Trains.com

Railroad History Quiz Game (Come on in and play) Locked

100894 views
2075 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: N. Fond du Lac WI
  • 81 posts
Posted by ShopsYardMaster on Saturday, February 23, 2008 12:49 PM
White Pass and Yukon, around 1960?
Jim North Fond du Lac WI Home of the late, great Wisconsin Central
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 724 posts
Posted by snagletooth on Saturday, February 23, 2008 12:40 PM
How about the ATSF, Chicago- L.A.?
Snagletooth
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Saturday, February 23, 2008 12:29 PM
Are we talking marine containers?
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, February 23, 2008 12:24 PM
No.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Saturday, February 23, 2008 12:22 PM
Was it the New York Central?
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, February 23, 2008 10:48 AM

Name the first U.S. railway to offer regular containerized freight services (and it's not one with a "Pacific" anywhere in its title or history), and when.

RWM 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Saturday, February 23, 2008 10:43 AM
 Railway Man wrote:
 CNW 6000 wrote:

Shock [:O]  YIPE!  That's what I get for guessing well, lol.  Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question.  I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:

Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines.  Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.

1938:  GE builds a pair of 2500-hp steam turbine/electric transmission demonstrators for Union Pacific, which tries them for a few trips and says thanks but no thanks.  GN demo'd them in 1943 and after that GE scrapped them.

1947-1948:  Baldwin and Westinghouse deliver 3 6,000-hp locomotives to C&O, which were scrapped in 1950.

1954:  GE and Babcock & Wilcock build Jawn Henry for N&W, which lasts to 1957.

Guess if you wanted to have seen these back then, you'd best have been quick on your feet!

RWM 

Shock [:O] Well that was fast...here I thought I had a toughie for you guys.  Great job...you have the next question!  Cool [8D]

Dan

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, February 23, 2008 8:29 AM
 CNW 6000 wrote:

Shock [:O]  YIPE!  That's what I get for guessing well, lol.  Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question.  I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:

Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines.  Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.

1938:  GE builds a pair of 2500-hp steam turbine/electric transmission demonstrators for Union Pacific, which tries them for a few trips and says thanks but no thanks.  GN demo'd them in 1943 and after that GE scrapped them.

1947-1948:  Baldwin and Westinghouse deliver 3 6,000-hp locomotives to C&O, which were scrapped in 1950.

1954:  GE and Babcock & Wilcock build Jawn Henry for N&W, which lasts to 1957.

Guess if you wanted to have seen these back then, you'd best have been quick on your feet!

RWM 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, February 23, 2008 3:29 AM
 CNW 6000 wrote:

Shock [:O]  YIPE!  That's what I get for guessing well, lol.  Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question.  I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:

Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines.  Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.

 

Do you mean locomotives whose motive power was steam engine and diesel-electric, or do you mean something along the lines of a hybrid steam engine / electric motor (I'd guess catenary) combo?  - a. s.

I for one think it's time for bed!  Clearly I am outclassed.  Shy [8)]  - a. s.

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Saturday, February 23, 2008 3:15 AM

Shock [:O]  YIPE!  That's what I get for guessing well, lol.  Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question.  I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:

Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines.  Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.

Dan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, February 22, 2008 5:27 PM

 CNW 6000 wrote:
$83.55
 

Good goin'!    DING!   DING!   DING!  

You're only eighteen cents below the actual amount:  $83.73

Since that's less than a daily paper and a local phone call, even in 1967, you have won!   

And you get to post the next question . . . 

Bow [bow]  Congratulations!  - al

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 22, 2008 4:55 PM

42! That's the answer to life, the universe, and everything!Laugh [(-D]

(From The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy) 

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: MaDiSoN, WiScOnSiN
  • 141 posts
Posted by WSOR 4025 on Friday, February 22, 2008 4:05 PM
$84.25
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:46 PM
$83.55

Dan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:43 PM

 CNW 6000 wrote:
$82.66
  The closest figure to date that doesn't go over.  Good goin'!  Care to try again?  - a. s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:42 PM
 espeefoamer wrote:
As a wild guess,$85.55.Cowboy [C):-)]
  A very sensible guess, but over a dollar too high.
al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:35 PM
$82.66

Dan

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:35 PM
As a wild guess,$85.55.Cowboy [C):-)]
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:29 PM
 blhanel wrote:

You went the wrong way, Murph.  My initial guess of $79 was too low!Tongue [:P]

I'll go with $80.45 this time...

    Impeccable logic, and this your latest guess is closer to the right answer than before -- Although you're getting warmer, you're still several dollars plus some change off.   Let's all of us look at all prior guesses; the lowest one that is too high is above where you'd want to be, and the highest one that is too low has gone from $79 to $80.45 (yours), but it is nonetheless too low.

Keep trying, folks!  The end is in sight!  - a. s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:22 PM
 blhanel wrote:

You went the wrong way, Murph.  My initial guess of $79 was too low!Tongue [:P]

I'll go with $80.45 this time...

Rats!  I was taking a clue from the date Al had listed. 7-1-67 ( Dunce [D)] )

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,212 posts
Posted by blhanel on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:16 PM

You went the wrong way, Murph.  My initial guess of $79 was too low!Tongue [:P]

I'll go with $80.45 this time...

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:13 PM
   $71.67

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, February 22, 2008 12:59 PM

 WSOR 4025 wrote:
$86.50?

Sorry guys, but $84.77, $87.55, $87.60, and $86.50 are all too high.  You all correctly figured out that $89.00 is too high a price and that, therefore, your entries should be below that point.

HINT:  What price given originally do you know is too small?  Your winning answers will be above that point.  IOW the entries above are mostly trending in the wrong direction.

Perhaps we can solicit some more guesstimates?  I'd like to declare a winner by early this evening (around 1830 CST) so a new question can open the weekend.

Thanks, and keep trying!  al

 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, February 22, 2008 12:51 PM
 nanaimo73 wrote:
 Murphy Siding wrote:

    Ah gee-wiz Al, you don't have to call Eric. 

Short for Leif Ericson? Was he Norwegian?

 

Maybe short for Eric the Red, since that's the color of my face right now.  My bad, and my apology offered.  - a. s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: MaDiSoN, WiScOnSiN
  • 141 posts
Posted by WSOR 4025 on Friday, February 22, 2008 10:27 AM
$86.50?
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Friday, February 22, 2008 2:32 AM
 Murphy Siding wrote:

    Ah gee-wiz Al, you don't have to call Eric. 

Short for Leif Ericson? Was he Norwegian?

Dale
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Redneck Land(Little Rock), Arkansas
  • 919 posts
Posted by arkansasrailfan on Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:12 PM
Oooooooooooo, you got burned
-Michael It's baaaacccckkkk!!!!!! www.youtube.com/user/wyomingrailfan
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:01 PM

    Ah gee-wiz Al, you don't have to call Eric.  You can just call me by my name-NorrisSmile [:)]

If we're playing The Price is Right, I'll guess about $87.60 Mischief [:-,]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,212 posts
Posted by blhanel on Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:07 PM
Hmmm... I'll go the other way this time, $87.55.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,859 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:02 PM

Try Number Two:  $84.77

Jeff

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy