Trains.com

Saluda Grade to reopen?

238367 views
531 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, December 11, 2021 9:39 AM

Backshop
Maybe they've forgotten that it's there?Big Smile With workforce turnover and transfers, the number of people that remember its operation is probably a small percentage.

I would venture EVERYBODY that operated Saluda in the past has retired.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,631 posts
Posted by Backshop on Saturday, December 11, 2021 9:32 AM

Maybe they've forgotten that it's there?Big Smile With workforce turnover and transfers, the number of people that remember its operation is probably a small percentage.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, December 11, 2021 8:28 AM

ns145
 
dubch87

Two decades... pretty sure I read somewhere that the last freight ran on December 9, 2001.

And before anyone starts... it will never reopen. 

You gotta believe!

 

To date NS has not undertaken formal abandonment procedures and started to reclaim the track materials for scrap value.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • 351 posts
Posted by ns145 on Saturday, December 11, 2021 8:17 AM

dubch87

Two decades... pretty sure I read somewhere that the last freight ran on December 9, 2001.

And before anyone starts... it will never reopen.

You gotta believe!

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,631 posts
Posted by Backshop on Saturday, December 11, 2021 8:04 AM

MrBassman81

Any news on Saluda? I was up there a few weeks back & it's a sad sight. 

 

Like Tree and Sunnyland said, why run on a dangerous, slow, limited capacity route when you have other options.  The purpose of a railroad is to make money, not keep railfans entertained.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Raleigh, N.C.
  • 182 posts
Posted by dubch87 on Friday, December 10, 2021 8:17 PM

Two decades... pretty sure I read somewhere that the last freight ran on December 9, 2001.

And before anyone starts... it will never reopen.

   

  • Member since
    November 2021
  • 2 posts
Posted by MrBassman81 on Monday, November 8, 2021 7:26 PM

Any news on Saluda? I was up there a few weeks back & it's a sad sight. 

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 1,243 posts
Posted by Sunnyland on Friday, June 26, 2020 4:36 PM

I agree, tree 68, sounds like it was dangerous route and if they have an alternative, why not use it.  And some of today's employees are not up to the challengers that the old times did routinely.  A friend who is retired BNSF engineer, started with the Q, said it was time to retire  when the other guy in the cab learned how to drive a train on a simulator.  He had spent 3 years on the left side of cab learning how it all worked before he could even think about becoming an engineer. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, June 26, 2020 3:30 PM

Sunnyland
...I expect it will never see a train again. 

Back when Class 1's were the size of today's regionals, a railroad might be stuck using a route because it was the only one they had.  

I would opine that today's availability of other routes, on the same railroad, diminishes that need.  That they haven't run traffic over the line in almost 20 years tends to confirm such a conclusion.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 1,243 posts
Posted by Sunnyland on Friday, June 26, 2020 2:19 PM

i was in Saluda with friends in 2016 and no signs of anything being done. The tracks are still there but the signal lights at crossing have been covered.  Did not look bad there, but things I have read about the Grade and pics I have seen, I do not ever expect railroading to come back there. Looked like a brutal ROW and if they do need it for some unknown reason, I expect it will never see a train again. 

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:11 AM

thanks;  this gives us some idea

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:02 AM

blue streak 1

How did the passenger trains operate on the grade ?  Did the F units have dynamic brakes ?  Those were not very efficient ?  How many  F units and many passenger cars ?

 

I wish I could give you a full report on the train that I rode down from Asheville to Hayne and the one I rode back to Asheville in 1964, but I did not make notes on the equipment. I would say that there were two engines, an RPO, a baggage car, at least two coaches, and a 10-6 Pullman. I, a coach passenger, was sitting in a roomette talking with the conductor and the flagman as we went down slowly. Going back up was quite different, for a weed killer train had just come down, and the rails were wet--and our sanders were not working well. I had a round trip ticket to Spartanburg, but the conductor, knowing that I was going right back, recommended that I get off at Hayne, where the crews changed, so as to be sure that I would take the westbound (the trains (9, 10, 33, and 34 were scheduled to meet in Spartanburg).

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:30 AM

Boyd
Or make it the first mainline cog railway in the US. Imagine the sound the first time a locomotive jumped the cog. 

Nothing in this weight or momentum range would use a vertical cog or rack arrangement.  In all probability it would be transverse, with opposed cog or toothed wheels engaging with (probably substantial) pressure in balance across the rack-rail profile.  

Now you would want an emergency release of excessive load on the rack gear, and it would likely make one hell of an interesting noise if that happened, but it would be less likely, and better managed, than cogs lifting and stripping vertically...

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 PM

How did the passenger trains operate on the grade ?  Did the F units have dynamic brakes ?  Those were not very efficient ?  How many  F units and many passenger cars ?

  • Member since
    April 2014
  • 5 posts
Posted by batt21 on Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:13 AM

I have an old N&W training video (not the one on youtube) given to me by a retired conductor about how to operate on Saluda, it's awesome and thrilling at the same time, to imagine being an engineer or conductor getting a coal train up and down that grade, the heart pounding one must have felt running that route as well as the professionalism and pride doing something that's difficult to do, even if part of Saluda was opened, the history and reputation of Saluda would be great. 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: St. Paul, Minnesota
  • 2,116 posts
Posted by Boyd on Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:49 AM

Or make it the first mainline cog railway in the US. Imagine the sound the first time a locomotive jumped the cog. 

Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Raleigh, N.C.
  • 182 posts
Posted by dubch87 on Thursday, June 18, 2020 7:58 PM

The thing about Saluda is that the trains were stopped more often than they were moving. I remember seeing trains stopped at Melrose, stopped at the crest, or being assembled at the top all of the time. Very rarely did you catch one on the move. It's amazing it stayed open as long as it did.

Downgrade required a stop at the crest to set retainers, then downhill at 8 mph, then stopping again at Melrose to turn the retainers. Upgrade required stopping at Melrose, disconnecting the first sixteen or so cars, pulling those upgrade, dropping off, then going back downhill to grab another set. Do that a few more times, put the train back together and you can keep going.

In the last few years, the uphill trains were mostly woodchips bound for the paper mill in Canton. There were still a few mixed freights up and down through the week. I think there was enough horsepower before the end that they could pull the empty coal hoppers up in one or two goes.

I don't recall there being any mid-train units during the 90's. Sometimes there were units at the end on the downgrade coal, and I think they were always manned helpers.

   

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: St. Paul, Minnesota
  • 2,116 posts
Posted by Boyd on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 5:06 AM

If the tracks of the Saluda grade were ever abandoned I think that Salud's could be the first RR ROW ever turned into a ski hill! â›·

Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:32 PM

Not a Saluda expert by any means, however, I think the primary tonnage was operted downgrad.  Coal loads downgrade, empty hoppers upgrade.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:21 PM

I wonder if one aspect of DPU operation would be the coupler strength.  The number of cars being pulled by the DPU would be limited to about 15 - 20 cars with the 250K couplers, or about 25 cars with the 350K couplers.  However, they could push many more cars since the couplers would be in compression.  Practical limit would be not too much 'buff' so as to push the cars near the DPU off the track in a sharp curve, or other bad train-track dynamics.

- PDN. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    February 2016
  • From: Virginia
  • 78 posts
Posted by GREG HODGES on Tuesday, June 16, 2020 6:35 PM

I've watched that NS training video a couple of times and admire how 5% grades were tackled over 35 yrs. ago.  Though NS had been in existance for 2 years at the time the film was made, the locomotives shown were still wearing their SR black and gold 'tuxedo' paint schemes.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, June 14, 2020 10:34 PM

BaltACD
I don't know if the SOU ever used LocoTrol on their operations on Saluda.

It seemed pretty clear to me that 13,000-ton unit coal trains would demand distributed power, and indeed the 'Saluda, Mountain of Challenge' training video from 1984 clearly covers the 'radio' operation at the time.  More modern versions of the technology would augment the 'uphill' part of the operation and probably at least facilitate safe downhill.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9IABM8UPplY

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:50 PM

06/13/2020...Re: SALUDA GRADE.... There is a You Tube Video that has an excelent report on 'The Grade'. dates from about a year ago [Sept.9,2019] 

See linked @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAlK61l6yQI

It is a video mentioned by one of Jim Wrinn's blog columns about that same time frame. It features some technical data on the saluda grade, many photos from the operational era, and explanations of the'whys, and wherefores' for the existance of the Saluda Grade vs. other lcations in the Western North Carolina area.

   It features narrations by locals who are members of the Saluda Depot Museum, in Saluda.

From JimWrinn's colum

FTA:"...The other video offering is on your computer. A young Michigan filmmaker, Drayton Blackgrove, through his Delay in Block Productions, has started a series on abandoned railroads. His first subject is dear to my heart: Saluda grade in Western North Carolina..."

linked @ http://cs.trains.com/trn/b/staff/archive/2019/09/12/two-videos-you-need-to-see-country-music-and-saluda-grade.aspx

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:06 PM

dubch87
...

With the prevalent use of DPUs now, you could have a mid-train unit(s) and rear units and probably make the hill in one go. Could they not have ran DPUs in the late 90's/early 2000's? Downhill would still be a monster. I remember in the last few years of operations seeing rear units on the down-grade coal trains. I’m assuming these were manned, but maybe not. I don’t know if they were for additional dynamic braking or pushing from Asheville to Saluda (or maybe both).

Ignoring the costs of rebuilding the line, would it ever make sense to reopen? Intermodal is here and big. The Port of Charleston is growing with a new terminal opening and the upcoming harbor dredging making it the deepest on the east coast. Intermodal traffic from Charleston has to go through Atlanta or Roanoke to get to the Midwest by rail. It’s probably 5 hours between Spartanburg and Atlanta, plus time north through Georgia to Tennessee. Saluda would cut off a lot of hours, at least going uphill. Safety wasn’t as big of a concern going up. Just add more horsepower and throw down sand.

Would the cost of rebuilding be cheaper than expansion elsewhere and alleviate any potential bottlenecks along the “Crescent corridor”, even if it was only operated one-way? I know it will never happen, but you have to wonder if there isn’t someone sitting at NS management wondering “would it work?”

SOU was one of the early users of 'LocoTrol' - a predecessor to today's Distributed Power.  I don't know if the SOU ever used LocoTrol on their operations on Saluda.

While the line is not operatable at present.  From the videos, a work train and MofW crew with the proper supplies could have it operating in a week or less.  Being able to opeate tonnage trains on a continuing basis would require a major installment of new rail and ties.

What the economics of the line in today's railroading are is a question I don't have any answer to.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, September 10, 2019 7:28 PM

dubch87
With the prevalent use of DPUs now, you could have a mid-train unit(s) and rear units and probably make the hill in one go.  Downhill would still be a monster.

And therein lies the real issue: you can't control the train using the dynamic as an integral part of the anticipated braking (in case you exceed the all-too-quickly-reached 22 to 23mph range where brake fade becomes infinite with the dynamics disabled or incompetent to hold the whole train) so you'd still have the whole retainer and setting manual brakes thing even with the DB distributed into the equivalent of 2 or 3 shorter consists.

The other half is, of course, that speed is less and less important to PSR and customers both: what's in demand is accurate scheduled delivery.  And trains over Saluda in any kind of inclement weather will remain an interesting exercise.

Perhaps if Elon Musk succeeds in getting the Boring Company to make equipment that tunnels in rock at 1/10 current costs, there will be some routing that eliminates the peak gradients...

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Raleigh, N.C.
  • 182 posts
Posted by dubch87 on Tuesday, September 10, 2019 6:45 PM

No one should be asking “When will Saluda reopen?” after watching this video. It is slowly rotting and washing away. Not to mention running Saluda in the age of reflective safety vests and PSR. Not a chance….

HOWEVER… I still have a couple of questions I’ve wanted to ask, but I didn’t want to beat a dead horse.

The “Saluda shuffle” of tripling the hill took a lot of time. In the old days they had helpers waiting at Melrose. Why didn’t they have helpers in the later years? Time/labor = money lost?

With the prevalent use of DPUs now, you could have a mid-train unit(s) and rear units and probably make the hill in one go. Could they not have ran DPUs in the late 90's/early 2000's? Downhill would still be a monster. I remember in the last few years of operations seeing rear units on the down-grade coal trains. I’m assuming these were manned, but maybe not. I don’t know if they were for additional dynamic braking or pushing from Asheville to Saluda (or maybe both).

Ignoring the costs of rebuilding the line, would it ever make sense to reopen? Intermodal is here and big. The Port of Charleston is growing with a new terminal opening and the upcoming harbor dredging making it the deepest on the east coast. Intermodal traffic from Charleston has to go through Atlanta or Roanoke to get to the Midwest by rail. It’s probably 5 hours between Spartanburg and Atlanta, plus time north through Georgia to Tennessee. Saluda would cut off a lot of hours, at least going uphill. Safety wasn’t as big of a concern going up. Just add more horsepower and throw down sand.

Would the cost of rebuilding be cheaper than expansion elsewhere and alleviate any potential bottlenecks along the “Crescent corridor”, even if it was only operated one-way? I know it will never happen, but you have to wonder if there isn’t someone sitting at NS management wondering “would it work?”

   

  • Member since
    September 2019
  • 1 posts
Posted by NKP AU Tower on Monday, September 9, 2019 6:30 PM

blue streak 1

One item that I've noticed.

1.  NS  does not seem to want to abandon any of their lines at the present time.  Maybe they have seen the mistakes that CSX and its predecessors made in abandoing the  "S" lines from Norlina -  Petersburg & Savannah -  JAX  , the B&O from Parkersburg - STL., etc.  t

The Old Fort line may have the potential for a many mile wipe out due to weather ?  If so Saluda in that case might be able to go back into service faster ? 

 

  

 

Newbie here, so go easy!  In response to the above quote, I would agree. The remaining ROW for the AC&Y ends in my village. The Ohio Department of Transportation approached NS about abandoning the ROW so that the overpass (over a county road and the AC&Y) for Interstate 75 could be removed instead of replaced. NS said no, they have no intention of giving up ownership of any additional portions of the ROW. The last train through here was in 81', and the tracks were pulled up between Carey and Delphos, and the entire ROW and grade removed from Delphos to Bluffton. Unless the W&LE decides to lease it and replace all the rails, I highly doubt I will see another train on it in my lifetime.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, September 9, 2019 2:30 PM

I found the video of Saluda Grade quite interesting. I am thankful that I was able to take a trip down from Asheville to Hayne and and back in the summer of 1964. Just before we started up the grade, we met a weedkiller train which was spraying the vegetation along the track--and also spraying the track. Somehow the sanders on the engines of our train (four or five cars) were not working, so we were delayed (I did not time the delay), and arrived in Asheville late. 

In the srping of 1967, I took an uneventful trip down, riding from Knoxville to Columbia.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, September 9, 2019 1:03 PM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, May 6, 2019 6:25 PM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy