QUOTE: Mopac 4-6-2 6001, fitted with Franklin valves, rebuilt from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000 This was in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it! (I posted this, but my answer was deleted - never happened before) Peter
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones Well Chapoleon, you're up again! OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I? Andre Mopac 4-6-2 6001 rebuilt with Franklin poppet valves from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000 At least I was geographically close It was mentioned in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it! Peter Wabash Class P-1 4-6-4, one rebuilt from 3 cylinder 2-8-2 class K-5 but my source says 1943, but two more were rebuilt from 2 cylinder 2-8-2s. A similar rebuild was Illinois Central 4-6-4 No 1 but it was rebuilt in 1937 from a 2-8-4 Edward Thomson's rebuild of a Gresley K3 2-6-0 into a K5 actually qualifies too! But I'm sure I'll recognise the real answer! This posting got delayed hours by a couple of magazine articles and deadlines! Peter Nope. This was a one off engine. However, the engine in question probably showed up at St. Louis Union Station next to a Wabash loco. Andre
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones Well Chapoleon, you're up again! OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I? Andre Mopac 4-6-2 6001 rebuilt with Franklin poppet valves from 3 cylinder 4-6-2 6000 At least I was geographically close It was mentioned in Vernon Smith's book, but I'd forgotten it! Peter Wabash Class P-1 4-6-4, one rebuilt from 3 cylinder 2-8-2 class K-5 but my source says 1943, but two more were rebuilt from 2 cylinder 2-8-2s. A similar rebuild was Illinois Central 4-6-4 No 1 but it was rebuilt in 1937 from a 2-8-4 Edward Thomson's rebuild of a Gresley K3 2-6-0 into a K5 actually qualifies too! But I'm sure I'll recognise the real answer! This posting got delayed hours by a couple of magazine articles and deadlines! Peter
QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones Well Chapoleon, you're up again! OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I? Andre
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones Well Chapoleon, you're up again!
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C QUOTE: Originally posted by andrechapelon QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones Well Chapoleon, you're up again! OK. I was built as a 3 cylinder locomotive by ALCO in 1925 and was converted to a 2 cylinder locomotive in 1942. Only 1 of me was ever built. What am I? Andre Wabash Class P-1 4-6-4, one rebuilt from 3 cylinder 2-8-2 class K-5 but my source says 1943, but two more were rebuilt from 2 cylinder 2-8-2s. A similar rebuild was Illinois Central 4-6-4 No 1 but it was rebuilt in 1937 from a 2-8-4 Edward Thomson's rebuild of a Gresley K3 2-6-0 into a K5 actually qualifies too! But I'm sure I'll recognise the real answer! This posting got delayed hours by a couple of magazine articles and deadlines! Peter
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones Probably some weird, obscure locomotive belonging to some unfamous road. At least tell me this: eastern or western?
"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"
EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION
http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588
QUOTE: Originally posted by npr765 This is a long shot but UP 4-12-2?
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29 Dear Andre Chapelon, Russian 4-14-4 is right, class, though, please [:)]. -Daniel Parks
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones I know of every steam locomotive ever built on every railroad on earth. And then some. Who am I?
QUOTE: Originally posted by joseph2 The Soviets built a massive loco,I believe it was a 2-14-2 which was a failure.Pennsy Hoosier,I wonder what the PRR should have bought in place of the T1 and Q2 types ? Maybe tried and proven steam designs or should they have started to Dieselize? Joe G.
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29 I am quite possibly the greatest locomotive failure in the history of railroading. I even beat out the Union Pacifics in my category. I was stored for 25 years before scrapping.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Fergmiester Was it one of those NP 2-6-8-2 or something or others?