QUOTE: Originally posted by Paul3 Then why would they be advertising brand new F3A-B sets on their own website for only $145?
QUOTE: Let me see if I get this straight. You are comparing a sale price at an LHS to the full MSRP?
QUOTE: The hobby is what you make of it. If you want to be a model builder that occasionally runs trains, then go right ahead. I'd rather be a guy that models railroad operations that occasionally builds models. But that's the nice thing about model railroading. Everyone who owns a Thomas the Tank Engine to Tony Koester is a model railroader...it's a big enough hobby for everyone. BTW, if the difficulty of construction is more important than the actual running characteristics, then why don't you just scratch build everything? Why are you even buying Athearn models (the definition of shake-the-box modeling), let alone P1K's? Cast your own out of resin or lead, or build it from stryene or brass. Why complain what a Walthers flyer says is the price of something you don't seem to get much enjoyment from anyways?
QUOTE: Apparently, realism is not your goal. GP7's and GP9's are also very simular in appearance, but I would never buy a GP7 and paint it up for New Haven because the NH had GP9's, not GP7's. It would be wrong. F3's and F7's are even more dissimular, and if the NH had either one, I would not use the other as a "substitute" because that would not be realistic, but to each their own. I suppose you would also find the NH's FL9's "substitutable" with F7's or F3's, as well...
QUOTE: Take a look at the NH scheme on the Athearn BB F-units. Totally bogus in every detail except they got the color black and white correct. Besides the fact that the model is an F7 and not an FL9, the logos are the wrong shape and in the wrong places, the numbers are supposed to be 2000-2059, not 0272, the FL9's only had one head light, the orange is not supposed to be that shade, the "NEW HAVEN" on the side of the loco is wrong, the NH never had EMD B-units but Athearn makes them, the striping around the nose is a joke, etc. A total fantasy paint scheme. Revell got it right, for pete's sake.
QUOTE: Good. Does this mean you'll stop complaining about high prices?
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
QUOTE: In my Sept. Walthers Flyer, On Page 8. It shows a P1K F3 AB set price stated is $165.
QUOTE: I bought both AB sets when P-1K introduced the GN roadname. As a matter of fact. The hobby shop I purchased them at was celebrating 50 Years being in business and I picked them both up for a grand total of $90.00
QUOTE: I get more enjoyment from BB F-units than I did from the P-1K ones because I get to sink my hands with it and work with them than just setting them on the track and go. Or is everything supposed ready to go with no modeling involved? Or has this hobby changed to "Miniature Train Running" and I am left diddly dinking around at the workbench.
QUOTE: No F3s are not F7s. However I contend that they are substitutible products.
QUOTE: As for your addressing of Fantasy Schemes on the BB F7. I don't see any "Chatanooga Choo Choo" or "Kansas Durango & Colorado like Tyco was fond of making.
QUOTE: Thanks. I will have to pick a few of them up.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Paul3 Ignoring the usual banter about the future of model railroading and getting back to the original post... Student of Big Sky Blue, You said that the Walthers flyer listed F3A-B (I assume ex-LLP1K) sets for $165. Then why is it that when I search Walthers' website, I can only find the brand new (expected 10-31-05) ex-LLP1K F3A-B sets for $145?
QUOTE: As far as your assertion that these models are "only slightly better than old Athearn Blue Box F-7s", then I would suggest you need to actually compare them, side by side. The F3 drives (smooth & quiet) are vastly superior to the old BB F7's (rough and loud). then, you don't have the "cookout in the cab" lightbulb in the F3's, unlike the BB F7's.
QUOTE: For starters, F3's are not F7's Then you have the actually prototypical paint schemes on the F3's vs. the fantasy BB F7 schemes. And so on.
QUOTE: BTW, as far as your whining about the high cost of model railroading, consider this: Walthers.com lists an F3A-F3A for sale...only $36.00. It's made by Model Power. Here's the link: http://www.walthers.com/exec/productinfo/490-6730
Have fun with your trains
Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296
Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/
QUOTE: Originally posted by CNJ831 Bruce - Go back and read my very detailed and lengthy posts, which included numerous verifiable figures. These were presented and I assume widely read based on the number of times they were viewed, in a long thread earlier in the summer.
QUOTE: There most certainly are hard numbers available in many areas and none of them are optomistic. Personally, I don't like for a moment what the numbers indicate, yet these are still what the numbers show.
QUOTE: The worse thing I do see is how many hobbyists act like ostriches, will insist figures don't indicate anything because it's not what they want to hear, and will simply refuse to look into the situation in detail for themselves.
QUOTE: In your own situation the rising costs of model railroading have completely curtailed your financial participation in the hobby. Do you think this is unique?
QUOTE: A great many longtime, older hobbyists are being forced out too and any new, younger prospects become increasingly hesitant to enter when they realize that, today, even at the entry level, a decent, operational layout easily runs into quite a few thousands of dollars...especially if it involves purchase of many RTR items.
QUOTE: Originally posted by MAbruce This is yet another re-hash of a tired topic. Why do I say tired? Because no one has offered any HARD evidence/numbers that the hobby is either declining or increasing. This is mainly because all MRR manufacturers are privately held companies that do not have any requirement to disclose their financial results. Let’s face it folks, without hard numbers from the financials, we’re only left to guess what’s going on by other indicators that are not always a reliable way of measuring what the market is doing. So let’s stop taking ourselves so seriously on this subject and admit that we just don’t really know. We can only make guesses. But I will tell you something I DO know. I have not spent a single dollar on the hobby this year. At the end of last year I determined that I could no longer afford to keep up. So my layout went into stasis, my Ntrak membership went into dormancy, and the meager MRR budget I would have worked with went into small home improvement items. That’s certainly not an indicator of the state of the hobby, but it’s an important indicator to me. Prices in this hobby have gone up way too much and I’m getting far more satisfaction spending it on my house where it seems to go much further.
Terry