Trains.com

Off topic (maybe not?) Introverts

4999 views
72 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Off topic (maybe not?) Introverts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:45 PM

     Stick with me for a moment.  There's a 57% chance you'll see the relevence.

     I'm reading a book Introvert Power by Laurie Helgoe, PhD.  The mor I read, the more this forum comes into focus.

     She suggests, that the internet is the perfect medium for (us) introverts.  See if any of this sounds familiar:

We can read and write rather than talk.

We can more comfortably network with people who share our interests and ideas.

We can take the time to think about something, before having to reply.

We can determine our own comfort zone, and come and go as we please.

We are not afraid to simply observe.

We like to read.  We like things that take us away to somewhere else,
like romance novels, science fiction, trains, WW I battleships. (<OK just me.)

We like our get-away time, to peruse something away from the hustle & bustle. 
Trains, for example.

We can find ourselves deeply involved in things others may find trivial.
(See any thread about tractive effort, for example.)

We're known to have a dry/odd/weird sense of humor.  Maybe we ponder too much.

We make up 57% of the population of North America.

Can anybody relate to this?

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:53 PM

I dunno.  I feel I am more extroverted and would be out working or actually riding trains if time and money permitted...and doing it with friends, not by myself.  And I feel that the internet broadens by base of access to information and communicating with people from different places and not just inthe neighborhood.  That being said, I see where she is coming from and she may be pretty much on target.

Years ago a friend explained the difference between modelers and other railfans in about the same terminoligy.  Modelers, he explained,  shunned society, weren't social too much, were more introverted into thier own train rooms, less athletic and cometitive than those of us who grouped together in the outdoors to chase trains and take pictures and socialize in groups at meetings, etc.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 1:06 PM
I have friends that basically spend all their time on a computer.  I don't know if that makes them introverts or not.  I proudly am not. Even when I am online, I am out because I have to go to a library and get a computer.  But I don't always mind, it is how I relax during or at the end of the day.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 1:32 PM

I would peg myself around 70% introverted. While I don't mind large groups or crowds, I do enjoy spending time by myself and with a few close friends. Many of my hobbies are introverted (photography, railfanning, and model railroading) although I would not call myself a social recluse and do enjoy spending time with other people, although smaller groups are always preferred.

When railfanning, I'm always by myself, camera in hand, standing next to camcorder on tripod...

To your original observations on internet communications, I agree completely. I always prefer email over other forms of conversation, because I'm confident in my writing skills and feel that I can express myself well and have time to organize my thoughts. And yes, I do enjoy reading and getting away from it all for a while. Whenever I go somewhere and get back by day, within a few minutes I'll be here, checking out the latest in railroading news and whetting my appetite for railroad-related material.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 2:20 PM

Murphy Siding

    We can read and write rather than talk.

I believe you excell at all three.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,008 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 2:34 PM

Gee, you want me to autograph that biography?  Cool

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • 85 posts
Posted by WSORatSussex on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 2:53 PM

Besides everything else said, you can stop listening (with your eyes) with just a mouse click!

Ed

Regards, Ed
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 2:56 PM

spokyone

Murphy Siding

    We can read and write rather than talk.

I believe you excell at all three.

  I fake it well.  I'm in sales, afterall! Wink

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 3:03 PM

Thumbs Up  Blush  Smile,Wink, & Grin 

Hey Murphy - How'd you get that out of my personnel file ?!?

You keep reading stuff like that, we'll have to throw you outta here !!!

Actually, you beat me to it - that's a thread topic I've had in mind for a while.  Except that I was going to frame it around the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ("MBTI") or "personality type", which is based on the following 4 scales and dichotomies (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator ):

Extraversion   <====>      Introversion     (E or/ vs.  I)

Sensing         <====>      INtuition         (S or/ vs.  N)

Thinking        <====>       Feeling          (T or/ vs.  F)

Judging         <====>       Perceiving     (J or/ vs.  P)

My wife and her study group prefers to analyze such things with the "9 types" of the "Enneagram of Personality".  See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enneagram_of_Personality and http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/ and http://www.9types.com , etc.  

Then there's always horoscopes, ouija boards, voodoo, . . .

- Paul North. (an MBTI "INTJ" - 2.1 %). 

 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 3:41 PM

Paul_D_North_Jr

Thumbs Up  Blush  Smile,Wink, & Grin 

Hey Murphy - How'd you get that out of my personnel file ?!?

You keep reading stuff like that, we'll have to throw you outta here !!!

Actually, you beat me to it - that's a thread topic I've had in mind for a while.  Except that I was going to frame it around the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ("MBTI") or "personality type", which is based on the following 4 scales and dichotomies (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator ):

Extraversion   <====>      Introversion     (E or/ vs.  I)

Sensing         <====>      INtuition         (S or/ vs.  N)

Thinking        <====>       Feeling          (T or/ vs.  F)

Judging         <====>       Perceiving     (J or/ vs.  P)

 

- Paul North. (an MBTI "INTJ" - 2.1 %). 

 

Laugh  Been there.  I'll have to check back into that book, and see what my MBTI is.  I think it's INTJ as well.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 3:43 PM

I contributed to another forum (a recent start-up modeling forum) on the question, "Does your layout reflect your personality?".  This was my first reply:

"I don't know that I can adequately answer the question. The most robust personality theory is called the "Trait Theory" and has been refined in recent years to what we call the "Big Five" traits (conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness). I guess an observer would point out parts of my layout that indicate a root in any one of these. I don't know that conscientiousness applies to me greatly because I frotolance (not much fidelity there!). I don't have to agree with a single person about my layout, except for She Who Must be Obeyed (what else is new.) I am an introvert mostly, and have to work at appearing to be extraverted. My introversion suits me nicely because I can be, as always, my own best friend (does that sound pathetic? I have never thought so...I am a very healthy and contented soul who can be alone for extended periods.). I would have to say that I am not at all neurotic. I have been a successful leader, soldier, teacher, husband, and father to three grown daughters. I really can't think of a way that my neuroticism or lack of it could be reflected in my layout, unless the roundy-round style of my folded loop speaks volumes."

When several responders seemed enthusiastic with that, I added the following to one of their observations that he had wondered if he was weird:


" I am happy to hear that both of you can relate.

Larry, I would say, from my numerous encounters with him here and on a couple other forums, would rank high on agreeableness. I don't know that my critics on MR forums would apply that label to me, but I am pretty sure my success as a teacher and counsellor lends some currency for its application to me. My now grown daughters would probably have mixed feelings. I was demanding and often strict, but I was also a good dad who now enjoys a wonderful rapport with the grown girls.

Also, I think retirement "does things" to people. One thing that modern personality theorists seem to agree on is that the manifestations of traits are highly responsive to situational variables. Changing circumstances will very often lead to a change in orientation in people. It kind of calls into question how robust or fixed, or strong, traits really are!"

The last statement is very important.  Context specificity governs much of what we do.  For example. it has been popular in business and in government to introduce and try to give currency to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) as a way to help people fit into the workplace.  Unfortunately, the MBTI is a very weak predictor of success in the workplace.  In my field of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, there are better ways of predicting success.  The best predictors still seem to be overal innate intelligence and formal learning.   The strongest is simply motivation, and motivation is highly sensitive to changes in circumstances.

-Crandell

P.S. - My "preference" is hard INTJ.  I think we are noted for eating our young.

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • 196 posts
Posted by john_edwards on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 4:29 PM

 Well I'm 64 years old so I don't have to worry about all that personalitySmile,Wink, & Grin crap anymore.  Don't need a job, don't want a job.  Humbug to all of you Laugh

 

John

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 4:43 PM

Oh, yeah?   Well..........

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:05 PM

This seems like a good point to note that one other personality aspect I intended to suggest adding to Murphy Siding's list above is: 

A preference for avoiding conflict - not necessarily debate, but hostile, angry conflict. 

Also - I agree with selector's comments about a personality as being relative to the specific context, enviroment, setting, or culture in which it is being observed or tested.  We can't all always be in the place we like and feel secure in - and when we're in those other places, and are being pushed and stressed and neither the support nor the refuge is there - then sometimes we take action that is inconsistent with our preferences - which can be "acceptable"or "unacceptable", depending on the circumstances.

Another thought just struck me (because it's one of my wife's ongoing crusades):  Is there any correlation between introversion as we're discussing it here, and autism or autistic tendencies (whatever that syndrome is called), which I understand is far more prevalent in males than females ?  Shock

SoapBox Or, is it instead that we're perfectly normal, and we just wish they'd go away and leave us alone ?  After all, we're guys (mostly), and accustomed to and genetically programmed* to work alone and quietly, etc. ?

* From "In Defense of the Caveman" - that's how our ancestors did the hunting thing with the big game to feed themselves and the clan - quiet to avoid spooking the quarry, independently so as to cover as much area as possible and to avoid having to coordinate by communication = noise, etc.  Go see the show or read the book or blog or whatever to find out why the women are equally well programmed to stay in groups and talk among themselves a lot - it all makes sense.

Hey Murphy - that book was written by a woman, right ?  Hmmmm . . . Whistling

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:09 PM

In my business life I spend virtually all of my time either speaking with customers or associates on the phone or in person and spend great amounts of time at business functions like meals, conferences, etc....and so I personally like to have as much "quiet time" when I am "off duty" so to speak, as possible and really like such modern technology such as caller ID on the phone, etc. so if I don't want to speak to somebody, I don't have to.  I don't think this makes me an introvert but rather someone who cherishes his private time, either with immediate family or alone if appropriate.  I like this forum communication method at times but also fully enjoy the company of fellow railfans when I am out and about engaged in our hobby.

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 5:31 PM

There's a quote to the effect of:  "If you don't like - or aren't comfortable - being alone with yourself - then what does that say about you ?" 

I may have mangled that quite a bit, but hopefuly you'll get the idea.

- PDN.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 9:00 PM
I usually prefer my own company. I work in a tower by myself, and, though I occasionally have students or visitors, I don't say too much when they're around. I definitely prefer to think about what I write/post; it will almost always be exactly what I wanted to say (and it will be spelled and punctuated correctly!).

I am devastatingly logical (just ask Pat!).

However, I do enjoy at least meeting others who frequent the Forum. I often say a lot less than Pat during these meetings--normal for me, no reflection on the other members. One of these meetings nearly proved to be my undoing...Pat wasn't around, and I found myself in the unusual role of doing most of the talking. The results were not good. Fortunately, I've since learned more about myself, what's "wrong" with me, what I should and should not do, whom I should avoid, and am satisfied to live within my own limitations.

Is retirement really going to change me that much? I hope not!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 9:37 PM

CShaveRR

 

I am devastatingly logical (just ask Pat!).

   Bingo!  One of my sons told me I was painfully logical.  Did we all marry extroverts?Smile

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 10:20 PM

Murphy Siding
Did we all marry extroverts?Smile

 

I wouldn't be surprised...

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: St. Paul, Minnesota
  • 2,116 posts
Posted by Boyd on Thursday, May 7, 2009 1:39 AM

I wonder what the percentage of people on here with Aspergers is? I've never been tested for it but both my doctor and therapist have thought I could have it. 

Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 7, 2009 6:10 AM

Paul_D_North_Jr

Extraversion   <====>      Introversion     (E or/ vs.  I)

Sensing         <====>      INtuition         (S or/ vs.  N)

Thinking        <====>       Feeling          (T or/ vs.  F)

Judging         <====>       Perceiving     (J or/ vs.  P)

I'm an ENTJ, boarderline between E and I, and heavy on the  T and J...

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2001
  • From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by SSW9389 on Thursday, May 7, 2009 6:30 AM

Paul, Thanks for posting this. My MBTI is ISTJ. I've taken the Myers-Briggs a couple of times with the Military. It came out the same both times. My E and I scores were identical and my J and P scores were pure J, not one P. In our class of military officers fully one quarter of the class were STJ and the instructor said that the STJ trait was common to many military officers. Maybe its the training. George Patton was said to be an ESTJ. Bottom line is that it takes all kinds.

Does this prove anything about being a railfan? I dunno, but will continue to study this thread.

 

Ed

 

COTTON BELT: Runs like a Blue Streak!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 319 posts
Posted by sanvtoman on Thursday, May 7, 2009 6:52 AM

When I railroaded I was in a tower or bridge so I was alone most of the time. When I watch trains I am alone or with my grand kids.  Train shows same thing, enjoy going but mind my own business.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Thursday, May 7, 2009 8:25 AM

For many years I was a disk jockey, locked up in a studio, alone, talking to a microphone. Later I go into sales and never wanted to back to the studio full time.  However, in sales I spend a lot of time in the car alone with face to face contact with clients in many different venues...its is more fun and enlightening than sitting in a sudio alone. 

My railfanning experiences have been similarly mixed.  As a kid, I found that prowling alone I got further than when with a group...met more railroaders, rode more engines, got in more towers.  But a group meeting was a lot of fun and I learned a lot.  As an adult I was a member of groups but found I was traveling on trains alone, especially when visiting the folks back in Jersey--simply nobody wanted to go with me.  But I found that inviting friends to join me on my jaunts was fun and gave us all an opportunity to ride and see a lot of NY Metropolitan area railroading.  We've done it regularly over the past ten years with two to five people. It has been so much fun and so successful as a railfan jaunt that in my retirement it has led to a chance for me to offer my services for such trip planning and escorting at a small fee to cover my expenses: it allows me to continue to do it, it exposes other railfans to much more railroading than they thought possible in an area they are unfamiliar with, and as a social event, it is a lot of fun for all.

So, my railfan experiences mirror my work experiences in that I have been both introverted and extroverted at various times.  And it always has been fun and rewarding.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, May 7, 2009 9:05 AM
Boyd

I wonder what the percentage of people on here with Aspergers is? I've never been tested for it but both my doctor and therapist have thought I could have it. 

Asperger's is a mild form of autism. A couple of years ago my sister hit me with her opinion that I had autism, and that was how she explained a lot of my childhood behaviors (she's a teacher of developmentally-disabled children, so she can spot behaviors). A counselor we'd used, when told of this, said she'd been thinking Asperger's. This diagnosis, according to some, even explains our tendencies toward the love of trains.

To say that I married an extrovert is putting it very mildly--thank Goodness!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, May 7, 2009 10:07 AM

Asperger's is what I meant in this portion of one of my posts from yesterday: 

"Another thought just struck me (because it's one of my wife's ongoing crusades):  Is there any correlation between introversion as we're discussing it here, and autism or autistic tendencies (whatever that syndrome is called), which I understand is far more prevalent in males than females ?  Shock "

From http://www.aspergers.com/ - "ASPERGER'S DISORDER HOMEPAGE":

 [emphasis added - PDN.]

 From the "What is Asperger's Disorder?" page at:

http://www.aspergers.com/aspclin.htm

"They usually have a circumscribed area of interest which usually leaves no space for more age appropriate, common interests. Some examples are cars, trains, French Literature, door knobs, hinges, cappucino, meteorology, astronomy or history."  

[ PDN's comment on this: Gee, thanks a lot !  Thumbs Down  Sigh ]

and from the "What is the epidemiology of Asperger's Disorder ?" page at:

http://www.aspergers.com/aspepi.htm 

"the male/female ratio was 4:1"  (based on a Swedish study).

From the last 2 paragraphs of the Wikipedia article, under "Cultural Aspects", at:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome 

[emphasis added for clarity, not necessarily advocacy - PDN].

"Autistic people have advocated a shift in perception of autism spectrum disorders as complex syndromes rather than diseases that must be cured. Proponents of this view reject the notion that there is an "ideal" brain configuration and that any deviation from the norm is pathological; they promote tolerance for what they call neurodiversity.[88] These views are the basis for the autistic rights and autistic pride movements.[89] There is a contrast between the attitude of adults with self-identified AS, who typically do not want to be cured and are proud of their identity, and parents of children with AS, who typically seek assistance and a cure for their children.[90]"

"Some researchers have argued that AS can be viewed as a different cognitive style, not a disorder or a disability.[7][91] In a 2002 paper, Simon Baron-Cohen wrote of those with AS, "In the social world there is no great benefit to a precise eye for detail, but in the worlds of math, computing, cataloguing, music, linguistics, engineering, and science, such an eye for detail can lead to success rather than failure." Baron-Cohen cited two reasons why it might still be useful to consider AS to be a disability: to ensure provision for legally required special support, and to recognize emotional difficulties from reduced empathy.[92] It has been argued that the genes for Asperger's combination of abilities have operated throughout recent human evolution and have made remarkable contributions to human history.[93]"

I think I heard Simon Baron-Cohen on a talk show about a year ago.  I might learn to like that guy !  Smile,Wink, & Grin

- Paul North.

 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Thursday, May 7, 2009 10:12 AM

CShaveRR
Boyd

I wonder what the percentage of people on here with Aspergers is? I've never been tested for it but both my doctor and therapist have thought I could have it. 

Asperger's is a mild form of autism. A couple of years ago my sister hit me with her opinion that I had autism, and that was how she explained a lot of my childhood behaviors (she's a teacher of developmentally-disabled children, so she can spot behaviors). A counselor we'd used, when told of this, said she'd been thinking Asperger's. This diagnosis, according to some, even explains our tendencies toward the love of trains.

 

To say that I married an extrovert is putting it very mildly--thank Goodness!

Carl, I have always been of the opinion that...as a society...we tend to try much too hard to categorize everything and everybody into one group or another, and we try very hard to explain away each and every action and behavior into a neat little category of its own.  Well, some things just "are what they are" and can't (and perhaps shouldn't) be explained as  they are simply part of the human behavioral experience.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, May 7, 2009 10:35 AM

There could be something to it, of course what about all the model railroad clubs?? There were more clubs in the past, when model railroading was primarily in O scale and you needed a big area to really get things rolling, but there still are a lot of clubs which have a lot of social contact, as may NMRA conventions, swap meets, railfan trips, etc.

It could be it reflects one aspect of our personalities too. I can see as a "lone wolf" modeller that it appeals to my introverted side, but then again I played sports thru college and still compete weekly in a bowling league. At the league, I'm sure I'm much more extroverted, joking around etc. than I am at other times like at work, or when I'm home working on the layout and just want to be left alone with the radio on. 

However I agree with the previous post that in general it's very tricky to get into "pop psychology" and make broad statements about people based on their interests, hobbies, etc. There was a book a few years ago where the author speculated that the reason so many model railroaders had beards was because the beard made them resemble the "face" of a steam engine, with the beard being the pilot (and I suppose the sideburns being the steps on either side of the smokebox) and their nose being the headlight etc.

Dunce

Stix
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, May 7, 2009 10:59 AM

That says more to me about the author's psychological state - Shock  -  than it does about the model railroaders.  Wonder what he saw in the Rorschach (sp ?) ink blot tests ? Scary stuff, man.

FWIW, I had a now-deceased uncle who was a well-regarded child psychiatrist.  I believe he did a lot of good for his patients - some of whom I understood had some really messed-up backgrounds - but his own life and that of his 4 now adult children as they were growing up and since then were far from normal, to put it nicely.  Someplace I read that dogs and cats are pretty good judges of personality - I'd put more faith in them than some of the so-called "experts".

- PDN.

P.S. - Most of my post-war Lionel train collection came from his eldest son, who lost interest in them and gave them up when he became a teenager.  Too bad for him . . .

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,008 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, May 7, 2009 11:07 AM

A former co-worker had studied psychology, psychiatry, or something (it's been a while).  He related that he had once in class listened to a recorded conversation between a psychiatrist and someone who was apparently certifiably insane.  He said it took several minutes to figure out which was which...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy