greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading
i think it's just change for the sake of change and makes little or no sense at all. perhaps there is a hidden agenda in this but does it really matter? how long before some "special edition" box cars show up with the new logo? i will withhold further comment less the thought police find me vulgar and insensitive.
grizlump
Some people see what they want to see. To me it looks like a wheel on a rail.
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
jeffrey-wimberly Some people see what they want to see. To me it looks like a wheel on a rail.
Which I guess is the heart of the matter. It didn't look like anything to me. I had to read the description to see that it was a wheel on a rail. Asked my 11 year old son what he thought and he didn't make the train connection either. A logo has to convey a precise message and I don't think the new one does. If I didn't know what this was, I wouldn't have the first clue that NMRA, oops nmra.org, had anything to do with trains. I'm not objecting to a fresher logo, but whatever we use, should send a clear message to the public which this one doesn't.
New logos and branding are rarely targeted for the existing audience or membership. In a few years the new logo will be recognized as easily as the BNSF Swoosh , "G" instead of Gatoraide, or any host of others that have changed logos (including the US Air Force that I recently retired from). People often complained that the NMRA was stagnant and needed to change. Sometimes making a change such as this can move an organization in a direction they need to go to keep up with the times and changing membership
Ricky
RedGrey62(including the US Air Force that I recently retired from).
Yep, the Air Force can't keep uniforms, logos, and organizations consistent from one CSAF to another anymore. I never thought I'd miss SAC -- the REAL Air Force.
I wasn't sure if I liked it or not. But, as I look at it more it looks good. It is a logo to the lead the NMRA into the future. PW
CSX ToledoThere has been a lot said about the new nmra logo that was introduced in Milwaukee this summer.
OK its THAT is official, the NMRA has gone completely insane, I opened the link took one look and did NOT see anything that resembled wheels on a rail until I read that thats what its supposed to be?, maybe if there was something that looked like the archbars, or journal boxes, or something??? But lets face it, it does indeed look like a womens body part.
I always knew that the NMRA was predominently made up of old men, but apparently its a bunch of dirty old men??? Come on guys, what in the universe is going thru their heads?
Someone PLEASE tell me how this logo is going to do ANYTHING to help negate the common held beleive that model RRs are a bunch wierdos who live in their basements, now we get THIS logo that now indicates we have a fixation with certain womens body parts?
This should be a logo for *** cancer research reconstuctive surgury services or something ANYTHING but model RRs. OMG this is nuts
I would NEVER wear logo this on any cap or shirt, simply because I dont want to get slapped in the face.
What the heck was wrong with the old logo? hint:, if aint broke, DONT fix it.
Have fun with your trains
vsmithOK its THAT is official, the NMRA has gone completely insane, I opened the link took one look and did NOT see anything that resembled wheels on a rail, maybe if there was something that looked like the archbars, or journal boxes, or something??? But lets face it, it does indeed look like womens body parts.
I still like the old one better.
And no, I wouldn't be caught dead wearing a shirt or cap that has the new logo on it.
It looks more like an owl's eye.
Or the left half of the Conrail logo.
Jeffrey is right on the money as to what the logos look like. I rather like the old logo myself, but it is pretty much dated......
Here is a link to the inspiration for the new logo: http://www.nmra.org/Wheel-Logo.gif
The next thread will probably one complaining that "the hobby is dying" because there are no young members in the nmra............. Guess what, they are out there, but what they percieve about an organization is a big part of whether they will join. If they percieve "Old Phart Group", well??????
Progress happens and many many of us in the nmra have been yelling at National Office to "DO SOMETHING" for years. Of course now that they have, "HOW DARE THEY!!!!!"
I think they tried to "hit the ground running" on this. Time will tell.
73
P.S. - my only thing with the new logo is that the Font is called Howard Fat! Well I am, but they don't have to rub it in!!!
Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO
We'll get there sooner or later!
I agree with Jeffrey. It looks like a wheel on a rail. Either one works for me, although I don't care for the late 60s/early 70s font of the new logo.
Some logos are pretty straightforward and recognizable, while others are just way out in left field somewhere. The sad thing is that some graphics designing firm got paid big bucks to create something "distinct" that looks very similar to someone else's logo.
For me, one of the most clever logo designs was the one for Northwest Airlines:
Old logo:
New logo:
On the old design: I like the way the "pointer" functions as the direction indicator (like that on a compass), as well as creates the illusion of the "W" in the "N". The new design is okay but I think it loses the creativeness of the old one.
At any rate, I don't lose sleep over these sorts of things...
Tom
https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling
Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.
I don't mind the logo so much, but why does ".org" have to be part of it? Is the organisation now nothing more than a website?
Dave
Just be glad you don't have to press "2" for English.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ_ALEdDUB8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hqFS1GZL4s
http://s73.photobucket.com/user/steemtrayn/media/MovingcoalontheDCM.mp4.html?sort=3&o=27
I would honestly have no problem if there was even just the hint of a journal box or the truck outline, but sheesh! I'm really laughing at this now because I know how regular people are likely to react to it. LOL
Well, we shall see how this "new look" is recieved when the flag is flown in public so to speak, beatcha a dollar we start getting threads like "I was wearing my NMRA cap, and some lady asked me where I could donate money to the brea$t cancer organization named on my cap" ROFLMAO
howmus Progress happens and many many of us in the nmra have been yelling at National Office to "DO SOMETHING" for years. Of course now that they have, "HOW DARE THEY!!!!!" I think they tried to "hit the ground running" on this. Time will tell.
The thing is that with all the internal issues going on there, somehow this is the priority? LOL
Sadly I see this kinda stuff all the time, the conversation in the corner office invariably sound something like an episode of "Dilbert"
Dilbert; "Our sales are still tanking, and our stocks are still falling"
Pointy-Haired-Boss; "That just can't be, we have a brand new slick company logo"
I think they just "hit the ground" . ROFLMAO
tstageThe sad thing is that some graphics designing firm got paid big bucks to create something "distinct" that looks very similar to someone else's logo.
Too true. Reminds me of an event that happened many,many years ago. NBC spent big bucks redesigning their network logo. Only to discover, after it had been announced with great fanfare, that it legally violated the existing copywrited logo of Nebraska Public Television. NBC had to withraw it and redesign it.
I have figured out what is wrong with my brain! On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!
jmbjmbRedGrey62(including the US Air Force that I recently retired from). Yep, the Air Force can't keep uniforms, logos, and organizations consistent from one CSAF to another anymore. I never thought I'd miss SAC -- the REAL Air Force.
You got that right brother!
Steel fist and lightning bolts FTW!
8th AF, 2nd Bomb Wing - B52s, KC135's and KC10's
Back to the NMRA Logo, looks fine to me, don't understand what all the hoopla is about. Some people just need to complain about something and anything.
"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination."-Albert Einstein
http://gearedsteam.blogspot.com/
I couldn't find anything on the NMRA website that had the organizational name next to the logo and it would look better with the name. I can see the wheel on the rail and appreciate the web site address, but without the name who will ever know what this is supposed to be.
There's never time to do it right, but always time to do it over.....
steemtrayn...why does ".org" have to be part of it?
It does if they want many new members under the age of 40, which they desperately need. I don't know if it needs to be as "front and center" as it is. it also implies that NMRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit and tax-deductible - that's important these days.
I think its a clever logo, perhaps too clever. I recognized it immediately, but I'm not the target audience.
Sean
HO Scale CSX Modeler
vsmithThe thing is that with all the internal issues going on there, somehow this is the priority? LOL
Actually this is only one small part of some major changes that are in the works. It is the most visible obviously. I am part of 2 nmra online groups that are discussing and finding options for addressing many of the concerns at the Regional and Division level. Understand the nmra is making plans for the 21st. century and being there to continue helping model railroaders in many, many ways.
Ray Howard, Superintendent, Lakeshores Division, Niagara Frontier Region, nmra
Heres my two cents. I really do not care which way the logo is designed. I think (and I am a member ) if the NMRA wants to increase members start treating people who are new members like they are welcome.Call them , talk to them , CORRESPOND . I joined well over a year ago , left messages sent e-mails trying to get plugged in and guess what I got for my efforts ? An e-mail that stated heres a flyer look at it see what you want to come to. Here is the real problem , there is a sense that one gets that this a good ole boys club and outsiders are to be endured and really not welcome. Why spend money on logos when there is a strucdtural problem such as getting the new members plugged in and growing with in the organization.From articles I have read in the NMRA this is a common problem.It is money wasted that should be spent repairing other issues.
yougottawantaHeres my two cents. I really do not care which way the logo is designed. I think (and I am a member ) if the NMRA wants to increase members start treating people who are new members like they are welcome.Call them , talk to them , CORRESPOND . I joined well over a year ago , left messages sent e-mails trying to get plugged in and guess what I got for my efforts ? An e-mail that stated heres a flyer look at it see what you want to come to. Here is the real problem , there is a sense that one gets that this a good ole boys club and outsiders are to be endured and really not welcome. Why spend money on logos when there is a strucdtural problem such as getting the new members plugged in and growing with in the organization.From articles I have read in the NMRA this is a common problem.It is money wasted that should be spent repairing other issues.
You just hit a home run! That is exactly where the problem is. What you are describing is a problem at the Division level I would bet. Every Division is supposed to have a person who is the "Member Aid" representative. They should be contacting you as soon as they know you are a member. They should also be getting you in touch with some of the members who live close to you as well as having someone call and invite you along to the meets and other activities. These are the issues we are taking on with the groups I spoke about earlier.
My division is trying to get all these things in place. A lot depends on having the members who are willing to step forward and DO these things. In my division the officers are only myself and a treasurer (absolute minimum) right now. I do have several of the "old guard" who help me out whenever possible (and they are great!). One MMR who is in the Southern part of my Division and has recently moved into the area is getting local MRs to come to some meetings and involved with other activities in his area. I need several more just like him.
Slowly but surely my division is moving in the right direction, but it is a lot of time and effort. Don't forget at the Division and Region, we are all volunteers. BTW, I am printing out your post and saving it for some future meetings with my group!
Geared SteamjmbjmbRedGrey62(including the US Air Force that I recently retired from). Yep, the Air Force can't keep uniforms, logos, and organizations consistent from one CSAF to another anymore. I never thought I'd miss SAC -- the REAL Air Force. You got that right brother!Steel fist and lightning bolts FTW! 8th AF, 2nd Bomb Wing - B52s, KC135's and KC10's
The new Global Strike Command logo keeps the three red lightning bolts, but also calls back to the pre-WWII white star with red dot roundel.
Just like the NMRA logo keeps a wheel but its not a driver any more.
Not sure now if this is a model railroad forum or an Air Force forum. Oh well. As I have said before, been part of the NMRA since 1960, like any other organization, it isn't perfect. I said that for those who might think the NMRA is trying to be perfect. It isn't and it isn't. Just some guys who decided to get more modern. Problem is anymore, if it don't look modern, smell modern, growl modern, then it can't be modern. That is the thinking of many who are so upset by the new one. I could care less. There are a lot of logos out there I don't care for, but if I boycott the product because of a dumb logo, then it doesn't speak well for me.
The Atlas forum is almost foaming at the mouth over this stupid logo, 7 pages of comments, including mine, when I just left there. If we put that much energy in our hobby efforts, we might have more Whiz bang modelers and less critics.
Since my early modeling days were in the infancy of the NMRA, I saw the hobby before, at and today, and things are much better today with standards being developed and followed than when I started. In those days you never knew what to expect when you opened a kit box and sometimes you just wanted to throw it in the trash when you did see it. In fact, I did that on a few occasions. There isn't a modeler alive who hasn't benefited from the efforts of the NMRA, and you can make fun, trash it, ignore it, but the fact is without the NMRA or some organization like it, the only standards would be what EACH manufacturer determined they were. That should say enough. Don't sweat the logo, sweat the consequences of no standards at all.
Bob
howmus yougottawanta Heres my two cents. I really do not care which way the logo is designed. I think (and I am a member ) if the NMRA wants to increase members start treating people who are new members like they are welcome.Call them , talk to them , CORRESPOND . I joined well over a year ago , left messages sent e-mails trying to get plugged in and guess what I got for my efforts ? An e-mail that stated heres a flyer look at it see what you want to come to. Here is the real problem , there is a sense that one gets that this a good ole boys club and outsiders are to be endured and really not welcome. Why spend money on logos when there is a strucdtural problem such as getting the new members plugged in and growing with in the organization.From articles I have read in the NMRA this is a common problem.It is money wasted that should be spent repairing other issues. You just hit a home run! That is exactly where the problem is. What you are describing is a problem at the Division level I would bet. Every Division is supposed to have a person who is the "Member Aid" representative. They should be contacting you as soon as they know you are a member. They should also be getting you in touch with some of the members who live close to you as well as having someone call and invite you along to the meets and other activities. These are the issues we are taking on with the groups I spoke about earlier. My division is trying to get all these things in place. A lot depends on having the members who are willing to step forward and DO these things. In my division the officers are only myself and a treasurer (absolute minimum) right now. I do have several of the "old guard" who help me out whenever possible (and they are great!). One MMR who is in the Southern part of my Division and has recently moved into the area is getting local MRs to come to some meetings and involved with other activities in his area. I need several more just like him. Slowly but surely my division is moving in the right direction, but it is a lot of time and effort. Don't forget at the Division and Region, we are all volunteers. BTW, I am printing out your post and saving it for some future meetings with my group! 73
yougottawanta Heres my two cents. I really do not care which way the logo is designed. I think (and I am a member ) if the NMRA wants to increase members start treating people who are new members like they are welcome.Call them , talk to them , CORRESPOND . I joined well over a year ago , left messages sent e-mails trying to get plugged in and guess what I got for my efforts ? An e-mail that stated heres a flyer look at it see what you want to come to. Here is the real problem , there is a sense that one gets that this a good ole boys club and outsiders are to be endured and really not welcome. Why spend money on logos when there is a strucdtural problem such as getting the new members plugged in and growing with in the organization.From articles I have read in the NMRA this is a common problem.It is money wasted that should be spent repairing other issues.
This was entirely my point as well, with all the structural issues, a new logo should be issue #356. They could have simply added the .org to the old logo for now and saved themselved a ton of cash.
I dont eat, breath, and sweat trains, thats why I had the visceral reaction to the new logo that an outside the hobby person would have, it WILL be misinterpreted by non-train types, they don't think like us, namely seeing an SD-60 in the burned toast instead of the Virgin Mary LOL.So believe me, there is a real risk this is going to be a media stink somewhere down the line when someones wife or girlfriend looks at it and says, WTH?
I hope I have a tub of popcorn ready when that happens, it will be a real entertaining show.
Personally, I thought it was a fancy smiley face trying to say welcome. The wheel on rail part had to be explained before I saw it. But then not everybody saw the kitten in the old Chessie logo..
I guess it says something about our culture that so many see a female body part, kinda of like those old ink blot tests.
I agree that the most important thing the NMRA has done and continues to do are the standards and RPs. But the organization needs new and younger members if it is to survive. And the old logo was kinda of stodgy so maybe this will help - it certainly can't hurt to get the web site publicized.
Enjoy
Paul
NMRA# 24602 since 1972
Said all I had to say earlier, but I post once more to simply say, as a long time NMRA member, I really don't give a tinker's dam what the logo looks like as long as the standards are maintained and improved. Any organization is made up of a variety of people, but the purpose of the organization must come first or the "organization" needs to fold up its tents.
As far as I am concerned, the NMRA has and continues to do its job. Period. and by the way, when I opene my mail and found the bulletin with the new logo, I was able to identify it as what it is, a wheel on a rail, stylized as many company logos are today. Makes no never mind to me.
Just saw the logo here for the first time. I would not have thought it a body part if it hadn't been brought up, and still don't think it looks like it. I wouldn't have thought it a wheel on a rail.... until it was pointed out, and now I do think it looks like that. I thought it was a series of half moons at night... and still looks like that.... unless I remind myself its a wheel on rail. I think a part of the journal box would have helped.
I commend the ".com" part...... that puts it in the here and now, and surely for the young. Even better with the org name is to its right.
Look, a new logo doesn't hurt anything, and suggests a try at a new beginning. Not a top priority, but ok for image...... its why Nike has the swift wing, not needed to make your shoes functional...... but repeatingly catches your eye and burns into your memory each time you see it.
As for the NMRA... I'm happy if it really continues and always improves to do its core business..... set standards and enforce or grade adherance in the industry, make the pieces and parts of modeling all fit together regardless of vendor, keep the history and library of mode RR, and provide good train shows with useful clinics.
But the bit of local chapters, regions, bylaws arguing, politics,bickering, central control and fellowship.... that direction for success from now on will be always up to the enthusiasm and desires of a local group of people...... one size to fit all for that doesn't happen anymore..... too much diversity and on the move (tweet, twitter, text, go). It has the same problems as the Scouts, Masons, Lions clubs, etc. with hand wringing on low attendance and poor membership. NMRA has a solution.... its core business. Sell it and the membership for it alone..... pure and simple! And local groups can best contribute to national by submitting the best input and ideas for standards, etc. And a good NMRA magazine can return the favor by honing in on the standards and the modeling tips.
The logo's ok.
Hal
steemtraynI don't mind the logo so much, but why does ".org" have to be part of it? Is the organisation now nothing more than a website?
I thought it might be because nmra.com went to another site with similar initials (National Mustang Racing Association, maybe), but nmra.com forwards to the nmra.org home page.
I guess the logo says .org because it's being published on the web site. Has anybody seen the logo in the wild? Does it have .org on it on banners at shows, in magazines, etc?