Trains.com

Semi-official Rochelle webcam discussion thread

373228 views
3712 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Tuesday, February 5, 2019 7:41 PM

If it was, they weren't actively working the rails, as there were no sparks flying.  Unfortunately I didn't have the sound up at the time.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: Muskogee Oklahoma
  • 185 posts
Posted by MKT Dave on Friday, March 22, 2019 4:20 PM

Just caught AMTRAK through Rochelle, crossed the diamonds at 16.14, Cans from Global 3 was on track 2, so just caught a glimpse of the lead engine UP, and AMTRAk behind it. Only picture I got with snipper.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/15158681@N00/46529030575/in/dateposted-public/

...
  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: Muskogee Oklahoma
  • 185 posts
Posted by MKT Dave on Friday, March 22, 2019 4:24 PM

Trains, can't get my photo to post, it's there before I submitted, but it doesn't come through after that.

...
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Friday, March 22, 2019 8:41 PM

Nice catch!!!

 

rochelle 03221641

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:36 AM

Question re a scenario occurring currently, as viewed from the camera and via ATCS- why would a mixed manifest be entering Global III?

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Sunday, March 24, 2019 4:05 PM

Did anyone else just see THAT!?!

A unit train of short white covered hoppers just cleared the diamonds WB at 1557 CDT, on the near UP track.

There were two BNSF units and a CSX unit on the point. THERE WAS NO UP LEADER. How is such a thing even possible? There were two more BNSF units bringing up the rear.

This flooding is causing all kinds of mayhem.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Sunday, March 24, 2019 4:18 PM

OS Rochelle.

Passenger Extra UP Engine ???? WB by at 1616 CDT.

BWM

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Sunday, March 24, 2019 4:28 PM

Read up on the other flood-related threads, Bruce- they will explain all.

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Sunday, March 24, 2019 4:37 PM

Thanks for the heads-up, I will get on that.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Sunday, March 24, 2019 7:55 PM

Why does Trains try to get me to subscribe when I go to the Rochelle webcam ... a site I can only reach because I am a subscriber?  What a waste!

They might at least advertise subscriptions to Classic Trains or Model Railroader.  (Of course, I already subscribe to both of those, too.)

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, March 24, 2019 9:09 PM

cefinkjr

Why does Trains try to get me to subscribe when I go to the Rochelle webcam ... a site I can only reach because I am a subscriber?  What a waste!

They might at least advertise subscriptions to Classic Trains or Model Railroader.  (Of course, I already subscribe to both of those, too.)

 

Chuck, the powers that be do strange things; indeed. I do not understand it either.. I can see presenting advertisements for this product or that product, but asking one who MUST already be a subscriber to subscribe again is truly strange.

Johnny

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Sunday, March 24, 2019 10:12 PM

You do not have to subscribe to the magazines to get access to the Rochelle webcam... you just have to be a member of the forum.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Monday, March 25, 2019 2:01 PM

This flood detouring is creating all kinds of new situations.

At about 1335 CDT three big BNSF six axle units pulled a train of short white covered hoppers west into the spur line heading toward the UP line. There was someone on the ground checking things out before he headed into the spur, and then he left in a SUV in a hurry, presumably down to the crossing just west of the trees. The train stopped again at that point for a minute or so and then started up again.

Now he has pulled farther in and as of 1401 is stopped again. The back of the train still on the BNSF mainline, and still blocking the crossing.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Monday, March 25, 2019 3:00 PM

Well, we may have just had our first Distributed Power train over the spur.

Two DPU's on the back end just cleared the switch and headed out of sight at 1458.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, March 25, 2019 4:02 PM

Watched a WB BNSF stack train.  Train had a number of Hyundai mechanical refrigerated containers.  I am wondering what size fuel tank they have and how long that fuel tank is expected to keep the refrigeration unit operating?  Between ocean and rail transportation I would expect the transit times in some cases to up to a month in duration.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Monday, March 25, 2019 4:23 PM

Caught westbound Zephyr going through...

Amtrak WB Through Rochelle

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Monday, March 25, 2019 4:47 PM

BaltACD

Watched a WB BNSF stack train.  Train had a number of Hyundai mechanical refrigerated containers.  I am wondering what size fuel tank they have and how long that fuel tank is expected to keep the refrigeration unit operating?  Between ocean and rail transportation I would expect the transit times in some cases to up to a month in duration.

 

 

Watched a show where they plugged in the units while on the ship. 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Texas
  • 5 posts
Posted by IC Dispatcher on Friday, April 5, 2019 10:55 AM

I was wondering if the interlocking plant at Rochelle is remote controlled by either railroad or just approach controlled (first come first served automatically).

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Texas
  • 5 posts
Posted by IC Dispatcher on Saturday, April 6, 2019 8:02 AM

Sent you a msg a few mins ago, but don't know if it went anywhere, so, I'll just wait for a replay and check back later.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Saturday, April 6, 2019 12:03 PM

It's automatic. 

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Texas
  • 5 posts
Posted by IC Dispatcher on Saturday, April 6, 2019 12:24 PM

traisessive1

It's automatic. 

 

 

Thank you so much for the reply. I've been watching the webcam for better than a year, but never knew how to participate in the discussions until lately. As a matter of fact you're my first discussion. How are the tracks designated; which are E-W or N-S?

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Sunday, April 7, 2019 1:18 PM

IC Dispatcher
How are the tracks designated; which are E-W or N-S?

I believe both roads' trackage at this point are E-W (by timetable, if not by compass) and are numbered conventionally.  That is, the EB tracks are #2 and the WB are #1.

Notice I said, "I believe".  Someone with more definite knowledge may want to correct me on this.

And, BTW, Welcome to the forum.

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, April 7, 2019 8:07 PM

Please forget Eastbound and Westbound tracks at this point.  Both lines have Centralized Traffic Control; directional operation is, for all intents and purposes, meaningless.

On the UP, pairs of tracks running east-west are numbered north-south.  Thus the track farther from the camera is Track 1.  I'm pretty sure the same holds for BNSF [meaning that the near track is Track 1]; if not; expect to see a correction soon.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Sunday, April 7, 2019 8:09 PM

Both tracks on both railroads are bi-directional- from the camera vantage point, the right track on either RR is #1 and the left track is #2.

EDIT: Oops, didn't see Carl's reply.  Got it right, though... Geeked

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, April 7, 2019 9:17 PM

Once you get outside Rochelle, BNSF is single track - the double track through the diamond is essentially part of a long passing siding.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Monday, April 8, 2019 7:45 AM

Looks like you'll be able to hear it before you see it this morning... Blindfold

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, April 8, 2019 11:58 AM

CShaveRR

Please forget Eastbound and Westbound tracks at this point.  Both lines have Centralized Traffic Control; directional operation is, for all intents and purposes, meaningless.

On the UP, pairs of tracks running east-west are numbered north-south.  Thus the track farther from the camera is Track 1.  I'm pretty sure the same holds for BNSF [meaning that the near track is Track 1]; if not; expect to see a correction soon.

 

Both roads are governed by GCOR. Just like Carl said, on east/west subdivisions the northernmost track is #1.

If the UP line was still current of track/directional traffic, #1 would've been the eastbound main here.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, April 8, 2019 1:45 PM

jeffhergert
 
CShaveRR

Please forget Eastbound and Westbound tracks at this point.  Both lines have Centralized Traffic Control; directional operation is, for all intents and purposes, meaningless.

On the UP, pairs of tracks running east-west are numbered north-south.  Thus the track farther from the camera is Track 1.  I'm pretty sure the same holds for BNSF [meaning that the near track is Track 1]; if not; expect to see a correction soon. 

Both roads are governed by GCOR. Just like Carl said, on east/west subdivisions the northernmost track is #1.

If the UP line was still current of track/directional traffic, #1 would've been the eastbound main here.

Jeff 

While the tracks are bi-directional now - the customer sidings and leads were installed (for the most part) when the tracks were operated with current of traffic signalling systems - with this being the case, line of road locals and road switchers that serve these customers must be on the proper track.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Monday, April 8, 2019 4:49 PM

BaltACD
 
jeffhergert
 
CShaveRR

Please forget Eastbound and Westbound tracks at this point.  Both lines have Centralized Traffic Control; directional operation is, for all intents and purposes, meaningless.

On the UP, pairs of tracks running east-west are numbered north-south.  Thus the track farther from the camera is Track 1.  I'm pretty sure the same holds for BNSF [meaning that the near track is Track 1]; if not; expect to see a correction soon. 

Both roads are governed by GCOR. Just like Carl said, on east/west subdivisions the northernmost track is #1.

If the UP line was still current of track/directional traffic, #1 would've been the eastbound main here.

Jeff 

 

While the tracks are bi-directional now - the customer sidings and leads were installed (for the most part) when the tracks were operated with current of traffic signalling systems - with this being the case, line of road locals and road switchers that serve these customers must be on the proper track.

 

And Track 2, nearer the webcam, would have been (and is still typically) eastbound with Track 1, further from the webcam westbound . . . which is what I said in the first place.

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: Muskogee Oklahoma
  • 185 posts
Posted by MKT Dave on Monday, April 8, 2019 6:13 PM

google earth did these photos in 2007, it shows tracks 1 UP, joined with track 1 BNSF, anyone know when it was removed?  last photo shows the track starting to merge with the BNSF.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/15158681@N00/46652316065/in/dateposted-public/  https://www.flickr.com/photos/15158681@N00/46652315965/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/15158681@N00/40601824173/in/dateposted-public/

I'll let the photo's speak for themselves, clearly marked OCT 2007,

...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy