Not much comment needed Boardman is warning about Hudson river ( NORTH ) tunnels having to close prematurely. One has to wonder what the situation is ?
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2014/07/8549155/amtrak-nj-transit-riders-should-be-very-concerned
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
Not living in the NY Metropolitan area, I am not that familiar with the issues related to repairing the existing tunnels and/or constructing new tunnels. I do, however, have a few questions that perhaps people knowledgeable about the issues could address.
If one of the existing tunnels had to be shutdown for repair, presumably the other one would be available for use. What impact would closing one of the tunnels have on traffic flow into and out of Penn Station?
What is the estimated cost to repair the existing tubes?
What was the estimated price tag to build the two new tunnels?
Where does the money for repairing the existing tunnels or building new tunnels come from?
Boardman is addressing the issue from a commuter point of view. But the larger issue for Amtrak is the impact that disrupting traffic through the existing tunnels would have on Amtrak's operations. The NEC is the only segment in Amtrak's map that covers its operating costs. What other, perhaps more objective, assessments of the situation and potential solutions have been put forth?
henry6 One tube is often closed for some kind of repairs and directional fleeting occurs The question is not how much will it cost to do but how much will it cost not to do. The answer is to stop asking questions and do something at any and all costs. Sound reckless? Not as reckless as not doing anything.
One tube is often closed for some kind of repairs and directional fleeting occurs
The question is not how much will it cost to do but how much will it cost not to do. The answer is to stop asking questions and do something at any and all costs. Sound reckless? Not as reckless as not doing anything.
Christie may need to be President. Otherwise, cancellation of the ARC tunnel could be what history will remember him for, especially if the PRR tunnel fails disastrously after a point in time the ARC tunnel would’ve been completed and in service.
The point is all comes down to who is going to pay. Growing up in North Jersey in the 60's I though Port Authority was suppose to manage the infrastructure as a joint asset. Guess that was just so much ink on paper.
To give everyone a measurement of the cost, in Pittsburg about 2013 a new 'T' tunnel was open from Dawntawn to the North Side. The cost of going under the river was $ 500 M. The Allegheny is only a little bit shorter to cross than the Hudson, so figure the cost in the B range. My two cents is government wasted the dollars over the year and well has gone dry. So instead of gliding under the water on rails, the Lackawanna Ferry is coming back instead (think there is one still around and the docks/ramps are still there in Hoboken.)
Not such a crazy idea, resurrecting those ferries. It'd be a hell of a lot cheaper than boring new tunnels, there wouldn't be the issue of environmental impact study after study after study after study, they'd be afloat and under way long before any of the tunnels were finished, (anyone think we'll be alive to see it?), and there's be the attraction of a fine ride as well.
As an aside, not only was the boring of the PRR tunnels 100 years ago an amazing feat of engineering, it's also an amazing example of what can get done if the builders don't have to deal with present day politics and pervasive corruption.
Firelock76 Not such a crazy idea, resurrecting those ferries. It'd be a hell of a lot cheaper than boring new tunnels,
Not such a crazy idea, resurrecting those ferries. It'd be a hell of a lot cheaper than boring new tunnels,
Henry can address this with more authority but how could Hoboken terminal ever handle the traffic?. That is a stub end terminal with how many tracks and limited storage space ? There is not a good connection from Newark Penn to Hoboken.
Unless the tracks have are changed I believe the single track NJT Newark to Hoboken crosses at grade the PATH line ? Full NJT service would muck up both lines. At that crossing believe grade separation is not possible ?. Was there a collision at that crossing years ago ?
There are ferries operating out of Hoboken now. I think this is rush hour service only, but to two or more points in Manhattan. They do not operate when the Hudson is frozen with ice in the winter. And now they operate out of one or two of the old slips, restored!
The Hudson only freezes in the worst winters, and even then not for long. It was one of the reasons the British wanted New York as a base of operations during both the French and Indian and Revolutionary Wars. New York harbor had a reputation for being reliably ice-free, and it usually was.
There's very little reason a ferry service couldn't operate year-round and in all but the worst weather, especially with the aids to navigation modern vessels have available.
Firelock76 The Hudson only freezes in the worst winters, and even then not for long. It was one of the reasons the British wanted New York as a base of operations during both the French and Indian and Revolutionary Wars. New York harbor had a reputation for being reliably ice-free, and it usually was.
blue streak 1 Firelock76 The Hudson only freezes in the worst winters, and even then not for long. It was one of the reasons the British wanted New York as a base of operations during both the French and Indian and Revolutionary Wars. New York harbor had a reputation for being reliably ice-free, and it usually was. You might want to study the Hudson this past super winter.
"One swallow does not a summer make."
In actual fact, the WORST recorded winter on the East Coast was the winter of 1779-1780. THEN the Hudson froze shore to shore, and the Kill Van Kull froze right to the bottom. Ice thicknesses of 10-plus feet weren't unusual. However, this was the exception, a very great exception, but not the rule.
If the tunnels are taken out of service forever that will mean the DEATH
of the Northeast Corridor. Another nail in the coffin of the U.S.A.
daveklepper There are ferries operating out of Hoboken now. I think this is rush hour service only, but to two or more points in Manhattan. They do not operate when the Hudson is frozen with ice in the winter. And now they operate out of one or two of the old slips, restored!
Henry6: Did not ever pay much attention to the Hoboken yard situation as was never there at rush hour. My concern is if all NEC trains had to terminate at Newark Penn or Secaucus how to handle the passengers including Amtrak passengers. Path at Newark seemed to be operating at capacity when there before as NJT discharged a portion of each NJT train. Does PATH even have enough extra equipment to expand service especially the 33rd street terminal ?
NJT probably does not have enough dual frequency equipment to run Newark Penn - Hoboken ? Even so is that route single track with a rail grade crossing of PATH ?
Also how many operational ferry slips left at Hoboken ? Can they take larger boats such as Staten Island ferry ?
another article saying about the same thing.
wanswheelChristie may need to be President. Otherwise, cancellation of the ARC tunnel could be what history will remember him for, especially if the PRR tunnel fails disastrously after a point in time the ARC tunnel would’ve been completed and in service.
Wanswheel,
You hit the nail on the head. The ARC tunnels had been planned for many years and their was a broad consensus that they were needed from both parties. The money was there to do it: Costs would be shared by the Federal Government, the Port Authority and the State of New Jersey. And New Jersey's share would be paid by toll increases.
One man, Governor Chris Christie, stopped the effort in its tracks. Maybe his luck will hold and there will be no disaster. Let's hope so.
So let the MTA sell the 14th Street Canarsie line to PATH and extend it Saucaucus, and then have trhough running with NJT and a third-rail electrification to High Bridge.
B Division cars can be built to FRA requirements and mix with the National Railroad system,
henry6 But there are as many pro rail, pro NJT, pro Amtrak who supported Christies' ARC action because of its shortcomings and inadequateness.
But there are as many pro rail, pro NJT, pro Amtrak who supported Christies' ARC action because of its shortcomings and inadequateness.
henry6But there are as many pro rail, pro NJT, pro Amtrak who supported Christies' ARC action because of its shortcomings and inadequateness.
Henry,
You are correct in your observation. However, there was also a lot of wrongheaded opposition. Ideally the ARC tunnels would have offered a direct connection to Grand Central Terminal. That, of course, was an anathema to the Pennsylvania and New York Central Railroads. But the public needed and still needs that connection. It would be very helpful for Amtrak trains.
However, New Jersey Transit and New Jersey commuters do not need it. But they badly need the new tunnels. I think that here half a loaf would be much better than none which is what we wound up with.
John
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.