Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856739 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 8:12 AM

Has Claasic Trains ever had an issue devoted to doodlebugs?   Seems like a great idea.   The winter I spent with the B&M, mostly abord GP7's 1567 and 1568 with the alternative prototype load regular controls for the GP-9, in connection with my MIT Bachelor's Degree Thesis, the B&M still used quite a few, and I used my locomotive pass to ride one from Nashua NH to Portsmouth NH.   I don't think that line even exists today.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:25 PM

daveklepper

Has Claasic Trains ever had an issue devoted to doodlebugs?   Seems like a great idea.  

I'd like to see such an issue and I've even got a caption for the cover - "Interurbans Without Wires".

Mark 

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:35 PM

I would also like to see an issue on doodlebugs. And maybe one on RDCs? Such things as the first, last, longest run, etc. Also, do a one about the cars, as they varied considerably from the McKeen "Windsplitters" to ATSF M190. And of course, first-hand stories.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:41 AM

Back to the doodlebug question. IGN has mentioned the right route but not the right railroad.

Mark

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, October 31, 2013 5:29 AM

WHO mentioned the right railroad?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:14 AM

Did CGW run a KC-Twin Cities train with a motor?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:04 AM

The 541.7 miles route between Minneapolis and Kansas City of CGW No's 5 & 6 was the longest doodlebug run. IGN and Rob both contributed to this answer. Buck (Flying Crow) earlier got the second longest, the 519 route of AT&SF No's 45 &46 between Wichita and San Angelo. Since Buck got one of the two entirely on his own, he's or winner and gets the next question.

Mark 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Friday, November 1, 2013 2:46 AM
I will admit I was mostly shooting in the dark. The best I could do was narrow down the list based on what was provided and what I could find on the net. Then my tablet crashed and took my notes with it.

Thx IGN
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, November 21, 2013 12:21 PM

Tomorrow will mark three weeks with no activity on this thread so I'll throw out a question to get it going again.

What railroad once advertised itself as "The Rhine, The Alps and The Battlefield Line"?

Mark

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, November 21, 2013 12:46 PM

For reasons I can't seem to find, The Chesapeake and Ohio used those names in its advertising before WW I.  My best guess would be the "Rhine" was their line along the New River in West Virginia, the "Alps" the Blue Ridge or maybe their resort hotels, also in West Virginia, and the "Battlefield" their traverse of just about every major battlefield in Virginia on the former Virginia Central and Orange & Alexandria lines.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:16 PM

The C&O is correct. Like you I can understand the rationale behind the Battlefield Line but I'm puzzled by the reference to the Rhine and Alps. 

Mark 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, November 22, 2013 6:30 AM

No fancy advertising claims for this question.

All of this railroad's lightweight Pullmans were listed on Pullman's list of cars identified by number even though the cars had names painted on them during their entire service lives.  Railroad and reason for this special treatment.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Friday, November 22, 2013 7:12 PM

Rob and all:

"Car Names, Numbers, and Consists", page 112, lists sleeping cars owned by the Nickel Plate as being identified by numbers as the "City" names were used on other Pullman cars.

 

Ed Burns

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, November 22, 2013 8:29 PM

Nickel Plate's 5DBRBuffetLounge cars 150 City of Cleveland and 151 City of Chicago, and 7 of their 13 200 series 10Rmt6DBR cars had the same names as various prewar NYC and PRR 17 and 18 roomette cars (NYC's had one section (9) for the porter).  For consistency the NKP's two 18 Rmt cars 215 City of St. Marys and 216 City of Coldwater were also identified by number.  The 18 Rmt cars were built for the Pullman pool and acquired by NKP in 1945 or so. The only other cars with names to be identified by number were a few of CN's 24 DupRmt cars in the "I" series that were on Pullman lease.

Pullman's 1950 car list has 150 and 151 with a diagram number of 230, which was listed as 5 DBR Buffet Lounge Observation, though they were mid-train cars.  B&O's Capitol Limited observations, built as C&O cars, had the same diagram number. There is some reason to suspect that all of NKPs postwar cars were intended as part of C&O's large order, as the car designs and equipment are identical down to the unusual 220 volt electrical systems.

Your question, Ed!

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Saturday, November 23, 2013 8:20 PM

ALL:

This is a two part question.

1.  The 1948 sleeping cars for the North Coast Limited were named. About 1954, Raymond Lowey modernized the NCL with a new paint scheme and the sleeping cars lost their names in favor of numbers. Why was his reason for numbering those cars?

2. Part two is tricker--another railroad that operated out of Minneapolis/St. Paul had two unique sleeping/lounge cars. What was the railroad, the names and numbers of those cars, and which train were they those cars used on?

As information, both trains traveled on the same track for about fifty miles before the second train veered of onto its own rails. I would see both trains stopped at the Northtown switchtender's shack before being allowed to proceed to the operator and receive orders.  I got paid to watch trains!

Ed Burns

763-234-9306

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, November 24, 2013 2:40 PM

NP Eddie

This is a two part question.

1.  The 1948 sleeping cars for the North Coast Limited were named. About 1954, Raymond Lowey modernized the NCL with a new paint scheme and the sleeping cars lost their names in favor of numbers. Why was his reason for numbering those cars?

2. Part two is tricker--another railroad that operated out of Minneapolis/St. Paul had two unique sleeping/lounge cars. What was the railroad, the names and numbers of those cars, and which train were they those cars used on?

1. The new 1954 paint scheme put the NP's Monad symbol right in the center of the car side - the traditional place for the name.  These weren't the first numbered sleepers NP had - that honor went to the 10-6s bought for use with SP's Cascade in 1950.  NP added names again with the 1959 Loch series slumbercoaches (which also carried numbers).

2.  GN cars 1198 Manitoba Club and 1199 Winniipeg Club were assigned to the Winnipeg Limited after 1956.  They were 8 Dup Rmt 2 DBR Buffet Lounges rebuilt from 16 Dup Rmt 4 DBR cars.  They allowed GN to retire some heavyweight cars and still offer light meal service.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:47 PM

Rob:

Good answer--you are good!!! I wrote in one of the two Winnipeg Limited sleeping cars before I hired out. I wonder what happened to them and I don't know when that train came off and a stub train from Fargo to Winnipeg was started.

Also, I was told that Raymond Lowey did not think that names on the sides would look good what with his new paint scheme.

Next question to you.

Ed Burns

763-234-9306

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:08 AM

The Winnipeg Limited ran intact until at least 1969.  I think BN cut it back to a connection from the Western Star in early to mid 1970.

I'm going to try a little steam here...

SP had 266 articulated steam locomotives, 256 cab forwards and 10 "normal" 2-8-8-4s.  The most famous SP cab forward class were the AC classes of 4-8-8-2s.  In the early days SP also had cab forwards in the MM and MC classes, and at least one MM became an AM.  What do the A, Ms and C stand for?

Big bonus - name the railroad that had a cab-forward 4-6-0.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:43 PM

possiblllly wheel arrangements:  AC 4-8-8-2., MM 2-8-8-2.. MC 2-8-8-0 or 2060602? 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:02 PM

AC = Articulated Consolidations (2-8-8-2, 4-8-8-2 & 2-8-8-4)

MC = Mallet Consolidation (2-8-8-2 & 4-8-8-2)

AM = Articulated Mogul (2-6-6-2 & 4-6-6-2)

MM = Mallet Mogul (2-6-6-2 & 4-6-6-2)

Hopefully with some research I'll be able to find the cab forward 4-6-0. It must have been a real oddity.

Mark

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:49 PM

Rob:

I have a bit of information about the GN's Winnipeg Limited.

The NP's St. Paul Division issued timetables frequently due to the many first class trains that operated on the First Subdivision between St. Paul and Staples. Only the Mainstreeter and NCL were NP trains. The rest were GN passenger trains that operated between Northtown or Coon Creek (to Superior) or Northtown to St. Cloud (Fergus Falls and Fargo).

St.. Paul Divn TT 03 from 8 18 68 does list GN 7 & 8 (listed as NP 77 and NP 78) with the times of the Winnipeg Limited. 

 

St. Paul Divn TT 04 from 9 15 69 shows only GN 27 and 28 (as NP 71 and NP 72). That would tell me that the Winnipeg Limited was taken off about that time and a stub train was operated between Fargo and Winnipeg. I don't know if 27 and 28 handled cars that were switched out at Fargo or not. Seeing that train carried a coach with a small food section that may have been the case as where would the food have been replenished and the attendant (a cook from the dining car roster) have been relieved.

Hope that give you some info.

Call me if you have any questions.

Ed Burns 763-234-9306 (CT)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:01 PM

rcdrye

Big bonus - name the railroad that had a cab-forward 4-6-0.

I doubt this is what you have in mind but the only cab forward 4-6-0 I've been able to find so far was the Italian Railways Gr670.

Mark

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:53 AM

Mark has all of the SP classes correct.  The MM and AMs proved too light and lasted only into the 1920s, the ACs were obviously much more successful, running up to the AC-12 class in 1944.  The AC-9 was the only "normal" non cab forward version. Simpling the engines gave them both tractive effort and speed, so SP could run them with large trains on the flats as well as in the mountains.

As far as I know all of the 2-8-8-2s were MCs.

The North Pacific Coast (later part of the NWP) rebuilt an oil-fired 4-6-0 from an older engine.  It was not a success.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:48 AM

But were there really any MC 4-8-8-2's?   Were not all 4-8-8-2's AC's?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:28 AM

First I want to correct a statement I made - North Pacific Coast #21 (1901) was a 4-4-0 !

For a drawing see http://steamcad.railfan.net/npc21.htm

Second incorrect statement - original pair of MC class (1909) were not cab-forwards.  They also did not last long in the mountains.  They did hang around long enough to become AC's and get turned around.

Roster counts from http://www.northeast.railfan.net/steam24.html

Correct count of CF's is 246 including the two rebuilts, and 10 that were never CF's

Dave is correct that all 4-8-8-2s were ACs, but many ACs were rebuilt MC 2-8-8-2s

2 MC-1 2-8-8-2 NOT cab forward (1909) became AC-1 cab forward in 1928

15 MC-2 2-8-8-2 (1909) became AC-1

12 MM-2 2-6-6-2 (1911) of these at least 8 were later rebuilt as simple 4-6-6-2 AM-2

12 MC-4 2-8-8-2  (1911) became AC-2

20 MC-6 2-8-8-2 (1912-1913) became AC-3

10 AC-4 4-8-8-2 (1928)

16 AC-5 4-8-8-2 (1929)

25 AC-6 4-8-8-2 (1930)

26 AC-7 4-8-8-2 (1937)

28 AC-8 4-8-8-2 (1939)

10 AC-9 2-8-8-4 (1939) coal burners - NOT cab forward

40 AC-10 4-8-8-2 (1942)

30 AC-11 4-8-8-2 (1942-1943)

20 AC-12 4-8-8-2 (1943-1944)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:17 PM

Time to put your thinking cap on. What was the last 3' gauge line in the Union Pacific System? What were its end points, it's nickname and unusual distinction (other than being narrow gauge)?

Mark

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:56 PM

The Ilwaco Railway and Navigation Company was (after a tangled beginning) part of UP's Oregon-Washington Railway and Navigation Company.  Physically not connected with any other railroads, it was the westernmost railroad in the continental U.S., running from Nahcotta to Megler WA, around 30 miles.  The only nickname I can verify is the Ilwaco Branch, though I seem to remember references to the "Cranberry Line".  It handled mail, resort passengers, oysters clams and cranberries.  Abandonment came in 1930.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:54 PM

Very good Rob. I thought this obscure line might be a bit more difficult to identify. The Ilwaco RR actually ran for 27 miles between Megler and Ilwaco, WA. Passengers and freight traveled by steamship across Willapa Bay from Astoria and Portland to Ilwaco -  there was no carfloat operation. The road was nicknamed "the Clamshell Line" and its last train ran on Sept. 9, 1930. The next question is yours. 

Mark 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:23 AM

More obscure railroads.  This two million dollar project was constructed to haul iron ore had elaborate bridges, deep cuts and a huge ore dock but never hauled a revenue load.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:00 PM

Rob:

The two NP 10 and 6 sleeping cars (364 & 365) were ordered for the interline with the SP between Seattle and Oakland, thus they were painted SP colors (the SP did not name their sleeping cars). After this pool was discontinued they were repainted NP Lowey colors for NCL service. Because there were only two cars they were not shown in the timetables. I have seen pictures of one of the cars in both SP and NP colors.

One of the cars (don't remember which one) remains in BNSF service as the power/sleeping car "Stampede Pass".

Ed Burns

763-234-9306

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter