Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO
We'll get there sooner or later!
QUOTE: Originally posted by cacole Everyone seems to be missing the simplest and most obvious solution to all of this argument about smoke and sound; and that is, if you don't like it, dont go there.
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
Isambard
Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at isambard5935.blogspot.com
QUOTE: Originally posted by chateauricher QUOTE: Originally posted by hoscalelarry Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes. That is so far from the truth, its laughable. If all smokers quit, just think of all the healthcare savings there'd be. The amount of money spent per year to treat people with smoking related diseases is surely greater than any tobacco taxes they pay. Also, by living longer, healthier lives, they could be paying taxes instead of costing the healthcare system millions.
QUOTE: Originally posted by hoscalelarry Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes.
QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman QUOTE: Originally posted by chateauricher QUOTE: Originally posted by hoscalelarry Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes. That is so far from the truth, its laughable. If all smokers quit, just think of all the healthcare savings there'd be. The amount of money spent per year to treat people with smoking related diseases is surely greater than any tobacco taxes they pay. Also, by living longer, healthier lives, they could be paying taxes instead of costing the healthcare system millions. Well I am a smoker, but I respect others that don't smoke so I refrain when in public, and I will honor your rights, to my death (sooner as I am a smoker) BUT if we apply your logic that we would save millions if people quit smoking, then let's apply that rule to those that are overweight, as that also drives up health care costs, oops lets not forget if your company has a large female workforce your healthcare costs are also higher, oh and if there are older folks on the plan, we also pay more. To blame high healthcare costs on smokers is a little extreme when you add all the other items that also inflate the costs of healthcare.
QUOTE: Originally posted by chateauricher [Anyways, to get back on topic ... It is my understanding that a properly maintained steam engine shouldn't be belching much smoke at all. Certainly not in any quantities approaching those that some modelers re-create. If you're going to be modeling accurately, you should (as others on this thread have suggested) also scale down the smoke (and noise) to a more realistic prototypical level.
QUOTE: Originally posted by ebriley You know, guys, there's always a problem. I am extremely sensitve to glutin-the stuff that's in wheat, rye, barley, oats and a few other grains. If I eat anything with glutin in it (like Wonder Bread, etc) I have some intestinal problems the next day, sometimes severe problems. But you go on an NMRA layout tour that includes a box lunch and they hand me a sandwich made with commercial bread (read that -lot's of glutin) and commercial balona or salami (which often use glutin as flavor enhancers and don't say so on the lable)and I have to punt or remain very hungry. I'm probably the only guy on the tour with this problem and so I cannot resonable expect them to change the menu for me so I always bring something I can eat instead of the box lunch. If the smoke bothers you-move away from the source.
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"