Trains.com

Passenger train's collisions with vehicles.

25464 views
137 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, June 14, 2015 5:12 PM

Well if you want to see something really strange grade crossing wise.      This is the former Milwaukee Road Branch to Monroe, WI.     Now WSOR in combination with the state has done a good job pulling the track up from the weeds and increasing weight limits and speed.    During Milwaukees time this line could only have a lightweight GP9 on it and then it was crawling 10 mph through the weeds.

Anyways look at the difference in crossing signals in the first three minutes.    Focus in on the crossing signals at 1:25 in the below clip.    Note the heavy duty tubular steel that blocks the entire roadway.    This is a line that might see 2-3 trains a day MAX, slow freights with no Amtrak trains.     Now contrast that Heavy Duty Crossing with some of the crossings that Amtrak traverses at a much higher speed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnzjJQP7s38

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, June 14, 2015 8:52 AM

The answers are not difficult.  Stop acting as the world's policeman.  It makes us less secure and costs trillions (Iraq alone =$4-6 trillion over time).  End the subsidies to carbon producers.  The IMF estimates the world total for 2015 will be $5.3 trillion.  Focus on broad infrastructure, the essential foundation for future economic strength.  But the political will is lacking

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Sunday, June 14, 2015 7:57 AM

ACY's is a better answer than mine. Personally, I wouldn't favor spending the money it would take for all-separated grade crossings even if we had it. There are better uses, for infrastructure that would be an actual investment in the future.

But it's all academic, because we would rather spend the money on ourselves -- entitlements all around, for the middle class and wealthy, too! -- and borrow more when that's gone. On top of bearing the cost of being the world's policeman.

Inadequate highways, bridges, railroads and airports are only the beginning of it. You can kind of ease into that kind of Third World-ism, like the frog in the pot of heating water. But wait until failure of our 200-year-old big-city water and sewer systems start becoming a monthly event. There won't be a check that will cover the social dislocations and upheavals. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, June 13, 2015 9:42 PM

dakotafred
There's not the money to pay for them. Every one is a struggle. One more example, if it were needed, of how infrastructure in this country is starved in favor of spending for other priorities.

Ending money-hole, pointless 'adventures' such as Iraq might be a start, as its total costs may reach $4-5 trillion.  A fraction of that spent on infrastructure here could do far more for our security than foreign ops.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, June 13, 2015 9:38 PM

Yes, grade crossing elimination would be helpful, but some folks are foolish enough to get hit by trains whether there's a designated crossing or not.  They walk.  They run, often with ear buds.  They lie down in the gauge to take a nap.  They make movies.  They make exercise videos.  They drive bicycles, cars, and trucks, often where there's no road.  They have no clue.  I have no idea what will stop them.  Maybe more grade crossings will help, but with or without the crossing closures, I see no end to this idiocy.

Tom

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:29 PM

The problem with reduction and elimination of grade crossings is obvious: There's not the money to pay for them. Every one is a struggle.

One more example, if it were needed, of how infrastructure in this country is starved in favor of spending for other priorities.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:18 PM

Phoebe Vet

This thread is focused on Amtrak, but trust me, just as many vehicles are being hit by freight trains.  Nothing will stop it but grade separation.  People are too stupid to be allowed to drive across train tracks.

And they don't know how to park next to the tracks either - One of our trains took out 1/2 dozen at 'watering hole'. 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Saturday, June 13, 2015 7:33 PM

This thread is focused on Amtrak, but trust me, just as many vehicles are being hit by freight trains.  Nothing will stop it but grade separation.  People are too stupid to be allowed to drive across train tracks.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, June 13, 2015 7:18 PM

Quite a few Amtrak train-vehicle collisions have been noted during the short, three-month life of this thread.  Putting to one side the damages/injuries to vehicles and their passengers, isn't it clear that the trains are also at risk?    Isn't it obvious that the only solution is level crossing reduction (separated, upgraded or eliminated) on lines where passenger train operate?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:54 PM

Removal of passengers from the train implies significant damage to track and/or equipment.  Anybody have any more details?

Tom

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:04 AM
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, June 8, 2015 12:21 PM

ACY

Amtrak 98 got a Lincoln Navigator yesterday in Satsuma, FL.  Driver drove around the lowered gates & was seriously injured.

Tom

 
A link
 
  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Monday, June 8, 2015 9:39 AM

Amtrak 98 got a Lincoln Navigator yesterday in Satsuma, FL.  Driver drove around the lowered gates & was seriously injured.

Tom

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, June 6, 2015 3:11 PM

Proposed headline:  Train Bites Into 35 Tons of Bacon

Tom

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, June 5, 2015 8:04 PM
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: San Francisco East Bay
  • 1,360 posts
Posted by MikeF90 on Friday, June 5, 2015 7:42 PM

More bad luck - Amtrak #22 collides with truck driver in Wilmington, IL:

 http://abc7chicago.com/news/amtrak-train-collides-with-truck-near-wilmington/768798/

This is just south of the UP Global IV intermodal yard on the Joliet sub.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, June 4, 2015 12:28 PM

Motorcyclist tried to beat Sounder train but lucky was hit by lowering gate knocking him off cycle and saving life .  Cycle not so lucky.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Police-Very-lucky-motorcyclist-OK-after-riding-into-path-of-train-306142941.html

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, June 3, 2015 9:18 PM

Meteor $98/01 hit vehicle going around gates near Jacksonville.  Unbelievable that no one killed.

http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2015-06-02/story/amtrak-train-shears-car-half-jacksonville-crash-police-say-driver-went

Also report of # 280 killing someone but no details.

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, May 14, 2015 6:34 PM

Back on April 27th the CZ hit a car in northern Nevada.  Local sheriff believes this was suicide by train.

Incident happened at 2:30 AM.  A little earlier or later the Darwin enforcer would have been a freight.

Chuck

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, May 12, 2015 3:36 PM

Amtrak hits another vehicle not near a grade crossing.  Appears to be another Piedmont.  NCDOT cannot get a break.

http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/20150511/News/305119984

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: NW Pa Snow-belt.
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by ricktrains4824 on Monday, May 11, 2015 12:44 PM

My Guess would be this: Issues with HEP after vehicle strike. 

Ricky W.

HO scale Proto-freelancer.

My Railroad rules:

1: It's my railroad, my rules.

2: It's for having fun and enjoyment.

3: Any objections, consult above rules.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Sunday, May 10, 2015 8:06 PM

Why evacuate the City of New Orleans?  Anybody know?

Tom

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, May 10, 2015 6:09 PM
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, May 4, 2015 8:05 PM

School bus almost became another stat.  In this case close did count as a save.

http://patch.com/new-york/chappaqua/school-bus-trapped-metro-north-crossing-driver-arrested-new-castle-police

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, May 4, 2015 4:54 PM
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Saturday, April 25, 2015 2:41 PM

ACY

I think my point was that the locomotive held together pretty well at Big Bayou Canot.  I've been told (not sure whether this can be confirmed) that the cab remained intact, and the three crew members of the crew did not die as a result of impact.  I'm told they drowned.

Cold comfort, I guess.

Tom

On that note, if you do find yourself in a sinking vehicle of some sort...

What happens is the water comming in exerts a kind of suction along with the downward sinking vehicle that does not allow escape until the water has completely filled the submerged space and the vehicle's rapid sink rate has diminished or stopped......then the pressure is equalized and one can escape.    Most untrained folks panic and gasp for air and drown in that type of environment.  

Best approach if your conscious is to hold your breath until the pressure equalizes making use of the time to plan your escape route and ensure your not tangled up in anything.   Once the vehicle fills with water and levels off it has a tendency to kind of exhale as the rush in of water is suddenly stops.....that will help eject you if your near an open door or window.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Friday, April 24, 2015 10:33 PM

I think my point was that the locomotive held together pretty well at Big Bayou Canot.  I've been told (not sure whether this can be confirmed) that the cab remained intact, and the three crew members of the crew did not die as a result of impact.  I'm told they drowned.

Cold comfort, I guess.

Tom

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, April 24, 2015 6:56 PM

BaltACD
There is a difference between what 'outsiders' consider serious locomotive damage and what those in the industry consider serious locomotive damage. Outsiders see cosmetic damage - those in the industry look for structural damage. Cosmetic damage is easily repairable, structural damage is harder to see and more critcal when it occurrs.

I haven't actually seen a picture of the damaged unit in question, so my point was that Amtrak (or their insurer) will check the locomotive and determine the cheapest option to get a 629 back to usable condition.   I am aware of the kind of damage that results in a retirement, but I can't see a collision with a car bending the frame or bending collision posts.

Your point is valid. I've seen locomotives with the long hood ripped completely off returned to service, and those with little cosmetic damage scrapped due to frame bowing.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, April 24, 2015 5:40 PM

NorthWest

I guess it depends whether or not it is cheaper to rebuild it, or build a new 629. That's the nice thing about having the assembly line still open.

 

There is a difference between what 'outsiders' consider serious locomotive damage and what those in the industry consider serious locomotive damage.

Outsiders see cosmetic damage - those in the industry look for structural damage.  Cosmetic damage is easily repairable, structural damage is harder to see and more critcal when it occurrs.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, April 24, 2015 5:40 PM

Pictures of Crescent tr #20 / 22  that hit vehicle near Tuscaloosa.

http://www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2015/04/authorities_are_on_the_scene_o.html

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy