Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

The coupling process?

12894 views
48 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PM

I used to work the loading dock of a large discount store and unloaded lots of trucks. I can remember numerous time raising the back door of the trailer and having merchandise spill out which had toppled from the pallets because of a clumsy driver. I imagine hard coupling would do the same thing to the contents of a boxcar.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:59 PM

I did not remember that the fireman played by Dub Taylor was named Wallie Sims.  That sounds like a combination of the name of Sim Webb, Casey's actual fireman, and Wallace Saunders, who wrote the original song.  Who'da thunk it?

t. 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,877 posts
Posted by maxman on Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:15 PM

ACY
Alan Hale's version of Casey Jones was a TV series that lasted about 1 or 2 years in the mid 1950's.

Here you go.  Somehow that show seems familiar to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzGMnDOsGVQ

 

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:00 PM

Douglas,The majority of the engineers  I worked with on the PRR was former steam locomotive throttle masters and they knew how to get every bit of  horse power out of their locomotive(s) and they knew how long they could peg the needle in the red zone before damage would accrue.The beauty is how they ran their engines by sound and feel.They would know if their engines wasn't working quite right just by the sound.

IMHO the younger (none steam era) engineers on the Chessie(C&O) had lost a lot of that skill.Pity.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Monday, March 9, 2015 10:10 PM

"Simply put you would be fired if you did that." -Brakie

Of that i have no doubt. So much has changed in the last 40 years that ya cant even ride the cab no more. Theres no one to wave to that waves back, and railroads dont hire foamers. Thus, why im not a railroader.

Douglas

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Sunday, March 8, 2015 10:10 AM

The actor who played Alan Hale's fireman was Dub Taylor, and he sure didn't look like Sim Webb!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, March 8, 2015 7:09 AM

PM Railfan
If i ever, EVER, get the chance to sit in the god seat.... you better believe i would do my best to recreate that old engineers habits.

Simply put you would be fired if you did that.

Real railroading is gone replaced by hampering rules and regulations railroading where you must stop before making a joint to ensure the knuckles is open.You even need a tool to set or release a brake wheel..There's a peeking tommy watching your every move you make and making a minor mistake can cost you your job or  some street time.

-----------------------------------------------

Mark Here ya go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_GkBh5SxU4

 

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Sunday, March 8, 2015 6:16 AM

ACY

Alan Hale's version of Casey Jones was a TV series that lasted about 1 or 2 years in the mid 1950's.  His engine was Sierra no. 3, and Casey got transplanted from the I.C. in Mississippi to some (unnamed?) railroad in the Wild West.  It was NOT a documentary, but it was fun.

 

For some reason I had never heard of this TV show.  Had it been airing in my local area, I would have.  In the Twin Cities here in Minnesota we had a kid’s show called “Lunch with Casey Jones”.  The actor who played Casey was Roger Awsumb and of course he had a “Side Kick” named Roundhouse Rodney played by Lynn Dwyer.  The show was a staple for pre-schools kids and had LoonyToons and Hanna Barbara cartoons and the Claymation Gumby shows (whatever in the heck Gumby was supposed to be)?

I brought this up thinking that Roger Awsumb and Alan Hale Jr. could maybe be mistaken for each other.  However, I have proven to myself that there were two Casey Jones shows for kids.

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 28 posts
Posted by dasBM2-6-0 on Sunday, March 8, 2015 4:37 AM

ACY

Alan Hale's version of Casey Jones was a TV series that lasted about 1 or 2 years in the mid 1950's.  His engine was Sierra no. 3, and Casey got transplanted from the I.C. in Mississippi to some (unnamed?) railroad in the Wild West.  It was NOT a documentary, but it was fun.

 

Casey Jones.....Steamin' and a-rollin'.....

Casey Jones........You never have to guess.....

When you hear.......the tootin' of the whistle....

That it's Casey at the throttle of the "Cannonball Express".....!!:D

(Sign of a misspent youth, remembering TV theme songs....!!Hmm)

May your freight ALWAYS roll smoothly...and ON TIME!!

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, March 7, 2015 10:02 PM

Alan Hale's version of Casey Jones was a TV series that lasted about 1 or 2 years in the mid 1950's.  His engine was Sierra no. 3, and Casey got transplanted from the I.C. in Mississippi to some (unnamed?) railroad in the Wild West.  It was NOT a documentary, but it was fun.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Saturday, March 7, 2015 9:28 PM

While the engineer handles the throttle and brakes, it's really up to the trainman/switchman at the joint on how hard it's made.  Good, consistent car counts and the "that'll do" signal at the right moment is the difference between a soft or hard coupling. 

Crews that work together on a regular basis in the same general area, such as in a yard or on a local freight, get a feel for one another.  The groundman knows how his engineer will handle the train/engine when he gives (either by radio or hand signal), "5 cars."  The engineer knows 5 cars today means 5 - 50 foot cars, the same as it did yesterday and the day before.  Not 5 - 50 foot box cars yesterday and 5 - 89 foot auto racks today.    

Also, once you've made the joint, don't forget to stretch it to ensure the pin dropped and it's secure.  Many rules today call for that.  Nothing more funny (or exasperating depending on your point of view) than coupling up, making the air and once you start moving have the train go into emergency.  All because it looked like the coupling made, but really hadn't.

Jeff

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Saturday, March 7, 2015 9:09 PM

ACY

Before Alan Hale was the Skipper, he was Casey Jones.  Seems appropriate to mention that.

 

Was this Casey Jones in a movie?  I would like to see that.

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Saturday, March 7, 2015 6:23 PM

"Much the same as what I described above - that happens at Strasburg a dozen or more times a day, most every day, for a good part of the the year, for the last 40-50 years now.

Sheldon"

 

I was just adding to the heap. Paying a little tribute to that long ago crew.

 

Douglas

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Saturday, March 7, 2015 6:21 PM

ACY

Before Alan Hale was the Skipper, he was Casey Jones.  Seems appropriate to mention that.

 

Im quite glad you did mention this. This is my learned fact for the day. I was totally unaware Alan Hale was Casey Jones. Thanks!

Douglas

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, March 7, 2015 5:51 PM

PM Railfan

Just as a reference from personal experience, i say this.....

 

Back when i wore a younger mans clothes, my railfanning career was alot brighter than it is by todays standards. Once upon a time, there were rail crews out there that were actually not bothered at all by a railfan hanging around.

I was lucky that i came across one such crew. I wont give details as to where and when or crew names (so no trouble comes unto them for being friendly), but the scene is a large paper factory with a modest yard serving it.

The crew was, to me, very professional. The ground crew were hardened looking men fashioned by long hours of hard work in all sorts of weather. The engineer a grissled old man who narry spoke a word and very much resembled the actor Alan Hale (captain from Gilligan's Island). He would still answer my youthful questions.

As for his coupling prowess, to this day i have never seen any better. He had obviously mastered the technique of throttle/brake control. So much so that on more than one occasion, while in the cab, the "jostle" of coupling could NOT, i repeat, NOT be felt. He was that good! I asked quite a few times "did we just couple up?"..... he would glance over the control stand and just smile.

I know now, being older, this was experience at work. Yet being naive, i thought this was how it was done by everyone. Certainly now being older i realize this is something that most only strive for.

Sure there are training videos, and rules and regs that will state you dont couple to cars doing 60mph. So i think it is safely said, engineers mean to do it with kid gloves. However, as we know.... it doesnt always work out like we wish things would.

If i ever, EVER, get the chance to sit in the god seat.... you better believe i would do my best to recreate that old engineers habits. Not only is that how its spose to be done, but i think a fitting tribute to the rail crew who gave me the opportunity to step into their world. And certainly, as thanks to them, i would brag thats where i learned it from!

 

 

Much the same as what I described above - that happens at Strasburg a dozen or more times a day, most every day, for a good part of the the year, for the last 40-50 years now.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, March 7, 2015 5:41 PM

Before Alan Hale was the Skipper, he was Casey Jones.  Seems appropriate to mention that.

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Saturday, March 7, 2015 5:22 PM

Just as a reference from personal experience, i say this.....

 

Back when i wore a younger mans clothes, my railfanning career was alot brighter than it is by todays standards. Once upon a time, there were rail crews out there that were actually not bothered at all by a railfan hanging around.

I was lucky that i came across one such crew. I wont give details as to where and when or crew names (so no trouble comes unto them for being friendly), but the scene is a large paper factory with a modest yard serving it.

The crew was, to me, very professional. The ground crew were hardened looking men fashioned by long hours of hard work in all sorts of weather. The engineer a grissled old man who narry spoke a word and very much resembled the actor Alan Hale (captain from Gilligan's Island). He would still answer my youthful questions.

As for his coupling prowess, to this day i have never seen any better. He had obviously mastered the technique of throttle/brake control. So much so that on more than one occasion, while in the cab, the "jostle" of coupling could NOT, i repeat, NOT be felt. He was that good! I asked quite a few times "did we just couple up?"..... he would glance over the control stand and just smile.

I know now, being older, this was experience at work. Yet being naive, i thought this was how it was done by everyone. Certainly now being older i realize this is something that most only strive for.

Sure there are training videos, and rules and regs that will state you dont couple to cars doing 60mph. So i think it is safely said, engineers mean to do it with kid gloves. However, as we know.... it doesnt always work out like we wish things would.

If i ever, EVER, get the chance to sit in the god seat.... you better believe i would do my best to recreate that old engineers habits. Not only is that how its spose to be done, but i think a fitting tribute to the rail crew who gave me the opportunity to step into their world. And certainly, as thanks to them, i would brag thats where i learned it from!

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, February 23, 2015 3:07 PM

As for the real railroads, I have a DVD with an old railroad training film from the '40's or '50's (can't think of the railroad that made it - perhaps New York Central) that the 'breaking point' (no pun intended) was 5 MPH. Any coupling above that speed risked damaging the lading inside the freight car.

When coupling to occupied passenger cars, many railroads required an engine to stop 10-15 feet short, and then crawl in for a soft coupling. For many years, when open-frame motors meant model engines didn't roll as smoothly as they do now, many model railroaders did that too.

I've seen many layout videos (even of the "Great Model Railroads" series) that shows rough coupling with the cars moving a lot after coupling. I think part of it is speed - modellers on a big layout with other many other people in an operating session maybe feel compelled to just "get er done" as quick as possible, and forget about making it realistic.

It could also be just that some people aren't that good at running engines / trains, or don't practice. I know when I couple onto a car, I try to make the car move as little as possible. In some cases if it moves too much (like a scale 10-15 feet or more) I'll uncouple and try it again until I get it right.

I like to set the speed and momentum of my engines so they all are as close to identical as possible. Once you get used to that, it's not that hard to do switching realistically. An engine like a BLI NW-2 will crawl along at 6-8 MPH is no problem, and you can learn just when to cut power to allow the engine's momentum to glide it into a soft coupling.

Stix
  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Saturday, February 21, 2015 1:12 PM

BUCK UP Sheldon!  Just funnin' with you!

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, February 21, 2015 12:35 PM

NP2626

Just a few thoughts, huh?

 

The Architect and Designer Mies van der Rohe said "God is in the details", sorry the details are so much trouble.

I will just go away now.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Saturday, February 21, 2015 10:34 AM

Just a few thoughts, huh?

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, February 21, 2015 9:58 AM

Now a few thoughts on model coupling in HO scale.

I use only regular head genuine Kadee couplers for more consistant operation.

The newer semi scale couplers may look a little better, but they actually have the same, or slightly more, train length slack, plus they require more coupling force, especially when coupling to a regular head coupler.

Side note - my other reason for not using semi scale couplers is side to side position, commonly called gathering range. The gathering range of the regular Kadee is larger than the tolerances of wheel guage and track width with regular NMRA track standards. The semi scale couplers have a gathering range smaller than these tolerances, making the chance of coupler miss-alignment greater.

Personally, I think the trip pins look just fine as air hoses in a coupled train - our hobby is full of compromises, this one is reasonable. That said, they must be correctly adjusted. That does not mean bent upwards like a "J" hook the way so many of the generic couplers on RTR cars are these days.

Correctly adjusted means adjusted per the Kadee instructions, with the bottom end parallel to the rail - period.

Correctly adjusted they don't hit anything, don't catch anything (except maybe a loco pilot or two - more on that later) and cause no problems - and if you chose to use magnets - it makes them work correctly.

Now I should also mention that I am a big fan of close coupling - that is reducing the distance between cars to as close to a scale distance as possible - especially on MU diesel lashups and passenger cars. This can casue issues on some diesel pilots - but I find if you just shave a little off the bottom of the pilot, so the correctly, not "J" hooked, trip pin can slide under it, you are generally OK.

Car weight and rolling resistance - I like free rolling cars, I have done a lot of work in that area to pull longer trains. But my methods also prefer cars to be well weighted - as per the NMRA RP - so I find that the cars have enough mass to stay still, despite being free rolling - again assuming the couplers are properly installed and lubed.

Throttles and momentum - I don't really like momentum, except to the very slight degree that my Train Engineer throttles have it even with the momentum set to minimum. One of the best fetures of that throttle is that using push buttons, the rate of change in speed is built into the electronics, not a function of how fast you can turn a knob.

That said, it is easy to learn when the train will stop, or stop it in advance then ease it back the rest of the way, and thereby allow for very smooth coupling - just like my description of coupling at Strasburg - without even moving the car being coupled.

In fact, it was this very operation of smooth coupling that was a subject of some of the many tests I subjected the Train Engineer throttle to before selecting it for my layout.

Coupling should be painless.....

Sheldon   

    

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Friday, February 20, 2015 10:45 PM

Just a short hour drive up the road from my house is the Strasburg Railroad, a steam powered short line offering excursion passenger runs most of the year on a regular published sachedule - trains every hour, and sometimes every half hour, every day, seven days a week, during the warmer months, for some 55 years now.

Their operation consists of a point to point run which requires the loco to run around the train and recouple to it at each end of the run - so twice per scheduled train.

This operation is played out in plain view of those standing on the platform on the "station" end of the line. And having visited this Railroad problably some 30-40 times in my lifetime, I have watched this process of them coupling a steam loco to a string of passenger cars that are being unloaded and loaded at the same time many times - maybe as many as 100 times.

And every time it is the same, the loco engineer stops the loco about 5 feet from the cars, the conductor makes sure the couplers are in line and fully open, then he directs the engineer to move toward the cars, indicating the closing distance with his hands.

As the couplers meet the conductor closes his fist, then waves his hand, the cars are coupled, and the train did not move an inch. The conductor then connects the air hose and opens the angle cocks.

In all my many visits to Strasburg, I can only remember once or twice feeling even the slightest "bump" as they coupled at either end of the line.

http://www.strasburgrailroad.com/

Sheldon 

    

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Friday, February 20, 2015 9:16 PM

I have cut most of the knuckle springs so they just fit between the two prongs with no tension on the spring (2 or 3 loops). This makes the coupler open with less force. I also graphite the heck out of the whole coupler mechanism. I also weight my cars on the heavy side and also don't mind the non-free rolling cars, (as someone else said, all the more reason to hook up more power!).

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Friday, February 6, 2015 9:54 PM

Lance Mindheim has given clinics on the subject of prototypical switching operations.  If you have a chance to see one of these presentations, it is highly recommended.  Stop your train at appropriate locations to let the brakeman get off the cars to throw a switch.  Don't move again until he has a chance to get back aboard.  If you're using the air brakes, be sure to allow enough time to recharge the air line before moving.  Things like that can put you in the mindset of a railroader, as opposed to the mindset of a guy running model trains. 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Dearborn Heights, Michigan
  • 364 posts
Posted by delray1967 on Friday, February 6, 2015 6:50 PM

Those you tube videos are great, I remember seeing them a couple years ago.  There are a bunch of other railroad safety films to be found there too.  They show the safe way for ground crews to work, which makes me think about how my imaginary model crews will act and where they will be.  Watching 1:1 switching activities is rare (at an industry, not necessarily at a yard), depending on your location, but it's very insightful to help get that 'railroady' feeling in my 1:87 world by slowing down the operations and thinking about the ground crew.

I always stop 5 feet from the car (or so there is at least 3 ties visible between the cars) before I couple to it, then I try to couple so the car to be picked up doesn't roll at all (usually in speed step 1), or only a scale foot or two...of course this means couplers have to be tweaked and the new super free rolling cars make this difficult to achieve as they'd rather roll than couple together.  I lubricate couplers with regular #2 pencil lead made by rubbing it against fine sandpaper to make fine dust and dropping it in the coupler pocket (put in more than necessary, work the coupler all around, then blow out the extra dust (be careful not to spit in it.lol) so only a thin coating remains inside).

Something else that helps is to file the parting line on the knuckle of KD's...use a fine file or emory board to make a smooth, almost polished surface, so the knuckles slide with as little force as possible (and paint won't stick very well to the faces).  I paint my couplers and after a few couplings, the paint wears off in only the right places so couplers work really well and look nice too.  It takes time but it gives me a nice change of pace from other railroad activities (I only have about 100 cars and a small 2'x25' layout so it's not a monumental task to work on one or three cars every once in a while if they don't behave like I want them to).

http://delray1967.shutterfly.com/pictures/5

SEMI Free-Mo@groups.io

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Clearlake, California. USA
  • 869 posts
Posted by Lake on Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:28 PM

Over the years I have read Larry's posting on how the 1:1 runs things and how he does it on his layout. It has changed the way I operate. Though I never really di the speed track thing.

And with a industrial switching layout, I now couple slower, run engines slower, take time for the crews to do their jobs. Such as, throwing switches, walking pass the rail cars, climbing onto cars or engines, etcetera. 
It adds a lot more fun then, slam, bam, and speed off. Big Smile

Ken G Price   My N-Scale Layout

Digitrax Super Empire Builder Radio System. South Valley Texas Railroad. SVTRR

N-Scale out west. 1996-1998 or so! UP, SP, Missouri Pacific, C&NW.

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:54 AM

BRAKIE

 

 
NP2626
My comment came from watching videos of people operating their model railroads and doing switching along the route on You Tube. They not only back into the car they're picking up fairly strongly; but, continue backing for a car length or more after coupling on.

 

Mark,I will say this..A "crash" coupling is frowned on and can get the crew in hot water that will result in standing before the man in order to give account.

As far as modelers..This won't be popular but,I have also watch switching videos and watched in person and with the number of operating and safety rules they break they would be fired. I won't get into the Union work rule violations.

Why is it thus? For the majority their knowledge about operations come from a book on operation written by author that never work on the road.These books don't cover the operation and safety rules like a railroader must learn and follow.

The sadder part some of these "operators" are the first to cry "Its my railroad and I don't need any rules".Little do they know to the knowledgeable they  are not prototypically operating their layout.

You mention momentum.Maybe this will help?

I use braking and momentum and one needs to learn the correct momentum setting and amount of braking needed for making a smooth stop at a switch,making a smooth complete stop before or at a coupling.

Successful switching operation with momentum and braking requires slow speed switching as well.. 

 

Brakie, I was wondering if you were ever going to Chime-in on this subject.  I figured if anyone should know, you would. 

 

I sort of think what is happening is that people get somewhat “lack-a-dazicle” about their operations, after years of doing so and maybe just aren't paying much attention.  If this weren’t that this is on a video, where I would think you would want your layout presented in the best light, nobody would care.   

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:00 AM

NP2626
My comment came from watching videos of people operating their model railroads and doing switching along the route on You Tube. They not only back into the car they're picking up fairly strongly; but, continue backing for a car length or more after coupling on.

Mark,I will say this..A "crash" coupling is frowned on and can get the crew in hot water that will result in standing before the man in order to give account.

As far as modelers..This won't be popular but,I have also watch switching videos and watched in person and with the number of operating and safety rules they break they would be fired. I won't get into the Union work rule violations.

Why is it thus? For the majority their knowledge about operations come from a book on operation written by author that never work on the road.These books don't cover the operation and safety rules like a railroader must learn and follow.

The sadder part some of these "operators" are the first to cry "Its my railroad and I don't need any rules".Little do they know to the knowledgeable they  are not prototypically operating their layout.

You mention momentum.Maybe this will help?

I use braking and momentum and one needs to learn the correct momentum setting and amount of braking needed for making a smooth stop at a switch,making a smooth complete stop before or at a coupling.

Successful switching operation with momentum and braking requires slow speed switching as well..

 

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!