Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856728 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, September 4, 2012 10:53 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

I will guess that the line in question is the Clover Leaf (Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City), between Toledo and East St. Louis.  The line was absorbed by NKP and parts of it are operated by NS and various short lines.

Paul, my OG's show the NKP mileage between Toledo and E. StL to be just a bit over 450 miles which, as you'll see from the following hint, is considerably shorter than the line I am looking for.

The line in question was (and is today) 800+ miles in length.

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, September 5, 2012 5:49 AM

This line was not in the US and that's the last hint I will give. If no one gets it by tonight I'll post the answer then.

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, September 6, 2012 4:04 AM

The answer is: Mexican National Railroad between Mexico City and Nuevo Laredo a distance of 803 miles. The Mexican National later became a part of the NdeM, then the TFM and today is the mainline of the KCSdeM.

And the winner by a nose is: Flying Crow whose 550 mile Fremont Elkorn and Missouri Valley line between Omaha and Rapid City just barely edged out rcdrye's 540 mile Tyler-Wyatt, MO  line of the Texas and St. Louis.

The next question is yours Buck.

Mark

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 6, 2012 5:13 AM

Mark, you are very fair.  But when did the MNRR convert to standard gauge?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, September 6, 2012 6:48 AM

daveklepper

Mark, you are very fair.  But when did the MNRR convert to standard gauge?

Dave, thank you for your kind words. According to my source it was standard gauged in 1903.

Mark 

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 8:17 PM

Woo...ok then.          

This train is generally recognized as the FIRST to have arrived at newly opened Kansas City Union Station on November 1, 1914.     Just the name will do.

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:57 AM

De Lux?    (AT&SF)

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:20 PM

Even tho the Deluxe was Extra Fine Extra Fast and Extra Fare

Nope

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, September 14, 2012 9:55 AM

FlyingCrow

Woo...ok then.          

This train is generally recognized as the FIRST to have arrived at newly opened Kansas City Union Station on November 1, 1914.     Just the name will do.

The Katy Flyer?

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Friday, September 14, 2012 8:19 PM

ZO...you are on a roll.    Katy Flyer is correct.      Of course I wasn't there for the first one into Union Station, but I was there for the LAST one.    

Take it away!!!

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:36 AM

FlyingCrow

ZO...you are on a roll.    Katy Flyer is correct.      Of course I wasn't there for the first one into Union Station, but I was there for the LAST one.    

Take it away!!!

When the City of Miami, Dixie Flagler and South Wind were established, their schedules allowed a daily Jacksonville-Miami service on the same timeslot on the FEC.  However, by 1950, the City of Miami started operating on a slightly different schedule, resulting in the Dixie Flagler/South Wind timeslot having a missing train every third day.  The complexity of running these trains increased in the winter seasons of 1952 and 1953 when the South Wind and City of Miami started running every 2 out of 3 days, with the Dixie Flagler keeping its every-third day schedule.  But, in the summer months of those years, all three trains were on an every third day schedule, with the City of Miami having its own timeslot.  To maintain schedule consistency, the FEC operated an every-third-day Jacksonville-Miami train running on the Dixie Flagler/South Wind schedule.  What was that FEC train?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 7:05 PM

Did FEC recycle the "Henry M. Flagler"?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 7:25 PM

rcdrye

Did FEC recycle the "Henry M. Flagler"?

Nope....

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:15 PM

Then I would guess they would recycle the name of one of the secondary trains that had been discontinued.  The only one that comes to mind is the "Sunchaser".

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:16 PM

rcdrye

Then I would guess they would recycle the name of one of the secondary trains that had been discontinued.  The only one that comes to mind is the "Sunchaser".

I wouldn't necessarily consider the Sunchaser a secondary train per. se., but the name I'm looking for was unique to the FEC.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:12 AM

East Coast Speical?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:50 AM

daveklepper

East Coast Speical?

Nope....The East Coast Special existed in 1963, near the end of through passenger service on the FEC.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:06 AM

ZephyrOverland

rcdrye

Then I would guess they would recycle the name of one of the secondary trains that had been discontinued.  The only one that comes to mind is the "Sunchaser".

I wouldn't necessarily consider the Sunchaser a secondary train per. se., but the name I'm looking for was unique to the FEC.

Since the Sunchaser was an all-Pullman train, I also would not consider it to have been a secondary train. It also ran every third day, in conjunction with the PRR-L&N-ACL and C&EI-L&N-NC&StL-ACL all-Pullman trains.

Oh, I wish I were at home! (I expect to get back there in nne days) then I could probably find the name of the train.

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Thursday, September 20, 2012 8:44 PM

Gulf Stream and Royal Poinciana

Since I helped Larry Goolsby with both his passenger books, I feel like I'm cheating a bit.    Are these what you are seeking?

Buck


AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:45 PM

FlyingCrow

Gulf Stream and Royal Poinciana

Since I helped Larry Goolsby with both his passenger books, I feel like I'm cheating a bit.    Are these what you are seeking?

Buck

The Gulf Stream was the train I was looking for.  This train and the Royal Poinciana were basically catchall trains for the FEC running in different schedules and time frames since the 1920's, handling through cars (and sometimes through trains) from the north and northwest.  The Gulf Stream operated southbound only in the summer of 1951 and both directions in the summers of 1952 and 1953 in every-third-day incarnations to help maintain the timeslot being held down by the South Wind/Dixie Flagler.

Buck, the next question is yours.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, September 21, 2012 5:42 PM
I wonder why the Dixe Flagler ran only one day out of three when both the South Wind and City of Miami were being operated two days out of three (the SW and the DF were operated on the same schedule south of Jacksonville). Was it not as popular as the South Wind or City of Miami?

Incidentally, when the three were inaugurated, they were given only about two hours to be turned in Miami. Just think of the pressure to get them turned so they could leave for Chicago on time. They were in Chicago overnight, but even then there was not much time for servicing.

Buck, what do you have to cause us to scratch our heads/

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Sunday, September 23, 2012 6:10 PM

Hey, Gang.    Been upgrading the system.    Got it all in a working great now, so stand by

AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Sunday, September 23, 2012 6:20 PM

Ok,   Long gone and mostly forgotten, this road was once considered an integral part of what could be described as the "35th Parallel Project".

Wink


AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Monday, September 24, 2012 4:48 AM

Since the latitude of both Memphis and Oklahoma City is 35 deg. N I'll guess the Choctaw Route of the Rock Island.

Mark

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, September 24, 2012 4:54 AM

The question regarding trains' frequencies of the three Chicago - Florida streamliners is answered by the relative size of the lightweight passenger equipment pool of the participating railroads.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, September 24, 2012 6:51 AM

The Tennesee Central was supposed to go Nashville to Knoxville, even if it never quite got there...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Monday, September 24, 2012 9:26 AM

Rob's mention of the TC brought to mind another abandoned east-west line that closely followed the 35th parallel, namely the Nashville - Memphis line of the NC&StL.

Mark.

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Monday, September 24, 2012 9:53 AM

daveklepper

The question regarding trains' frequencies of the three Chicago - Florida streamliners is answered by the relative size of the lightweight passenger equipment pool of the participating railroads.

That may be an issue but for the 1951 winter season, all three trains ran on a 2 out of 3 day schedule.  It was only during the 1952 and 1953 winter seasons that the Dixie Flagler kept its 1 out of 3 day schedule run and the South Wind and City of Miami went on a 2 out of 3 day schedule.  Also as a sidenote, the C&EI and L&N obtained a group of lightweight sleepers in 1954 but kept the Dixie Flagler on a year round 1 out of 3 day schedule. 

Another explanation could be economics.  Chicago-Florida seasonal train service ended in 1949, causing the City of Miami/Dixie Flagler/South Wind to receive sleepers (initially heavyweight ones) to make up some of the loss of the seasonal trains.  Also, overall passenger loadings were dropping from the post WWII highs.  In 1951 the railroads may have predicted the need for additional train service for the winter season, but not enough to require an additional daily train. 

Also, I believe that the C&EI was trying to keep a tight rein on costs.  While the other railroads had other lines to make money off of,  the C&EI basically had one line - its Chicago-Evansville route, to derive the majority of its passenger revenues.  They already pulled out of the Chicago-St. Louis market in 1949.  They may have gotten financially burnt from running the Flagler 2 out of 3 days in 1951.  So they may have felt that they were better off keeping the Flagler on the same schedule structure year round.   Also, remember that the C&EI and the Dixie Route was the earliest line to reduce involvement in and eventually withdraw from the Chicago-Florida market by dropping the Dixieland (the Dixie Flagler's successor) in 1957.   

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 574 posts
Posted by FlyingCrow on Monday, September 24, 2012 7:56 PM

I'll just jump in here and say...no correct answer on the 35th Parallel question yet.    ZO sent me a personal message and said "Kansas Pacific".    Nope.  


AB Dean Jacksonville,FL
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:23 AM

The only other contender I can think of is the Quanah Acme & Pacific.

Mark

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter