One local TV station's web site constantly says "Person killed after house fire." Oh! Did they drag him out and shoot him? Their command of the English Language leaves something to be desired. [That from a guy who is NOT an English major.]

 

Oh come on, Norm.   The reason Streak said that was not because he cannot read or lacks the minimal familiarity with the subject to mentally correct the typo or whatever error.  He posted that because in some quarters it is de rigueur to poke (fun or in the eye?) the hated media.  Had it been in Fox, I wonder if he would?

Try reading papers of otherwise good students, who often say, someone "defiantly" chose X when they mean "definitely" of course.  Even worse is to have to repeatedly see "the dinning car" or "the dinner" instead of Dining and Diner from posters on here and not say anything.  We can assume they are not complaining of excessive noise levels.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Mobile Alabama
  • 694 posts
Posted by carknocker1 on Monday, November 9, 2015 5:03 PM
If it happens I hope they don't screw up the NS . They are so well run and classy I would hate to see it fall apart . I am not real familiar with the CP .
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Monday, November 9, 2015 4:50 PM

Well, let's get to the really important stuff - hopefully 611 can run on Buckingham Branch.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Monday, November 9, 2015 3:58 PM

schlimm
Can't you read? Both articles are clear, but CNBC either typoed or erroniously put 'United' for 'Union', obviously.

So is mud somedays. Wink There are time we have to wonder what they really meant. It's pervasive in the media to use wrong words. One local TV station's web site constantly says "Person killed after house fire." Oh! Did they drag him out and shoot him? Their command of the English Language leaves something to be desired. [That from a guy who is NOT an English major.]

Norm


  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, November 9, 2015 3:33 PM

blue streak 1

cnbc really goofed up read short article and tell me what United Pacific railroad is.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/09/norfolk-southern-canadian-pacific-shares-jump-amid-deal-report.html

 

 

 

What else do you expect from the person writing about railraods?

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, November 9, 2015 3:04 PM

Can't you read?  Both articles are clear, but CNBC either typoed or erroniously put 'United' for 'Union', obviously.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, November 9, 2015 2:48 PM

cnbc really goofed up read short article and tell me what United Pacific railroad is.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/09/norfolk-southern-canadian-pacific-shares-jump-amid-deal-report.html

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Canadian Pacific Norfolk Southern Merger
Posted by Victrola1 on Monday, November 9, 2015 2:20 PM

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., the second-biggest railroad in Canada, is exploring a takeover of U.S. carrier Norfolk Southern Corp. in a fresh attempt to consolidate the North American industry, according to people familiar with the matter.  

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-09/canadian-pacific-said-to-explore-takeover-of-norfolk-southern

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy