Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Dangers of Second Hand Smoke and Noise at Shows and Clubs?

5384 views
48 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canada, eh!
  • 737 posts
Dangers of Second Hand Smoke and Noise at Shows and Clubs?
Posted by Isambard on Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:21 PM
At a recent trains show the O gauge layout next door to our layout featured several steam and diesel locomotives putting out generous volumes of smoke and noise.

Despite the room being large and air conditioned, the air in the room stank of smoke. The level of noise from the locos combined with that of the crowds made normal level of conversation between our operators difficult such that we're planning to go to headphones next showtime.

What is this stuff that's used in those smoke generators and has it been analysed for toxicity? Surely the anti-smoking lobby or the California government must have had a look at it? [:)].

Do any clubs or shows have regulations or standards for use of smoke and/or sound?

(Thinks to himself--the responses to this thread should generate a lot of sound and warmth, if not smoke)[:D]




Isambard

Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at  isambard5935.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:36 PM
Hey according to George there is no global warming, second hand smoke, or noise polution; however, my guess would be that the "oil" based smoke from those O Gauge locos is not good for you, but unless you are going to be exposed constantly to it for half a millenium or longer, you probably will not be adversely affected.
I have "Flamed"!!
Will
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:51 PM
Who want's to live forever?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:48 PM
We've had a similar problem in our club, as the smoke from the Lionel and MTh engines irritates those with allergies. It causes throat irriitation in one fellow and another who wears contact lenses says it irritates his eyes. It's bad enough to visit a show for a while, but for those who have displays or sales tables at a train show, they are exposed to this smoke the whole day. Our locations do not have air conditioning or other mechanical ways to circulate the air. The only circulation is from the main doors opening and closing.

Our main club proponent of the smoke is very touchy about the subject, feels its his right to demonstrate the "latest technology" - steam and diesel engines with fans that spew out smoke continuously. He's threatened to leave his stuff home if he cannot operate the smoke units. Way overboard.

One of our members did some online research and came up with this:

"Second-hand smoke

Is this toy train pseudo-smoke harmful to your health?

Well, a jar of pure meta-terphenyl is labeled an “irritant,” meaning that chronic exposure can irritate the eyes, skin, and mucous membranes. Some chemical substances in smoke fluid can also be moderate eye irritants and slight irritants to mucous membranes.

Common sense suggests that hobbyists provide themselves with at least some ventilation in their train rooms and that they find some fresh air if they experience headaches, sore throats, eye irritation, or itching skin after standing in a cloud of toy train “smoke.”


Our next show is in November, and we have yet to make a decision - Lionel & MTH trains with smoke or none at all.

No one has even brought up the loudness of the electronic bells, whistles and horns yet! I personally inquired if these sounds can be turned down, and found out they indeed can. I can just imagine what the reply would be if we also asked for them to be softened.

Bob Boudreau
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm

Who want's to live forever?


You know I hear that a lot in the health business. It's not a matter of dying sooner, it's a matter of being alive longer and being really sick the whole time.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:36 PM
I assume that meta-terphenyl is the active ingredient in the smoke? I don't know, but here is a link to a page about it in the "Pocket guide to Chemcical Hazards" from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health:

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0592.html

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:41 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm

Who want's to live forever?


You know I hear that a lot in the health business. It's not a matter of dying sooner, it's a matter of being alive longer and being really sick the whole time.




Or it is a matter of perspective. 4 or 5 hours exposure one or two times a year is not something worth worrying about. If we were talking about a restaurant wait person who is exposed 8+ hours a day 5+ days a week, week in week out, that could be a problem.

Life is to short to worry about an old age that none of us are guaranteed. I would not let the possibility that I could be exposed to a few parts per million of a carcinogen stop me from spending the day at a train show or touring a museum with real trains (and of course nasty chemicals).

Just my opinion. I don't mean to disparage the health industry. Yosarean worried to much.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canada, eh!
  • 737 posts
Posted by Isambard on Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:02 PM
[
Or it is a matter of perspective. 4 or 5 hours exposure one or two times a year is not something worth worrying about. If we were talking about a restaurant wait person who is exposed 8+ hours a day 5+ days a week, week in week out, that could be a problem.

Life is to short to worry about an old age that none of us are guaranteed. I would not let the possibility that I could be exposed to a few parts per million of a carcinogen stop me from spending the day at a train show or touring a museum with real trains (and of course nasty chemicals).

Just my opinion. I don't mean to disparage the health industry. Yosarean worried to much.



Yes but look what happened to him (Yossarian)!

Isambard

Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at  isambard5935.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:21 PM
I have a friend that loves to see his HO engines smoke, and will sometimes have his train room so smoke filled that I can hardly stand to stay in there for more than a few minutes, but then, I have asthma and allergies to any kind of smoke really bad. Maybe if it were better vented it wouldn't be so bad.

Tracklayer
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Pacific NW
  • 733 posts
Posted by JohnT14808 on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:27 PM
I hadn't really thought about it that much. None of the members at our club use smoke units....I'm not even certain that any of the members have "smokin' " locos!! Sound, now...that's another story. The DCC sound units are going full bore most of the time. Sometimes it gets so loud you can't hear yourself think. But most members keep the levels down to the minimum. It is bad only when the younger members have the throttles...then it's like dueling horns and slashing whistles.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:34 PM
The health hazard most guys face at a train show is themself, not the small amount of smoke. I see many people who seriously need to see a doctor and stop smoking, loose weight, exercise, eat better and in some cases get a shower. I see too many obituaries in Train Magazines of young guys and I don't think train show smoke is the leading cause.

As for global warming, I love the people who say it is real and 'somebody' better do 'something' about it, while they sit in air conditioned comfort using an electrically powered computer, on a train board about electrically powered models of diesel powered real engines?![banghead]
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:37 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard
Do any clubs or shows have regulations or standards for use of smoke and/or sound?
Due to the large number of sound equipped locomotives showing up at the club, we just implemented a sound standard. At a distance of 4 ft. (normal operational/viewing distance) the locomotive engine sounds are limited to a certain db level. I don't remember what the number is. As I recall it ends up being a main volume setting of about 40 on a QSI sound unit.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Chateau-Richer, QC (CANADA)
  • 833 posts
Posted by chateauricher on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bukwrm
Who want's to live forever?

I'm not so worried about the quantity of life I have; but the quality.

I have been working in a nursing home for the last 15+ years. I have seen the suffering patients endure when they have lost any quality of life. I, for one, do not want to live to age 95 if I have to be a vegetable. If I am lucky, I will die quickly and painlessly, without a long, lingering death.

My mother (a retired registered nurse) has often said there are worse things than death. And she is right. Personally, I don't fear death. Its the transition part that I am concerned about.


Timothy The gods must love stupid people; they sure made a lot. The only insanity I suffer from is yours. Some people are so stupid, only surgery can get an idea in their heads.
IslandView Railroads On our trains, the service is surpassed only by the view !
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Friday, August 26, 2005 5:25 AM
Ooooo! A "Chicken Little" thread!

I have what my doctor calls "reactive airways," stemming from asthma as a kid and growing up with a parent who was a smoker. It's bad enough that I wear a respirator when mowing the lawn, to avoid inhaling the dust. Things that don't bother most people at all make my bronchial passages cringe! A lot of perfumes do that, for example.

I've attended train shows with smoking locos (most of them were even supposed to be smoking!), and my lungs have protested on occasion. I just move ten feet or so back from the table and the level of smoke decreases to a tolerable level for me. Wandering through the buildings all day hasn't posed a problem for me.

Regarding the noise - if it's too much, get a set of those noise-cancelling headphones. If the noise level isn't painful, short-term exposure isn't damaging. The noise level in the car you probably took to the show, if you traveled at highway speeds at all, and unless it's a Caddy or other luxury-type vehicle, is probably a lot higher than what you ran into at the show.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,846 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Friday, August 26, 2005 7:29 AM
Health issues aside, I have been to at least one large train show where a modular club with smoking engines and sound(including moo'ing cattle cars) has been told to turn it off. A modular club 'down wind' found that their trains had a soft 'film' on them the next day.
At our local club we might have set some 'noise' standards as when there are 6 or so QSI engines running, it is hard to hold a conversation. I have turned down the volume to about 50% of the default at home. I have found that the sound is best when you just hear it - sort of like outdoor night sounds.
On the 'plus' side, I have found that switching with a sound equipped engines(P2K GP9) is really nice. Having to crank up the throttle to pull a 20 car train out of a yard track seems so real as the engine starts to really work(just like the prototype). The intesity of the sound really matches the the power applied - nice!

Jim Bernier

Jim Bernier

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 7:39 AM
One thing about sound equipped models - many don't take into consideration that if you were watching a prototype engine from a few hundred feet away, the sound wouldn't be all that loud. That's the way we often view operating models, from a scale hundred feet or more away. So the sound should really be to scale too - not too loud to be distracting, but loud enough so you are aware of it.

I've been in large school gyms with train shows and if you can hear the large scale whistles and bells very clearly at the opposite end of the gym - some 100 feet away, then in my opinion the sound is too loud!

Bob Boudreau

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Friday, August 26, 2005 7:44 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer

I have a friend that loves to see his HO engines smoke, and will sometimes have his train room so smoke filled that I can hardly stand to stay in there for more than a few minutes, but then, I have asthma and allergies to any kind of smoke really bad. Maybe if it were better vented it wouldn't be so bad.

Tracklayer


One thing for promoters of the shows, as well as train clubs to consider is people with respiratory problems, allergies, etc, that might be adversely affected by the model smoke. I believe most smoke fluids are a form of mineral oil which will trigger adverse reactions in people with these problems. They may be missing out on visitors, and the attendant revenue from them, because of this.

The noise question is a whole other story.
Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Cleveland, Ohio
  • 26 posts
Posted by hoscalelarry on Friday, August 26, 2005 8:28 AM
One thing for promoters of the shows, as well as train clubs to consider is people with respiratory problems, allergies, etc, that might be adversely affected by the model smoke. I believe most smoke fluids are a form of mineral oil which will trigger adverse reactions in people with these problems. They may be missing out on visitors, and the attendant revenue from them, because of this.

The noise question is a whole other story.



Being a pipe smoker for over 30 years -- and my health problems are NOT from smoking -- I am getting a little tired of everyong trying to "adjust" the level of smoke & noise to what they like. In other words -- our parents lived with noise & smoke - why do we try to 'FORCE" changes on everyone else. If I'm in a smokie place & don't like it -- I leave. When the music on the juke box [at my VFW Post] is to loud -- I leave. Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes. [Just thinking here] I understand a Non Smokers "frustration" with this subject -- however, [off subject] when I ride my wheel chair down the street and a Non smoker tells me I am harming their health by smoking -- I get a "little" upset! I guess I want to say -- come on people -- we need to live together and find that "happy middle ground" for all of us to enjoy the lifestyle we chose. Maybe if you have to be at train show all day -- bring a small fan to blow smoke away from your tables. Just an idea [:)]
Larry VIETNAM VET -- please remember -- FREEDOM IS NOT FREE !!!!! After 3 years of battling cancer in 2 areas -- FINALLY getting started on the 12 foot by 30 foot train layout room. YES I'm blessed with that much area to build in.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 8:46 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by hoscalelarry
[ Maybe if you have to be at train show all day -- bring a small fan to blow smoke away from your tables. Just an idea [:)]


At our local train show in a shcool gym that is 75' by 105. ' I was at one sde of the room, and the smoking MTH engines were at the opposite side - 75' away. There's no way that a fan would blow the smoke away. It permeates the entire gym, from one end to another. Other dealers closer have 6-8 tables and there's no way a fan could help them either. Our show is in the winter, so natural ventilation is not possible - it's cold out there!

The smoke to me is merely an annoyance, but the fellow with me at our club sales table has respiratory problems and the smoke was bothering him most of the day. Our big problem is those operating the smokers are club members too, and don't want to compromise one bit by either turning the smoke down or using it fewer times. All or nothing seems to be their demands. It would be interesting if one of their family members had breathing problems, they would probably see the light.

If it were the older Lionel trains with their little puffs of smoke it probably would not be a problem, but the newer electronic models have large tanks to hold the smoke fluid and fans that blow out the smoke continually - steam and diesels! Sometimes too much of a good thing is just too much.

Bob Boudreau
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Friday, August 26, 2005 9:00 AM
So your saying the show was just like a real train.Loud, noisey, smokey.
How prototypical! Cool!
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Friday, August 26, 2005 11:13 AM
Guys,Allow me to say this..After having a major and near fatal heart attack on March 29 I no longer worry of what might,can or could happen..Life is way to short and fragile for worries.Enjoy life today because tomorrow just might be your last regardless of your age.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Friday, August 26, 2005 11:23 AM
I wondered how long it would be before someone started whining about their right to smoke!

QUOTE: Being a pipe smoker for over 30 years -- and my health problems are NOT from smoking -- I am getting a little tired of everyong trying to "adjust" the level of smoke & noise to what they like. In other words -- our parents lived with noise & smoke - why do we try to 'FORCE" changes on everyone else. If I'm in a smokie place & don't like it -- I leave. When the music on the juke box [at my VFW Post] is to loud -- I leave. Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes. [Just thinking here] I understand a Non Smokers "frustration" with this subject -- however, [off subject] when I ride my wheel chair down the street and a Non smoker tells me I am harming their health by smoking -- I get a "little" upset! I guess I want to say -- come on people -- we need to live together and find that "happy middle ground" for all of us to enjoy the lifestyle we chose. Maybe if you have to be at train show all day -- bring a small fan to blow smoke away from your tables. Just an idea [:)]


Larry -

It isn't a matter of what I "like," it's a matter of what won't irritate my lungs.

Smoke (cigarette, cigar, pipe, burning house, etc.) makes my bronchial passages spasm even if the concentration is relatively low. Suddenly feeling as if you can't breathe is not at all pleasant. Quite often an exposure of only a few hours is enough to give me a bad case of bronchitis. If all you have to do is not smoke for a few hours at a public place, then it's pretty darned self-centered and downright rude of you to insist on pursing your addiction and telling me that if I don't like it I should leave. Instead, you should learn some consideration. You do not have the right to make me ill with your filthy habit, any more than an alcoholic has a right to endanger me by drinking and driving, just because he (or she) has a craving for alcohol.

On the other hand, if you're outside smoking, that isn't a problem for me. You have a right to exercise and display your abject stupidity if you want, and outdoors the smoke dissipates fast enough that it doesn't affect my lungs, unless I'm directly downwind of you, and very close by. Then I'll move. The only real problem I have with smokers outdoors, which apparently doesn't apply to you, is seeing all the cigarette butts lying on the ground.

Sorry if this post is rude, but your "up yours, non-smokers!" attitude makes it very difficult to be otherwise.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Northeast Houston
  • 576 posts
Posted by mcouvillion on Friday, August 26, 2005 12:59 PM
I just looked at the chemical composition of the meta-terphenyl used in the smoke liquid. Essentially three benzene rings connected together. Since respiration is one of the fastest ways to assimilate hazardous stuff, I think I will try to avoid places where there is an excess amount of trains smoke. Not good for your long-term health.

Concerning noise, the guys I operate with have all turned down the volume on their sound-equipped locos. We run at about 25% of the maximum, where the default from the factory is usually about 75%.

Mark C.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Chateau-Richer, QC (CANADA)
  • 833 posts
Posted by chateauricher on Monday, August 29, 2005 10:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by hoscalelarry
Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes.

That is so far from the truth, its laughable.

If all smokers quit, just think of all the healthcare savings there'd be. The amount of money spent per year to treat people with smoking related diseases is surely greater than any tobacco taxes they pay.

Also, by living longer, healthier lives, they could be paying taxes instead of costing the healthcare system millions.


Timothy The gods must love stupid people; they sure made a lot. The only insanity I suffer from is yours. Some people are so stupid, only surgery can get an idea in their heads.
IslandView Railroads On our trains, the service is surpassed only by the view !
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:50 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chateauricher

QUOTE: Originally posted by hoscalelarry
Just think -- if the 25% plus or minus quite smoking -- all you NON SMOKERS would have to pay more taxes to make up for what is lost by smokers paying taxes on their packsof smokes.

That is so far from the truth, its laughable.

If all smokers quit, just think of all the healthcare savings there'd be. The amount of money spent per year to treat people with smoking related diseases is surely greater than any tobacco taxes they pay.

Also, by living longer, healthier lives, they could be paying taxes instead of costing the healthcare system millions.


Just one of the idiocies that smokers use to try and justify their addiction!

Had a funny/strange one too from one of our Lionel/MTH smokers - he said he heard that arcing brushes in electric motors can make ozone, so maybe the breathing irritation people get at train shows is caused by all of the motors in the trains! Talk about grasping at straws!

Another attempt at justifying the stream of endless smoke spewing out of their models is because the public comes to train shows to "see the latest technology". Meaning of course the ability for them to full everyone's lungs with smoke! I can just imagine a little five year old checking out non-smoking large scale trains and saying "I'm leaving because there is no latest technology being shown".

Gimme a break! And some fresh air too!

Bob Boudreau [8D]
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: USA
  • 152 posts
Posted by mrgstrain on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:04 AM
I think it is funny that everyone want's and trys to get thing's so close to scale so you can live in our little world's, but when it come's to sound ,(what did you say can't hear you). What about the ears of that poor little guy standing next to the train.
Larry
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:15 AM
Guys,Second hand choo-choo smoke is the very least of your worries..Of course Corporate America wants you to worry more about second hand choo-choo or tobacco smoke then the millions tons of the poisonous smoke they put out in a days time and not to mention the cars,trucks,buses and locomotives that pollute the air..Choo-choo smoke is the very least of your worries.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:44 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BRAKIE

Guys,Second hand choo-choo smoke is the very least of your worries..Of course Corporate America wants you to worry more about second hand choo-choo or tobacco smoke then the millions tons of the poisonous smoke they put out in a days time and not to mention the cars,trucks,buses and locomotives that pollute the air..Choo-choo smoke is the very least of your worries.


Smoke from model trains has caused difficulties with club members and the public who have breathing problems. Having to be in a closed room all day at a train show is a problem if you are those whom it bothers. This has nothing to do at all with "Corporate America" - it has to do with the health of fellow modelers. The smoke doesn't bother me personally, as I (currently) don't have breathing problems.

So unnecessary overwhelming constant sprewing out of a chemical smoke in a closed room IS a worry. We have laws in our area that forbid the smoking of tobbacco in public places. Why cannot those with breathing problems be free of this hobby generated smoke?

Bob Boudreau
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:44 AM
Ah, hah! So, let's see....the healthcare system would save billions of dollars if people stopped smoking......hmmmm......gee, do you know any industry that really truly favors losing millions of dollars of business? It's all tangled up in money. Personally, I am also one who easily gets bronchitis from cigaret smoke, and being around smokers is digusting to me, too, but I don't see this problem ending soon. Tobacco and health care are both big businesses, with too much at stake.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:57 AM
Bob,Are these the same people that jogs every morning? If so,then they do have more worries then choo-choo smoke.Of course there are many puppets that believe the evil of smoking causes all ills..This of course is what the corporations want you to believe while they pollute the air.
Now,I always thought choo-choo smoke stinks far worst then any sickening cigar smoke.[xx(]
BTW..I am a anti smoker but feel as long as there is money to be made tobacco use will continue.So my worry is what Corporations of ALL counties is doing to the very air we breathe and the water we drink.[:(!]

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!